- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Felix Yan 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Hi, I found the package openvpn-dev already provides all functionality that my package openvpn-ipv6 [1] provides, so there is no aim to provide an old beta package. Please help me remove it [1], thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60170 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: quad, balz
by Limao Luo 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Quad [1] and balz [2] don't build properly (because they use $startdir/src and $startdir/pkg instead of $srcdir and $pkgdir. tuxspirit is, AFAIK, inactive, and hasn't updated their packages in the past. Would appreciate a disown, especially since a couple of my packages (peazip-gtk2 [3], peazip-qt [4]) depend on [1] and [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14145 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18352 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43957 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43956

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: riak-systemd-unit
by Gianni Vialetto 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

My package riak-systemd-unit [1] is now useless, since the service unit is already included in the latest riak AUR package [2]. Please remove it from the AUR. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62061 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35433 -- Gianni Vialetto "To see things in the seed, that is genius." - Lao Tzu

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: systemd-granola
by Limao Luo 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

All the scripts from my package systemd-granola [1] have been added into granola-connect [2] and granola [3]. Please delete [1] as it now serves no purpose. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52808 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by der_FeniX 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Please, merge [1] into [2] because of original app renaming [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62896

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove my AUR account
by Tomasz Niedzielski 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Due to a cheeky comment (in my opinion) under one of my packages, I decided to resign from creating and developping any packages for public use. The best would be if you could completely remove my account and all packages created by me - those of them, which I adopted, will be orphaned (after removing my data from PKGBUILDS). Thank you.

8 12

[aur-general] Deletion request: fancytasks
by miste78＠web.de 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Hi, I uploaded a package 'fancytasks' to the AUR. I didn't see there was already a package named 'kdeplasma-applets-fancytasks' for the same program. Please delete my package fancytasks: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62885 Thanks, Michael

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 26 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-28 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-20 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.032.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-14 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-28 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-20 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.032.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * virtualbox-iso-additions-4.2.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 4 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 3. bisson - 3 signoffs 4. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: granola and granola-connect
by Limao Luo 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Both granola [1] and granola-connect [2] have been out of date for a month, and maintainer has not responded to email for well over two weeks. Please disown them. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670

3 4

[aur-general] Multiple Kernel modules in the AUR [WAS: Disown request: nvidia-pae]
by Oon-Ee Ng 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Dave Reisner <d(a)falconindy.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM +0200, Robert Knauer wrote: >> Hello, >> please disown nvidia-pae[1], it's outdated for more than a month now >> and I mailed the maintainer on 1st of September and got no answer. >> >> Thanks, >> Robert >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40101 > > Don't take this personally... you're just the one who happened to bring > it up. Do we _really_ need all this duplication? Does every kernel in > the AUR needs its own _from_ _source_ instructions to build kernel > modules? Really, these should all be about 3-4 lines to change in the > extra/nvidia PKGBUILD. Instead, we have... > > nvidia-apparmor > nvidia-bede > nvidia-bfs > nvidia-bl > nvidia-ck > nvidia-custom > nvidia-fbcondecor > nvidia-ice > nvidia-ll > nvidia-lqx > nvidia-mainline > nvidia-pae > nvidia-pf > nvidia-rifs > nvidia-rt > nvidia-uksm > nvidia-zen > > I'm sure these are all unique and beautiful in their own way, but > really, they're all duplicates as far as I'm concerned. nvidia is the > biggest offender of this, but it certainly applies to other modules as > well. > > </rant> > > dave Firstly - full disclosure - I'm the author and maintainer of the hackish nvidia-beta-all package (someone else based nvidia-all from that). It basically builds the nvidia module for every exiting kernel (including specific patches if needed). When initially submitting the package there was some discussion about whether such a PKGBUILD which is non-reproducable (would produce different results on different machines) violates the AUR's guidelines. The only alternative to that (if reproducability is important) would be the various nvidia packages as we currently have. Of course, I never really agreed with that line of reasoning simply because as it is compiling any random package on two different machines could produce different results due to autotools or similar.

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: nvidia-pae
by Robert Knauer 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Hello, please disown nvidia-pae[1], it's outdated for more than a month now and I mailed the maintainer on 1st of September and got no answer. Thanks, Robert [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40101

4 3

[aur-general] Disown Request: uif2iso
by Ben 17 Sep '12

17 Sep '12

Hello there, Please orphan the uif2iso[1] package. I have attempted to contact the maintainer via email but have received no response. The package in question has been flagged out of date since the 16th May this year. I have a working PKGBUILD ready to upload. Thanks, Ben. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15159

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Schala Zeal 17 Sep '12

17 Sep '12

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61509 (lib32-mingw-w64-libunicows) into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62869 (mingw-w64-libunicows)

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Sep '12

17 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 23 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (23 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-28 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-20 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-8 (i686) * r8168-8.032.00-2 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.032.00-2 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-14 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-6 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-9 (i686) * virtualbox-4.2.0-1 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.0-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.0-1 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-28 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.57-20 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-8 (x86_64) * r8168-8.032.00-2 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.032.00-2 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-14 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-6 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-9 (x86_64) * virtualbox-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.0-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-iso-additions-4.2.0-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-28 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-20 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.032.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-14 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-28 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-20 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.032.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * virtualbox-iso-additions-4.2.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 7 signoffs 2. bisson - 4 signoffs 3. tomegun - 4 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 5. tpowa - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: granola and granola-connect
by Limao Luo 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

If you're asking if I would be able to maintain granola-gui [1] along with the other two, then I am. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36866

1 0

[aur-general] freeplane in the AUR
by scrawler 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

Hey guys, Would anybody like to take over the freeplane package for me? It needs to be updated, and I don't have time to take care of it. thanks!

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion request: pari-nightly-snapshot
by Limao Luo 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

The package pari-nightly-snapshot [1] was badly written, is out of date, and is completely replaced by pari-git [2]. Also note that, as the maintainer, I have made a comment under [1] to prove that I am the maintainer saying, "Accepting the deletion request." Please delete my old package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61085 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62268

2 1

[aur-general] [merge request] python2.6 => python26
by Markus Unterwaditzer 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

hello, Earlier i asked for python2.6 to be orphaned because it was and is out-of-date. TIL there was python26 available all the time. So, please merge python2.6: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51138 into python26: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41809 Thanks, Markus

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: emacs-browsekillring
by Limao Luo 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

The package emacs-browsekillring [1] has an out-of-date source and is badly named. The only consistently updated source for the browse-kill-ring.el file that it is based on is the github-based version. Since the source is github-based, I created a separate package called emacs-browse-kill-ring-git [2]. As the current maintainer, I have made a comment under [1] saying, "Accepting deletion request." Please delete [1]. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55404 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62282

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request - groff-doc
by Ecmel ERCAN 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

Hi, Please remove my package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61250 I have uploaded an updated version with a proper name. Have a good day. Ecmel Ercan

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 5 signoffs 2. dan - 5 signoffs 3. pierre - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Yet another package deletion request
by Etienne Perot 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

Please delete my package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61092 To prove my identity as the owner of the package, I have commented "Acknowledging deletion request" on the package comments section under the same account as the package owner. There's nothing wrong with the package, but as it is built from a git repository, I'd like to resubmit it under the name "ascrubber-git" for consistency. Thanks, Etienne -- Etienne Perot - https://perot.me/ Signed using https://perot.me/pgp.asc (974E E250) on 2012-09-15 19:48:15.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: emacs-adoc-mode-svn -> emacs-adoc-mode-git
by Nick Smallbone 15 Sep '12

15 Sep '12

Hi, adoc-mode has moved from svn to git. Could you merge emacs-adoc-mode-svn into emacs-adoc-mode-git? (Or just delete the first one, it has no comments or votes.) emacs-adoc-mode-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61161 emacs-adoc-mode-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62830 Nick

3 2

[aur-general] Inactive users
by Xyne 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Hi, What is the current policy on dealing with inactive users? In the case of the zephyr package, the owner has not been active since 2011-07-18 and had several flagged packages, many of which had been flagged for quite a while. I orphaned all of the flagged packages but in such cases should we just preemptively disown all of the user's packages? I have written a script to handle such cases [1]. Of course, if there were some official policy here then this might be better handled server-side, but for now this solution is convenient. Incidentally, aurploader contains a full python module since the last release with support for automating most AUR interaction (disowning, merging, etc.). In combination with python3-aur it is quite versatile. Regards, Xyne [1] http://xyne.archlinux.ca/scripts/aur/orphanizer

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Faruk Diblen 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Hello, I made some modifications and renamed the package I maintain. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62784 Could you please remove the old package from the repository? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56066 Thank you, -- *Faruk*

