- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] python packages as depends and easy_install
by Storm Dragon 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Hi, I am making a PKGBUILD for p and it requires pypump. Would it be ok to use easy_install-2.7 pypump in a build function or something? I would just make a pypump package, but I cloned the repository, and I'm not really sure where all that stuff goes lol. So, if using easy_install is ok, I'll just take the easy way out. Thanks Storm -- -- Registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.us/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stormdragon2976 ____________________________ < http://www.stormdragon.us/ > ---------------------------- \ / \ //\ \ |\___/| / \// \\ /0 0 \__ / // | \ \ / / \/_/ // | \ \ @_^_@'/ \/_ // | \ \ //_^_/ \/_ // | \ \ ( //) | \/// | \ \ ( / /) _|_ / ) // | \ _\ ( // /) '/,_ _ _/ ( ; -. | _ _\.-~ .-~~~^-. (( / / )) ,-{ _ `-.|.-~-. .~ `. (( // / )) '/\ / ~-. _ .-~ .-~^-. \ (( /// )) `. { } / \ \ (( / )) .----~-.\ \-' .~ \ `. \^-. ///.----..> \ _ -~ `. ^-` ^-_ ///-._ _ _ _ _ _ _}^ - - - - ~ ~-- ,.-~ /.-~

5 10

[aur-general] [rename request] weka
by GSC 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weka/ It should use the latest stable version 3.6.11, instead of current 3.7 branch. Current weka should be renamed to something like weka-devel. Although a previous maintainer states that " The difference between stable and development upstream is pointless, there is no reason not to be using this branch." , there still exist users who want to use a stable package. So a rename is necessary to clarify. And if possible, orphan it as well, several packages of the maintainer are out of date.

1 0

[aur-general] Please Delete pypump2-git
by Storm Dragon 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Hi, I went about this the wrong way the first time around. Please delete pypump2-git. pypump-git handles both versions. thanks, and sorry for the extra file Storm -- -- Registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.us/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Get paid to read email: http://is.gd/feRiB "Serpent's kin, born of sin. Dark within, father of the wolf!" Amon Amarth - Father of the Wolf

2 1

[aur-general] Python Dependancy Issue
by Storm Dragon 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Hi, I have the PKGBUILDs for both p-git and pypump-git. One of the dependancies is something called click. I found python2-click and figured this would be what is needed. However, when the package is installed, the name changes to just python-click. Ichanged the PKGBUILD to depend on python-click which works for the building process, but then, when everything is installed: p Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/p", line 27, in <module> import click ImportError: No module named click So, do I have the wrong library, or is something wrong with the python2-click PKGBUILD? thanks Storm -- -- Registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.us/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Get paid to read email: http://is.gd/feRiB _____ < MOO > ----- \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || ||

4 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Cannot update yaourt and package-query
by Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti 22 Jun '14

22 Jun '14

Hello Viktor, yaourt is a pacman helper and as such it is unsupported. Therefore the appropriate channel to get the help you need is the aur-general mailing list. I'm copying this to them. Good luck! Vitor On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Viktor G <meilenweitvoraus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I can't update yaourt and package-query via pacman -Syu because I get > an error which says the package is broken and there's a problem with > the PGP signature. [1] > > I can ignore this package but I think it's not a good solution. > > What can I do? > > Thanks for your answers. > > -- Vik > > [1]: Original Error (in German): "Datei > /var/cache/pacman/pkg/package-query-1.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz ist > beschädigt (Ungültiges oder beschädigtes Paket (PGP-Signatur)). > Soll die Datei entfernt werden? [J/n]"

2 1

[aur-general] AUR logo
by Özgür Sarıer 22 Jun '14

22 Jun '14

I think that AUR should have a simple logo.It will symbolize the importance and power of the AUR. http://ozgur.bugs3.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/AUR.png The image above is an example for dark backgraunds. -- Özgür Sarıer - Google Profili <https://plus.google.com/105874669126239646891?authuser=0> <https://plus.google.com/105874669126239646891> Isparta - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi https://plus.google.com/105874669126239646891

5 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Jun '14

22 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge and delete Request: e-modules-extra-svn series packages
by Eno Neemous 22 Jun '14

