- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: pkgbuild
by Robin Candau 03 Jul '23

03 Jul '23

Le 03/07/2023 à 07:00, james smith a écrit : > Now after making those changes running it, it doesn't correctly git > clone Neither source directory 'source' nor build directory 'build' > contain a build file meson.build. and I believe this command is the > culprit |printf "%s.r%s.%s" "$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 | sed > 's/^v//')" "$(git rev-list --count HEAD)" "$(git rev-parse --short > HEAD)"| because it git clones it "empty" as just the .git folder. Not > all files https://bpa.st/XA5JI apologies for the redundant questions The culprit is that you copied the "meson setup" command from the wiki without actually adapting it to your case. The "source" and "build" statements in it have to be replaced by the actual "source" and "build" directory of the repo you're trying to build (notice how "source" and "build" are written in /italic/ in the wiki [1], indicating that they have to be adapted to your case). Also, you have to `cd` first to the cloned repo before launching build instructions. Finally, "libadwaita" should be an actual dependency (not simply a make one) I think. Here's a fixed PKGBUILD: https://bpa.st/BTXWE I allowed myself to also make some small "best practices" and "style" improvements to it as well: re-add the trailing ".git" at the end of the source, switch to sha256 instead of md5 (I know the checksum is skipped there, but better take the habit to use a stronger algorithm for the potential future), better indentation in functions, etc... [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Meson_package_guidelines#Using_meson_binar… -- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz