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal Request] esta-git sclock-git
by Bastien Dejean 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Hi, I'm dissatisfied with the names I gave to the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62763 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62765 Furthermore, I shall merge them into one package, hence I demand the removal of the two aforementioned packages. Thanks, -- b.d (| |) ^ ^

2 1

[aur-general] [markus@unterwaditzer.net: AUR Package: python2.6]
by Markus Unterwaditzer 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Hello, please orphan the package "python2.6": https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51138 because of the reasons stated in the forwarded mail. Thanks, Markus ----- Forwarded message from Markus Unterwaditzer <markus(a)unterwaditzer.net> ----- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:10:04 +0200 From: Markus Unterwaditzer <markus(a)unterwaditzer.net> To: 9099jack(a)googlemail.com Subject: AUR Package: python2.6 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hello, Could you please fix your AUR package "python2.6"? It currently fails to build. Otherwise please orphan it so others can pick it up. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51138 Thanks, Markus ----- End forwarded message -----

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: zephyr
by karnath 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Hello. Package zephyr [1] is not updated for some years, flagged out of date and submitter is not responding to my email for 2 weeks. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22542 -- E-Mail : karnathtorjian(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Aur package removal
by Leonidas Spyropoulos 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Hello, I uploaded a new renamed version of one of the packages I maintain. Can someone please remove the old package from the repository? OLD package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62708 NEW package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62771 Thanks in advance, Leonidas -- Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health. #include <stdio.h> int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}

4 5

[aur-general] Disown request: tmux-git
by Dmitry Korzhevin 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

Please, disown package tmux-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35618 Last Updated: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:43:23 +0000 Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin

8 13

[aur-general] Disown request: zekr
by Mohammad Mehdi Saboorian 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

Hi, the package zekr [1] was marked out of date since Jul 12th. the last update was more that two years ago. I've tried contacting maintainer in comments and by email, but received no reply from him. Please disown this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9692

2 1

[aur-general] Please disown cdm-git and delete cdm
by Jakub Klinkovský 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

The cdm[1] package is out-of-date since July, last update was in August 2011. The source url of cdm package doesn't exist anymore, the software lives only on github. Please delete this package. The cdm-git[2] package is out-of-date since August, last update was in December 2011. There have been some changes proposed in comments, but current maintainer seems to have no interest. I sent him an email, but got no answer. Please disown this package, so that somebody can update them. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31879 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32120

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request for ArchLinux package weechat-git
by Dmitry Korzhevin 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

Hello, Can you please disown package weechat-git [1], because current version PKGBUILD is buggy and outdated. I wish to maintain this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14159 Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin

4 7

[aur-general] Disown request: sshuttle
by Felix Yan 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

Hello, the package sshuttle [1] was marked out-of-date since Jul 08th (new version was out almost that time), I tried to contact the current maintainer but got a "Unknown user" from the mail server. Please help me orphan it so I can pick it up :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58775 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: redirect-xsession-errors
by Schala Zeal 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

I was hoping for a solution to stifling ~/.xsession-errors but my package apparently doesn't work. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62685

3 4

[aur-general] Cleanup compiz and utouch packages
by 小龙陈 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

Hi, The following packages have been combined upstream. Could someone please remove them? I'll upload the new package after they are deleted. compiz-core-ubuntu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52860 compiz-plugins-extra-ubuntu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52861 compiz-plugins-main-ubuntu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52862 compizconfig-backend-gconf-ubuntu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52857 compizconfig-backend-kconfig4-ubuntu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52858 compizconfig-python-ubuntu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52859 libcompizconfig-ubuntu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52863 Could these also be removed? They were renamed upstream and the new packages have already been created. utouch-evemu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45311 utouch-evemu-bzr: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48646 utouch-frame: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45312 utouch-frame-bzr: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48647 utouch-grail: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40333 utouch-grail-bzr: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48649 utouch-geis: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40334 utouch-geis-bzr: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48648 Thanks in advance! Xiao-Long

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: ut1999 and makepkg-lib-unreal
by Ben 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi there, Please disown the ut1999[1] and makepkg-lib-unreal[2] packages. I have been unable to contact the current maintainer, and the packages have not been updated since 18 May 2009 and 18 Aug 2009, respectively. I currently have updated PKGBUILDs for both packages ready for upload. Thanks, Ben. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26544 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26545

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request pica-pica
by der_FeniX 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Please, remove package [1] because it's duplicate already existed package [2] and it is orphan [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62300 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62298

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Request Removal of 'dupekill' package
by Daniel Campbell 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

> On 9 September 2012 05:49, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell at gmx.com> wrote: > > Hello. Please remove the "dupekill" package from the AUR. > > It seems someone already removed it. Anyway, please submit reasons & > link to the package in future requests. > > Lukas Sorry for not including the link. I wasn't aware that was needed. May I ask why a reason is preferred?

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request
by Daniel Wallace 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Done skydrome <skydrome(a)i2pmail.org> wrote: >Requesting to merge http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52654 with >http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62645 >to correctly specify that this is a python2 module.

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request
by skydrome 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Requesting to merge http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52654 with http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62645 to correctly specify that this is a python2 module.

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Zhengyu Xu 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Hi, please merge gtk-theme-config [1] and gtk-theme-config-git [2] into gtk-theme-preferences-git [3] as all of them correspond to the same package. Thank you very much. Best regards, Z. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62557 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62556 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62561

2 2

[aur-general] Request removal of 'wifigw-login' package
by Otto Šabart 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Hello, can you please remove package 'wifigw-login': https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62625 Reason: I changed project name to 'wifigw' Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 3 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs 3. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request libglu{,-git} and lib32-libglu{,-git}
by Christoph Haag 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

I forgot to add the -git suffix to libglu and lib32-glu. Please merge libglu [1] to libglu-git [2] and lib32-glu [3] to lib32-glu-git [4]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62441 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62623 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62442 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62624 Thanks, Christoph

2 1

[aur-general] Request Removal of 'dupekill' package
by Daniel Campbell 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Hello. Please remove the "dupekill" package from the AUR.

3 2

[aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel
by Jonathan Steel 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Dear fellow Archers, I first enquired about becoming a Trusted User in October 2011 [1] where afterwards I realised the request was a little premature, but I was shown where I can be more involved as a user and where I can spend time improving my PKGBUILDs. Earlier this month I felt I had improved my knowledge and skills significantly, so I asked if someone could take me under their wing and prep me for applying [2]. I feel I have made good progress, and so I am now applying to become a Trusted User. Sven-Hendrik Haase has kindly sponsored me. I have been using Linux for 8 years, Arch for 5. I was a distro hopper for some years but I am now 3 years sober. My second favourite distribution (or the one I used the most before Arch) is Debian, but I don't use that any more. A year ago I decided I wanted to get more involved with Arch so I started adopting packages in the AUR and found it was more fun and rewarding than wasting time tweaking my window manager. I currently maintain 64 packages [3] which are well varied in categories and with a total of 2,756 votes. I am comfortable creating PKGBUILDs myself. I use devtools to do my building. I am familiar with packaging standards, TU bylaws/guidelines etc. I am always striving to make sure my methods are following the best standards. I have mild OCD. I feel I do a good job staying on top of everything. I often check through my packages to see if there are any updates and to check that they still compile and run. I stay in contact with upstream where possible/necessary (RSS feeds, mailing lists, bug reports) and relay any issues in the comments to try and provide the best experience for the users of my packages. I keep a close eye on the Arch mailing lists, the forum and what's going on in the AUR. I generally stay quiet until I feel my input will be helpful, and not just be adding to the noise. I would love to maintain some of my packages in [community] such as gsimplecal, partclone, obkey, pidgin-facebookchat, consonance, vim-colorschemes, gmail-notify, banner and some games, and also some packages I do not maintain but am a big fan of like dvdbackup and clonezilla. Looking at the orphans in [extra], I am interested in archlinux-artwork, ipcalc, vim-buftabs, aspell-*, dvdrtools, gnuchess and lsdvd. If they could be dropped into [community] I would be happy to maintain these. I would also pick up gtk-chtheme, mednafen and vim-nerdtree from [community]. I use i686, x86_64 and arm architectures. I enjoy using my 10 year old laptop as much as my 2 year old desktop, so I tend to avoid software bloat so I can run the same setup on all my hardware (don't drop i686 support!). I enjoy trying out and hacking tiling window managers. I'm good with web languages like HTML, CSS and PHP. I have written and helped out with websites. I used to be a helper on Richard Stallman's website but thought he was rude so I lost interest... also, Vim FTW! I've used PHP to create some web-based systems (primarily for schools) such as a resource booking system and a system to send emails to groups of people using data from a MIS which I plan to release in the near future. I'm good with BASH, sed, AWK and diff/patch and I have an interest to learn C, python and pearl. I'm quick to pick things up and enjoy learning something new if I feel it will help me. I like spending time on something that will save me time in the future. Outside of Arch, I'm 27 and live in Buckinghamshire England. I work at a school as an IT Manager, managing approximately 500 computers and laptops, a VMware setup and approximately 1,100 users. I've basically set up the current system single-handedly. I've been doing that for six years in two schools and before that I was an IT Technician in a school for two years. I've got a lot of experience with Windows (I'm a Microsoft Certified Professional or something... I often forget that) so logging into my home Arch setup is such a relief after a hard day's work. I'm married with a daughter of 15 months. Don't worry, they won't interrupt my Arch work. I'll get the baby logged in ASAP so she can start helping. My wife uses Arch but has no interest in it other than to check her email and browse the web, and it serves her well... apart from when I break it. I enjoy films, TV series, playing the guitar and playing (more retro) computer games. I used to (but still do a little) compete on the Mario Kart Players Page [4] where in 2004/2005 I was the world champion of Mario Kart: Double Dash!! [5]. I used to help update the website and I am still involved with updating another of the partner websites. If you want to have a chat feel free to email me or message me on IRC. Thank you for reading my application. At least I hope you can advise where I can improve so I am a better applicant next time. Kind regards, Jonathan Steel (jsteel) [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-October/016278.html [2] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2012-August/019864.html [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=jsteel&do_Search=Go&detail=1&C… [4] http://mariokartplayers.com [5] http://www.mariokart64.com/mkdd/pastchamp.php

