- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
by Thiago Barroso Perrotta 10 May '14

10 May '14

Hi, Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts. I'd suggest its removal. Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its removal here, or would this be too cumbersome? [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 May '14

10 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686), since 2014-04-25 * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-04-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Searching a TU to maintain gqrx in [community]
by Dominik Heidler 10 May '14

10 May '14

Hi, I'm currently maintaining gqrx [1] in [aur]. The pkg has 20 votes and I would like to see it in community. It would be really nice if someone would like to maintain it. Now the downside: You would also also need to maintain some dependencies: The GNU Radio source block: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr-osmosdr/ The device drivers: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bladerf/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr-fcdproplus/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackrf/ Some I/Q balancing extansion for gnuradio: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr-iqbal/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gqrx/ - http://gqrx.dk/ regards, Dominik

2 2

[aur-general] Disownment request: gtk2-aqd and gtk3-aqd
by Giuseppe Borzi 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hello, I would like to request disownment of the packages "gtk2-aqd" [1] and "gtk3-aqd" [2] with intetion of taking over maintenance along with the already orphaned "xfce4-macmenu-plugin" [3]. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-04 for gtk2-aqd and since 2013-06-17 for gtk3-aqd and is not reachable by email (Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-aqd/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-aqd/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-macmenu-plugin/ Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 May '14

09 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (i686) * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] package removal request: ktsuss-svn
by Valere Monseur 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hi, Here are the info: Package name: ktsuss-svn Package url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktsuss-svn/ Reason for deletion: development has moved to github. I have created the package ktsuss-git for that purpose. Cheers, Valère

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Rick 08 May '14

08 May '14

Hi, Can I please get [1] 'dkms-8192cu <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-8192cu/>' merged in to [2] '8192cu-dkms <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/8192cu-dkms/>'. Upstream changed names, just following suit. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-8192cu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/8192cu-dkms/ Regards, Rick

3 5

[aur-general] Notify by e-mail when PKGBUILD updated by maintainer?
by Amish 08 May '14

08 May '14

Hello, I went to through this AUR wiki page but did not get the answer. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR Is there a way to get notified when "Maintainer" updates new PKGBUILD? We already have way to notify for new comments on AUR package. So possibly it would be easy to extend that without much coding and send notification when new PKGBUILD is uploaded. New Comment => send e-mail to those who subscribed for comments New Update => send e-mail to those who voted AND subscribed for comments (or we can have a link called "Notify of new update") In my opinion getting notified for Update is more important than getting notified for comments. I see similar discussion on Google around 2012, but I really am surprised that not many have asked for this feature which I thought should be a basic need. :) PS: I am not looking for solution like pkgbuild-watch. I am looking for option on AUR itself. Thanks, Amish.

9 14

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 May '14

08 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. anatolik - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal : check-kernel
by Damien 08 May '14

08 May '14

Hi This script [1] is orphan and no longer works. I suggest deleting this pkgbuild. Thanks [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/check-kernel

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: bacula
by Steven Haigh 08 May '14

08 May '14

Hi guys, I'm trying to take back the bacula AUR package to continue maintaining. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bacula/ I am the submitter of the original AUR package: Submitter: CRCinAU I am listed as a maintainer in the PKGBUILD file: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ba/bacula/PKGBUILD # Maintainers: Steven Haigh <netwiz(a)crc.id.au> # goll <adrian.goll+aur[at]gmail> I have tried contacting goll to update the package, but have not heard a response for some time (and a few revisions). I hereby request that either the package be orphaned so I can pick it up and update it in future, or the maintainer be changed by to myself (ie the submitter). Thanks. -- Steven Haigh Email: netwiz(a)crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 Fax: (03) 8338 0299

2 2

[aur-general] Retake control of AUR package?
by Steven Haigh 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hi guys, I dropped the bacula package for goll to take over - but it seems I've had much more free time to work on this and haven't been able to get him to update the package on AUR... I submitted the package in the first place. Is there a way to take it over again to keep it updated? -- Steven Haigh Email: netwiz(a)crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 Fax: (03) 8338 0299

3 5

[aur-general] Merge request
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 07 May '14

07 May '14

Please merge light-table into lighttable: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lighttable/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/light-table/ The latter only exists because the former was out of date (and it seems nobody had contacted the previous mainteiner). Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: No, it doesn't make sense. Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply?

