- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Blazej 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Please remove rainlendar-x64_86-beta pkg, rainlendar-beta covers now both arch. Blasse

2 1

[aur-general] please disown libvorbis-aotuv
by revel 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Hello, The AUR package libvorbis-aotuv http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6155 has been flagged out of date for at least half a year now. I am willing to take over it. -- revel

2 1

[aur-general] Codeblocks vanished from AUR
by stefan-husmann＠t-online.de 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Hello, the package codeblocks I maintain in Community vanished. I am quite sure this happened not long ago, maybe yesterday ore the day before. The x86_64 package still shows up on Pierre's package list on archlinux.de, but the i686 package does not. Also the AUR comment page is gone. Now someone uploaded codeblocks again to AUR. What should I do? Regards Stefan

3 4

[aur-general] Package Removal Request
by Jonathan Wiersma 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Please remove the following packages from AUR: freeciv-gtk eclipse-pdt-integration eclipse33-xerces Reasons: Now that the freeciv in extra is being updated, freeciv-gtk is a duplicate. eclipse-pdt-integration is a duplcate of eclipse-pdt since it has been updated. eclipse33-xerces is included in eclipse33-wsdl4j and no longer needed. Thanks, Jonathan Wiersma

2 1

[aur-general] Remove package "capifax"
by Bernhard Walle 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Hi, please remove the package "capifax" because it's not needed any more. "ffgtk" needs "libcapifax" and that needs "libcapi20". Regards, Bernhard

2 1

[aur-general] libmtp
by Jens Maucher 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Hi folks libmtp is in [extra] Why is this package in AUR too? Regards -- Jens 'defcon' Maucher

5 5

[aur-general] Remove package amarok-rc1
by Simon Legner 21 Dec '08

21 Dec '08

Hi, please remove the AUR package »amarok-rc1« since it is outdated. Thanks in advance! simon

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove firefox-spookyet package
by Blazej 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

Package was renamed to firefox-pgo, as it is just a pgo with little modifications in mozconfig. Blasse

2 1

[aur-general] Is Arch64 community repo broken?
by Giovanni Scafora 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

Hi, I guess that arch64 repo is broken. Can someone check out what's wrong? Thanks. -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR & Pacman Italian Translations Microdia Developer http://www.archlinux.it

3 2

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Lukáš Jirkovský 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

Hi, can somebody remove package blender-yafaray (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14177)? Yaf(a)Ray no longer needs patched blender for running. Regards Lukas "stativ" Jirkovsky

2 1

[aur-general] transmission-web removing request
by Артем Смирнов 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

Hi, please remove package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21844, because it included in transmission-cli in now. Thanks. -- Artyom

2 1

[aur-general] TU Removal - Bob Finch
by Allan McRae 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

Hi TUs, Bob deleted all his packages from the AUR using his Trusted User powers. This is in complete violation of the principle behind the restriction that only Trusted Users can delete packages from the AUR and I believe is enough to warrant the removal of Bob as a TU. As you would have seen in previous threads, Bob has removed all his packages from [community] and apparently intends to resign anyway. Given the absence of official resignation, I am starting the discussion period now. It appears his CVS access has already been removed by someone else and I have drop his privileges on the AUR for the period of this discussion/vote. Allan

10 32

[aur-general] packages to remove
by kasa 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

Could someone remove these packages: libnetworkmanager-svn networkmanager-svn gnome-network-manager-svn Recently NetworkManager switched to git on freedesktop.org and gnome-network-manager was renamed (in testing) in network-manager-applet let me know if I have to orphan them. Thanks, -- kasa

2 1

[aur-general] inactive period
by Imanol Celaya 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Well, I'll be inactive from the 26th of December till the 9th of January because of holidays Greetings, Imanol

3 2

[aur-general] Packages
by Jens Maucher 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Hello is flashplugin-mozilla (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18695) the same as flashplugin from [extra]? Regards -- Jens 'defcon' Maucher