12 19

[aur-general] Merge/delete request
by Axilleas Pi 08 Sep '12

08 Sep '12

All below packages recently adopted by me. __Deletion due to typo in name__ pythoni2-webtest https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62610 __Merge due to python2 convention__ - pylons (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45883) -> python2-pylons (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62608) - python-weberror (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24330) -> python2-weberror (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62609) - python-webtest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24328) -> python2-webtest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62611)

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Sep '12

08 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs 3. ronald - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] privoxy systemd
by skydrome 07 Sep '12

07 Sep '12

Systemd unit file has been added to community package, so this aur package is no longer needed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55378 https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packag…

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Zhengyu Xu 07 Sep '12

07 Sep '12

Hi, please help me to merge gtk-theme-config-git [1] into gtk-theme-preference-git [2] as they are the same software but with different names. Thank you very much. Best regards, Zhengyu [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62556 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62561

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Sep '12

07 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 3 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request libreoffice-converter
by Alpár Török 07 Sep '12

07 Sep '12

Please remove libreoffice-converter [0] There is a package closer to the vanilla sources, called pyodconverter [1]. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48275 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46085 Alpar Torok

2 1

[aur-general] Rename aur/lejos to aur/lejos-rcx
by Zack Buhman 07 Sep '12

07 Sep '12

Hello, I am the current maintainer of both aur/lejos and aur/lejos-rcx. As promised, I updated the ancient aur/lejos PKGBUILD to something that is actually working on a modern arch system, as well as the latest/last upstream release. Simultaneously, I would like to rename the package to its "lejos-rcx" retronym to reduced ambiguity between it and its lejos-nxj counterpart. Thank you.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request fgrun-svn
by Hans Janssen 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

Please remove fgrun-svn.[0] The svn trunk is empty and the project switched to git. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17878 thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 11 signoffs 2. allan - 6 signoffs 3. thomas - 5 signoffs 4. tomegun - 5 signoffs 5. bisson - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Abandoned package "lejos"
by Zack Buhman 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

Hello, I notified the maintainer of aur/lejos https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7719 several months ago that his package was obsolete, however it appears to have been dormant since its creation in 2006. I would like to become the maintainer of this package.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: imagej
by Michael Schubert 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Dear TUs, Please merge imagej-shared [1] into imagej [2]. Both use the non-java-bundled version of the software as they should. Maintainer of [1] in CC. Thanks Michael [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40634 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26559

3 4

[aur-general] Removal request - acpi4asus
by Jonathan Steel 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

acpi4asus [1] - It is now obsolete [2] and five years old. It looks like changes have been merged in newer kernels [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23959 [2] https://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi4asus/files/ [3] http://acpi4asus.sourceforge.net/ -- Jonathan Steel

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request - arson
by Jonathan Steel 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

arson - author states the package is dead and unmaintained over a year ago (see comments). It has since been orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16021 -- Jonathan Steel

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: dayplanner
by Robert Knauer 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Hello, please disown dayplanner[1]. It's outdated since 8th of August 2012, I mailed the maintainer on 22nd of August (two weeks ago), I got no answer and I have already a PKGBUILD for the new version. Thanks, Robert [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12499

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request]
by Miguel Revilla Rodríguez 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Please remove qpdf http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27106 as it is now in the extra repo as a dependency for cups-filters. Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 5 signoffs 2. dwallace - 2 signoffs 3. bisson - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please delete my package 'buildpae'.
by Tom Wizetek 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37239 Thanks. -- TW (MajorTom)

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Ivan Sichmann Freitas 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Please merge vim-spell-pt-br [1] into vim-spell-pt-vero [2]. The latter includes the former and fixes a naming issue. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13917 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62523 -- Ivan Sichmann Freitas GNU/Linux user #509059 SDF Arpa Member http://isf.sdf.org

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Axilleas Pi 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

I just adopted python-rhodecode[0] and renamed it to python2-rhodecode[1], please merge them. Thanks :) [0]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47542 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62522

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Sep '12

04 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * girara-0.1.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * girara-0.1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 2 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request: systemd-redis-units
by Benjamin A. Shelton 04 Sep '12

04 Sep '12

Please remove the package systemd-redis-units[1]. Its functionality is now replaced as redis from the community repo includes the appropriate unit file. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61292

2 1

[aur-general] Please orphan peazip-gtk2 and peazip-qt
by Kevin Vesga 03 Sep '12

03 Sep '12

Both Peazip packages have been marked out-of-date since mid May. Furthermore I sent an email to the maintainer on August 15 and have yet to receive any response. Therefore I ask both packages be orphaned so someone can update them. peazip-gtk2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43957 peazip-qt: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43956

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Sep '12

03 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * girara-0.1.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * girara-0.1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request - loemu
by Jonathan Steel 02 Sep '12

02 Sep '12

Please remove loemu; it is over four years old and has been broken for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11093 Thanks -- Jonathan Steel

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Sep '12

02 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * girara-0.1.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * girara-0.1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 7 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 3 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [aur-dev] python-whoosh should be renamed to python2-whoosh
by Ike Devolder 01 Sep '12

01 Sep '12

On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 08:44:48PM +0800, rns wrote: > According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines, > > python-whoosh (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27425) should be > renamed to python2-whoosh. > > What I have done is like this: > I downloaded the PKGBUILD of python-whoosh, and uploaded it under the name > of python2-whoosh. > > And I realize maybe I've messed something up, because the discussion and > votes python-whoosh got won't migrate to python2-whoosh in this way. Sorry > for this. > > As my notetaking app "mikidown" > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57432) now depends on > "python3-whoosh"! > Can someone help me rename the current "python-whoosh" to "python2-whoosh"? > > Thxs. first some notes: - this mail should have gone to the aur-general mailinglist - provide links to all the packages you refer to further on, i will not merge the packages, since you could have asked the current maintainer to update the package (to depend on python) and upload the python2 package with a dependency on python2 so the only thing what needs to happen is Stebalien to update the package python-whoosh to depend on python and you leave the python2-whoosh also to Stebalien or Stebalien agrees you maintain the python2 version. -- Ike

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Sep '12

01 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * freedroidrpg-0.15.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * girara-0.1.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lincity-ng-2.0-5.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tmw-0.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * warmux-11.04.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freedroidrpg-0.15.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * girara-0.1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lincity-ng-2.0-5.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * privoxy-3.0.19-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tmw-0.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * warmux-11.04.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request perl-net-irc
by karnath 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Orphan request for package perl-net-irc [1]: it is not updated for 3 years, and submitter seems to be unreachable. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6602 --

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 20 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (20 total) == * freedroidrpg-0.15.1-2 (i686) * girara-0.1.4-1 (i686) * lincity-ng-2.0-5.1 (i686) * tmw-0.6.1-1 (i686) * vdrift-2012.07.22-1 (i686) * warmux-11.04.1-5 (i686) * widelands-17-4 (i686) * zathura-0.2.1-1 (i686) * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (i686) * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (i686) * freedroidrpg-0.15.1-2 (x86_64) * girara-0.1.4-1 (x86_64) * lincity-ng-2.0-5.1 (x86_64) * tmw-0.6.1-1 (x86_64) * vdrift-2012.07.22-1 (x86_64) * warmux-11.04.1-5 (x86_64) * widelands-17-4 (x86_64) * zathura-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * freedroidrpg-0.15.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * girara-0.1.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lincity-ng-2.0-5.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tmw-0.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * warmux-11.04.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freedroidrpg-0.15.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * girara-0.1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lincity-ng-2.0-5.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tmw-0.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * warmux-11.04.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-djvu-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 5 signoffs 2. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion requests: emacs-gtk3 and craftd-git
by Mike Swanson 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

emacs-gtk3 is obsolete as the main repository emacs now builds against gtk3. craftd upstream is not maintained and no longer usable for its intended purpose (it requires Minecraft Beta 1.2 which is extremely old).

