- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Jul '13

14 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Problem with a package maintainer / versioning in the PKGBUILD [ponymix-git]
by Richard Schwab 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

Hi there, today I noticed that there was a newer PKGBUILD for the package ponymix-git available, because I noticed an update in the package on another system. After that I wondered why I didn't see an update notification in cower and noticed that the package version I had installed was recognized as greater version number than the new version. [2013-07-13 16:48] [PACMAN] downgraded ponymix-git (20130329-1 -> 1.2.g60328ca-1) After seeing that I contacted the maintainer and asked him to add an epoch ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#epoch ) to the PKGBUILD to have it recognizing the newer version, but he refused to do so, telling me he'd be aware of how the versions are compared and told me to "complain to every other maintainer on the AUR that their VCS package needs an epoch". https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ponymix-git/ -- Sincerely Richard Schwab

3 2

[aur-general] Merge request [Jul 13]
by Limao Luo 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

Can you please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-acroread-chs/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acroread-chs/ ? The functionality of the former has been added to the latter. Thanks in advance, luolimao

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Armin K. 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

Please remove [1], it's now in [community] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcxx

3 2

[aur-general] OCaml merge
by Florian Dejonckheere 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

Please merge [1] into [2], which follows package guidelines. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ocamlsdl/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ocaml-ocamlsdl/ - Florian

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 102 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (102 total) == * 0ad-a13-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bitcoin-0.8.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * blender-8:2.68.58182-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cclive-0.7.13-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cegui-0.8.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * codeblocks-12.11-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * easystroke-0.6.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * frogatto-1.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gigi-6142-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glom-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gource-0.40-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * librime-0.9.9-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luxrays-1.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luxrender-1.2.1-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mapnik-2.2.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mygui-3.2.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ogre-1.8.1-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openimageio-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdns-3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-0.7.0-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pinot-1.06-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pion-5.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pokerth-1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pycuda-2012.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pyopencl-2013.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-tagpy-0.94.8-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * schroot-1.6.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sdcc-3.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sigil-0.7.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * spring-0.94.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * springlobby-0.169-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.6-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * widelands-17-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wt-3.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * 0ad-a13-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bitcoin-0.8.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * blender-8:2.68.58182-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.7.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cegui-0.8.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * codeblocks-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * easystroke-0.6.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gigi-6142-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gource-0.40-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * librime-0.9.9-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrays-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-1.2.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-2.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mygui-3.2.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.7.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.06-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-5.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pokerth-1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pycuda-2012.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyopencl-2013.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-tagpy-0.94.8-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * schroot-1.6.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sdcc-3.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sigil-0.7.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.94.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * springlobby-0.169-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.6-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request for "avinaptic2"
by Rob 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

Can avinaptic2 please be orphaned so I can take over maintenance. Package has been broken for over a year. I linked to my new working source package in a comment almost a year ago. Thanks, - Rob (aka Korrode)

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: jist
by omega＠mailoo.org 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

Hi, Could you please remove jist [1], the project has been merged into gist [2], so this package is now obsolete. Thank you. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jist/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gist/

2 1

[aur-general] Cannot reset password guillaume.algis at gmail
by Guillaume Algis 12 Jul '13

12 Jul '13

Hi, *This is my first time posting on the arch mailing list, so let me know if I'm doing anything wrong.* I'm trying to reset my password on https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/, but I never receive any mail with the steps to reset the password. I double checked the mail address (guillaume.algis(a)gmail.com) and checked the spam folder, but I don't receive anything. Thank you for your time. -- Guillaume Algis

2 2

[aur-general] Stage2
by Ofir Balas 12 Jul '13

12 Jul '13

Could someone orphan this package please: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stage2/ The PKGBUILD is deprecated and the source address is wrong now. <3

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request
by Xavier D. 12 Jul '13

12 Jul '13

Yop, Could you merge dahdi-tools (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dahdi-tools/) in dahdi (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dahdi/) as dahdi-tools is now included in dahdi ? Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Jul '13

12 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 90 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 102 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (90 total) == * 0ad-a13-5 (i686) * bitcoin-0.8.3-2 (i686) * blender-8:2.68.58182-1 (i686) * cclive-0.7.13-2 (i686) * cegui-0.8.2-2 (i686) * codeblocks-12.11-3 (i686) * easystroke-0.6.0-3 (i686) * electricsheep-2.7b33-9 (i686) * encfs-1.7.4-11 (i686) * frogatto-1.3.1-3 (i686) * gigi-6142-1 (i686) * glob2-0.9.4.4-19 (i686) * glom-1.24.0-2 (i686) * gnash-0.8.10-9 (i686) * gource-0.40-2 (i686) * gpsdrive-2.11-19 (i686) * kmymoney-4.6.3-3 (i686) * librime-0.9.9-3 (i686) * luxrays-1.2.1-1 (i686) * luxrender-1.2.1-5 (i686) * mapnik-2.2.0-3 (i686) * mongodb-2.4.5-2 (i686) * mygui-3.2.0-6 (i686) * ogre-1.8.1-5 (i686) * openimageio-1.2.0-1 (i686) * openshadinglanguage-1.3.3-2 (i686) * pdns-3.3-2 (i686) * performous-0.7.0-8 (i686) * pingus-0.7.6-9 (i686) * pinot-1.06-1 (i686) * pion-5.0.2-1 (i686) * pokerth-1.0.1-2 (i686) * povray-3.7.0.RC7-1 (i686) * python-pycuda-2012.1-4 (i686) * python-pyopencl-2013.1-1 (i686) * python2-tagpy-0.94.8-4 (i686) * schroot-1.6.5-3 (i686) * sdcc-3.3.0-2 (i686) * sigil-0.7.2-2 (i686) * spring-0.94.1-3 (i686) * springlobby-0.169-2 (i686) * synfig-0.64.0-4 (i686) * wesnoth-1.10.6-6 (i686) * widelands-17-8 (i686) * wt-3.3.0-2 (i686) * 0ad-a13-5 (x86_64) * bitcoin-0.8.3-2 (x86_64) * blender-8:2.68.58182-1 (x86_64) * cclive-0.7.13-2 (x86_64) * cegui-0.8.2-2 (x86_64) * codeblocks-12.11-3 (x86_64) * easystroke-0.6.0-3 (x86_64) * electricsheep-2.7b33-9 (x86_64) * encfs-1.7.4-11 (x86_64) * frogatto-1.3.1-3 (x86_64) * gigi-6142-1 (x86_64) * glob2-0.9.4.4-19 (x86_64) * glom-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) * gnash-0.8.10-9 (x86_64) * gource-0.40-2 (x86_64) * gpsdrive-2.11-19 (x86_64) * kmymoney-4.6.3-3 (x86_64) * librime-0.9.9-3 (x86_64) * luxrays-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) * luxrender-1.2.1-5 (x86_64) * mapnik-2.2.0-3 (x86_64) * mongodb-2.4.5-2 (x86_64) * mygui-3.2.0-6 (x86_64) * ogre-1.8.1-5 (x86_64) * openimageio-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) * openshadinglanguage-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) * pdns-3.3-2 (x86_64) * performous-0.7.0-8 (x86_64) * pingus-0.7.6-9 (x86_64) * pinot-1.06-1 (x86_64) * pion-5.0.2-1 (x86_64) * pokerth-1.0.1-2 (x86_64) * povray-3.7.0.RC7-1 (x86_64) * python-pycuda-2012.1-4 (x86_64) * python-pyopencl-2013.1-1 (x86_64) * python2-tagpy-0.94.8-4 (x86_64) * schroot-1.6.5-3 (x86_64) * sdcc-3.3.0-2 (x86_64) * sigil-0.7.2-2 (x86_64) * spring-0.94.1-3 (x86_64) * springlobby-0.169-2 (x86_64) * synfig-0.64.0-4 (x86_64) * wesnoth-1.10.6-6 (x86_64) * widelands-17-8 (x86_64) * wt-3.3.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (102 total) == * 0ad-a13-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bitcoin-0.8.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * blender-8:2.68.58182-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cclive-0.7.13-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cegui-0.8.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * codeblocks-12.11-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * easystroke-0.6.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * frogatto-1.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gigi-6142-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glom-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gource-0.40-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * librime-0.9.9-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luxrays-1.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luxrender-1.2.1-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mapnik-2.2.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mygui-3.2.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ogre-1.8.1-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openimageio-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdns-3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-0.7.0-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pinot-1.06-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pion-5.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pokerth-1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pycuda-2012.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pyopencl-2013.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-tagpy-0.94.8-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * schroot-1.6.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sdcc-3.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sigil-0.7.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * spring-0.94.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * springlobby-0.169-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.6-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * widelands-17-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wt-3.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * 0ad-a13-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bitcoin-0.8.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * blender-8:2.68.58182-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.7.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cegui-0.8.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * codeblocks-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * easystroke-0.6.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gigi-6142-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gource-0.40-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * librime-0.9.9-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrays-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-1.2.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-2.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mygui-3.2.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.7.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.06-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-5.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pokerth-1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pycuda-2012.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyopencl-2013.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-tagpy-0.94.8-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * schroot-1.6.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sdcc-3.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sigil-0.7.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.94.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * springlobby-0.169-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.6-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 7 signoffs 2. thomas - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package deletion requests: perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish and perl-rdf-trineshortcuts
by Jason St. John 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish has a source that 404s, and its CPAN page has been deleted. -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish/ -- http://search.cpan.org/search?query=rdf%3A%3Avcard&mode=all perl-rdf-trineshortcuts has the same issues. -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-rdf-trineshortcuts/ -- http://search.cpan.org/search?m=dist&q=RDF-TrineShortcuts Jason