1 0

Re: pkgbuild
by Robin Candau 02 Jul '23

02 Jul '23

/Transferring OP's reply to the proper mailing list/. > On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 6:59 PM Robin Candau <antiz(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > Le 02/07/2023 à 04:20, james smith a écrit : >> I am trying to package this https://github.com/lemmygtk/lemoa >> this is my pkgbuild any tips on how to improve it before I send >> it to aur is appreciated > > Hi James, > > _/Quick note before reviewing your PKGBUILD:/_ > /When asking for a review, try to make your PKGBUILD publicly > readable somewhere (by posting it in paste service for instance, > like https://bpa.st/ or https://gist.github.com/) This is way > easier to track as the discussion progresses and way more "trust > worthy" than an attached file sent to a mailing list. > //For everyone's context, here's the initial PKGBUILD provided for > a review:/ > https://bpa.st/TXEW2 > > In it's current state, your PKGBUILD won't work and needs some > modifications and improvements. > Here's what I can list after a quick review: > > - The comments at the top provided by the PKGBUILD example file > should be removed. > > - You can remove variables/arrays that are empty/unused in your > PKGBUILD (epoch, groups, checkdepends, etc...). > > - Consider filling out the maintainer info at the top of the > PKGBUILD. This isn't mandatory but it is recommended and appreciated. > > - The pkgname you chose refers to a VCS package ("lemoa*-git*"). > If you indeed want your package to be a VCS package (meaning that > it relies on the latest upstream commit instead of a specific > tag/release) then you have to adapt your PKGBUILD accordingly with > a proper "pkgver()" function [1]. > Otherwise, switch your "pkgname" to "lemoa" and update the rest of > the PKGBUILD accordingly. > > - 'GNU' isn't a valid license. The correct license for "lemoa" > currently is 'GPL3' [2]. See also the license section of the > PKGBUILD wiki page for more information [3]. > > - The 'Gtk' package listed in the "depends" array isn't a valid > package. "Lemoa" seems to depends on GTK-4 [4] which can be > installed via the "gtk4" package in Arch [5]. > > - Upstream documentation also lists "rust, cargo and pkg-config" > as "Build dependencies" [4]. According to that, you should add the > "cargo" package (which also provides "rust") to your "makedepends" > array. > However, you don't have to explicitly list the "pkg-config" > package (provided by the "pkgconf" package in Arch [6]) because it > is a member of the "base-devel" meta-package [7] which is assumed > installed during build-time [8]. > > - The "install" variable expects the name of an optional > ".install" script used to perform tasks before or after the > install, the upgrade and/or the removal of the package [9], it > isn't meant to store a "raw" command like you did. At first > glance, there's no need for an install script in your case so you > can remove that variable. > > - The "source" array is wrong and will fail to download the repo. > It should be "git*+*$url" instead of "git*=*$url". See the VCS > sources section of the wiki for more information [10]. Just for > the sake of it, I'll add the usual trailing ".git" at the end, > like so: source=("git+${url}.git") > > - Because the sources are not static in a VCS package, you have > to explicitly skip the checksum by adding 'SKIP' to the "md5sums" > array [11]. Letting it empty will not work. > On a side note, I recommend switching to a more modern and secure > hash algorithm generally speaking ("sha256sums" for instance). > > - You shouldn't "git clone" the repo inside the "build()" > function. This is implicitly done beforehand by filling the > correct/proper sources in the "source" array. > > - The "ninja -C _build install" part as to be called within the > "package()" function. You'll also need to setup the destination > directory to "$pkgdir" which is the temporary directory where > "makepkg" builds and bundles the package [12]. See the "package()" > section of the Meson packaging guidelines for more information [13]. > > Overall, I advice you to read closely the three following Arch > wiki pages which should contain most of the information you'll > need to write a proper PKGBUILD for "lemoa-git": > - PKGBUILD [14] > - VCS Packaging Guidelines [15] > - Meson Packaging Guidelines [16] > > I hope this helps :) > Don't hesitate to ask for details or further questions if needed! > > [1] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#The_pkgver()_functi… > [2] https://github.com/lemmygtk/lemoa/blob/main/LICENSE > [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license > [4] https://github.com/lemmygtk/lemoa#build-dependencies > [5] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gtk4/ > [6] https://archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/pkgconf/ > [7] https://archlinux.org/packages/core/any/base-devel/ > [8] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#makedepends > [9] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#install > [10] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#VCS_sources > [11] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#Authentication_and_… > [12] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Creating_packages#Defining_PKGBUILD_variab… > [13] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Meson_package_guidelines#package() > [14] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD > [15] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines > [16] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Meson_package_guidelines > > -- > Regards, > Robin Candau / Antiz > Le 02/07/2023 à 21:26, james smith a écrit : fixed some of the suggestions you had https://mystb.in/AuroraStreamAdjacent is it ok that my email is md5 hashed instead of just the email? Well, according to the fact that filling your email address at the top of the PKGBUILD isn't mandatory per say, this is better than nothing but not so "accessible". If this is a matter of protecting yourself from eventual bots or something, you could do something like "address[at]mail[dot]com" which is eventually more accessible. But the final decision is up to you, no obligation there. Regarding your PKGBUILD, there are still some modifications to make as far as I can see: - The maintainer information has to be contained inside a comment, otherwise your PKGBUILD won't work: # Maintainer: Your Name <Your email address> - The "pkgver()" function does not replace the "pkgver" variable, it just updates it automatically each time makepkg is ran against the PKGBUILD (according to the latest upstream commit). You should put back the "pkgver" variable where it was and put the "pkgver()" function before the "build()" function. Once done, building the package against the PKGBUILD will automatically update the "pkgver" value. - Generally speaking, you should list every first level dependencies even if some are already implicitly satisfied by another package. However, some exceptions can be done when you're absolutely sure that a package cannot ever stop pulling another one as a dependency. According to that, you don't necessarily have to explicitly list "rust" as a dependency as it is already pulled by "cargo" and we're sure that "cargo" won't ever stop pulling "rust" as a dependency since "cargo" is the "rust package manager". See the "depends" section of the PKGBUILD wiki page for more information [1]. - No need to keep the empty "noextract" array. - One thing I forgot to mention in my initial reply is that your package has to "conflict" and "provide" the "lemoa" package in order to avoid issues if someone tries to install both on the same system (even though the "lemoa" package does not exists */yet/*). To do so you have to use a "provides" and "conflicts" arrays in your PKGBUILD. See the related section of the PKGBUILD arch wiki page [2] [3]. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#depends [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#provides [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#conflicts -- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz

1 0

Re: pkgbuild
by Robin Candau 02 Jul '23

02 Jul '23

Also, the proper mailing list to ask for a PKGBUILD review is aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org. I haven't noticed you used aur-dev(a)lists.archlinux.org instead when I replied the first time so I forwarded the discussion to the proper mailing list this time via this reply. Let's continue this discussion here please :) For everyone's context, here's the initial PKGBUILD provided for a review: https://bpa.st/TXEW2 -- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz Le 02/07/2023 à 20:59, Robin Candau a écrit : > Le 02/07/2023 à 04:20, james smith a écrit : >> I am trying to package this https://github.com/lemmygtk/lemoa this is >> my pkgbuild any tips on how to improve it before I send it to aur is >> appreciated > > Hi James, > > _/Quick note before reviewing your PKGBUILD:/_ > /When asking for a review, try to make your PKGBUILD publicly readable > somewhere (by posting it in paste service for instance, like > https://bpa.st/ or https://gist.github.com/) This is way easier to > track as the discussion progresses and way more "trust worthy" than an > attached file sent to a mailing list. / > > In it's current state, your PKGBUILD won't work and needs some > modifications and improvements. > Here's what I can list after a quick review: > > - The comments at the top provided by the PKGBUILD example file should > be removed. > > - You can remove variables/arrays that are empty/unused in your > PKGBUILD (epoch, groups, checkdepends, etc...). > > - Consider filling out the maintainer info at the top of the PKGBUILD. > This isn't mandatory but it is recommended and appreciated. > > - The pkgname you chose refers to a VCS package ("lemoa*-git*"). If > you indeed want your package to be a VCS package (meaning that it > relies on the latest upstream commit instead of a specific > tag/release) then you have to adapt your PKGBUILD accordingly with a > proper "pkgver()" function [1]. > Otherwise, switch your "pkgname" to "lemoa" and update the rest of the > PKGBUILD accordingly. > > - 'GNU' isn't a valid license. The correct license for "lemoa" > currently is 'GPL3' [2]. See also the license section of the PKGBUILD > wiki page for more information [3]. > > - The 'Gtk' package listed in the "depends" array isn't a valid > package. "Lemoa" seems to depends on GTK-4 [4] which can be installed > via the "gtk4" package in Arch [5]. > > - Upstream documentation also lists "rust, cargo and pkg-config" as > "Build dependencies" [4]. According to that, you should add the > "cargo" package (which also provides "rust") to your "makedepends" array. > However, you don't have to explicitly list the "pkg-config" package > (provided by the "pkgconf" package in Arch [6]) because it is a member > of the "base-devel" meta-package [7] which is assumed installed during > build-time [8]. > > - The "install" variable expects the name of an optional ".install" > script used to perform tasks before or after the install, the upgrade > and/or the removal of the package [9], it isn't meant to store a "raw" > command like you did. At first glance, there's no need for an install > script in your case so you can remove that variable. > > - The "source" array is wrong and will fail to download the repo. It > should be "git*+*$url" instead of "git*=*$url". See the VCS sources > section of the wiki for more information [10]. Just for the sake of > it, I'll add the usual trailing ".git" at the end, like so: > source=("git+${url}.git") > > - Because the sources are not static in a VCS package, you have to > explicitly skip the checksum by adding 'SKIP' to the "md5sums" array > [11]. Letting it empty will not work. > On a side note, I recommend switching to a more modern and secure hash > algorithm generally speaking ("sha256sums" for instance). > > - You shouldn't "git clone" the repo inside the "build()" function. > This is implicitly done beforehand by filling the correct/proper > sources in the "source" array. > > - The "ninja -C _build install" part as to be called within the > "package()" function. You'll also need to setup the destination > directory to "$pkgdir" which is the temporary directory where > "makepkg" builds and bundles the package [12]. See the "package()" > section of the Meson packaging guidelines for more information [13]. > > Overall, I advice you to read closely the three following Arch wiki > pages which should contain most of the information you'll need to > write a proper PKGBUILD for "lemoa-git": > - PKGBUILD [14] > - VCS Packaging Guidelines [15] > - Meson Packaging Guidelines [16] > > I hope this helps :) > Don't hesitate to ask for details or further questions if needed! > > [1] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#The_pkgver()_functi… > [2] https://github.com/lemmygtk/lemoa/blob/main/LICENSE > [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license > [4] https://github.com/lemmygtk/lemoa#build-dependencies > [5] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gtk4/ > [6] https://archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/pkgconf/ > [7] https://archlinux.org/packages/core/any/base-devel/ > [8] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#makedepends > [9] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#install > [10] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#VCS_sources > [11] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#Authentication_and_… > [12] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Creating_packages#Defining_PKGBUILD_variab… > [13] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Meson_package_guidelines#package() > [14] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD > [15] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines > [16] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Meson_package_guidelines > > -- > Regards, > Robin Candau / Antiz

1 0

Rename AUR package
by Aditya Mahajan 29 Jun '23

29 Jun '23

Hi, I am the maintainer of the AUR package [luametatex](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luametatex) which provides the luametatex binary + the context macro package. Recently, a new package named [luametatex](https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/luametatex/) was added to extra, which provides the luametatex binary. I realize now that the name of my AUR package is not appropriate and I should have used a more elaborate name (either context-luametatex or context-lmtx). Is it possible to rename the package? Or should I delete the current package and simply create a new one with a more elaborate name? Thanks, Aditya