2 3

[aur-general] Deletion request: fs2_open_3614
by Zeke Sulastin 30 Aug '12

30 Aug '12

Please remove my package fs2_open_3614 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59754 - it's served its purpose but is no longer necessary as I now have fs2_open proper following 3.6.14. Thanks! -ZekeS

2 1

[aur-general] Firefox orphan cleanup
by Axilleas Pi 30 Aug '12

30 Aug '12

These are the current firefox-related orphans that could be removed. There is no merge required, these are only candidates for removal. Happy nuking :p ------------------ The following packages have a dead source url, I think they are safe to remove: firefox-extension-convergence : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56428 firefox-form-widgets : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11637 firefox-nightly-qt-bin : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45473 firefox-nightly-tm : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41393 firefoxqs : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9800 ------------------ The following are orphan and more than six months out-of-date: bluegriffon-bin : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29325 Last Updated: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 and flagged out of date on 28 Sep 2011. bmundertaker : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35394 Flagged out of date since 28 Sep 2011. Needs PKGBUILD to be fixed. firefox-esr-bin-de : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56308 Flagged out of date since 17 Feb 2012. It's been replaced by firefox-esr as stated in comments. firefox-extension-nosquint : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52496 Flagged out of date since 11 Nov 2011. AUR interface shows a gibberish dependencies array, bad written PKGBUILD? firefox-extension-right-encoding : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52497 Flagged out of date on 11 Nov 2011, although there seems to be the latest version. AUR interface shows a gibberish dependencies array, bad written PKGBUILD? firefox-gnome-globalmenu-git : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41799 Flagged out of date since 16 Nov 2011, the submitter stated that it's no longer working. firefox-hg : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17820 Last Updated: Sat, 01 Oct 2011, there are comments stating errors in compiling, and one that says it doesn't work with gcc4.7. firefox-imglikeopera : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26238 Flagged out of date since 21 Feb 2011, last Updated: Mon, 04 May 2009. firefox-nightly-debug : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54540 Flagged out of date since 14 Mar 2012. firefox-pgo-minefield : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32030 Flagged out of date since 21 Feb 2011, comments are more than 2 years old stating that it doesn't compile. firefox-qt-hg : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40997 Last Updated: Sat, 23 Oct 2010, there is a comment with a working PKGBUILD, don't know if it should be nuked. firefox-requestpolicy : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56861 Last Updated: Tue, 21 Feb 2012, I flagged it out of date. firefox-theme-bloomind-ft-deepdark : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52498 Last Updated: Fri, 03 Feb 2012, there is a new version, I flagged it out of date. logmein-client : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21551 Last Updated: Thu, 13 Aug 2009, last comment was on 15 Jun 2011, which stated there was an update. I coudn't find the source on their website. sakura-exo : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56156 Last Updated: Fri, 27 Jan 2012, I flagged it out of date. status-4-evar : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42663 Last Updated: Sun, 20 Mar 2011, I flagged it out of date. tabmixplus-beta : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38654 Flagged out of date since 22 Mar 2011. zeitgeist-dataprovider-firefox : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44741 Doesn't compile, out of date since 05 Sep 2011. firefox-extension-firefoxnotify-git : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37443 2 year old package, works only with ff 3.6. firefox-extension-color-toggle : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52552 Only orphan but seems to work. ------------------ The following are orphan and less than six months out-of-date. It's up the TUs to decide: firefox-aurora : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48216 Orphan but used by many users. Could be adopted. firefox-beta-bin-es-es : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40465 Flagged out of date since 27 Jun 2012. Could be adopted. firefox-beta-bin-it : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40413 Flagged out of date since 11 Jul 2012. Could be adopted. firefox-nightly-russian : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50673 Flagged out of date since 18 Jul 2012. Could be adopted. firefox-oss : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57710 Flagged out of date since 06 Jun 2012. Could be adopted. firefox-qt : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22050 Flagged out of date since 25 Aug 2012. Could be adopted. firefox-system-cairo : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59634 Last Updated: Wed, 30 May 2012, flagged out of date since 06 Jun 2012.

3 2

[aur-general] deletion request: tmux-cvs
by Martti Kühne 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

hi guys I request deletion for my package tmux-cvs [1] because the history stops at some point in 2009 or so. That makes it extremely useless, as current vcs checkouts are available from both sf/svn and github. cheers! mar77i [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25719

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Maxime Gauduin 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

Hi guys, Aegisub is moving from svn to git, could you merge aegisub-svn into aegisub-git? aegisub-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10919 aegisub-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62332 Thx in advance! -- Alucryd "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen."

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (i686) * r8168-8.032.00-1 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-8 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (x86_64) * r8168-8.032.00-1 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-8 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. idevolder - 3 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. stephane - 2 signoffs 4. lcarlier - 2 signoffs 5. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package merge request: mayavi-doc and python2-mayavi-doc
by Felix Yan 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

This is following a rename by giniu ( aur/python2-mayavi => community/mayavi ) Please help me merge package python2-mayavi-doc [1] into mayavi-doc [2] , thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46181 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62326 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Looking for a sponsor
by Felix Yan 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

Hi all, I'm interested in becoming a TU. I used Arch only for one year and a half but 4 for Linux (Ubuntu before). I submitted my first package by the end of last year, and maintain more and more during the last a few months. I am eager to maintain packages that loved and needed by Chinese users as I am one too, such as input methods(fcitx-*, ibus-*, sunpinyin, libpinyin, etc), internet supplicant in Chinese universities(mentohust/ruijieclient), chat tools qq related(linuxqq, webqq, libqq*, etc) and popular proxy tools (sshuttle, goagent, etc). And I am also a python programmer and maintaining more than 20 python libraries I use for now. I am also active in reporting and following issues upstream, such as pidgin-lwqq [1]. As I looked after more and more packages on AUR I found many users not so convenient to install so many packages in AUR, so I joined archlinuxcn's community repository project [2] to provide popular packages in binary. But this is not good for user to involve in (such as flag out-of-date, report bugs, etc). I am also an IT manager in work, and maintaining several Arch servers. Some more info about me: 21, male, Wuhan in China, working in a startup, not very good at C and English. My AUR packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=felixonmars And my stackoverflow careers if interested: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/felixonmars [1] https://github.com/xiehuc/pidgin-lwqq/issues?page=1&state=closed (Chinese) [2] https://bbs.archlinuxcn.org/viewtopic.php?id=798 (Chinese) Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Felix Yan 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

systemd-goagent-units [1] has been merged into goagent [2] a month ago and not needed by any package now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56743 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59593 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 3. tpowa - 4 signoffs 4. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Schala Zeal 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58510 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58486 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61472 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61473 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58485 All of these are Flash games I previously packaged that are better suited to be played through a web browser. I guess I went a bit nutty with my package making.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Aug '12

26 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 5 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] delete request
by Dirk 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

[1] & [2] are orphaned and they don't build because the linked files are not available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23863 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41352 Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: cb2bib
by Egon Geerardyn 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

Please disown cb2bib [1]. It has been outdated since May. I contacted the maintainer (tdy) at the end of July, but I never got a response or an out of office. At the same time, I also linked to an updated PKGBUILD on AUR, but it hasn't been integrated. Thanks! Egon Geerardyn [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21447<%20https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21447>cb2bib AUR page

2 1

[aur-general] Package update help
by der_FeniX 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

Hello! I take an orhpaned package [1] and update it. Original binary name is odeskteam-qt4. AUR package is named as godesk. And now I don't understand - leave name as is or need to rename it. I don't know why it was named as godesk, may be because early it was written on gtk, but now is on qt4 or there is another reason. Anycase I need help now with the definition of package's name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635 -- Le Roi Est Mort! Vive Le Roi!