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests: lightzone-free
by N30N 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

This package[1] is no longer needed as the software has been open-sourced and is available via the lightzone package[2]. So I'm requesting it's removal. Thanks, N30N. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightzone-free/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightzone/

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: Lightzone
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi everyone, since LightZone is now OpenSource and Free I think this version[1] should be merged into this[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightzone-free/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightzone/ Thanks, Edoardo

3 3

[aur-general] Disown request: perl-graphviz
by Jason St. John 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

perl-graphviz[1] has been flagged out-of-date with a 404'd source for over a year. Please disown it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-graphviz/ Jason

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: udev logitech
by Diego Principe 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi TUs! please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udev-logitech-unifyng-git/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udev-logitech-unifying-git/ Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Diego Principe 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

I make a mess. Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udev-logitech/ Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: libgit2-glib
by Gary van der Merwe 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

I uploaded libgit2-glib, but it is now in extra. (There is also a libgit2-glib-git) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgit2-glib/ Thanks, Gary

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request: glib-git -> glib2-git
by Gary van der Merwe 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi It seems glib-git duplicates glib2-git (glib-git does not build glib1.) Please could we merge glib-git -> glib2-git to avoid confusion. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glib-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glib2-git/ Thanks, Gary

2 1

[aur-general] Fw: Merge request
by Stefan Husmann 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hello, please merge gdl-svn (repo does not exist) into gdl-git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gdl-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gdl-git/ Best Regards Stefan

5 7

[aur-general] Merge request for SuperTuxKart
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi everyone, as you can see from the comment, this[1] can be merged into this[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/supertuxkart-cmakesvn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/supertuxkart-svn/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request dexter-bzr
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi everyone, this[1] is an old, developement version (not developed anymore under this name) of this[2] therefore I think it should be removed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dexter-bzr/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dexter-contacts-bzr/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: qu
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi everyone, it seems that the source of this packages is not present anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23350 Please remove it. Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi, as the comment suggests, I think these two packages should be merged. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applet-time-keeper/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applets-time-keeper/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: wesnoth-svn
by Rikard Falkeborn 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hello, Since March, wesnoth uses git as vcs and therefore I think the wesnoth-svn package [1] can be deleted (the PKGBUILD was last updated 2010). It has been replaced by wesnoth-git [2]. Is it necessary for the PKGBUILD for wesnoth-git to contain replaces=('wesnoth-svn') (I'm not the maintainer, I'm just curious). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wesnoth-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wesnoth-git/ Best regards, Rikard

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: exfat-git
by Patryk Kowalczyk 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi, Please remove package exfat-git[1] because use illegal source code. Today I read this post: http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?81642-Native-Linux-Kernel-Module-… https://github.com/rxrz/exfat-nofuse/issues/5 Before I didn't know it. best regards, Patryk [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat-git/ -- Patryk Kowalczyk <patryk(a)kowalczyk.ws> GnuPG fingerprint: 9283 2CD2 A703 6735 CD79 567F 6CE9 859D AF28 424C

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: perl-xml-xpathengine
by Patryk Kowalczyk 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi, perl-xml-xpathengine [1] hasn't been updated year. is broken and depend to virt-v2v ("Convert a guest to use KVM (support esx, virtualbox, kvm, xen)". I sent mail to the current maintainer 3 weeks ago and received no response. best regards, Patryk [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-xml-xpathengine/ -- Patryk Kowalczyk <patryk(a)kowalczyk.ws> GnuPG fingerprint: 9283 2CD2 A703 6735 CD79 567F 6CE9 859D AF28 424C

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: libiscsi
by Patryk Kowalczyk 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi, Please remove libiscsi[1] from aur. Package moved to extra. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libiscsi/ best regards, Patryk -- Patryk Kowalczyk <patryk(a)kowalczyk.ws> homepage: kowalczyk.ws jabber: patryk(a)kowalczyk.ws GnuPG fingerprint: 9283 2CD2 A703 6735 CD79 567F 6CE9 859D AF28 424C

2 1

[aur-general] Deletetion request: skype_dsp_hijacker
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

Hi everyone, yes, I know that we agreed that even old relics should be kept in AUR, but don't you think this[1] is a little too much? Not just for the time passed, but also for its (in)utility at the moment... [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/skype_dsp_hijacker/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request: cinnamon-theme-google+
by sh4nks 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

Hey, The cinnamon-theme-google+ theme got deleted on the cinnamon homepage. Could you please delete it from the AUR? The link to the theme: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cinnamon-theme-google%2B/ Thanks! Regards

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for two GTK Themes
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

Hi, following Maxime suggestions, I renamed two of my packages. Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-stepintofreedom/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-step-into-freedom/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-ubuntusunrise/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-ubuntu-sunrise/ Thanks, have a nice day. Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: quodlibet-plugins-hg
by Gary van der Merwe 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

Please delete quodlibet-plugins-hg. I have now include this in quodlibet-hg as a split package. Thanks, Gary

2 2

[aur-general] Are split packages ok for aur.
by Gary van der Merwe 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

Hi Is it OK to submit split packages to aur, using the workaround used by linux-zen (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-zen/PKGBUILD)? This is the PKGBUILD I would like to submit: http://fpaste.org/23879/ Are there any implications that I need to take into account? How do aur helpers handle split packages? (I started reading this bug report to try find the answers: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16394 , but there is much noise and little signal, hence I'm asking here.) Thanks, Gary

2 2

[aur-general] Removal of: quodlibet-pygobject-hg and quodlibet-pygobject-plugins-hg
by Pedro Martinez-Julia 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

Hi, I, as submitter and maintainer, hereby request the removal of: quodlibet-pygobject-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quodlibet-pygobject-hg/ quodlibet-pygobject-plugins-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quodlibet-pygobject-plugins-hg/ The reason for both removals is that they are based on branches which are now merged into the main packages, which already are in [extra]. Thank you very much for your support. Regards, Pedro -- Pedro Martinez-Julia Department of Communication and Information Engineering Faculty of Computer Science University of Murcia Email: pedromj(a)gmail.com, pedromj(a)um.es --------------------------------------------------------- *** Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem ***

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: various gtk-theme
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * perl-gd-2.50-2 (i686) * perl-gd-2.50-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fswebcam-20110717-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * perl-gd-2.50-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sarg-2.3.6-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vnstat-1.11-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fswebcam-20110717-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * perl-gd-2.50-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sarg-2.3.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vnstat-1.11-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove AUR packages
by Svetkin Mikhail 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

Hi, Since I'm a new PKGBUILD creator and learning. I create pkbuild for pymodbus-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pymodbus-git/) but i don't know about ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines#Package_nami…) and then i create second package with other name (python2-modbus-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-modbus-git/) and now i can't delete pymodbus-git. I'm sorry to bother you but could you remove the pymodbus-git( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pymodbus-git/) ?

