Hi, everyone.
I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/
The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new
packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's
unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in AUR.
Regards,
Stephen.
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 9 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==
* gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686)
* gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) ==
* waf-1.7.15-2 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* avrdude-6.1-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* mldonkey-3.1.5-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* rethinkdb-1.12.1-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mldonkey-3.1.5-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* rethinkdb-1.12.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. fyan - 8 signoffs
2. thomas - 4 signoffs
The following package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bluecurve-cursor-theme/
conflicts with this package in the official repos:
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/xcursor-bluecurve/
But the AUR package provides extra variants on this cursor theme that
the official repos package does not provide.
The AUR package in question is currently orphaned. I'm happy to adopt
it, fix the pkgbuild and ensure that it only installs the variant themes
and not the main theme that the official package provides. In this case
it could be renamed to xcursor-bluecurve-extra or something like that?
Or should the aur package simply be deleted?
What should happen here?