=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 18 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) ==
* scala-2.11.0-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* waf-1.7.15-2 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* agg-1:2.4r93-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* cinnamon-control-center-2.2.3-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.2.1-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* mingw-w64-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* simple-scan-3.12.0-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* weston-1.4.0-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* agg-1:2.4r93-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cinnamon-control-center-2.2.3-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.2.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mingw-w64-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* simple-scan-3.12.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* weston-1.4.0-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==
* waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686), since 2014-04-11
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64), since 2014-04-11
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. bisson - 2 signoffs
please remove
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-json/
my fault, I've reuploaded the package because i've not saw that
[extra] package has been renamed to lua-luajson
greetings
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 18 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==
* avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686)
* mingw-w64-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686)
* avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64)
* mingw-w64-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) ==
* scala-2.11.0-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* waf-1.7.15-2 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* agg-1:2.4r93-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* cinnamon-control-center-2.2.3-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.2.1-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* mingw-w64-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* simple-scan-3.12.0-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* weston-1.4.0-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* agg-1:2.4r93-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cinnamon-control-center-2.2.3-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.2.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mingw-w64-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* simple-scan-3.12.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* weston-1.4.0-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==
* waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686), since 2014-04-11
* python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64), since 2014-04-11
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
I take that to mean the maintainer is OK with this. Felix, could you
merge the packages?
J. Leclanche
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Nikita Nikishin <i.nnikishi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure how this process works, so I've just disowned the package. Let
> me know if you need any more intervention from me.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I thought I had quoted the original email - clearly I did not.
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-flask-classy/ into
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-flask-classy/
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-flask-markdown/ into
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-flask-markdown/
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-tabulate/ into
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-tabulate/
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ngxtop/ into
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ngxtop/ *
>> J. Leclanche
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nikita Nikishin <i.nnikishi(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I apologize, but which package are you referring to?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh(a)gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Blender CC'd here.
>> >>
>> >> Regarding ngxtop: It needs to be merged either way. I'm fine disowning
>> >> all of these by the way.
>> >> J. Leclanche
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Felix Yan <felixonmars(a)gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday, April 24, 2014 09:22:12 Jerome Leclanche wrote:
>> >> >> Essentially, the only user of the version 2 of these packages is
>> >> >> (was)
>> >> >> mediacrush-server-git and we are currently working for proper Python
>> >> >> 3
>> >> >> support in there. In the mean time, the mediacrush-server-git
>> >> >> package
>> >> >> does not actually build and is currently useless due to other
>> >> >> reasons.
>> >> >> Imo there is no real point in keeping the python2 package around for
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> long time unless it is actually needed by something, same logic as
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> all "old versions of libs" applies here.
>> >> >> J. Leclanche
>> >> >
>> >> > OK then, I agree with you.
>> >> >
>> >> > Have you contacted the current maintainers of those packages?
>> >> > (Blender
>> >> > and
>> >> > bgaleotti, in particular) I'll do the merge if they agreed or didn't
>> >> > respond
>> >> > to you after certain period of time.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> > Felix Yan
>> >
>> >
>
>