2 1

[aur-general] Massive orphan request II
by Frank Vanderham 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

>> That list is huge. I can certainly pick up a couple, but some of them look >> horribly outdated; is it an option to delete the ones that haven't been >> updated in - say - 12 months just to bring it down to a manageable number? >> It would be a waste of resources to spend time on a package that nobody is >> using anymore. > I'm afraid it's not possible to remove old and unmaintained packages, > unless e.g. the upstream is dead i.e. the source is missing: > https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-June/023923.html [sorry, accidentally hit Send too soon] Can we create a "zombie / placeholder" status for those packages that need to be kept as Xyne mentions: " Even if the PKGBUILD is an ancient relic from the age of Judd in need of a complete rewrite, we tend to leave them as placeholders." I just don't think it's feasible to maintain all packages that were created once upon a time, since *anyone* can create a package on AUR?

3 2

[aur-general] Massive orphan request II
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

>> That list is huge. I can certainly pick up a couple, but some of them look >> horribly outdated; is it an option to delete the ones that haven't been >> updated in - say - 12 months just to bring it down to a manageable number? >> It would be a waste of resources to spend time on a package that nobody is >> using anymore. > I'm afraid it's not possible to remove old and unmaintained packages, > unless e.g. the upstream is dead i.e. the source is missing: > https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-June/023923.html Can we create a "zombie" status for those

1 0

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

1 1

[aur-general] Merge requeste: A New Start GTK Theme
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi, these two packages should be merged, they offer the same theme. Please merge [1] into [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-theme-anewstart/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-anewstart/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Various merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

2 1

[aur-general] Massive orphan request II
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

>> Karol Blazewicz asked an excellent question. What's next, do you want to >> adopt them? >> > I may adopt a few but not all. I am hoping that by orphaning them, an active > maintainer may pick them up and fix/update them. That list is huge. I can certainly pick up a couple, but some of them look horribly outdated; is it an option to delete the ones that haven't been updated in - say - 12 months just to bring it down to a manageable number? It would be a waste of resources to spend time on a package that nobody is using anymore.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: broadcom-wl-dkms, wireless-bcm43142-dkms, broadcom-wl6-dkms
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

I understand, no problem! I adopted broadcom-wl-dkms. Would the people that had notifications on broadcom-wl-dkms (the one that was accidentally deleted) get those notifications again going forward? Otherwise I'll post something on the forums. Thanks! On Monday, July 08, 2013 07:50:33 Frank Vanderham wrote: > Folks, > > Sorry, as I mentioned in the original request, I needed everything merged > into broadcom-wl-dkms, not broadcom-wl6-dkms, which was one of the packages > to be deleted. Is there a way that this can still be done? Or should I > create a new package called broadcom-wl-dkms and re-merge? > > Packages in question: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl6-dkms/ > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl-dkms/ (had the latest > PKGBUILD but doesn't exist anymore, should have been the "final" one) > > Thanks! Sorry I must had my brain messed up... Restored the latest version of broadcom-wl-dkms and merged the other into it. Please go ahead and adopt the "new" package, thanks and sorry again! Regards, Felix Yan

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: broadcom-wl-dkms, wireless-bcm43142-dkms, broadcom-wl6-dkms
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Folks, Sorry, as I mentioned in the original request, I needed everything merged into broadcom-wl-dkms, not broadcom-wl6-dkms, which was one of the packages to be deleted. Is there a way that this can still be done? Or should I create a new package called broadcom-wl-dkms and re-merge? Packages in question: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl6-dkms/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl-dkms/ (had the latest PKGBUILD but doesn't exist anymore, should have been the "final" one) Thanks! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Felix Yan <felixonmars(a)gmail.com> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" < aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Cc: Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:34:23 +0800 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Merge request: broadcom-wl-dkms, wireless-bcm43142-dkms, broadcom-wl6-dkms On Sunday, July 07, 2013 22:26:20 Frank Vanderham wrote: > Just a friendly reminder of this request I made a couple of days ago: > please let me know if there is info missing or if there is a problem: > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Frank Vanderham <twelve.eighty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > To clean up the naming and confusion around the various DKMS Broadcom > > drivers out on AUR, please perform the following: > > > > * merge the comments, history, etc. from wireless-bcm43142-dkms into > > broadcom-wl-dkms > > * merge the comments, history from broadcom-wl6-dkms into broadcom-wl-dkms > > > > This means that those three packages should now be just one: > > broadcom-wl-dkms. The current PKGBUILD of broadcom-wl-dkms is already the > > latest, so going forward that is the maintained version. Both merged. Please include links to packages next time, thanks! Regards, Felix Yan

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: massif-visualizer
by Christian Bielert 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

massif-visualizer [1] hasn't been updated in 18 months, is broken and has a (working) suggestion to fix it, equally old, sitting there. I've sent a mail to the current maintainer over 2 weeks ago and received no response. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/massif-visualizer/

2 1

[aur-general] pytransmissionrpc deletion
by Cédric Girard 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi, pytransmissionrpc [1] may be removed as it as been replaced by python2-transmissionrpc [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pytransmissionrpc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-transmissionrpc/ Regards -- Cédric Girard

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for Murrine and Ubuntu themes
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I just fixed the name of two of my packages, please merge the old versions: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/murrine-themes-collection/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ubuntu-community-themes/ Into the new ones: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-murrine-collection/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-ubuntu-community/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for Finery GTK
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I already contacted the actual maintainer of gtk-themes-finery[1] and he's ok to merge the package into this one[2] with a better name and the dependencies fixed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-themes-finery/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-finery/ p.s.: also delete this, I made it for a mistake: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/finery-gtk-theme/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for Hope GTK
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi everyone, hope-gtk-theme[1] is a duplicate with less votes and wrong name of gtk-theme-hope[2]. Please merge the former into the latter. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hope-gtk-theme/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-hope/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (i686) * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (i686) * fswebcam-20110717-3 (i686) * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (i686) * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (i686) * perl-gd-2.49-4 (i686) * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (i686) * sarg-2.3.6-3 (i686) * vnstat-1.11-7 (i686) * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (x86_64) * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (x86_64) * fswebcam-20110717-3 (x86_64) * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (x86_64) * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (x86_64) * perl-gd-2.49-4 (x86_64) * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (x86_64) * sarg-2.3.6-3 (x86_64) * vnstat-1.11-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fswebcam-20110717-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * perl-gd-2.49-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sarg-2.3.6-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vnstat-1.11-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apcupsd-3.14.10-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fceux-2.2.1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fswebcam-20110717-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mrtg-2.17.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openlierox-0.58_rc3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * perl-gd-2.49-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sarg-2.3.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vnstat-1.11-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] dropping omniorb to aur
by Laurent Carlier 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

omniorb was a dependency of gambas2, as now gambas2 isn't anymore in community repo, i plan to move it also to unsupported. Currently no packages in our repos are dependeing on omniorb, and i was maintaining only because a dependency of gambas2 Regards, -- Laurent Carlier ArchLinux Developer http://www.archlinux.org

1 1

[aur-general] Forgot username
by Amit Mendapara 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Hi, I have registered on AUR long time ago but I forgot my username. Is it possible to recover my username? As there is no link on aur page for forgotten username but just for password. Regards

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: broadcom-wl-dkms, wireless-bcm43142-dkms, broadcom-wl6-dkms
by Frank Vanderham 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

To clean up the naming and confusion around the various DKMS Broadcom drivers out on AUR, please perform the following: * merge the comments, history, etc. from wireless-bcm43142-dkms into broadcom-wl-dkms * merge the comments, history from broadcom-wl6-dkms into broadcom-wl-dkms This means that those three packages should now be just one: broadcom-wl-dkms. The current PKGBUILD of broadcom-wl-dkms is already the latest, so going forward that is the maintained version. Thanks!