2 3

[aur-general] merge request
by Dirk 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

There is a duplicate package for {systemd-}xorg-launch-helper [1]&[2]. I don't know which one is better or what name is preferred, but I guess they should be merged. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60347 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62064 Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: systemd-mongodb-units
by Benjamin A. Shelton 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Please remove my package systemd-mongodb-units[1]. It is now provided with MongoDB from the community repository and is no longer needed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61297 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlA39zQACgkQX0wjpDDqKTAsGwD+MjMVYWzLNo3b/IKA7307A4OG rC7CmGxIQ2fpy492HScBAKNVKStT+tcXuMJTijuAhlSYDCQp+334XOboQ0weZrDF =e3iR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request : chrome-pepper-flashplugin
by raeonz 24 Aug '12

24 Aug '12

I am maintainer of this package and since it is packaged with the stable version of google-chrome you can now delete it from aur. Thanks. link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58861

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Aug '12

24 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: vba-m-gtk
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 24 Aug '12

24 Aug '12

Please remove vba-m-gtk [1], vba-m [2] already has GTK support. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56355 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55248 -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete request] octave-gui-hg
by Stefan Husmann 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hello, octave-gui-hg [1] is not needed anymore, because the gui version now has become the default in octave-hg [2], also providing octave-cli. The former mantainer agreed in the AUR comments. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30572 Best Regards Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete my package maya2013sp1
by Flaminigo 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hi, Something messed up in the PKGBUILD file and the application's icon won't show up correctly. I don't know I cannot delete the package after submitting it. Otherwise, I will check it carefully. Sorry for that. I am a newbie. Thanks. -Sunny

3 4

[aur-general] revised PKGBUILD for dupeguru-me & two questions
by Rob Til Freedmen 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hi, now that I've read what I should have done before posting ;) I've still some questions: 1) The package changed the license to 'BSD Revised' - is it any different to 'BSD'? 2) The package contains also a qtlib license - do I have to add it also? 3) With a BSD license, is it ok to disable the nag screen shown on every start? There is still the registration/contribute menu in <help> for support of the author. Any comments welcome. rtf --x--x--x--x-- # Maintainer: rtfreedman (rob<d0t>til<d0t>freedman<aT>googlemail<d0t>com # Contributor: Dan Serban, SiD pkgname=dupeguru-me-bin pkgver=6.5.0 pkgrel=2 pkgdesc="Find duplicate songs in your music collection" arch=(any) url=http://www.hardcoded.net/dupeguru_me/ license=('BSD') depends=(python pyqt sip) source=(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112416309/dupeguru-me_${pkgver}_all.… md5sums=('1b143883a44c99965b0acea9c5c23a48') build() { return 0 } package() { cd "${srcdir}" bsdtar -xf dupeguru-me_${pkgver}_all.deb data.tar.gz bsdtar -xf data.tar.gz # nonag sed -i 's/self.model.initial_registration_setup()/# self.model.initial_registration_setup()/g' \ usr/share/dupeguru_me/qt/base/app.py mkdir -p "${pkgdir}"/usr/bin mv usr/bin/dupeguru_me "${pkgdir}"/usr/bin mv usr/share "${pkgdir}"/usr/ install -Dm644 "${pkgdir}"/usr/share/dupeguru_me/hscommon/LICENSE \ "${pkgdir}"/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE } --x--x--x--x--

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 13 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (13 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please merge aafm and aafm-git
by Cyker Way 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hello, Since aafm is actually using the upstream git repo, I've renamed it to another package called aafm-git. Please merge these two packages under the same name *aafm-git*. Thank you! -- Cyker

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Nuno Araujo 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello Me again, sorry... Could you remove the following packages? gnome15-gnome-plugins (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47363) gnome15-panel-applet (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47362) gnome15-systemtray (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47361) Those packages are obsolete (gnome15-panel-applet) or were integrated into existing packages (gnome15-gnome-plugins and gnome15-systemtray). You can check AUR comments for more information. Thank you once again! -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 3

[aur-general] Package removal request: x264-jeeb-git
by Felix Yan 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hi, I'd like to ask for removal, this package was my orphaned package by the end of last year and renamed to x264-jeeb after then, as upstream only releases patches in major versions and often breaks -git building. Thanks! Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove package
by Tomasz Niedzielski 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello. Accidentaly I sent wrong package on AUR plasma-surtime [1]. Please, be so kind and remove it. Thank you. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62208

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: dayplanner
by Robert Knauer 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello, there is a new version of dayplanner[1] since the 28th of March and the package is marked as outdated since 08th of August and there's no reaction from the maintainer. I have a working PKGBUILD for the new version and I already added an AUR package for perl-date-holidayparser[2], which is a dependency for the new version, so it would be nice if a TU could disown it that I can become the maintainer. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12499 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62205

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 13 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (13 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 4 signoffs 2. jgc - 3 signoffs 3. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge request
by Schala Zeal 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

mingw32-glm and mingw32-glmath seem to be the same software. mingw32-glm would be the appropriate one to use. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58831 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57750

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request
by Claudio Kozický 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

Please disown the pacakge mcabber-module-jingle-git[1] because the maintainer isn't updating it. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43393 -- Claudio Kozický

2 1

[aur-general] Disownment request for granola{,gui,connect}
by Limao Luo 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

I am posting this as a request for disownment of granola [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841 ], granola-gui [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36866 ], and granola-connect [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670 ]. granola and granola-gui are currently out of date. granola-connect is maintained by the same maintainer. I have emailed the maintainer 2 weeks ago, and the maintainer has not replied or updated the PKGBUILDs in that time. Therefore, in accordance with the AUR guidelines, I am posting this message to request a transfer ownership of the packages to myself. - Limao Luo

1 1

[aur-general] KDM - Missing LXDE entry
by set 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

Hello, KDM doesn't show installed LXDE entry. /usr/share/xsessions/LXDE.desktop exists. Using lxdm, I can log in LXDE normally. LXDE.desktop describes startlxde as Application type. Tried as XSession type, same result. This is not a big issue, just an annoyance. Can it be solved simply though ? Thank you.

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 5 signoffs 2. bisson - 3 signoffs 3. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete context-free
by Yclept Nemo 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

[context-free] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62157 I'm the maintainer, I just disowned myself. It is a duplicate, and I rather maintain the mercurial version.

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request
by Xavier Devlamynck 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Hi, Could you disown landslide (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45129) The guy doesn't respond on the website nor by email (> 1 month). Thanks,

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] my obsolete packages
by Guten 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request?
by Robert Knauer 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Hello, there are two packages for pdfposter, pdfposter[1] (I'm the maintainer) and another package, pdftools.pdfposter[2]. I've updated today pdfposter to version 0.6.0dev, the source files are from openSUSE Build Service[3], since upstream[4] isn't available anymore. The package pdftools.pdfposter uses upstream as source, so it doesn't build and it also an old version (0.5.0). Could a Trusted User merge pdftools.pdfposter[2] into pdfposter[1] or should I contact the maintainer before that can be done? Regards, Robert [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48544 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49604 [3] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=pdfposter&project=devel%3Al… [4] http://pdfposter.origo.ethz.ch/

2 4

[aur-general] Package removal request: gcc42-bin
by Martin Peres 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Hi, I am the maintainer of the gcc42-bin package. Since it doesn't work anymore and I am not willing to fix it, could you remove it please? I will keep on maintaining the source package gcc42 which is cleaner than the bin package. Thanks in advance, Martin Peres

2 2

[aur-general] [Removal request] ruby-kramdown-last
by Olivier Parent Colombel 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Hello, Could you please delete the package ruby-kramdown-last ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50720) which isn't needed anymore ? The original maintainer of ruby-kramdown has updated the main kramdown package. Could you please also add the ruby-kramdown-last votes to the main kramdown package ? Thanks in advance, -- Olivier Parent Colombel _______________ +33 7 77 06 37 60

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Removal (or merge) request
by Schala Zeal 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55160 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55209 lib32-mingw-w64-glew and mingw-w64-glew-pure64 seem to be abandoned in favor of mingw-w64-glew ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52214 )

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] kile-i18n
by A Rojas 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33341 obsolete, kile includes translations for a long time now

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] kpeg
by A Rojas 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36676 Doesn't compile, needs porting to libkdegames 4.9 API and upstream hasn't shown signs of life since 2010

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request for package weechat-git
by Dmitry Korzhevin 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

Hello, I am asking you to disown package weechat-git as it is not maintained for a very long time, PKGBUILD is broken. I will adopt this package. Thank you Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 3 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] please delete petsc-openmpi
by Myles English 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

petsc-openmpi : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40071 I am the maintainer of that package (and also 'petsc' that also compiles with openmpi). Thanks, Myles

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Nuno Araujo 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

Hi Could you remove the following packages: roccat (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41347) kone (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41349) koneplus (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44946) pyra (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41348) All those packages were replaced upstream by roccat-tools (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57300) Thank you -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 1

[aur-general] take over of orphaned AUR package dupeguru-me-bin
by Rob Til Freedmen 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

Hello, I would like to take over maintenance of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49918 I've posted a modified PKGBUILD in the comment section What is the requirement/procedure?

