March 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [Removal Request]
by Berno Strik 15 Mar '14

15 Mar '14

Please remove[1] and [2]. They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3140cn/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-lpr

1 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Mar '14

15 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * cuda-6.0.26_rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * docker-1:0.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 3 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 3 signoffs 3. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Cannot log in to AUR
by Pablo Alejandro Fiumara 15 Mar '14

15 Mar '14

Hi, I am trying to log in to AUR but cannot do it. It seems there is a problem with my username because I have just resetted my password but it still does not work. What should I do? Thank you very much for your answer! Regards, Fiumara, Pablo Alejandro

2 2

[aur-general] Merge Request: nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres
by Lance Chen 15 Mar '14

15 Mar '14

Hello TUs, Please merge nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres, since the latter provides more understandable name to users. Thank you. nginx-lua-pg is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-pg/ nginx-lua-postgres is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-postgres/ Cheers, Lance Chen

2 1

[aur-general] [Request for disown] mitmproxy-git
by Pyro Devil 14 Mar '14

14 Mar '14

Hi! I hereby formally request the compulsory expropriation of the mitmproxy-git package from its current owner alphazo. ;) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitmproxy-git/ Because the current owner seems not to update this package anymore. I suggested about 2 months ago to replace git describe --tags with git describe --tags | sed -E 's/([^-]*-g)/r\1/;s/-/./g' because the current tag contains a '-' As said the current owner has not updated the package until now. Thanks Pyro Devil

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan deltarpm-git
by Ben Reedy 14 Mar '14

14 Mar '14

Hi, could someone please orphan the deltarpm-git [1] package? I emailed the owner ~1 week ago with no response, and the package has been out of date since October. Cheers, Ben. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deltarpm-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion of jnc64
by qqqqqqqqq9 14 Mar '14

14 Mar '14

Please delete jnc64 from aur, it is a duplicate of jnc. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Mar '14

14 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * cuda-6.0.26_rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * docker-1:0.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 6 signoffs 2. djgera - 3 signoffs 3. ronald - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Quick question about sl
by David Phillips 14 Mar '14

14 Mar '14

Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's got over three hundred votes; is there a reason for it staying out of community? I can understand the viewpoint of it being such a small package that it's not worth the time and space on mirrors, but still? Wow, I'm proof reading this message just now and it sounds more demanding than intended. Cheers all -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Mar '14

13 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * ibus-anthy-1.5.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cuda-6.0.26_rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * docker-1:0.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-anthy-1.5.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 2 signoffs 2. djgera - 2 signoffs 3. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 4. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0