3 3

[aur-general] Disown request for dvtm-git
by Joris Steyn 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

Could the dvtm-git package be orphaned? The package is broken since the 0.9 release - I found no signs of activity for this maintainer and there was no response to e-mail. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dvtm-git/ Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] AUR password recovery / login trouble
by Emil Lundberg 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

Hi, I seem to have lost my password for my AUR login - either that or I actually don't even have a login, I'm not really sure, but my preferred username, "emlun", is in use. I've tried requesting a reminder e-mail to all my e-mail addresses, but none has arrived that shows up in a "(in:all OR in:spam) (arch OR aur)" search in Gmail. If security policies allow, could anyone tell me if the AUR account "emlun" is registered with an e-mail address other than "lundberg.emil(a)gmail.com" or "emlun(a)kth.se"? (Note: I'm not asking "which e-mail it's registered with, only if it is registered with one of those two e-mails or not") Thanks in advance. Emil Lundberg

2 1

[aur-general] Massive orphan request II
by Kevin Vesga 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

7 9

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libkkc-0.2.6-1 (i686) * libkkc-data-0.2.5-1 (i686) * libkkc-0.2.6-1 (x86_64) * libkkc-data-0.2.5-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libkkc-0.2.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libkkc-data-0.2.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libkkc-0.2.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libkkc-data-0.2.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion of package tn5250j-jtopen
by Muflone 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

Hi please delete the tn5250j-jtopen [1] package. I've already uploaded a new package with a better name. thank you in advance [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tn5250j-jtopen/ Muflone

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request - mplayer-mt-lite
by Iru Cai 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

The package mplayer-mt-lite[1] is orphaned, and it's dependency ffmpeg-mt-lite is not available. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mplayer-mt-lite/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Rob Til Freedmen 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

On behalf of the maintainer patryk, I request deletion of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat/ which is a duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat-git/ There are no votes and no comments worth to preserve.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: Songbird
by Diego Principe 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

Hi TUs! Unfortunately Songbird is no longer maintained, it is a dead project. Some time ago it was forked in Nightingale which is still developed. Whereby I propose to merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/songbird-bin/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/songbird-bin64/ IN https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nightingale/ AND https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-songbird-nightly/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/songbird-nightly-bin/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/songbird-svn/ IN https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nightingale-git/ Diego

5 5

[aur-general] Some package deletion requests
by Kevin Vesga 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

I request that linux-lqx-3.1 [1] and xmms-skins [2] be deleted as their source(s) are no longer available. In addition gtranslate [3] should be deleted since it relies on an API that is no longer available hence making it useless. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lqx-3.1/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xmms-skins/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtranslate/

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request: dcron and dcron-git
by gt 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

I would request that the AUR packages dcron and dcron-git be orphaned. dcron has been flagged since one month and I even contacted the maintainer through email on 21st June, but no reply. And, dcron-git too has been flagged since one month, but I haven't tried contacting the author personally.

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request - cacheclean
by member graysky 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cacheclean/ Now that paccache is out, I have deleted the upstream code from my github and my http server. Recommend removing the PKGBUILD from the AUR since I am upstream.

6 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Jul '13

05 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (i686) * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (x86_64) * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 9 signoffs 2. thomas - 5 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs 4. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Looking For A Sponsor
by Iru Cai 05 Jul '13

05 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I'm interested in becoming a TU. I've used Arch for more than a year. Before I used Arch, I had been a Fedora user for about half a year. I also tried some other Linux distros such as Debian,Gentoo, and LFS. I'm now a student in college, and I'm an active participant in the Linux Club of my school. I think I've gained enough knowledge to use Linux proficiently. Now I'm eager to be a contributor to the Linux user group instead of just a user. Arch is my favorite Linux distribution. I've seen the 'Arch is the best' wiki page and forum thread, and I believe that Arch is the best. I submitted my first package to AUR soon after I became an Arch user. Now I have only 18 packages in AUR, and most of them are adopted, but I believe I can do better. As a student in college, I'd like to maintain packages that students need, such as BBS Clients(FQTerm,PCManX,etc.), science tools(gnome-chemistry-utils,some octave packages,etc.). As a member of the Linux Club, I've seen a lot of software Linux users like, which is still in AUR, such as screen-message,debootstrap,etckeeper. I also like to visit websites about Linux, and get to know a lot of new software. I also like to share them with other users. I can write in bash, and familiar with C/C++. I'm also interested in functional programming languages like Scheme and Haskell, though I'm not good at them. I have enough spare time to maintain the packages, and communicate with others in the mailing list. I've read the TU wiki page and TU Bylaws, and I think I met the requirements for becoming a TU. More information about me: I'm 21 years old, studying in Peking University, China, majoring in computer science. Username of AUR,Wiki,Forum,and Bug Tracker: mytbk My AUR packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=mytbk Sincerely Yours, Iru Cai

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Alessio Sergi 05 Jul '13

05 Jul '13

Hi TUs, please delete netbsd-rump-cvs [1]. It's now replaced by netbsd-rump-git [2]. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netbsd-rump-cvs/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netbsd-rump-git/ -- Alessio Sergi

2 1

[aur-general] TU inactivity - Away until July 12
by Balló György 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

Hi, I'll be away until July 12. Feel free to fix or update my packages. -- City-busz Trused User

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: gtk-theme-win7-8
by podhorsky.ksj 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win7-8/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win78/ Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request: battery-applet-4-xfce4
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

Hi everyone, this package is orphaned and won't compile (even after adding HAL as dependecy): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/battery-applet-4-xfce4/ I think it needs to be removed. Thanks, Edoardo

3 3

[aur-general] Dropping of smc and smc-data
by Laurent Carlier 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

smc and smc-data will be moved AUR soon cegui will be updated to last version and smc doesn't support it. Current version is already patched for cegui in community, and upstream hasn't release new smc version for years. Regards -- Laurent Carlier ArchLinux Developer http://www.archlinux.org

1 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I adopted and correct the name for: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mist-redmond-gtk-theme/ Here's the new package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-mist-redmond/ Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

Hi everyone, this package is old (like very, very old): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-cddrive-plugin/ Is orhpaned, there's not upstream developement and there's no source on Xfce website: http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-cddrive-plugin I think it needs to be removed. Thanks, Edoardo

3 3

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

2 1

[aur-general] Merge/removal requests
by Fantix King 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

Hi, Could someone please remove these two: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-x32/ Remove, because the official kernel included it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/virtualbox-modules-x32/ Remove, same reason above. And please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libx32-sqlite3/ merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libx32-sqlite/ following an upstream renaming, and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libx32-blas/ merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libx32-lapack/ because libx32-lapack included libx32-blas. Thanks! BR, Fantix

3 2

[aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Starting work on TeXLive 2013
by Karol Blazewicz 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 09:15:06 Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > The packages are ready but they will tend to install /etc/texmf files > as .pacnew instead of replacing the old ones. When it happens fmtutil > will not unhappy and the things will be unusable until the user > overwrites the old files with the pacnews then re-runs "fmtutil --all" > as root. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Rémy Oudompheng <remyoudompheng(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 2013/7/2 Rashif Ray Rahman <schiv(a)archlinux.org> wrote: >> An official announcement is useful here because it requires user >> intervention. An install message is not appropriate (i.e. not >> sufficient for the problem at hand). >> >> So, yes, if there is no other way to solve this you should post a news >> announcement explaining the reason why this intervention is required >> and the steps to take in order to solve it. > > I think we can try that. I will upload the current version of packages > to [testing]. I don't think it is a common practice to sliently > overwrite files in /etc, but I don't understand why new files get > installed as .pacnew. > > I have tried the upgrade path from a clean Texlive 2012 install and it > does not replace the old files. > > Rémy. .pacnew files get created when the old files have been altered - user edited https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacnew_and_Pacsave_Files#.pacnew I have no idea what /etc/texmf hold and why would one edit them, but if you updated from a clean Texlive 2012 install I guess no edits were made to these files and thus no .pacnew files got created .