3 2

[aur-general] Disown request for package strongswan
by Dmitry Korzhevin 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

Hello guys, I request your help and ask you to disown strongswan package (or if you can, please just switch this package to me - dkorzhevin) beacause current maintainer doesn't update this package for a long time Last Updated: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 Last comment: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 I write a letter to maintainer's contact e-mail, without any response.. I use strongswan (ipsec) for a long time, and wish to maintain package for ArchLinux. Thank you Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin

2 2

[aur-general] please delete git-subtree-git
by Myles English 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

Hi, Please woud a TU delete the package git-subtree-git I was maintaining at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44315 ? It is now part of git proper. Thanks, Myles

2 1

[aur-general] [delete request] - nct6775-git
by member graysky 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

The author of the following package has orphaned it since one of my packages supplies the same software. Plz delete it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59396 Comment by: Glaucous on Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:20:29 +0000 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61127 Duplicate, use this package instead.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Schala Zeal 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57846 mingw-w64-glmath seems to be abandoned in favor of mingw-w64-glm and is essentially an older version of the latter.

2 1

[aur-general] disown request: zoneminder
by Vojtech Aschenbrenner 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

Hello. I'd like to adopt zoneminder[1] package, it compilation fails, patches are available and I'd like to repair it. Marked out of date since 19th July 2012. Author answered once in the comments but did no repair. Author is not responding to email. Regards Vojtech [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15847

2 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please delete win7-fotns and osx-lion-fonts
by BlissSam 17 Aug '12

17 Aug '12

I am the maintainer of win7-fonts and osx-lion-fonts. Due to copyright problems, I am going to delete these two packages. Please delete them. Thanks.

3 2

[aur-general] Help with PKGBUILD
by Lucas Saliés Brum 17 Aug '12

17 Aug '12

Anyone can help me with this PKGBUILD: http://pastie.org/4473721 ? Thanks in advance. -- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org

3 6

[aur-general] Request for orphaning
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 17 Aug '12

17 Aug '12

Please orphan Dragonlord's packages [1]wfmath and [2]mercator, They have been out-of-date for quite a sometime alredy. I have emailed him conserning this issue over 2 weeks ago, with no reply what so ever. Worst, these packages are preventing me from updating my packages, which depend on the newer versions.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Aug '12

17 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 28 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-3 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (26 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Aug '12

16 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 11 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * sauerbraten-2010_07_28_justice_edition-4 (i686) * sauerbraten-2010_07_28_justice_edition-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sauerbraten-2010_07_28_justice_edition-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sauerbraten-2010_07_28_justice_edition-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (11 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 10 signoffs 2. allan - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: lib32-cnijfilter320-common
by Jakob Nixdorf 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

Hello, could someone please remove lib32-cnijfilter320-common [1]. This was my first split-package and the name display in the AUR got the pkgname wrong. The new package is called lib32-cnijfilter320 [2]. Thanks, Jakob Nixdorf [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62024 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62025 -- Mail: flocke(a)shadowice.org Jabber: flocke(a)shadowice.org PGP: 651F241F (hkp://pgp.mit.edu) Web: http://shadowice.org

2 1

[aur-general] PKGBUILD for 32bit app on 64bit Arch
by Jonathan Arnold 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

I looked around on the wiki but didn't find any guidelines for installing a 32bit app on a 64bit arch. For dependencies, is this common practice in the PKGBUILD: [ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ] && depends=(lib32-glibc lib32-zlib) [ "$CARCH" = "i686" ] && depends=(zlib) -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

3 2

[aur-general] Remove dunst-light-git from AUR
by Jente Hidskes 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

Hello, Recently, I have uploaded a package (named dunst-light-git) to the AUR. Only afterwards I found out from the developer of Dunst (Knopwob) that the light version isn't maintained anymore and that soon, he is going to delete the relevant branch from his GitHub. He recommended me and other users to use the normal version instead. Because of this, I ask you to remove that package from AUR: it's no longer maintained and soon, the files will be removed from Github and the PKGBUILD is just useless. I had searched Google on how to remove an AUR package and came across two topics on the Arch boards that said I had to notify the maintainers on this mailing list. If this is not the correct way anymore, then please regard this email as not send. I do hope though that I am doing this in the correct way and that you will remove my package from the AUR. Thanks in advance, Jente

3 3

[aur-general] Orphan request - firefox-speed-dial
by Hyacinthe Cartiaux 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

Hello, Please, orphan firefox-speed-dial ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51479 ) This package is outdated since 02/05/2012. I've sent a mail to the maintainer with an updated PKGBUILD at the end of June and got no answer. Thanks -- Hyacinthe

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by François Boulogne 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

Hi, Could you remove archdocumentalist (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40125) which is my own package (and my own source code btw). As mentioned in the comment, the reason is that the i18n policy regarding the arch wiki changed; now translations are maintained by communities on different websites and the code does not handle that for the moment. Since I have no time right now to fix it, I think it is worth to remove the package to avoid misunderstanding. Thank you. -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete aacgain
by Michael Düll 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

Hi! I accidentially uploaded a package for aacgain to AUR. Please delete it. Sorry. akurei

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 35 packages missing signoffs * 11 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * arm-elf-gcc-base-4.7.0-2 (i686) * avr-gcc-4.7.1-2 (i686) * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (i686) * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (i686) * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (i686) * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (i686) * mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-2 (i686) * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (i686) * sage-mathematics-5.2-2 (i686) * arm-elf-gcc-base-4.7.0-2 (x86_64) * avr-gcc-4.7.1-2 (x86_64) * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (x86_64) * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (x86_64) * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (x86_64) * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (x86_64) * mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-2 (x86_64) * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (x86_64) * sage-mathematics-5.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (33 total) == * arm-elf-gcc-base-4.7.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * arm-elf-gcc-base-4.7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evas_generic_loaders-svn-75109-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.24.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.2.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (11 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 11 signoffs 2. heftig - 8 signoffs 3. dan - 5 signoffs 4. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete package : python2-enthought-enable
by Akshay Srinivasan 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

Hello, Can you please delete the python2-enthought-enable PKGBUILD from AUR repositories ? Enable is now provided by python2-enable. Akshay

2 1

[aur-general] My first PKGBUILD, need some guidance
by Martin Cigorraga 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

Hi! I'm creating my first PKGBUILD for Zeya, a nice app that lets you play your local music from any browser without any extra plugin(s) and I'm a bit disoriented about how to handle its installation. Unlike most application Zeya does not need to be compiled to run, just run it's main Python file and that's all, so, how should I proceed? I think about copying the whole directory structure after cloning it to /usr/bin/zeya-git and then create a symlink to the executable to /usr/bin/zeya but I'm not sure if this is the right procedure. So far this is how the PKGBUILD is being shaped: # Submitter: Martin C. msx(a)archlinux.us pkgname=zeya-git pkgver=0.6 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Bring your music anywhere" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="http://web.psung.name/zeya/" license=('GPL3') depends=('python2' 'fastoggenc') makedepends=('git' 'python2') optdepends=('mpg123: for decoding MP3 files' 'flac: for decoding FLAC files') conflicts=('zeya') _gitroot="http://web.psung.name/git/zeya.git" _gitname="zeya" build() { cd "$srcdir" msg "Connecting to GIT server...." if [[ -d "$_gitname" ]]; then cd "$_gitname" && git pull origin msg "The local files are updated." else git clone "$_gitroot" "$_gitname" fi msg "GIT checkout done or server timeout" msg "Starting build..." rm -rf "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" git clone "$srcdir/$_gitname" "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" cd "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" } package() { } I think I can put all the instructions to create the directory under /usr/bin and to copy all the needed files in the package() section butI'm unsure about it. As you see this is a very basic question - for a very basic package. Thanks in advance, Martin -- -msx

3 4

[aur-general] Non-Free font packages
by George Brooke 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

Hi, Today I noticed the following packages on the AUR, osx-lion-fonts [1] and win7-fonts [2]. Both of these packages download the fonts from an FTP server which appears to be operated by the maintainer, not from any kind of official source and although they both specify "Custom" as the license neither of them install a license file (or show any indication that the maintainer has permission to redistribute the files). To me, this gives the appearance that the archives linked to are probably copyright infringing. As I understand it, PKGBUILDs which link to infringing sources are generally frowned upon which is why others for Win7 fonts (for example) require the user to manually acquire and copy the font files. Could a TU and/or the maintainer (who is CCed in) investigate and clarify the situation. Thanks GeorgeB [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61979 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61978