3 3

llvm 16.x
by Mohan R 24 Jun '23

24 Jun '23

Hi, What happened to llvm 16.x? It was released three months ago. I tried to update the PKGBUILD locally to 16.x, this is what I got https://paste.rs/9R0Mk This issue should have been prevented if we used Source.tar.gz with a single PKGBUILD and should build different packages from this single source (like clang, lld, llvm, llvm-libs etc). Instead, we have three different PKGBUILD files (one for clang, one for lld, one for llvm+llvm-libs). why? I'm a long time arch user, when I started arch, I loved it because of how easy it was to take an official PKGBUILD file for an upstream project, bump the version and get the latest binaries in a single package, it was fairly simple. Now, lot of upstream projects was split into multiple packages (eg: qemu), I can understand the reason for the qemu package split, at least we have a single PKGBUILD to generate multiple qemu packages but this llvm split with multiple PKGBUILD is not helping us to move forward easily. It is stuck at 15.x. I think this is not supposed to be Arch's way. Thanks, Mohan R

3 4

API for AUR?
by Polarian 21 Jun '23

21 Jun '23

Hello, I am not sure if it exists, but if there is an API for the AUR could someone link me to the documentation on it? I am aware there is an rss feed for package updates, but I want to be able to parse information about a package. I assume there isn't and the only way to do it is to clone the repository and parse the .SRCINFO or PKGBUILD file for the information? Any pointers would be useful. Thanks, -- Polarian GPG signature: 0770E5312238C760 Website: https://polarian.dev JID/XMPP: polarian(a)polarian.dev

7 10

Conflicting go package naming
by Polarian 19 Jun '23

19 Jun '23

Hello, The naming for go packages seems inconsistent, I can see both go-* and golang-* on official and AUR packages, which am I meant to use as go-* seems to be more popular but according to the guidelines golang-* is what is meant to be used. So which should be used? and why are they differing? is either accepted? I do not know which to use, and I don't want to push a new package until I know, sorry for the noise for such a simple question but better do it right the first time, so I don't need to fix it in the future :) Thank you in advance, -- Polarian GPG signature: 0770E5312238C760 Website: https://polarian.dev JID/XMPP: polarian(a)polarian.dev

9 32

package aid - tmpfiles.d problems
by Polarian 15 Jun '23

15 Jun '23

Hello, So I have been attempting to package an irc bot for the aur, because I know a good 3 people or more now who are manually installing it on their arch servers so I decided to attempt to package it. I decided to use gitea as a good reference as it contains the sysusers configuration and also tmpfiles configuration as well. However for some reason when I attempt to adapt it, I get an error, I have not yet pushed the package to the aur and won't until its working so please check it here: https://git.polarian.dev/AUR/irc-uberbot-git I am aware for those rust packagers out there that I have not included "--locked" when fetching the crates, unfortunately upstream has not maintained their dependencies therefore cargo will not build unless "--locked" is removed, I will probably patch this shortly. The following error when I attempt to install this package which I need help in fixing: Detected unsafe path transition /etc/uberbot (owned by uberbot) → /etc/uberbot/config.toml (owned by root) during canonicalization of etc/uberbot/config.toml. error: command failed to execute correctly I do not see why this is happening for me but when I install gitea it works just fine :/ Its probably something really obvious, but I would still appreciate an explanation as I have not worked with tmpfiles very much so I am very naive, so please play nice :P Thanks in advance, -- Polarian GPG signature: 0770E5312238C760 Website: https://polarian.dev JID/XMPP: polarian(a)polarian.dev

6 11

VCS package check - chuncord-git
by Polarian 10 Jun '23

10 Jun '23

Hello, I just want some quick feedback on a package I made a few days ago, this was my first time writing a VCS package, so I want to make sure I have done everything properly: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chuncord-git Please let me know if I have done anything wrong. Thank you, -- Polarian GPG signature: 0770E5312238C760 Website: https://polarian.dev JID/XMPP: polarian(a)polarian.dev

2 2

Autobot caught in use?
by Polarian 03 Jun '23

03 Jun '23

Hello, I was looking at the AUR today and I have realised a ton of packages with the prefix r-<package name> being updated within a minute of each other, and then found the user to be publishing them: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/BioArchLinuxBot By the name it seems this is a Bot, Anthraxx and Jelle have already discussed how this is not acceptable in a previous thread, see: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-general@lists.archlinux.org/m… https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-general@lists.archlinux.org/m… A draft has also been submitted on the ArchWiki to set this into stone: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Talk:AUR_submission_guidelines#Automation_… Therefore I am bringing this user, and the packages which this has occurred on to the TUs here. I have also attached an image to this email which is a screenshot of the recently updated packages, you can use the rss feeds to back this up as well, it clearly shows that a large number of r packages were updated BY THE SAME USER within the span of 10 minutes. Let me know what you think :) Have a good day, -- Polarian GPG signature: 0770E5312238C760 Website: https://polarian.dev JID/XMPP: polarian(a)polarian.dev