1 0

[aur-general] Aggressive deletions?
by enderst 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Not sure how pkgs are checked before deletion but Autoscan was deleted reason was no source. It’s just a broken link: http://autoscan.fr/download_files/autoscan-network-1.50.tar.gz Should be: http://autoscan-network.com/download_files/autoscan-network-1.50.tar.gz Clearly they've changed domains and haven't updated their links. So source is available and binaries for major platforms: http://autoscan-network.com/download/ enderst

3 2

[aur-general] Request transfer of ownership of AUR packages
by Siddhartha Sahu 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi! There are two AUR packages that I'm using personally, and they haven't been updated for a while. I have also indicated so to the maintainers both in comments and using email to their respective email ids (on 9th May) I haven't received any reply yet. I have written the new PKGBUILDs myself so I was wondering if I could take over the maintenance of these two packages? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/verlihub https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/verlihub-git Thanks! Siddhartha (sdh)

4 5

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Jakub Klinkovský 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: yourls-svn
by Florian Bruhin 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Aaand housekeeping done after that one ;) Could you please merge yourls-svn[0] into yourls-git[1], as upstream switched to git? Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yourls-svn/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yourls-git/ -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail www.asciiribbon.org /\ www.the-compiler.org | I love long mails http://email.is-not-s.ms/ Anyone who imagines that all fruits ripen at the same time as the strawberries, knows nothing about grapes. -- Philippus Paracelsus

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: strace-patched
by Florian Bruhin 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hey again, could you please delete strace-patched[0]? The two-digit kernel number fix has landed in extra/strace since 4.8, so this is not needed anymore. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/strace-patched/ Thanks, Florian -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail www.asciiribbon.org /\ www.the-compiler.org | I love long mails http://email.is-not-s.ms/ The three best things about going to school are June, July, and August.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: python-quick2wire
by Florian Bruhin 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Heya, I uploaded python-quick2wire[1], but since it's a git package it should probably be called -git, so I uploaded the new version as python-quick2wire-git[2] -- can someone please merge them? Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-quick2wire/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-quick2wire-git/ -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail www.asciiribbon.org /\ www.the-compiler.org | I love long mails http://email.is-not-s.ms/ The Killer Ducks are coming!!!

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: fdupes-pr
by Florian Bruhin 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Heya, can someone please delete fdupes-pr: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fdupes-pr/ It was a "preview release" (aka beta), now this got released as an normal release and community/fdupes is the newest version, making this package obsolete. Thanks, Florian

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

3 3

[aur-general] [AUR] man-pages-*fr
by Xorg 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi. I think many packages about man-pages in French are outdated. List of packages : - man-pages-fr : v3.03.0 ; last update : 2008-07-18 19:35 ==> the 2013-05-20 at 15:15, I had written a comment to say the package created is empty. - man-pages-extras-fr : v0.8.1 ; last update : 2008-07-18 19:36 ==> the 2013-05-20 at 15:19, I had written a comment to say the package created is empty, too. - man-pages-sup-fr : v20080606 ; last update : 2008-08-19 22:11 ==> PKGBUILD don't have a function package(), so package will be empty too. I have found this (in French, in perkamon-fr directory, README.fr file) : - Christophe Blaess <URL:http://www.blaess.fr/christophe/> : 1996-2005 - Alain Portal <URL:http://manpagesfr.free.fr/> : 2005 - Thomas Huriaux et Denis Barbier <URL:http://po4a.alioth.debian.org/> : 2006-2009 They used po4a for Debian. - Denis Barbier <URL:http://perkamon.alioth.debian.org/> : 2010 Perkamon project, to be not only for Debian. - Denis Barbier <URL:http://www.traduc.org/perkamon/> : since 2011 I think only *man-pages-fr *is useful today, but it need to be based on Perkamon project. Now, man-pages-fr can be found here : https://alioth.debian.org/frs/?group_id=100455&release_id=1879#man-pages-fr… The latest version is man-pages-fr-3.51-1 So I think man-pages-extras-fr and man-pages-sup-fr are very obsolete and deprecated today, but man-pages-fr need an upgrade. Thanks in advance. X0rg

2 4

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi, I created a right-named package for: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-clearlooks-clearlux-theme/ Here it is: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-clearlooks-clearlux/ Please merge the former into the latter. Thanks, Edoardo

2 3

[aur-general] Removal request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/ Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/ since we have this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-116/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 24 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (24 total) == * fcitx-table-extra-0.3.4-1 (any) * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (i686) * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (i686) * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (i686) * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (i686) * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (i686) * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (i686) * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (i686) * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (x86_64) * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (x86_64) * skk-jisyo-20120902-2 (any) * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (i686) * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (i686) * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (i686) * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (i686) * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (x86_64) * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (x86_64) * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (x86_64) * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * fcitx-table-extra-0.3.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-m17n-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-sunpinyin-0.4.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-unikey-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kcm-fcitx-0.4.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * skk-jisyo-20120902-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-kkc-0.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-kkc-1.5.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libkkc-0.2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libkkc-data-0.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, this package[1] is an orphaned version of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elegant-gnome/ therefore I think it should be merged into the latter one. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-elegant-gtk/

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I created a package with the right name for: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-sugarlike-theme/ Please merge it with: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-sugarlike/ Thanks, have a nice day. Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Removal (or merge) request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I can't see the point of this package since it just install a plain Xfce-mixer: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-oss4/ Also: it's orphaned. I think it need to be deleted. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: clerwaita theme
by Diego Principe 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Now is abandoned project... read the comment https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clearwaita-light-gtk-theme/ Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi everyone, the upstream link don't work anymore, I don't think there's a reason to keep this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/somatic-icon-theme/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Merge yukon/seom-svn -> -git
by Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

The upstream Subversion repositories of yukon and seom have disappeared, but seems to be more or less semi-officially continued on GitHub. The -svn packages in AUR were orphaned, so I have adopted those as well as uploaded new -git ones: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yukon-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yukon-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/seom-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/seom-git/ -- Namasté, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/>

2 1

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi everyone, Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/ Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/ since we have this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-116/ Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I fixed the name, the category and adopted this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-theme-mira/ It should be merged into the new and correct one here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-mira/ Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * fcitx-4.2.8-1 (i686) * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (i686) * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (i686) * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (i686) * fcitx-4.2.8-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (i686) * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * fcitx-4.2.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-4.2.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. angvp - 4 signoffs 2. jsteel - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by Evan Teitelman 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Could you please merge 'xsser' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser/) into 'xsser-svn' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser-svn/)? The original 'xsser' package should have been named 'xsser-svn'. The original uploader made a new package called 'xsser-svn' and disowned 'xsser'.

2 1

[aur-general] move split2flac-git to split2flac
by member graysky 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Upstream has finally started tagging releases. Please replace the git package with the standard one I just uploaded. Thanks!

3 2

[aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi everyone, I was wondering why a lot of icon themes in AUR have this "kind" of name: $name-icon-theme. I think it should be better if the guidelines would encourage a cleaner (and IMHO better) format like: icon-theme-$name, just like the gtk-themes in AUR. What do you think? Maybe the guidelines already suggest something like this, I'm just asking since I found A LOT of packages with that "kind" of name. Have a nice day, Edoardo

6 7

[aur-general] Merge/Removal request: thunar
by Diego Principe 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

I believe that is not useful to have a non-maintained and old development version for thunar... I think that they should be merged keeping the git version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-devel/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-git And these are very old and patched version, the second one have a patch that now is upstream https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-notrash/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-smallicons/ Delete it Diego

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion package stegano-git
by Simone Solinas 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi, I ask the deletion of the package *Stegano-git* due to the change of name. -- Simone Solinas

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: nzbget-svn
by Richard Schwab 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi there, I noticed that this packages maintainer seems to be gone, the domain in his mail address seems to be parked. Please orphan the package, I already wrote a new PKGBUILD to upload as soon as I can take it over. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nzbget-svn/ -- Sincerely Richard Schwab

4 3

[aur-general] Merge request: win7-8 theme
by Diego Principe 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/win7-8-theme/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win7-8/ Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: thunar plugins
by Diego Principe 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

Good morning please merge the following outdated devel versions https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-volman-devel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-vfs-devel/ into git versions https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-volman-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-vfs-git/ best regards Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Package Merging Request.
by Jagmjp Janpgm 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

Could orion-gtk-theme be merged into gtk-theme-orion please?