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: zfs to zfs-git
by Jesus Alvarez 07 May '14

07 May '14

Packages include: zfs => zfs-git zfs-utils => zfs-utils-git spl => spl-git spl-utils => spl-utils-git Reason: The original zfs packages could not keep up with the default linux kernel in Arch. ZFSonLinux is slow to make official releases and kernel API changes made basing the ZFS packages on the official release impossible without many patches from git. Users that want to continue to use official ZFS releases are encouraged to use the zfs-lts packages in AUR. Thanks, Jesus A. (demizer) Maintainer of the ZFS packages in AUR.

3 9

[aur-general] Can't receive an email after registered at AUR
by Serhii Dovhan 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hello! I registered at AUR a few month ago, but I didn't receive an email from AUR. My email provider is gmail.com. I was search the mail in my "spam" folder, etc. I was try to use the URL for resetting password: https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/. It doesn't help. I find the mail from user with same problem, this is last message in conversation with him: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur -general/2014-February/027214.html. Thanks for your attention. -- С уважением, Сергей.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 May '14

07 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * scala-2.11.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Submit request - Package c-icap - Update
by Amish 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hello, This is regarding c-icap package in AUR which is now outdated. Latest upstream version is 0.3.3 but version in AUR is 0.2.6 (Not updated since 2013-10-26) Also the upstream package is now split in to two packages, called c-icap and c-icap-modules. I have already submitted new package called, c-icap-modules in AUR https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/c-icap-modules/ This module package however depends on latest c-icap. I already have PKGBUILD file for same. So, I would like to request the permission to update c-icap package So please allow access to same. My AUR user id = amish Thank you Amish.

4 5

[aur-general] Merge request
by Justin Dray 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hi, Can I please get [1] 'sickbeard-tvrage-git' merged in to [2] 'sickrage-git'. Upstream changed names, just following suit. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sickbeard-tvrage-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sickrage-git/ Regards, Justin Dray E: justin(a)dray.be M: 0433348284

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: ii-git
by Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay 06 May '14

06 May '14

Some comments were made about a year ago on its AUR page and are not addressed. I sent an email to the maintainer a week ago and have not received a response. I would like to update the PKGBUILD and maintain it. Thank you jpgg

1 0

[aur-general] Duplicate MIT/GNU Scheme packages
by Gulshan Singh 06 May '14

06 May '14

I see two MIT/GNU Scheme packages in the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mit_gnu_scheme/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mit-scheme/ I don't see any difference between them. Should one be removed?

2 1

[aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana
by Miodrag Tokić 06 May '14

06 May '14

Hi, I would like to request disownment of the package "eclipse-aptana" [1] with intetion of taking over maintenance. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-22 and is not reachable by email (Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender). I belive you can also disown all the other packages by "michael.manley" [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-aptana [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=michael.manley&SeB=m Thanks, -- Miodrag Tokić | loonies.io

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 May '14

06 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * salt-2014.1.4-1 (any) * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) * mailman-2.1.18-1 (i686) * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) * mailman-2.1.18-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * salt-2014.1.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * scala-2.11.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 May '14

05 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * tinyserial-20090305-2 (i686) * tinyserial-20090305-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * scala-2.11.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tinyserial-20090305-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tinyserial-20090305-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686), since 2014-04-11 * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64), since 2014-04-11 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request: tengine-dev to tengine
by Allen Zhong 05 May '14

05 May '14

Hi all, It's been a while that I maintain both tengine and tengine-dev, but tengine's development release (now 2.0.2, updated to nginx 1.4.6) is quite stable as there's no need to maintain both packages.(the tengine package is quite out-of-date, now 1.5.2 updated to nginx 1.2.9) So please merge tengine-dev to tengine, I'm planning to submit a new tengine-extra package for some extra features. Regards, -- Allen Zhong North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering Monitoring Engineer (Intern) at Alibaba Group

2 1

[aur-general] Delete Request
by Lara Maia 04 May '14

04 May '14

Delete xdg-settings [1]. The package is not usefull anymore, this is now provided by xdg-utils. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xdg-settings/ -- ~ *Lara* ~

2 1