5 4

[aur-general] bfinch - Was: [arch-dev-public] pkgstats and repo cleanup
by Allan McRae 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

Daenyth Blank wrote: > Bob (Finch) asked for his community packages to be removed. I wrote a > little script to help with it. It's not documented and has some rough > edges, but it should give you a nice base to hack on. Enjoy :) > Two things here... Did Bob quit as a TU or just pulled all his packages from the repo? And, I do not see many of his old packages in the AUR. e.g. fldigi, fdlog. Is that accidental? Allan

6 9

[aur-general] VirtualBox and 64bit guests
by bardo 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Hi fellow TUs. I'm happy to inform you that the new VirtualBox 2.1.0 finally added support for 64bit guests on 32bit hosts. So if you always sticked to arch32 because of lack of proprietary apps/lack fo time/fear of "those new things"/whatever... now you have no more excuses =) You can start contributing to arch64 today, just install a virtual machine! I'm doing it myself now ;-) Cheers, bardo

2 2

[aur-general] 2 same packages in AUR
by Jens Maucher 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

In AUR exists two packages thar are the same. perl-wx http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13033 wxperl http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5645 Best Regards, -- Jens 'defcon' Maucher

2 1

[aur-general] orphan request : python-webpy
by Thomas SARBONI 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Hi, python-webpy is out-to-date for 15 days, can i adopt it ... and update it ? It's important because the last release is python 2.6 compliant. Thank you. -- Thomas SARBONI April -promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre- Aujourd'hui, Mercredi 17 Décembre 2008, il y a 3678 adhérents à l'April. Et vous, où en êtes vous ? http://www.april.org/adherer?referent=Thomas+Sarboni

3 5

[aur-general] #10674
by Jens Maucher 18 Dec '08

18 Dec '08

Hello, what do you think the feature request (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10674) will be entered? Maybe as present on x-mas? :-) Best regards, Jens

4 5

[aur-general] Testmail
by Jens Maucher 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Testmail.. Don't answer. Thanks,

1 0

[aur-general] suggestion
by Jens Maucher 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Hi folks, After adding a comment to a packet i get "Comment has been added. " Well, i miss a button like "back" or something. Click on the 'Back'-button and press F5 is in my opinion silly. Best regards, Jens aka defcon

2 2

[aur-general] AUR Suggestion
by Jens Maucher 17 Dec '08

17 Dec '08

Hi folks, After adding a comment to a packet i get "Comment has been added. " Well, i miss a button like "back" or something. Click on the 'Back'-button and press F5 is in my opinion silly. Best regards, Jens aka defcon

1 0

[aur-general] glib docs package
by Bráulio Barros de Oliveira 16 Dec '08

16 Dec '08

Hello, I would to know the name, if there is, of the package for the glib documentation, cause it is not included in the official repositories (or I cannot find it) neither included into gtk docs. Regards, bráulio

2 2

[aur-general] Voting period - Rules governing packages entering [community]
by Allan McRae 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Hi TUs, This starts the seven day voting period for the proposed rules for packages entering the [community] repo. Voting is being done on the AUR interface, last 7 days and will require a quorum of 75%. For your reference: [proposal] * Only "popular" packages may enter the repo, as defined by 1% usage from pkgstats or 10 votes on the AUR. * Automatic exceptions to this rule are: - i18n packages - accessibility packages - drivers - dependencies of packages who satisfy the definition of popular, including makedeps and optdeps - packages that are part of a collection and are intended to be distributed together, provided a part of this collection satisfies the definition of popular * Any additions not covered by the above criteria must first be proposed on the aur-general mailing list, explaining the reason for the exemption (e.g. renamed package, new package). The agreement of three other TUs is required for the package to be accepted into [community]. Proposed additions from TUs with large numbers of "non-popular" packages are more likely to be rejected. * TUs are strongly encouraged to move packages they currently maintain from [community] if they have low usage. No enforcement will be made, although resigning TUs packages may be filtered before adoption can occur. [end proposal] Allan

5 9