3 3

[aur-general] Merge syslinux-bios-elflink-git and syslinux-efi-git into syslinux-firmware-git
by Keshav Padram 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

Hi, Please merge syslinux-bios-elflink-git [1] and syslinux-efi-git [2] into syslinux-firmware-git [3]. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-bios-elflink-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-efi-git/ [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-firmware-git/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram

3 7

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

Hi everyone, please merge this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-murrine-arch-theme/ into this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-murrine-arch/ Thanks, Edoardo

5 9

[aur-general] Merge request: xnview into xnviewmp
by Diego Principe 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

Please merge xnview https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xnview/ It is an old version (1.70). Has now come to version 2.0 and now is no longer developed for Linux but for Windows only. into xnviewmp which is the new program (the same but upgraded) that is developed for Linux yet. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xnviewmp/ Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: nuoveXT icons
by Diego Principe 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-icons-nuovext/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeicons-nuovext/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nuovext-icon-theme/ Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I created a package with the right name for: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-murrine-spacedust-theme/ Please merge it with: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-murrine-spacedust/ Thanks, have a nice day. Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Jun '13

29 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-4 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-48 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.58-14 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-6 (i686) * r8168-8.035.00-16 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-34 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-25 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-4 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.14-2 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-4 (x86_64) * cdfs-2.6.27-48 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.58-14 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-6 (x86_64) * r8168-8.035.00-16 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-34 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-25 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-4 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.14-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-48 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-16 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.14-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-48 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] delete/merge request
by Rob Til Freedmen 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Please delete orphaned package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vlc-spros-plugin/ It is a duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vlc-rpos-plugin/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vlc-srpos-plugin/ which should be merged to vlc-srpos-plugin/ - the name of the code project I think this one can also be deleted - it is unmaintained, outdated and skins2 is now included in extra/vlc https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vlc-skins2/

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request: nerolinux3
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Hi, the following package won't build (the link is broken) and is orphaned, I think it needs to be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nerolinux3/ Thanks, Edoardo

3 2

[aur-general] Merge request: elementary theme
by Diego Principe 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary-gtk-theme/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-elementary/ because the guidelines suggest to have homogeneous names *Diego*

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request: orion theme
by Diego Principe 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/orion-gtk-theme/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-orion/ because the guidelines suggest to have homogeneous names for gtk-themes *Diego*

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 2 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge requests
by Doug Newgard 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

**MERGE** Enlightenment is switching from SVN to Git. Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/e17-places-svn/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/places-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eweather-svn/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eweather-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libeweather-svn/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libeweather-git/ Thanks Doug Newgard (Scimmia)

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Hi everyone, this project seems dead (maybe replaced by tumbler), there's no source upstream and it's orphaned on AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-audio-thumbnailer/ This package needs to be renamed into something more appropriate like xfce4-remmina-plugin https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/remmina-xfce/ This packages need to be renamed into something more appropriate like gtk-theme-$name: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/abt-gtk-theme/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/adt-gtk-theme/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/abt2-gtk-theme/ Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 3

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I create some right-named packages from orphans with wrong names. Here's the old/wrong list: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm4-theme-candido-redux/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm-oxygen-theme/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm-newwave-theme/ Here's the new/correct ones: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm-theme-candido-redux/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm-theme-oxygen/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm-theme-newwave/ Thanks ;)

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Hi, please merge these packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clearlooks-bluecurve-gtk-theme/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/optimus-gtk-theme/ into these, with a correct name (and with a different category since GTK2 is basically for Xfce now and not for Gnome): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-clearlooks-bluecurve/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-optimus/ Thanks :)

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Francisco Pina Martins 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

I own a package in AUR called hardware-monitor (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hardware-monitor/) It no longer serves any purpose I know of since panel applets have been deprecated, the package no longer builds (due to a new version of automake) and upstream seems to have dropped it. This package can be deleted. Thank you. Francisco Pina Martins

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request: eGTK
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Hi eveyone, elementary-gtk-theme[0] on AUR has many, many, many problems with Archlinux's GTK2 and GTK3 packages. I think that upstream they did not added the support for GTK 3.6 or 3.8. Should we keep it? Have a nice day, Edoardo [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary-gtk-theme/

2 1

[aur-general] Rename Request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I just adopted this package, but it has a wrong name: please change xfce4-theme-axis in xfwm-theme-axis. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-theme-axis/ Have a nice day, Edoardo

3 3

[aur-general] tor-browser-en 2.3.25_10-1 unknown public key
by Ralf Mardorf 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-2.3.25-10-dev-en-US.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 416F061063FEE659) ==> WARNING: Warnings have occurred while verifying the signatures. Please make sure you really trust them.

1 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libpinyin-0.9.93-1 (i686) * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (i686) * libpinyin-0.9.93-1 (x86_64) * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * libpinyin-0.9.93-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge grub-bios-bzr and grub-efi-x86_64-bzr into grub-bzr
by Keshav Padram 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Hi, Please merge grub-bios-bzr [1] and grub-efi-x86_64-bzr [2] into grub-bzr [3]. The grub-bzr pkg matches the consolidated "grub" pkg currently in [core]. I am the current maintainer of grub-efi-x86_64-bzr andn I was the maintainer of grub-bios-bzr for some time. I have informed the current maintainer of grub-bios-bzr via comments about grub-bzr pkg. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grub-bios-bzr/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grub-efi-x86_64-bzr/ [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grub-bzr/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: slim-cursor and slim-plus in slim-git
by Diego Principe 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

slim-cursor https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slim-cursor/ slim-plus https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slim-plus/ ar outdated, no vanilla and poorly documented clones of slim in repo Many of these patch applied now are in upstream Could be possible to merge votes in slim-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slim-git or simply delete slim-cursor and slim-plus *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: textwidth-git
by Bastien Dejean 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Hi, Please remove the following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/textwidth-git Is was renamed to avoid a binary clash with dzen2's gadgets. Greetings, -- b.d (| |) ^ ^

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request - magic-background
by Oon-Ee Ng 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

Personal project of the author that he's lost the sources to (confirmed via email conversation with him). Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/magic-background/

2 1

Re: [aur-general] packages without category
by chillermillerlong 26 Jun '13

26 Jun '13

I guess this is caused by uploading new packages using the burp tool. I'll fix my packages in a little bit. I'm chenxiaolong on the AUR. Sent from my T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S4 -------- Original message -------- From: Diego Principe <cdprincipe(a)gmail.com> Date: 06/26/2013 13:44 (GMT-05:00) To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Subject: Re: [aur-general] packages without category Ok, I'll fix my packages. I'm "Diego" on AUR *Diego* 2013/6/26 Rob Til Freedmen <rob.til.freedman(a)gmail.com> > There are 828 packages from 299 maintainers where category is set to 'none' > - another 209 packages are orphaned. > > orphan - Buce > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=0 > > buhman - gtmanfred > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=250 > > gtmanfred - Perberos > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=500 > > Perberos - yhager > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=750 > > yhager - zosodk69 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=1000 > > full csv list of packages with category=none (no orphaned listed) > http://sprunge.us/Necd > > This top-20 list counting for nearly 50% of the packages > 8 masterkorp > 9 Huulivoide > 9 zootboy > 10 spider-mario > 11 buhman > 11 kevku > 11 nbryskin > 12 eworm > 13 demonicmaniac > 15 crocowhile > 16 Mizuchi > 16 t-8ch > 18 taylorchu > 21 chenxiaolong > 27 Diego > 32 gtmanfred > 33 yhager > 34 StefanHusmann > 35 Perberos > 43 Morfeo > > full csv list maintainers with a count of packages with category=none > http://sprunge.us/BDFD > > I think this has no priority but should be fixed nevertheless. >

4 3

Re: [aur-general] How to contribute to AUR?
by Ralf Mardorf 26 Jun '13

26 Jun '13

Oops, wrong email address. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf mardorf alice-dsl net> To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] How to contribute to AUR? Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:08:00 +0200 Thank you :) On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 19:55 +0200, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote: > Where did you get this PKGBUILD template from? As templates I used https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ja/jack-rack-git/PKGBUILD and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf/xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin/PKGBUILD FWIW there's https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf/xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin-git/PKGBUILD too, but I haven't seen it and I anyway won't contribute with this PKGBUILD, but maybe audio packages. > Moreover, you need a closing brace at the end of > package() I've done this for the original PKGBUILD, it get's lost during copy, paste and editing the email. The original PKGBUILD does work. Regards, Ralf

