June 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge ronn into ruby-ronn
by Allen Li 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Please merge ronn into ruby-ronn. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ronn/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ronn/

2 1

[aur-general] Delete jtopen-jt400-jdbc3 and jtopen-jt400-jdbc4 packages
by Muflone 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Hi please delete the jtopen-jt400-jdbc3 [1] and jtopen-jt400-jdbc4 [2] packages as the upstream author doesn't provide anymore separate jdbc drivers for newer versions and the jtopen package is enough. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jtopen-jt400-jdbc3/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jtopen-jt400-jdbc4/ Best regards Muflone

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request: ureadahead
by Steven Honeyman 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

I've been looking for a preload solution, and found this outdated/orphaned wiki article [1] which says the kernel module is no longer available (replaced by systemd), but the userspace package "ureadahead" is still in the AUR [2] (orphaned, "out of date", and no comments for 2 years!) Thanks, Steven [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ureadahead [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37889

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Ivaylo Kuzev 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Hi, The package [1] is out-of-date. Please remove [1]. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nikola-zsh-completion/[1][1] -- Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Charles Bos 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Hello, I think the following package ought to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackedbox/ The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2008 and neither the upstream url nor the source link work. The following website lists 0.8.5 as the latest release: http://freecode.com/projects/hackedbox Version 0.8.5 is the same version that is in the AUR and that would indicate that upstream hasn't released a new version since January 2007 so the project would appear to be stone dead. Regards

2 1

[aur-general] Disown package python2-scitools
by Joey Dumont 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Disown package [1] as current maintainer has not responded to comments or to direct email in two weeks. Thanks! [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-scitools/ Joey Dumont (Profil <https://profiles.google.com/joey.dumont/about>)

2 1

[aur-general] Deluge package cleanup
by Florian Bruhin 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Please merge my package deluge-git-stable[1] into deluge-stable-git[2], didn't realize I was creating a duplicate. Also, deluge-client-svn[3] should be deleted, as upstream switched to git, the package doesn't build, is orphaned, uses $startdir and is outdated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deluge-git-stable/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deluge-stable-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deluge-client-svn/ -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail www.asciiribbon.org /\ www.the-compiler.org | I love long mails http://email.is-not-s.ms/ There is only one way to be happy by means of the heart -- to have none. -- Paul Bourget

2 1

[aur-general] Another removal request
by Charles Bos 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hello, Can the following package be removed please: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/icewm-testing/ It's basically just an out of date duplicate of the icewm package in the official repos. It uses exactly the same sourceforge.net sources as the official package, the only difference being that it's a version out of date. It's also orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2011 and has just 6 votes. Regards

5 4

[aur-general] Package Delete requests.
by Yichao Yu 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hi, Please delete my pypy3-* packages. They were there only because the old AUR recognized the last pkgname in the array as the package name and they were always provided by their pypy-* counterpart. Yichao Yu [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-tornado/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-pyzmq/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-markupsafe/

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicated package removal request
by Steven Honeyman 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

I've just noticed that the md5deep [1] package (kept up-to-date, first submitted in 2006) someone has duplicated to "hashdeep" [2] in 2014. They compile from exactly the same source, and produce the same binaries. Can the hashdeep package be removed? Also, would anybody be interested in moving md5deep over to the community repo? It's a very popular set of checksum tools that have many more features than md5sum,sha1sum (etc). Thanks, Steven. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/md5deep/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hashdeep/

7 10