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka-git
by Spyros Stathopoulos 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

Hello! I maintain this package [1] but it has not been updated upstream for about 3 years and does not longer build. Could someone please remove it? Thanks! Spyros [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36626

2 1

[aur-general] Removal: fcitx-keyboard and fcitx-keyboard-git
by Justin Wong 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

fcitx-keyboard has been merged into fcitx's main package since fcitx 4.2.4. https://www.csslayer.info/wordpress/fcitx-dev/fcitx-4-2-4/ -- Open Source,Open Mind Blog: http://bigeagle.me/ E-mail: bigeagle(a)xdlinux.info

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: xournal-image-patched
by Egon Geerardyn 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

I think xournal-image-patched [1] can be deleted as it is outdated and its main reason for existence was including images, which has been included in the latest version in community [2] (as mentioned by the former maintainer in the comments on AUR [1]). [1] AUR xournal-image-patched: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38375&detail=1 [2] xournal in community: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=xournal&maintainer=&last_update=… Thanks! Egon Geerardyn

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 9 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (9 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Microchip Compilers Cleanup
by BxS 14 Aug '12

14 Aug '12

Hi TUs, I think is time for a cleanup in microchip compilers that I maintain, lets start: a) Merge hitech-picc_bin[1] and hitech-picc-18_bin[2] to microchip-mplabxc8-bin[3]. Microchip bought [1] and [2] but now they are now legacy compilers, Microchip decide to make [1]+[2]=[3], microchip-mplabxc8-bin[3] are just the new versions of [1] and [2] packaged together with some small additions. The code for [1]&[2] should just compile in [3], if not the changes needed are very minimal, like in a normal new compiler version. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52776 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52777 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57911 b) Merge microchip-mplabc32_bin[4] to microchip-mplabxc32-bin[5]. [4] are now a legacy compiler, Microchip decide to make [4]->[5], microchip-mplabxc32-bin[5] are just the new versions of [4], with some additions like C++ support. The code for [4] should just compile in [5], if not the changes needed are minimal, like in a new version of a compiler. Also [4] for Linux don't appear any more in any Microchip webpage. [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52726 [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57912 c) Delete hitech-dspicc-bin[6]. [6] are a legacy compiler for a long time, Microchip in [6] page says: "Microchip highly recommends the MPLAB C Compiler for PIC24 and dsPIC (SW006012) for new designs." Note that the recommended (SW006012) are this days already also a legacy compiler, the (SW006012) have been replaced by microchip-mplabxc16-bin[7], so you can have an idea. Also [6] have 0 votes. [6]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54315 [7]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59174 d) Delete hitech-picc32-bin[8]. [8] are a legacy compiler for a long time, Microchip in [8] page says: "Microchip highly recommends the MPLAB C Compiler for PIC32 (SW006015) for new designs." Note that the recommended (SW006015)=microchip-mplabc32_bin[4] are this days already also a legacy compiler, as you can see in my b) merge request, so you can have an idea. [8]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54315 Sorry for all the requests, thanks for everything. Best Regards, BxS

2 2

[aur-general] Dropping wvstreams/wvdial from [community]
by Florian Pritz 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

wvstreams stopped building with gcc 4.7, upstream is dead for ~2 years now and gentoo's patches don't seem to fix stack magic checking properly. Current trunk (not pushed to the repos) gets me a different error than the one reported[1], but it still fails after pppd has been started: > wvdial: utils/wvtask.cc:304: static int WvTaskMan::yield(int): Assertion `*current_task->stack_magic == 0x123678' failed. Unless someone adopts wvstreams and wvdial I'll drop them to AUR next week. [1]: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31096 -- Florian Pritz

2 2

[aur-general] Mozc
by Tony Olagbaiye 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

Hi all! Can I request that a TU add Mozc to the community repo? It has 32 votes, which is plenty above the guideline (25), and it takes quite a while to build. It is actively developed, by Google employees themselves, but is under the BSD License. It would be much appreciated if someone would! -- Tony

3 2

[aur-general] ongoing TU inactivity for Chris Brannon
by Chris Brannon 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

I'm still inactive, and it looks like I will remain so until mid-September. Things should have settled down for me by then. Thanks for all the kind words from people in the community. -- Chris

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 1 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by rafael ff1 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

lib32-libusb[1] is maintained by me and since libusb was replaced with lib32-libusbx, I believe lib32-libusb was replaced lib32-libusbx. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56520 So, please delete lib32-libusb Thanks

2 2

[aur-general] Please remove my package
by Tomasz Niedzielski 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

Hi! I'm total new in AUR package creation and by a mistake I sent to AUR wrong (messy) version of the package. Please, remove it from AUR. Here's link to the package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61775 Thank you very much in advance. Tomasz "Ludvick" Niedzielski

4 6

[aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages
by Myles English 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

Hi, I was pursuaded[1] to keep some unworthy packages in the AUR, and the thread was inconclusive (may be my final email was too long)... To summarise the contents of that thread: for a group of related packages, the stable versions are not likely to work for anyone and the VCS versions (*-bzr) are more sensible, but someone might adopt the stable ones, so we'll keep them lying around, at the risk of confusing users who install them by mistake to satisfy dependencies or the -bzr versions. What has changed since then is that now, users are indeed confused and no one has adopted the non-bzr pacakges so please would a hard working TU transfer any votes to the -bzr versions and delete as follows: Delete Migrate votes to | dolfin | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37270 | dolfin-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58971 | | ffc | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37268 | ffc-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59137 | | fiat | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37267 | fiat-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59138 | | instant | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20880 | instant-bzr| http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59369 | | ufc | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37269 | ufc-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59139 | | ufl | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37266 | ufl-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59140 | | viper | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37328 | viper-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59007 | Thanks, Myles

2 2

[aur-general] Remove request: wally_bin
by Zhengyu Xu 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

Hi, Please help me to remove wally_bin (right now maintained by me) in the following link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=wally_bin because it is the same as wally: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20649 Thank you. Zhengyu

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 8 signoffs 2. bisson - 7 signoffs 3. allan - 5 signoffs 4. dreisner - 2 signoffs 5. ibiru - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Νίκος Θεοδώρου 11 Aug '12

11 Aug '12

Please merge [1] coolvlviewer-stable https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55986 into [2] coolvlviewer https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61915 Thanks! -- Νίκος Θεοδώρου «Ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω!»

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Aug '12

11 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 9 signoffs 2. stephane - 5 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 4. eric - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Enthought packages
by François Boulogne 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Hi, Several Enthought python tools on AUR are out-dated and have no maintainer. I was interresting in Miyavi. This package (python-enthought-mayavi) is out-dated and uncorrectly named since it depends on python2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21647 The correct corresponding package is python2-mayavi https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46179 I think python-enthought-traits should be deleted https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21645 Out-dated, it doesn't compile, it was a dependance of python-enthought-mayavi and uncorrectly named (python2) Correct corresponding package : python2-traits The same for python-enthought-utils https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21646 python-enthought-enable https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32326 python-enthought-chaco https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32325 Thanks, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 2

[aur-general] Remove request: muttng
by jsteel 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Hi, Please remove muttng https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10892. The link to the wiki states that the project is dead and recommends using mutt instead [1], their mailing lists have not had any activity since 2008 [2] and it no longer builds. Thanks, jsteel [1] http://www.strcat.de/muttng [2] http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/mutt-ng-users

2 1

[aur-general] Package delete: synergy-plus
by Jonathan Arnold 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

The synergy-plus effort has been combined with synergy, so the package can be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29622 -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Vinycius Maia 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Please, remove libstreamanalyzer-kde-light [1] accidentally uploaded [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61888 Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Removal: i386-haiku-binutils-git
by Schala Zeal 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57424 I wanted to resubmit this without the -git suffix since GIT is the only means of obtaining this package, as there are no releases of any sort. The -git suffix, in this case, would only serve to imply that there's a release variant package I'd think.