6 7

Questions on JDK naming
by Tommaso Dordoni 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23

Hello, I recently started contributing to the AUR and I have some questions on JDK naming. I submitted a package called “jdk17-azul-prime-bin” yesterday, but then I realized that other Zulu jdk packages follow a different naming convention, such as “zulu-8-bin”, “zulu-17-bin”, “zulu-20-bin”... For consistency, I requested a merge to rename my package as “zulu-prime-17-bin”. Was that a good decision? In general, what is the best way to name JDK and JRE packages? For instance, how should I name the JDK and JRE Zulu Prime packages for Java 8 to differentiate them? Thank you

2 1

Harrassment?
by Pellegrino Prevete 13 May '23

13 May '23

the "xiota" aur user, I never talked even once as far as I remember, and who somehow came to maintain "gnome-contact-git", defined me "a squatter who has never pushed an update to packages" in an orphan request. I'm notifying him I have reported the issue here. Cheers

3 2

Binary AUR packages when associated packages exist in the repos
by é 12 May '23

12 May '23

I would like to reopen the discussion to delete a package (yuzu-mainline-bin) that exists in [community] (yuzu). As per AUR guidelines [1]: >The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of >the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the >official package database for the package. If any version of it exists, >do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of-date, flag >it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking a feature, >then please file a bug report. > >Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra >features enabled and/or patches in comparison to the official ones. In >such an occasion the pkgname should be different to express that >difference. For example, a package for GNU screen containing the >sidebar patch could be named screen-sidebar. Additionally the >provides=('screen') array should be used in order to avoid conflicts >with the official package. yuzu-mainline-bin provides zero extra features or functionality compared to the repo build, at least, no one has yet mentioned such. The name itself refers to yuzu-mainline which is exactly what the repo package is building. As a result I filed a deletion request, but this was apparently rejected [2] with the reasoning that "Yuzu only seems to support binaries", along with some links to comments from upstream as well as a link to a previous thread [3] on the ML from 2021 where this topic was mentioned before. The other point mentioned in the AUR package comments [4] is that the repo version can be out of date frequently. Again, that is addressed in the quote above, still doesn't justify the AUR package. To me, the entire purpose of having the official repos is to have binary builds (presumably done in a clean environment with some minimal source verification), so we don't have to rely on arbitrary developers to have clean environments and only really need to trust the TUs who build that package. If there are issues with a package, they are first reported to Arch maintainers via bug report (this is in accordance with the "please file a bug report" in the quoted passage above). This applies to any package, and yuzu is neither an exception nor special case here. Also the entire point of having distros in the first place is that you have someone (who is usually not upstream) maintaining the package and making sure it slots well into your system. I don't know of any package in any distro where the distro builds the package, but upstream is expected to support it. So why should a specific -bin package exist in the AUR just because upstream is in accordance with decades of tradition? Either way they clearly do not want unnecessary bug reports from inexperienced users [5], so any Arch user reporting a bug with the repo package upstream would be unhelpful to both Arch and Yuzu. Best, éclairevoyant [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submiss… [2] https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/… [3] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2021-December/005056.html [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yuzu-mainline-bin#comment-913540 [5] https://github.com/yuzu-emu/yuzu/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_rep…

4 4

Re: Broken Package
by paul.mirkwood 09 May '23

09 May '23

Thanks artafinde for the clarification, and thanks also Polarian, your explanations were worth reading! > As an additional sidenode, if the issue you want to report is that the package is > broken because it can't be built, the maintainer has already highlighted that it is due > to gcc update, and they are awaiting upstream to patch the issue. That was posted 3 > days ago so I assume it is still valid right now as I do not see any recent commits to > the AUR for this package. (not since 2023-04-18) This is indeed what I'm talking about, sorry I should've read the comments on Aurweb before posting here. Since the problem has already been reported, I feel like there's no more to do but waiting if the maintainer is willing to backport the patch. I totally understand that packages may break, I was kind of wondering why upstream would have released a non-compiling version, but I have the explanation now. Have a good day/night, Mirkwood

2 2

Broken package
by paul.mirkwood 09 May '23

09 May '23

Hello everyone, I'm pretty new here so I hope you will forgive me if my question isn't appropriate. I don't want to blame anyone, but is it normal that non -git packages may be broken? (maybe it is, I genuinely don't know) Currently, the mangohud package is broken even though upstream has fixed the bug. The mangohud-git package is also fine. Best regards, and thanks for your answers, Mirkwood ------- Forwarded Message ------- De : paul.mirkwood <paul.mirkwood(a)protonmail.com> Date : mardi 9 mai 2023 à 10:51 PM Objet : Broken package À : aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org <aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org> > Hello everyone, > > I'm pretty new here so I hope you will forgive me if my question isn't appropriate. > I don't want to blame anyone, but is it normal that non -git packages may be broken? > (maybe it is, I genuinely don't know) > Currently, the mangohud package is broken even though upstream has fixed the bug. > The mangohud-git package is also fine. > > Best regard, and thanks for your answers, > Mirkwood