1 0

[aur-general] How to contribute to AUR?
by Ralf Mardorf 26 Jun '13

26 Jun '13

Hi :) I'm new to this list. I'm uncertain, but perhaps I'll maintain audio packages, however, I've to learn how to do it, so I started with a test PKGBUILD for a non-audio app I wanted to test. IIUC what's written at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards the below example needs just the following changes to become a valid PKGBUILD: - I need to remove the # text lines, or should add useful text - remove # Contributor and add # Maintainer with my real name - should add an URL - if it shouldn't build from git/svn... I need to add a checksum *?* Regards, Ralf $ cat /usr/src/whiskermenu/PKGBUILD # text : ############################################################### # text : PKGBUILD for the first time edited on my tablet PC # text : ############################################################### # Contributor : Batpackager <info.mardorf(a)rocketmail.com> pkgname=xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin-git pkgver=20130626 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Alternate Xfce menu" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') license=('GPL2') makedepends=('git' 'cmake') depends=('xfce4-panel') provides=('xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin') conflicts=('xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin') _gitroot="https://github.com/gottcode/xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin.git" _gitname="xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin" build() { cd "$srcdir" msg "Connecting to https://github.com/gottcode..." if [ -d $_gitname ] ; then cd $_gitname && git pull origin msg "The local files are updated." else git clone --depth 1 $_gitroot fi msg "GIT checkout done or server timeout" msg "Starting make..." rm -rf "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" cp -R "$srcdir/$_gitname" "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" cd "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr make } package() { cd "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install

5 7

[aur-general] Deletion request: owncloud-client-fdo
by Bjoern Franke 26 Jun '13

26 Jun '13

Hi! Please delete owncloud-client-fdo[1], the upstream-version[2] has support for freedesktop-notifications now. regards bjo [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owncloud-client-fdo [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owncloud-client -- xmpp bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 26 Jun '13

26 Jun '13

Package no longer builds (upstream mirror is also gone). Additionally, last upstream release was 3 years ago, and migration to lightning is recomended by the devs. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunbird-branded/ The following two depend on the above mentioned package, and are therefore, deprecated (and unbuildable): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunbrand/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunbird-i18n/ -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete evolution-plugins-experimental
by Oon-Ee Ng 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/evolution-plugins-experimental/ External Editior plugin is now enabled in evolution in the repos I'm the submitter and maintainer.

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request: sbase-hg
by Jakub Klinkovský 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

Please merge sbase-hg into sbase-git, upstream switched to git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sbase-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sbase-git Sorry I missed this to include in the previous request.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Jakub Klinkovský 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: compat-wireless
by Jakub Klinkovský 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

I suggest deleting these packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compat-wireless/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compat-wireless-all/ Both are pretty old, depend on kernel26, and since August 2012 upstream was renamed to compat-drivers (few packages in AUR present).

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: gett-git
by Jakub Klinkovský 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gett-git It has a maintainer, but according to his comment it should be removed.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: subgit-git, subhg-git
by Jakub Klinkovský 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

Please delete these packages (upstream gone, according to comment both packages are deprecated in favor of 'subrepo' package): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subgit-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subhg-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Status of the signoff reports?
by William Giokas 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

All, Just wondering where the signoff reports for the [community-testing] repo went? I've noticed that for a few days I've been getting most aur-general emails, but no signoff reports. Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: xfce-util-git
by Diego Principe 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

Source are gone... I suppose it's been replaced by libxfce4util https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce-utils-git/ *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: python2-quvi-git
by Jakub Klinkovský 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please remove python2-quvi-git [1], upstream is missing and there is python2-libquvi-git from the same submitter. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-quvi-git

2 1

[aur-general] Various request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

3 3

[aur-general] Merge request: fdesktoprecorder into fdesktoprecorder-git
by SpinFlo 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fdesktoprecorder/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fdesktoprecorder-git/ this sources only provides via GIT (like say in comments) greetings

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request: vim-powerline
by Jonas Heinrich 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Hi, please remove this package since the project is discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-powerline/ Best regards, onny

4 4

[aur-general] Orphanage request: faenza-xfce-addon
by Diego Principe 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

I have written many emails to the developer but he never answered me. The package is outofdate from May. Please orphanage it https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faenza-xfce-addon/ *Diego*

1 1

[aur-general] Multiple Removal Request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Hi everyone, here's a little list of package that need to be removed in my opinion. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-appfinder-devel/ is some sort of duplicate and deprecate version of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-appfinder-git/ so it's pretty useless. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-dev-tools-devel/ is some sort of duplicate and deprecate version of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-dev-tools-git/ so it's useless too. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-lock-screen/ is an orphan, deprecated package with few votes and there's no an upstream project. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm-theme-grayrevenge/ is included in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-grayrevenge/. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfdesktop-standalone/ is deprecated and orphaned (and pretty useless IMHO, it just install Xfdesktop). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfprint-devel/ very old package, orphaned and no longer part of Xfce. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Multiple request
by Diego Principe 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

MERGE https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-appfinder-devel/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-appfinder-git/ DELETE https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce-theme-blackbird-mod-mlx/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-lock-screen/

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: marble
by Diego Principe 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marble/ is an outdated clone of kdeedu-marble in extra repository *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: qbittorrent-dev
by Diego Principe 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qbittorrent-dev/ now is useless *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] Various requests
by Karol Blazewicz 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Is it OK to merge (transfer votes) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-classbrowser/ with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-classbrowser-git/ ? The former is missing source and even the website is gone, so I don't know if it's the same software. I asked for removal of other -wz packages and that left https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pplive-wz/ hanging so I guess it makes sense to remove it too. I reqested merging https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eduke32-polymer-hrp/ with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eduke32-hrp/ because according to the comments, the former is obsolete. These packages are not merged, so either they slipped through or there's a reason not to merge them the TU forgot to share :-) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-pdf-viewer/ and others below seem to be candidates for removal but https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/notification_plugin_unread/ says it sometimes makes sense to keep them https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rssyl/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-notification/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-gtkhtml2viewer/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-fancy/ Most of them have maintainers but the sources are gone.

2 2

[aur-general] Rename request: qbittorrent-git-nogui
by Diego Principe 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Please rename in qbittorrent-nogui-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qbittorrent-git-nogui/ *Diego*

2 3

[aur-general] Merge shim-efi-x86_64-git into shim-efi-git
by Keshav Padram 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Hi, Please merge shim-efi-x86_64-git [1] into shim-efi-git [2]. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shim-efi-x86_64-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shim-efi-git/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: aquaria-hib-git -> aquaria-git
by Sam S. 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Hi, Could you please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aquaria-hib-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aquaria-git/ ? I'm the submitter and maintainer of both packages. Reasoning: Currently, aquaria-hib-git takes the proprietary Aquaria game data from the Humble Bundle archive, but replaces some game files and the executable with an improved GPL version compiled from git. Thanks to recent upstream changes to the GPL executable, it has now become possible to separate out the installation of the proprietary game files into their own package ("aquaria-data-hib"). What remains of "aquaria-hib-git" should be called "aquaria-git" to reflect this, so I have re-uploaded it under this new name. Benefits include: - proprietary and GPL stuff is no longer mixed in the same package - no need for users to supply the Humble Bundle game archive again, each time they install a new version of the executable - in the future, "aquaria-data-hib" could be complemented by drop-in alternatives like "aquaria-data-steam", "aquaria-data-demo", ... Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Jakub Klinkovský 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Hi, from [1]: Support for the features in xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink and udlfb from the AUR have been included upstream and are no longer needed. Use the official packages instead. xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink [2] has a maintainer, but udlfb [3] is orphaned, so I think it's fine to remove it. [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DisplayLink [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-fbdev-for-displaylink/ [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udlfb/

2 1

[aur-general] Merge requests
by Sébastien Leduc 22 Jun '13

22 Jun '13

Hello, Could you please merge: python2-pipeline [1] into python2-grapevine [2] and python-pipeline [3] into python-grapevine [4] ? The project changed its name upstream so 'grapevine' replaces 'pipeline'. Thanks. 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pipeline/ 2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-grapevine/ 3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pipeline/ 4: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-grapevine/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Jun '13

22 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-3 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (i686) * r8168-8.035.00-15 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-3 (x86_64) * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (x86_64) * r8168-8.035.00-15 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-3 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-47 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-33 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.12-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Multiple requests
by Karol Blazewicz 21 Jun '13

21 Jun '13

Merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/csv2json/ with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/csv2json-git/notify/ It gets the code from git in both cases, so I guess the author and sumbitter decided to name it properly. Spam by joyoauto Found one more comment: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/boost-build-config What do we do about packages that host binaries in the AUR e.g. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sub32/ , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/evolution-statusicon/ or https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kio-sysinfo/ ? "I am a robot. AUR guidelines suggest to not include binaries." What is the current policy, are a few icons OK?

