- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Orphan request for awib & ascii-invaders
by Baptiste 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Hello, I would like to adopt ascii-invaders [1] and awib [2]. I had proposed some changes to the PKGBUILD back in January, but the current maintainer of both packages (Phrodo_00 [3]) didn't show any sign of life since then. Changes include a python -> python2 patch and a new upstream release for awib [2]. Thanks, Baptiste PS: CC-ing this to Phrodo_00 [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7730 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=1707 -- "C'est mieux, mais il y a plus cher ailleurs" : ____ _ _ _ _ ___ _ / ___| \ | | | | | / / | (_)_ __ _ ___ __ | | _| \| | | | |/ /| | | | '_ \| | | \ \/ / | |_| | |\ | |_| / / | |___| | | | | |_| |> < \____|_| \_|\___/_/ |_____|_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ GNU/Linux fan && Archlinux user

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: btrfs-progs
by Estêvão 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

This package [1] is now available in [core] as btrfs-progs-unstable. [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15635 Thanks. -- Estêvão Valadão

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: mencoder
by Estêvão 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Please delete mencoder [1], now it's available in [extra]. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21282 -- Estêvão Valadão

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request for xfce-menu-edit
by Heiko Baums 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

xfce-menu-edit is obsolete. It doesn't compile anymore, doesn't work with Xfce 4.8 anyway and is orphaned. So I guess it should be removed from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39370 See also the last maintainer's comment in AUR. Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request: e17-full-svn
by Calimero 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Hello, Could you remove e17-full-svn? It has become absolutely impossible to maintain. It needs to be linked to several libraries that are included in the package itself, so a hundred of silly hacks are necessary. I have lost an entire day on it to finally think that it wasn't worth so much effort (and maintainability would be horrible too). All the best

2 1

[aur-general] Delete: mod_bw and mod_macro
by Phillip Smith 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Could someone please delete "mod_bw" and "mod_macro" as I have renamed them to have the "apache-" prefix. Thx, ~p

2 1

[aur-general] Package Guidelines: Naming of Apache mods
by Phillip Smith 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Hi all, My Google-fu has turned up nothing on this this. Is there a preferred standard for naming packages of Apache mods? I see everything in [extra] is just "mod_name" but some AUR packages are "apache-mod_name" Personally I prefer the "apache-mod_name" form, but I take the format of [extra] to be the official word? It doesn't seem to have been discussed before (as best I can find in my searching) so thought I would raise it. I have packages in AUR using both formats and I want to bring them in line with "the right way", whichever that is ;) Cheers, ~p

5 4

[aur-general] Remove gnome-panel-no-limit-places-menu
by Simon Legner 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Please consider to remove gnome-panel-no-limit-places-menu [1] as it is completely out-dated. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39415

1 0

[aur-general] pyopengl packages
by Michael Schubert 29 Jun '11

29 Jun '11

Dear TUs, Currently, there are 3 pyopengl packages in community and AUR: [1] python-opengl (python2): http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-opengl/ [2] python-pyopengl (python3): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7798 [3] python3-pyopengl (python3): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45322 I just adopted and updated python-pyopengl without realizing that there is a python3 version already in AUR. As the package itself is called "OpenGL", I think that the correct name in community would be python2-opengl and the one in AUR python-opengl (according to the naming standards). Either way, there are now 2 packages for python(3)-opengl in AUR, please delete whatever you think is the better choice. Thank you. Michael

2 1

[aur-general] Provide update in AUR to extra package as a dependency of my package?
by Leif Warner 29 Jun '11

29 Jun '11

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the 4store package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33807 It's been blocked from being upgraded for a while now by a lack up upgrades to the rasqal package in extra. Would it be permissible to provided an updated rasqal version on AUR for people who want to run a recent version of 4store? Another of its dependencies, raptor, which is maintained in step with rasqal, was updated from raptor1 to raptor2 a while ago, and both are installed concurrently, but there's no similar update for rasqal. -Leif Warner

2 1