3 3

Help with old large commit to AUR
by Iyán Méndez Veiga 09 May '23

09 May '23

Hi, I have an issue trying to update a package in AUR. I get the following error: $ aurpublish python-tweedledum git push using: aur:python-tweedledum.git master Enumerating objects: 12, done. Counting objects: 100% (12/12), done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads Compressing objects: 100% (9/9), done. Writing objects: 100% (9/9), 870.96 KiB | 6.80 MiB/s, done. Total 9 (delta 4), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 remote: Checking connectivity: 9, done. remote: error: The following error occurred when parsing commit remote: error: ef079835003ac029a21f2bcec32ece1a62bc19d0: remote: error: maximum blob size (488.28KiB) exceeded remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master To aur:python-tweedledum.git ! [remote rejected] c19571c71b3b6c9d3ea28ba069d965b22509bd0a -> master (hook declined) I think the issue is that in the past I commited a large patch file (by mistake) instead of including the url in the sources array (that's commit ef079835), and somehow the remote didn't complain back then but it does now. I have removed that patch and replace it with the upstream url, but I can't push a new version. This is what I'm trying to commit: https://github.com/iyanmv/PKGBUILDs/commit/ 5e642048f438b3857007621d8b778689776244f3 Hopefully some trusted user can help me. Thanks, Iyán -- Iyán Méndez Veiga GPG 0x422E3694311E5AC1

2 1

Non-git AUR with submodules
by Christian 07 May '23

07 May '23

Hi, I took over the package blink1. It is not a -git package so it should have a stable checksum, in my opinion. But since the project it builds uses a submodule, the package uses source=("git+https:/…) and SKIP for the checksum. This way prepare() can do a submodule init and submodule update. Is there a better way to deal with submodules? Or would it be better to download the released binary for the correct architecture and install that? As I currently understand it this would only be acceptable for a -bin package, wouldn't it? (I found no clear guidance when to use that prefix, e.g. zoom) This is my first AUR and I'd like to do it properly. Best, Christian

3 3

keyrings on the AUR
by Fabian Bornschein 06 May '23

06 May '23

Hi, I'd like to ask what's the current status on gpg keys, "keyrings" on the AUR? A few years back they where removed[1]. If I search for 'keyring' right now a few pop up. I guess there are different reasons for them to appear, like for example the 'linuxmint-keyring' is different from the 'alph-keyring', where one is from a pacman repo and the other one is not. However it would be good to have a consistent rule/guideline what's OK and what not. [1] <https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/…> --- Sincerely, Fabian Bornschein

1 0

AUR unavailable because of broken refs
by Morten Linderud 05 May '23

05 May '23

Hi, The AUR is currently unavailable because of some broken refs in the underlying Git repository that needs to be fixed. We are working on solving the issue but it might take a couple more hours. -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16

3 2

Error pushing package: "remote: fatal: bad object .alternate"
by é 05 May '23

05 May '23

Hi all, I'm attempting to update https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cpuset, and cloning it works fine, however trying to commit and push changes results in the following error (snipped): ``` Total 5 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 remote: fatal: bad object .alternate fatal: bad object refs/heads/python-degiro-connector To ssh://aur.archlinux.org/cpuset.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (missing necessary objects) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://aur.archlinux.org/cpuset.git' ``` Also, interestingly enough it seems that python-degiro-connector itself has some issues; cloning it via https simply fails: ``` Cloning into 'python-degiro-connector'... fatal: remote error: upload-pack: not our ref ae7907349a087b4ec7e550cccbb059dc212d2bc9 ``` Referring somehow to this commit https://github.com/archlinux/aur/commit/ae7907349a087b4ec7e550cccbb059dc212… (which seems fine to me?) I don't know how to resolve this issue as I'm not familiar with git alternates, and searching snippets of errors on the mailing list / google was not fruitful. Any suggestions? Best, éclairevoyant

