Hello folks,
I have recently packaged the Microsoft edit[1] in the AUR[2] and it
seems to have opened a debate on whether the name is correct or not (in
fact the package already has two requests, one for deletion and the
other for merging).
IMHO the correct package is the one I uploaded as it does not collide
with anything (the name `edit` was not being used in any package) and
is obviously the closest to upstream (which I have always understood to
be the philosophy of Arch Linux). But in any case I would like to know
your opinion.
Am I wrong, should it be called `ms-edit` or `microsoft-edit`? And if
so, is it also logical to rename the executable to `ms-edit` or
`msedit`?
I read you, best regards.
[1]: https://github.com/microsoft/edit
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/edit
--
Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me
Hi,
Could someone review https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wtfis
This is my first time packaging a python tool from PyPI
My understanding since it's not a library python-wtfis would be an
incorrect naming convention.
I used a tool to generate the first PKGBUILD then added dependencies.
I assume lots of other things are missing to make this meet proper AUR
standards.
Thanks in advance,