July 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Disown Request
by Georg Bremer 29 Jul '12

29 Jul '12

Please disown rosinstall[1]. The maintainer said in the comments, that he disowned it, but did not and did not respond to emails. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46839

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Nicolás de la Torre 29 Jul '12

29 Jul '12

gnome-shell-extension-auto-move-windows-git orphaned - broken, does not build. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48612

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by Nicolás de la Torre 29 Jul '12

29 Jul '12

gnome-shell-extension-activities-button 1.0-1 orphaned, marked ood 30 Sep 2011 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49369 gnome-shell-extension-activities-button-git orphaned, git repo does not work https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53866

1 0

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 28 Jul '12

28 Jul '12

Please merge [1]lib32-udev to [2]lib32-systemd-tools. It is a simplish rename to represent the naming scheme used in repos. (Altought only udev is included in the new package) [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56518 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60231

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Jul '12

28 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fish-2.0b2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fish-2.0b2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs 2. tomegun - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] fish 2.0.0b2 in [community-testing]
by Bartłomiej Piotrowski 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

As you probably know, fish release available in [community] is very old. Code hasn't been updated since 2009. Official website doesn't work currently, but there was the info that development is stalled. Alex Søndergaard suggested switching to Ridiculous Fish' fork[1]. It provides almost identical set of features, but I'm not sure about compatibility, that's why it goes to [community-testing] first. Current release "beta2" is rather pacman unfriendly, but incoming stable release will be versioned as "2.0", so say hello to fish-2.0b2. Happy testing! [1] http://ridiculousfish.com/shell/ -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fish-2.0b2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fish-2.0b2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lfleischer - 7 signoffs 2. stephane - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request
by Schala Zeal 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

I'd like mingw32-sqlite3 and mingw32-sqlite3-static deleted, as the native package is simply 'sqlite', not 'sqlite3'. I will be submitting mingw32-sqlite to reflect this convention. Thanks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53438 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22029

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: ttf-ipaex
by Masato Hashimoto 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Hi, Could you merge ttf-ipaex[1] to otf-ipaexfont[2]? This fonts are actually otf but named *.ttf to avoid a problem on some OSs. I renamed it with the cleanup of PKGBUILD. Thanks [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35078 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61226 -- HASHIMOTO, Masato (ponsfoot)

2 1

[aur-general] Messy packages
by Vinycius Maia 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Today I was creating the package linux-zen, but i noticed that already existed in the aur[1], but check the package i have seen it was git version, then the package should not be linux-zen-git? The same occurs with linux-next[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55162 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55161 I have not yet informed the maintainer about this

3 4