3 2

[aur-general] Looking for a sponsor
by jsteel 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Hi, In October 2011 I sent an email to register my interest in becoming a TU [1] (thinking that was the next step to get involved) and I received some helpful responses of how I can be more involved with Arch, without jumping in as a TU right away. Over the last 10 months my AUR packages have continued to grow as I found time to look after more. I currently maintain 58 packages [2]. I often get in contact with upstream to help with any queries or issues and feel that I do a good job staying on top of everything. I'm not on IRC much, but I keep a very close eye on mailing lists, the forum and what's going on in the AUR. Generally I stay quiet and get on with it and only make a noise if necessary or to help someone. I am hoping for some further guidance now, and hopefully for a TU to take me under their wing to get me closer to becoming a TU, as I would love to maintain some of my packages in [community] such as gsimplecal, partclone, obkey, scratch and some games, and also some packages I do not maintain like dvdbackup and clonezilla. I am a fast learner so should not be much of a burden. Many thanks, jsteel [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-October/016278.html [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=jsteel&do_Search=Go&detail=1&C…

2 3

[aur-general] Removal: i386-haiku-binutils
by Schala Zeal 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61875 Darn Haiku tools trolled me again. Next thing I'll submit will be the entire toolchain in one package so I'll know it's done

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Antonis Kouliakiotis 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Please delete akonadi-google-git [1]. This is now included in the official kde tarballs. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49769

2 1

[aur-general] ags removal request
by Jorge Barroso 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Hi, I'm requesting to remove the package ags[1] from the aur. Link is broken (the proyect page is death) and to maintain the package a new Git package should be done so it's useless and can't be installed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1208

4 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * homebank-4.4-3 (i686) * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (i686) * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) * homebank-4.4-3 (x86_64) * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. thomas - 6 signoffs 3. stephane - 3 signoffs 4. andrea - 2 signoffs 5. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Accidentally upload remove
by Jorge Barroso 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

Hello, I've uploaded accidentally the iceweasel language packs with an incorrect name (il18n in time of i18n) could you please remove it? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61533 Since this "ID="...

4 4

[aur-general] Some packages removal request
by Jorge Barroso 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

Hello, I've listed some packages that I think should be removed from the aur: advcp: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45056 The package was orphaned, I adopted it, but the proyect is stopped since about 2 years ago. It works with coreutils 8.4 (actual is 8.17) and pv already exists in community with the same function. iceweasel-il18n-af: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61533 It already exists with the name iceweasel-i18n-af, like all the other language packages of iceweasel. 0ad-ppa-wfg alpha_5_9530-1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42000It's orphaned since 24 Jul 2011 and outdated since 11 Jul 2011. Also, there's an svn version up to date. Regards

2 1

[aur-general] Concerning mingw-w64-qt
by Schala Zeal 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

I was hoping to get mingw-w64-qt placed into multilib or community repo because today I had built the package, but it took approximately TEN HOURS to do so. This is because it builds static release, static debug, shared release, and shared debug for both 32 and 64-bit. I will admit the full suite is very handy, but it would be great to have a binary package in the repo to save people the abysmal build time. Seeing as mingw-w64's toolchain has a good number of votes and Qt's widespread use, I feel it would be a great benefit to cross platform developers, again, given the circumstances of the above issue. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60127 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please remove imule-new
by Kevin Vesga 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

imule [2] has recently been adopted and updated thus making imule-new [1] a duplicate and unnecessary. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56858 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35015

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request - Tribler
by Jeremiah Dodds 08 Aug '12

08 Aug '12

Tribler[1] (at the least) needs its md5sums updated. I emailed the maintainer two weeks ago, and have had no response, I'd like to adopt the package. Footnotes: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6355 -- Jeremiah Dodds github : https://github.com/jdodds freenode : exhortatory twitter : kaens

2 1

[aur-general] [Orphan request] tyrs-git
by Alexandre Ferrando 08 Aug '12

08 Aug '12

tyrs-git [ 0 [ PKGBUILD needs to get updated in order to build because of a dependency name change. I've tried to e-mail the maintainer but his/her mail account seems to be no longer available: On 8 August 2012 15:53, Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > diegotorre1094(a)hotmail.com > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further >information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable >(state 13). Also, he doesn't seem to respond on the AUR page as another request to change the PKGBUILD was made two months ago. Could this package get orphaned so someone willing to update it can take care of it? Thank you in advance. [ 0 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49045

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: plexydesk-svn
by Jonathan Arnold 08 Aug '12

08 Aug '12

Please remove (or merge) plexydesk-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15411 which is superseded by plexydesk-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52218 -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

2 1

[aur-general] Rename/Merge request
by Thomas Kuther 08 Aug '12

08 Aug '12

Hello, please rename my package plasma-widget-menubar-appmenu-bzr (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56579) to kdeplasma-applets-menubar-appmenu-bzr (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61660) following the KDE package guidelines for plasma addons. Thanks! Regards, teekay

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Aug '12

08 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Aug '12

07 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal: mingw-w64-freeglut
by Schala Zeal 07 Aug '12

07 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61633 Apparently mingw-w64 already has a libglut of its own. Woops

2 1

[aur-general] KDE 4.9 to [extra]
by Andrea Scarpino 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

Hi all, the new KDE major release[1] has been moved to [extra]. Read the upstream changelog for the new features/bug fixes. The KDE Multimedia development has been moved to git. As consequence of this, the kdemultimedia-kioslave package has been removed and split into: * kdemultimedia-audiocd-kio * libkcddb * libkcompactdisc Every maintainer of the packages depending on the -kioslave package should check the dependencies. Also libkipi, libkexiv2 and libdcraw packages have a soname bump, respectively: libkipi.so.8 -> libkipi.so.9 libkdcraw.so.20 -> libkdcraw.so.21 libkexiv2.so.10 -> libkexiv2.so.11 The packages in the official repos have been rebuilt. The kdesdk-kdeaccounts-plugin, kdesdk-kdepalettes and kdeutils-ksecrets packages have been removed. Have a nice update! [1] http://kde.org/announcements/4.9/ -- Andrea

1 0

[aur-general] Package Uploading Problem
by Jorge Barroso 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

Hello again XD I'm trying to upload the language pack for iceweasel, but when I try (https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgsubmit.php) I get an error which tells me It is only allowed to use small letters :S the pkbuild is the following: http://pastebin.com/bT4fdtPE It's taken from the parabolalinux official PKGBUILD ( https://projects.parabolagnulinux.org/abslibre.git/tree/libre/iceweasel-i18n ) Could you tell me why do I get this error?

4 11

[aur-general] Merge package request
by Hyacinthe Cartiaux 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

Hello, Please, could you merge these 2 packages: Old one: servicemenu-encfs-kde4 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26567 New one: kde-servicemenus-encfs (which comply to the new naming guidelines) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61523 Thanks ;) -- Hyacinthe

2 1

[aur-general] broken dependency of community/python2-sqlobject
by mitsuset＠gmail.com 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

Hi. The dependency of python2-sqlobject[1], one of community packages is broken. This package should require python-formencode[2]. [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-sqlobject/ [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-formencode/ Please ignore this message if it is out of purpose for this mailing list. -- Tomoya Kose (mitsuse) mitsuset(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion or merge requests
by Lex Black 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 48 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (46 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * audex-0.74b1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kaudiocreator-1.3-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.2-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.3.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcurve-kde4-1.8.13-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * soundkonverter-1.6.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tellico-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * audex-0.74b1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kaudiocreator-1.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-0.6.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcurve-kde4-1.8.13-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * soundkonverter-1.6.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tellico-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Disown Request xchat-svn
by skyalmian＠myopera.com 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

I contacted the current maintainer of xchat-svn[1] to become the next on June 03, 2012, he responded back on June 14, saying "Be my guest. I no longer use it." and I waited, but he didn't orphan the package, nor respond to my subsequent "You have to 'orphan' the package in order for someone else to pick it up. :)" message even though it's reaching two months. Since he already said I could have it, but didn't orphan it, disown request. :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37787

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Schala Zeal 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

craftbukkit-plugin-guns has been replaced by craftbukkit-plugin-gunsplus https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57782

2 1

[aur-general] Merge package request
by Jorge Barroso 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

Hello, could you please merge iceweasel[1] under iceweasel libre[2] Thanks in advance. 1.- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59185 2.- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61502

2 3

[aur-general] Merge or Delete haskell-nanocurses
by j＠iv597.com 05 Aug '12

05 Aug '12

Hello all, haskell-nanocurses does not build, and has not built since GHC 6.8 or 6.10 as far as I'm aware. I found a git repo with a working copy and made a new package, haskell-nanocurses-git. Could you merge these or simply delete the original? Being as it doesn't build, was an orphan before today, and has no votes, I don't see much cause to bother merging, but I'll leave that up to wiser people :) Thanks, iv597 <j(a)iv597.com>

3 3

[aur-general] Merge package
by Kevin Vesga 05 Aug '12

05 Aug '12

Please merge spicebird-bin [1] into spicebird [2] as the latter has a better name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14716 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25331

3 4

[aur-general] Delete and merge requests
by Schala Zeal 05 Aug '12

05 Aug '12

In a hurry, making this quick: Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58488 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58489 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60264 Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35432 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61475

3 3