July 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] merge dwarves into pahole
by ohav chochmah 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

Hello, dwarves [0] is orphan, links are outdated, and name is incorrect. Please merge into pahole [1], which is the corrected version. Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24639 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61124

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request: xen
by Luceo Astrum 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

Hi, I'd like to request that xen be orphaned so that I can adopt it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14640 I've contacted the maintainer (revellion) by e-mail yesterday (I know nowhere near the two weeks but believe the rest of this post is relevant). Since the last update in 2011, there have been three serious Xen Security Advisories with patches: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00001.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00003.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00002.html The maintainer has not upgraded the package to support these patches. He also hasn't changed the dependency for 'xz-utils' to 'xz'. The package was marked out of date. Finally, he has not responded on the AUR comments, including two addressed directly to him by 'aaronfitz' and 'fatmike' in January and March respectively. All of the above leads me to believe that he's no longer active. I will update this thread after 2 weeks if he hasn't responded, unless a TU takes the decision that my research is enough to show that the user is not active.

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (i686) * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (i686) * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (x86_64) * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 14 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] A question about building qgis
by Myra Nelson 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

The qgis-trunk package build to this point Scanning dependencies of target synccrsdb ../../output/bin/crssync: error while loading shared libraries: libqgis_core.so.1.9.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [src/crssync/CMakeFiles/synccrsdb] Error 127 make[1]: *** [src/crssync/CMakeFiles/synccrsdb.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 In searching for a solution I found a this solution [ error while loading shared libraries: libqgis_core.so.1.8.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory If you have this error while loading a compiled qgis, you can try this: # get the full lib path, for example "/home/myusername/src/qgis/Quantum-GIS/build/lib/" (no wildcard ~) # copy this path to a new file /etc/ld.so.conf.d/qgis.conf (on Ubuntu distribution. This can change a bit) sudo su echo "/home/myusername/src/qgis/Quantum-GIS/build/lib/" > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/qgis.conf exit # ldconfig sudo ldconfig # verify with ldd ldd /home/myusername/src/qgis/Quantum-GIS/build/bin/qgis | grep "libqgis" ] here -> http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Building_QGIS_from_Source This is one of my weaker areas. Is this the correct solution or is there a better way to do this? I really don't want to f'up my box after successfully negotiating the latest upgrades. Thanks for any assistance. Mya -- Life's fun when your sick and psychotic!

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request
by Dan Vratil 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hi, please merge following packages. I updated them to conform the KDE package policy. google-translate-runner [0] => kdeplasma-runners-google-translate [1] plasma-idos-search [2] => kdeplasma-applets-idos-search [3]. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26685 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61075 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33299 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61074 Thanks Dan -- Dan Vratil www.progdan.cz | dan(a)progdan.cz | Jabber: progdan(a)jabber.cz Fingerprint: 76C9 2F08 5D0D 6F9E 5AD4 2BFD 3A85 0307 F506 5B61

2 1

[aur-general] disown request: esniper
by Bjoern Franke 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hello, I would like to adopt esniper[1], it has been marked out of date since 16.02.2012. Regards Bjoern [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5782 -- xmpp: bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de

4 7

[aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hi, I've recently seen some comments in AUR, where a user points out that X package works well on powerpc/arm. I was wondering what's the general approach given to these architectures on AUR; since AUR is unsupported, is it ok to add these architectures to the PKGBUILD's arch array? If it is ok, is it *advised* to do so when apropriate? Supported architectures should see absolutely no change regarding these packages, and unsupported one will benefit from it. Again, being AUR unsupported anyway, I see nothing bad out of this, but I'd like to know the TU's stance on this, especially since I'm about to install archlinuxppc on one of my laptops. :) Cheers, thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

13 20

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 9 signoffs 2. allan - 8 signoffs 3. tomegun - 8 signoffs 4. eric - 4 signoffs 5. idevolder - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Rename/Merge Request (pythondialog)
by bwr sandman 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hello! I am requesting that the out of date pythondialog package[1] be merged into the new python2-dialog[2]. I contacted the maintainer and he orphaned it[1], so I adopted it. I updated the nomenclature and explicitly use python2. I also made it conform more to the python packaging guidelines in the new package[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2165 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61061 Thank you! -- bwrsandman

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Jul '12

20 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0