December 2013 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Dec '13

13 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request for merging python-dulwich into python2-dulwich as well as its -git version
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 13 Dec '13

13 Dec '13

1. [python-dulwich][1] => [python2-dulwich][2] 2. [python-dulwich-git][3] => [python2-dulwich-git][4] [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-dulwich [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-dulwich [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-dulwich-git [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-dulwich-git

2 1

[aur-general] Possible to switch the votes/comments for two packages?
by member graysky 13 Dec '13

13 Dec '13

This is complex. I while ago, I adopted the 'mprime' package which provides the pre-compiled bins. The mistake I made was to rename this mprime to 'mprime-bin' which did not take with it the comments/votes. I then uploaded a 2nd package which provides mprime compiled from source which I called 'mprime' thus replacing the legacy binary one with the new from-source one. Effect: The comments/votes for mprime-bin are really those of mprime. Is there any easy way to switch the votes/comment from the mprime package to the mprime-bin package? Of course, some of the comments will then be confusing. Not sure how to proceed. Thanks.

3 7

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 12 Dec '13

12 Dec '13

2013/12/10 Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz(a)gmail.com>: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) > <techlivezheng(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Hey, I wonder if it is possible to query the `provides` of a package in AUR? > > Is e.g. 'cower -ii wine-git' good enough? Acctually, I want to know if it is possible to query the AUR through API to know what packages provide the desired package. e.g. I query for packages provived 'wine', and get I get 'wine-git' and others. Does cower do that?

7 18

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Dec '13

12 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 5 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * dokuwiki-20131208-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * dokuwiki-20131208-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 10 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs 3. djgera - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Dec '13

11 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2c.20131206-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: sdlpal-->sdlpal-git
by 蒲肖肖 11 Dec '13

11 Dec '13

Hi, Please merge my package sdlpal[1] into sdlpal-git[2]. The upsteam now use git to manage source code. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sdlpal/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sdlpal-git/ Thanks, Shaw

2 1

[aur-general] Disowning some packages
by Stefan Tatschner 10 Dec '13

10 Dec '13

Hi, I'm disowning some of my packages because I do not need them any more. Feel free to adopt them. :) Stefan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-hgapi/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-hgapi/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shovel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/git-extras/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-feedgenerator/

2 1

[aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 10 Dec '13

10 Dec '13

Hey, I wonder if it is possible to query the `provides` of a package in AUR?

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request (pygeoip into python2-pygeoip)
by sebastien＠sleduc.fr 10 Dec '13

10 Dec '13

Hello, Could you please merge my package pygeoip [1] into python2-pygeoip [2] ? Since it is a python2 package its correct name should be python2-pygeoip. Thanks 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pygeoip/ 2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pygeoip/

2 1