2 2

Application as Trusted User - gromit
by Christian Heusel 28 Apr '23

28 Apr '23

Hello everyone! My name is Chris and I am a 24 year old computer science student from Heidelberg in southern Germany. With this mail I would like to apply to become part of the Trusted User group! I am happily using arch-based systems since 2016 and Archlinux since around 2018. Generally I use Linux systems since 2012, and have even worked as linux system administrator (paid and as volunteer) which was very fun! Aside from that I am trying my best to contribute to open source projects and the overall FOSS community, so far mostly by open sourcing personal projects, modifying & extending existing projets to my liking and reporting the bugs I find. Most of this activity is taking place on GitHub[0]. In my spare time I rock climb and hike, play the drums and I am an active youth lead in my local YMCA. In the last few years I also was very active in student politics but I am now winding down this involvement since I am about to finish my studies. Sometimes I can also be found in my local chaos computer club[1] chatting with other people about computers and stuff. In general you may know me better by the nick of "gromit" in IRC tho, under which I also participate in the various other arch resources: - Since 2018 I am part of the Arch Testing team to check packages in the various testing repos - I help out on the bugtracker[2] where I can, but I also just read a lot of it to keep up to date for support requests on IRC - I have some minor contributions on Gitlab[3], mostly around devtools and mkinitcpio - I participated in the proof of concept testing for the git package migration - I maintain packages on the Arch User Repository[4] and try to help out in the AUR comments aswell - I have some minor contributions on the wiki[5] - I also comment on /r/archlinux regularily (please note that reddit usernames[6] cannot be changed once created :p) To further extend this involvement and to help the arch community I am now applying as trusted user. Here is a collection of packages from [community] that I frequently use and could therefore possibly (Co-)Maintain: - bat 1 - blueberry 1 - borgmatic 1 - bpython 0 - gopass 2 - gopass-jsonapi 1 - gum 1 - lolcat 1 - mosquitto 1 - nemo 1 - nethogs 1 - pasystray 1 - polybar 1 - rofi-emoji 1 - scrcpy 1 - sxiv 1 - tailscale 1 - terminator 1 - unp 1 - variety 1 - yamllint 1 I especially selected these packages because they currently lack maintainers (except for gopass), but I am also open to help out with other packages! Additionally I could imagine bringing the following packages to the [community] repos, should I be accepted: - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ly - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nsxiv - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-boot-pacman-hook My sponsors are Morten Linderud (Foxboron) and Robin Candau (Antiz) which I am both very thankful for because they also guided me through the application process! Cheers, and thanks for reading until here! Christian "gromit" Heusel [0] https://github.com/christian-heusel [1] https://www.noname-ev.de/howtotreff.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/30483 [3] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/gromit [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gromit [5] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Special:Contributions/Gromit [6] https://www.reddit.com/user/TheEbolaDoc

6 11

AutoUpdateBot harmful
by j.r 17 Apr '23

17 Apr '23

Hello, just noticed that the denaro package [1] was updated by AutoUpdateBot two days ago. That account seems to be a bot based on some Github actions stuff [2]. This update broke the package, as it wasn't as simple as "change version number and checksum" (see my comment at the package site). Investigating a bit further I noticed this bot does not seem to do any checks if the package is still buildable or anything [3]. My question now: is there any policy about such bots? Are they allowed? Should they at least test if the package still builds before uploading the package update? Thanks j.r [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/denaro [2] https://github.com/arch4edu/aur-auto-update [3] https://github.com/arch4edu/aur-auto-update/actions/runs/4655655968/jobs/82…

12 28

Re: Aur-general Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4
by eile_kerning 10 Apr '23