22 Jun '14

Hi, Since enlightenment foundation has fully switched from svn to git, svn version packages for e-modules-extra are useless now, So, please merge e-modules-extra-svn into e-modules-extra-git, and delete e-modules-extra-svn-alternative & e-modules-extra-svn-repacker. Thanks in advance! Cravix

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Jun '14

21 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

2 1

[aur-general] TU orphan ask for eclipse-linuxtools
by Zamarin Arthur 21 Jun '14

21 Jun '14

Hello The package of eclipse-linuxtools <https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/eclipse-linuxtools/> is outdated for a very long time. No mails to the maintainer helped. I would ask to make the package as orphan so I can get owning over it so I can maintain it. Thanks, Arthur Zamarin

2 1

[aur-general] Delete package vinagre-spice
by Muflone 21 Jun '14

21 Jun '14

The package vinagre-spice [1] is outdated and useless as the SPICE protocol is provided by the official package of vinagre [2] in the main repo. Please delete the vinagre-spice [1] package. Muflone [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vinagre-spice/ [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=…

2 1

[aur-general] Wrong Registration
by David Segura M 21 Jun '14

21 Jun '14

I hope this is the correct way to fix the problem .I have attempted to register in the AUR but make a mistake with the email adreess, y entered daviseg at gmail dot com, instead o davidseg at gmail dot com, could that be corrected? -- David Segura M

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Jun '14

20 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thestinger - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Another merge request
by Armin K. 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Hello, Can you please merge intel-dri-git [1] into mesa-git [2]. Maintainer has agreed in the comment section of [1]. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intel-dri-git [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

2 1

[aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request
by sinma 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Hi, I have uploaded a PKGBUILD but I want it to be deleted because I made a mistake about his name. Can you remove it please? Thanks by advance, -- mon site web: hack-libre.org

3 4

[aur-general] Remove/Merge request
by Armin K. 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Hello, Please remove clang-svn [1] package or merge it into llvm-svn [2] because I will shortly upload a split pkgbuild for llvm-svn that also builds clang-svn. I maintain both of them. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clang-svn [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-svn -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

2 1

[aur-general] merge request
by Jeremy Audet 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Please merge ruby-nanoc [1] into nanoc [2]. Nanoc is primarily intended for use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging guidelines, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain both packages. — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nanoc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nanoc/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 10 signoffs 2. bisson - 9 signoffs 3. djgera - 2 signoffs 4. ronald - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: bitscope-dev -> bitscope-dso
by Ente 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Hello please merge the packet: bitscope-dev https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitscope-dev/ into: bitscope-dso https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitscope-dso/ the resulting packet should be: bitscope-dso https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitscope-dso/ Renamed the packet because bitscope-dev is not a developer packet. They both provide the same thing. thx

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete dwm-sprinkles-svn-experimental
by Runiq 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Hello, See subject line, the package is here [1]. The upstream SVN branch doesn't exist anymore, and development has moved to Github [2]. Thanks in advance, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dwm-sprinkles-svn-experimental/ [2] https://github.com/0mark/dwm-fork-experiMental

2 2

[aur-general] Merge requesrt: hdf5-wfortran and hdf5-fortran-cxx
by Quan Guo 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the package hdf5-fortran-cxx[1]. Another package hdf5-wfortran[2] which is the same to the package hdf5-fortran-cxx now is orphaned and out-of-date. Since there are two packages are doing the same thing, I would like to request to merge them. Thank you very much. Best regards, Quan Guo [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hdf5-fortran-cxx/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hdf5-wfortran/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-7 (i686) * bbswitch-0.8-11 (i686) * r8168-8.038.00-6 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-5 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-49 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-29 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-5 (i686) * acpi_call-1.1.0-7 (x86_64) * bbswitch-0.8-11 (x86_64) * r8168-8.038.00-6 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-5 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-49 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-29 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-49 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-29 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-49 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-29 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 2. anatolik - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-48 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-28 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-48 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-28 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request -- osc-build-archlinux
by Thiago Barroso Perrotta 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

Hi, osc-build-archlinux [1] should be deleted: it is outdated; more than that, it is not needed anymore, since support for this feature is included upstream now (see comments in the package). Anyway, obs-build-git [2] is an up-to-date version of it. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osc-build-archlinux/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obs-build-git/

2 1