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 21 Jun '13

21 Jun '13

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 21 Jun '13

21 Jun '13

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Jun '13

21 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 4 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR cleanup policy
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

What's the policy wrt to packages that have been submitted years ago and are neither developed upstream nor maintained in the AUR since then? Just let them be or get rid of them as they're of no use? If there're old unmaintained packages foo and foo-git, is it OK to request removing at least one of them? Which one? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4-bzr/ The PKGBUILD need updating but it still builds and runs so I can pick it up, update and orphan it. I don't know which filetypes does it open (.odp is not recognized) and the editor doesn't work, so you can't create a new presentation from scratch. It's man page is of no help.

6 10

[aur-general] Orphaned and outdated haskell packages
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

There's over 200 packages submitted by arch-haskell that are marked out of date and are not maintained anymore. Some of them have been updated in the past year, so maybe there's no need to remove them, I'm just reporting something I noticed. Some packages were hosting their source on github e.g. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-warp/ and they now returns 404.

4 6

[aur-general] Removal Request
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I found this useless and orphan package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce-utils-4.8.3/ I think it needs to be removed from AUR. Thanks, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Please orphan uefivars-git
by Anatol Pomozov 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi, uefivars-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/uefivars-git/ installs packages into /usr/sbin that is not recommended with the new pacman standard. I notified current maintainer 3 weeks ago and provided fiexed/cleaned PKGBUILD file. The maintainer never responded. Please orphan it. I would like to become the package maintainer, fix the issues and keep supporting the package.

2 2

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

2 1

[aur-general] Multiple requests
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

3 3

[aur-general] Remove Request for xfce4-volstatus-icon
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, there's this package in AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-volstatus-icon/ ) that won't compile, depends on HAL (deprecated) and isn't updated upstream since 2006. I think it should be removed. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Package deletion request: nghost3
by Jonas Heinrich 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hey, unfortunately this project is dead and discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nghost3/ Please remove the packae, thank you! - onny

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicated package for amule-adunanza
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, there's two package that provides amule-adunanza: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amule-adnza/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amule-adunanza/ The first one is the correct one, is updated and maintained, the second one is orphaned and old. The right name of the package is amule-adunanza (like the second one) so after removing "amule-adunanza" the fist package must be renamed into amule-adunanza. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicate package for gtk theme config git
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, there's two packages that provides the same software. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-preferences-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-config-git/ The first one has more votes (11 vs 3), but the second one has the right name (gtk-theme-preferences is wrong) and I know that the maintainer is in constant contact with the developer on Google+. I'd keep the second one, but the coiche is not mine :) Have a nice day, Edoardo

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Duplicate package for Kingsoft Office
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I noticed that there are two packages offering the same software: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kingsoft-office/ (76 votes) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wpsforlinux/ (5 votes) I think we should keep just the first one. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Please merge dupeguru-me packages
by Rob Til Freedmen 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

We have now a native ARCH build of dupeguru-me Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dupeguru-me-bin/ to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dupeguru-me/ Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Multiple requests
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Removal https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prism/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prism-svn/ Google Reader stuff - as Google Reader will be gone shortly, will it make these packages obsolete? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-googlereader/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/conkygooglereader-bzr/ Spam by JOYOAUTO https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-May/023640.html There are at least a few spam comments left https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arbtt/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cnijfilter-mp610/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/Catalyst-hook/ Can you search and remove them or do you need the urls like the ones above?

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

1. 4dtris-git has been renamed by the developer to ntris 2 months ago (see comment in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/4dtris-git/ ). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/4dtris-git/ returns 404 for the source while https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ntris/ looks maintained. Please remove 4dtris-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/4dtris-git/ (no votes, single comment) 2. acpi-handle-hack-lenovo-git and hack-lenovo have become obsolete as the fix has been included upstream - see comments on https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hack-lenovo/ Does it mean both these packages should be removed from the AUR? They need to be updated to work with the current kernel but there seems to be no need for them. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acpi-handle-hack-lenovo-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hack-lenovo/

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal Request] blender2.6-bin
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I think this package ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/blender2.6-bin/ ) should be removed from AUR because it won't install Blender 2.6. Also, there's a package that works and provides Blender 2.6: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/blender2.62-bin/ Have a nice day, Edoardo

3 2

[aur-general] Cinnamon theme packages
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

2 1

[aur-general] merge request: aksusbd
by Andre Bartke 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

You may merge aksusb [1] into aksusbd [2] The latter one is correctly named, is up-to-date and provides a systemd service file instead of initscripts. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aksusb/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aksusbd/

2 1

[aur-general] rtmpdump-svn vs. rtmpdump-git
by Rob Til Freedmen 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

We have these packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-svn/ and both giving the same upstream url: http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/ where it says: Download the source: *git clone git://git.ffmpeg.org/rtmpdump * but both are fairly recently updated... Do they differ or providing different features?

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * libraw-0.15.2-1 (i686) * luminancehdr-2.3.1-3 (i686) * shotwell-0.14.1-4 (i686) * libraw-0.15.2-1 (x86_64) * luminancehdr-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) * shotwell-0.14.1-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * libraw-0.15.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shotwell-0.14.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libraw-0.15.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.14.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Python debug symbols
by Mo0O mo0ofier 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

hello, I have made a PKGBUILD which enable Python debug symbols - http://sprunge.us/gDLL - to enable python debuging with gdb I have two question: - as I only add !strip and debug options in the original PKGBUILD, is it realy relevant to push it on AUR? -I know some python dev who's thinking it could be useful to have python packaged like this, but I want your opinion- - I have named it python2-gdb, is it a good choice ? or maybe you prefer something like: python2-symbols, python2-debug, python2-debug-symbols or python2-debug-gdb? Thanks Mo0O PS: I could make one for Python3 too, if you fell the first one necessary

2 3

[aur-general] Removal request: "consort-panel-marcoscarpetta-git"
by Marco Scarpetta 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

Please remove my pkgbuild for consort-panel-marcoscarpetta-git, the repository doesn't exists more. URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consort-panel-marcoscarpetta-git/ Thanks Marco

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Karol Blazewicz 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

Previous maintainer of kate-syntax-markdown-git orphaned it 3 weeks ago because the syntax patch it provided has been included upstream. I thinks it's OK to remove it https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kate-syntax-markdown-git/

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (i686) * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2:9.2.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 3 signoffs 2. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] deletion of package g95-cocon
by Eduardo Martins Lopes 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

Hello guys, I'd like to request the deletion of g95-cocon from AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g95-cocon/) The original developer deprecated the network console (the software of this package alongside a custom g95 binnary) and therefore, this package is no longer usefull. Thanks in advance, -- Eduardo Martins Lopes

2 1

[aur-general] xmppflask deletion
by Mo0O mo0ofier 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

Hello, I had previously released a package named xmppflask, but according to they installation guide -http://xmppflask.org/intro.html#installation- I have made a second one based on mercurial, and according to AUR's standards I have renamed it xmppflask-hg so, as the first one -xmppflask- is now useless, could you please remove it? thanks in advance Mo0O

2 1

[aur-general] Merge libefivar-git into efivar-git
by Keshav Padram 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Hi, PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efivar-git/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram

2 1

[aur-general] clementine-rc
by Rob Til Freedmen 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/ has been superseded by the final release in community I suggest removal from the AUR

2 1

[aur-general] Merging of comp-scale-svn with comp-scale-git and engage-svn with engage-git
by Moritz Maxeiner 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Dear TU(s), the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines) I would like to request for the new two packages (*-git) to be merged with their old packages (*-svn), respectively. Sincerely, Moritz Maxeiner

2 1