10 Apr '23

unsubscribe Sent from Proton Mail mobile -------- Original Message -------- On Apr 10, 2023, 04:08, wrote: > Send Aur-general mailing list submissions to aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to aur-general-request(a)lists.archlinux.org You can reach the person managing the list at aur-general-owner(a)lists.archlinux.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Aur-general digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Application as Trusted User - gromit (Brett Cornwall) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2023 14:39:25 -0700 From: Brett Cornwall Subject: Re: Application as Trusted User - gromit To: aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hb5gxynovta7s3x6" On 2023-04-07 10:35, Christian Heusel wrote: >Hello everyone! Hi, Chris! >My name is Chris and I am a 24 year old computer science student from >Heidelberg in southern Germany. >With this mail I would like to apply to become part of the Trusted >User group! > >I am happily using arch-based systems since 2016 and Archlinux since >around 2018. Generally I use Linux systems since 2012, and have even >worked as linux system administrator (paid and as volunteer) which was >very fun! > >Aside from that I am trying my best to contribute to open source >projects and the overall FOSS community, so far mostly by open >sourcing personal projects, modifying & extending existing projets to >my liking and reporting the bugs I find. Most of this activity is >taking place on GitHub[0]. > >In my spare time I rock climb and hike, play the drums and I am an >active youth lead in my local YMCA. >In the last few years I also was very active in student politics but I >am now winding down this involvement since I am about to finish my >studies. >Sometimes I can also be found in my local chaos computer club[1] >chatting with other people about computers and stuff. > >In general you may know me better by the nick of "gromit" in IRC tho, >under which I also participate in the various other arch resources: >- Since 2018 I am part of the Arch Testing team to check packages in >the various testing repos >- I help out on the bugtracker[2] where I can, but I also just read a >lot of it to keep up to date for support requests on IRC >- I have some minor contributions on Gitlab[3], mostly around devtools >and mkinitcpio >- I participated in the proof of concept testing for the git package >migration >- I maintain packages on the Arch User Repository[4] and try to help >out in the AUR comments aswell >- I have some minor contributions on the wiki[5] >- I also comment on /r/archlinux regularily (please note that reddit >usernames[6] cannot be changed once created :p) I like the dedication to keeping packages managed rather than just bringing in a whole bunch of new packages. :) The quality of the packages is good! I like your commitment to following the wiki guidelines. I also appreciate your useful commit messages. I like that there's a TODO on one of your packages to upstream a patch: It's important to make sure all distros benefit, not just Arch! I love that you have comments telling *why* you do something out of the ordinary instead of randomly doing something with no explanation. It's worth noting that only two packages have been maintained for more than a month; The rest of your packages were adopted/created only recently! I guess if you've had good commits, good adherence, and good community engagement, there's not much else to "prove". -------------- next part -------------- A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Aur-general mailing list -- aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org To unsubscribe send an email to aur-general-leave(a)lists.archlinux.org ------------------------------ End of Aur-general Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4 *****************************************

2 1

Re: Application as Trusted User
by Anton Hvornum 06 Apr '23

06 Apr '23

Addendum! On 3/14/23 12:29, Anton Hvornum wrote: > Hi! > > I hereby apply to become a Trusted User! > According to ChatGPT3 becoming a TU is like becoming a wizard, I will > learn how to cast complex spells on package bugs and conjure releases. > And apparently I get to wear a robe too so sign me up! > > I have the following sponsors: > > * Artafinde > * dvzrv (David will happily let someone else sponsor if they feel > like it tho) dvzrv hands over the torch to alerque to distribute the sponsorships more evenly. So new sponsor list is: * Artafinde * alerque > > My involvement spans mostly across maintaining archinstall, but I also > have a finger in archweb, repod, archiso, mkinitcpio and lately I've > become a mirror admin. So I'm getting pretty well rounded. Some links to profiles, ongoing projects and involvements: * GitHub: https://github.com/Torxed/ * GitLab: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/torxed * Archinstall: https://github.com/archlinux/archinstall * Flyspray/Bugs: https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/15638 * AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archinstall-git (I have a few others that I've cleaned out as they were my very first AUR packages that never gained popularity) * ArchISO: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archiso/-/merge_requests/251 * mkinitcpio: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/mkinitcpio/mkinitcpio-archiso/-/merg… & https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/mkinitcpio/mkinitcpio-archiso/-/merg… * repod: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/repod/-/merge_requests?scope=all&sta… (Mainly contributed in terms of PR reviews and participating in developer discussions) Aside from the above, I'm also active on BBS forum, IRC, Reddit, Discord and Matrix in various channels. I mainly run all the archinstall related channels and servers. But I'm subscribed to more or less all the mailing lists, but specifically `arch-general`, `arch-mirrors` and `arch-projects`. My goal is to ease packaging and bug reports, as of today I have to rely on others to do packaging for projects I maintain and administrate. The main packages I aim to co-maintain the following packages: * python-pyparted (added 2023-03-14) * python * synapse * keycloak * rdesktop * python-* (there's a 50+ list I would like to help out with that I use every day) I'm sure the list will grow, but those are the main ones I have my eye on currently. Overall, I'm a very enthusiastic tech geek and I'm committed to enhance the Arch Linux experience further in various ways. I've been an active developer for years, have plenty of devops experience as well as a programming and security background. I plan to translate my experience into the Arch Linux echo system as well as offer my support to the community in any way I can. > > I'm aiming to continue the work on the above, but gradually I'll also > help out with testing and packaging of Python libraries. > > //Anton "Torxed" Hvornum >

6 12

How to change the author of a package's commit？
by ShiZhi Huang 03 Apr '23

03 Apr '23

I recently accidentally used a different computer to submit the patch and the author information is wrong, is there a way to change it? I tried the ` https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3042437/how-to-change-the-commit-author… method, but it gets rejected when git push -f.

2 1