January 2013 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Various requests
by Doug Newgard 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Ivan de Jesús Pompa García 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

Hi everyone: Would be great if package alx-drive were removed from aur. The efforts are now merged into the package dkms-alx. Have a great day, Ivan

2 1

[aur-general] [MERGE] fdk-aac into libfdk-aac and fdk-aac-git into libfdk-aac-git
by lou＠fakeoutdoorsman.com 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

This is to differentiate the library other packages such as fdkaac-git. fdk-aac [1] into libfdk-aac [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fdk-aac/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfdk-aac/ fdk-aac-git [3] into libfdk-aac-git [4] [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fdk-aac-git/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfdk-aac-git/ Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete opus-tools
by Michael Düll 08 Jan '13

08 Jan '13

It has been moved to [community]. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opus-tools/ Michael Düll

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Jan '13

08 Jan '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 34 packages missing signoffs * 16 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * fatrat-1.2.0_beta2-3 (i686) * fatrat-1.2.0_beta2-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-27 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-27 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130104-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130104-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (16 total) == * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686), since 2012-12-11 * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-11 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686), since 2012-12-14 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64), since 2012-12-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] e17-module-trash-svn by any other name...
by Barton 08 Jan '13

08 Jan '13

Possibly undelivered due to HTML format; here it is in plain text -> On 01/07/2013 08:00 AM, Doug Newgard wrote: > I'm attempting to clean up the e17 related packages in the AUR. > > There's currently three packages in the AUR all pointing to the same source code that should probably be merged. e17-trash-svn is an orphan, so that's no big deal, but e17-module-trash is not. Did you ever email Dashh? If you did and got no reply for two weeks, you can request that that package be orphaned as well. I would suggest that you pick which ever of the three names makes most sense to you and request that the others be merged into it. You can do this by sending an email to the aur-general mailing list. I think this would cut down on confusion for new users. > > Thanks > Scimmia Thanks Doug. e17-module-trash-svn 480-1 is the one that contains my patches and the I intend to maintain. I think that I do recall attempting to contact the maintainer of the non-orphaned package. I did not receive any contact from him. I don't recall how it came to be that I didn't adopt the orphan - my usual practice is to do so. If "merge" means any comments, etc. get tacked on to the one that I'll maintain and my PKGBILD stays in tact, then yes, please merge e17-module-trash and e17-trash-svn with e17-module-trash-svn Thank you

1 0

[aur-general] Package "ttf-lato-fonts" Removal
by Nathan Hodgson 08 Jan '13

08 Jan '13

Removal Request. Name: ttf-lato-fonts URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-lato-fonts/ Rational: There is an exact duplicate of the package, called "ttf-lato" at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-lato/, which I (the ttf-lato-fonts maintainer) missed when originally packaging it. Searched for "lato fonts" rather than "ttf-lato", which I now realize would have been much better, considering it's the convention. My apologies, Nathan

2 1

[aur-general] orphan request
by Paul Bragg 07 Jan '13

07 Jan '13

Could someone please merge my old v7 package into the new and updated foldingathome package. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] twice the same aur package
by Dmitry Grebennikov 07 Jan '13

07 Jan '13

Please, delete the package I submitted today: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorg-server-xdb-patch/ I have seen just now that this patch is already implemented in this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorg-server-bug865/ My apologies..

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by YUP 07 Jan '13

07 Jan '13

Please delete my package obmixer from AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmixer/. Obmixer is forked and not maintained anymore. Thanks. Yarema (aka Knedlyk)

2 1