March 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Delete request
by Jerome Leclanche 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-synaptics-jumpycursor/ No longer needed (cf comments) J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: python-pygraphviz -> python2-pygraphviz
by Clément Démoulins 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, To follow the python guidelines, could you please merge python-pygraphviz [1] into python2-pygraphviz [2]. Thanks. Clément Démoulins [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pygraphviz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pygraphviz/ -- Clef PGP : 0xDD51E028

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal Request] stm32flash-svn
by Stephen Zhang 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, everyone. I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/ The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in AUR. Regards, Stephen.

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request:scid_vs_pc
by Martin Doege 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi! Please disown scid_vs_pc https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scid_vs_pc/ I've sent an email to the maintainer but not received a reply. Thanks! Martin

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift
by thecattony＠gmx.com 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. Regards.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 Mar '14

31 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mldonkey-3.1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rethinkdb-1.12.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mldonkey-3.1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rethinkdb-1.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 8 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please disown ttf-unifont
by Tai-Lin Chu 31 Mar '14

31 Mar '14

The package is out-of-date for a long time, and the maintainer is not updating it. Thanks

1 0

[aur-general] bluecurve-cursor-theme official repos conflict
by Charles Bos 30 Mar '14

30 Mar '14

The following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bluecurve-cursor-theme/ conflicts with this package in the official repos: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/xcursor-bluecurve/ But the AUR package provides extra variants on this cursor theme that the official repos package does not provide. The AUR package in question is currently orphaned. I'm happy to adopt it, fix the pkgbuild and ensure that it only installs the variant themes and not the main theme that the official package provides. In this case it could be renamed to xcursor-bluecurve-extra or something like that? Or should the aur package simply be deleted? What should happen here?

2 1

[aur-general] [amsmath] Deletion request
by Florian Dejonckheere 30 Mar '14

30 Mar '14

Hi Please delete amsmath [1], as it is included in TeXlive. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amsmath/ Thanks Florian

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request of i3-py-git
by willemw 30 Mar '14

30 Mar '14

Please remove i3-py-git. It has been replaced by python-i3-git and python2-i3-git. Willem

2 1