April 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux
by Daniel Micay 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

On 09/04/14 11:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 10/04/14 12:58, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Therning <magnus(a)therning.org>wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm guessing this means cabal-install now is the only package outside >>>> of [community] that uses ghc to build. Is that right? >>>> >> That would be correct. >> >> >>>> Is the plan then that any future tools (i.e. non-libraries) >>>> implemented in Haskell would go into [community]? >> >> This would also be correct. I believe that most people who use packages in >> our supported repos don't actually use the haskell libraries themselves, >> but rather the tools that depend on them. (e.g. xmonad) >> I am not against keeping these tools around and their dependencies if >> someone wants to maintain them, but I personally have no interest in >> maintaining them myself. > > I am fine with this decision. Although I think it better to use a > system package manager if at all possible, I do recognise that this > takes man power that we do not have for haskell. People still have the > option of using the AUR over cabal-install if they want to use the > package manager (or system wide installs - is cabal-install a per user > thing?) > > <aside> > In my ideal situation, we would have a team of people for each of the > "major" programming languages who would determine packaging policy and > provide packages for many of the libraries for that language. Sort of > like how we have multiple people who deal with KDE and GNOME updates. > With a team based setup, it would be easier to have more junior people > brought on to help. > </aside> > > Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell > group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages > officially instead? It's definitely still active. They seem to have all the necessary automation worked out. AFAICT they do an automated conversion from the cabal files and maintain a set of patches for adding external dependencies, etc. https://github.com/archhaskell

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux
by Thomas Dziedzic 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Allan McRae <allan(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell > group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages > officially instead? I wouldn't actually be opposed to this idea. A lot of effort is duplicated with regards to Archlinux's official haskell packages and Arch-Haskell's packages. We could try to work out something between the existing haskell package maintainers and arch-haskell maintainers. It might lead to a possibly better overall haskell experience on archlinux. Arch-haskell could maintain official haskell packages using pacman. I (and anyone interested) could support haskell package installation using the cabal-install route.

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by G. Schlisio 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

please delete [0] as it does not compile, is orphan and the project is discontinued. as a replacement [1] is available. thanks [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress-git/

3 3

[aur-general] Deletion of aur package 'shell'
by Ricardo Band 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

Ahoi, I've added the package shell[1] to the AUR some time ago. Now I found out that the idea behind this little python script can be achived with normal ssh tools. I don't think the package is useful for anyone so it can safely be deleted. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shell/ -- Greetings

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thestinger - 9 signoffs 2. anatolik - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal request] kde4support-git
by A Rojas 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

Replaced with kdelibs4support-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde4support-git/ Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Jerome Leclanche 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-wikipedia-rewrite-svn/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pywikibot-git/ Cheers. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] libechonest merge request
by Kuba Serafinowski 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

Hi, Please merge libechonest2* into libechonest**. I'm the maintainer of both of them. Cheers, Kuba * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libechonest2/ ** https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libechonest/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 19 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. seblu - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Merge Request] brother-dcp*-{cupswrapper,lpr}
by Berno Strik 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

2 1