- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] delete pybtex
by François Boulogne 05 May '12

05 May '12

Hi, Please delete [1] (pybtex) because it download the source on a bzr repo and the package name does not reflect that. I uploaded [2] named pybtex-bzr. [1] is useless because upstream does not provide a stable tarball. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47273 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59019 Cheers, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan and removal requests
by Gianni Vialetto 05 May '12

05 May '12

Hi, Please orphan rabbimq (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19090) The current package is outdated and has a lot of problems with permissions that require manual fixes. I've sent an email to the current mantainer, but the domain does not exists anymore. Also please remove my erlang-r15b package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55925) It's now useless since the official repo has been updated. Thanks, -- Gianni Vialetto "To see things in the seed, that is genius." - Lao Tzu

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 May '12

05 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (7 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 12 signoffs 2. allan - 11 signoffs 3. dan - 3 signoffs 4. eric - 2 signoffs 5. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge and orphan request: jhbuild and jhbuild-git
by Jekyll Wu 05 May '12

05 May '12

They[1][2] both build jhbuild from git repository, and they both fail to build because of lacking 'yelp-tools' in their dependencies. Both maintainers seems inactive in regard to this building failure. I'm not interested with maintaining. But at least they should be merged. jhbuild-git seems to be in a better shape. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47030 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37340

2 1

[aur-general] Remove a package submited to AUR
by Luis Manuel Ramos Da Costa 05 May '12

05 May '12

Hello my name is Luis Da Costa (aka Aliasboody), Today I've submited a new package to aur (it was javafx-sdk), but I made a mistake on my first PKGBUILD, and because the names were differente now the aur has 2x the same package with a different name... how can i remove the first one ? 1º Package (the one to remove) : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59004 2º Package (the new and good one) : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59005 Thanks in Advance, (And sorry for my dumb mistake :s...)

2 1

[aur-general] Request for deletion: openssh-dnsval
by Max Fierke 04 May '12

04 May '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello there, I'd like to request that my package openssh-dnsval be deleted from the Arch User Repository. It's a version of openssh5.9 compiled with a patch from dnssec-tools.org which added local DNSSEC validation. OpenSSH 6.0p1-2 adds a higher degree of DNSSEC support in a much better manner. - -Max Fierke (m4xm4n) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPpDB9AAoJEF08m6lcSreNSOsH/2zYJLoqvh05h/NbUZU5s+Qn 6aUgv4l0f8hb+ps8LMDSxG2JLc9doEsnxKHo9GON2r23/0Vw3dqU8jWu2/PBzEun zH25tWsvbgxERTxa7SrrJ68vSvbSMzIadYBqBPVDuerOVgMYqjBhvIRmw6Bpt6eh Q8RdMU+p3tdTgCM+WIWxByUKhPDnLtHrs8eEdcgW/A11uaCyWZPtCukXFPTpnyGh rvJ7DcyOV248SU5E4e8lKvgNQbbMviMJSFNAJLSl+po2QdFgjBDMmjPW/WE3epCI ezHcs5AMEI7yhLh1UXF8cZha/tMwSYPpLoxktS6D9cWRpLRbuBexfNkkFqLrrLc= =OOdB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Bernard Baeyens 04 May '12

04 May '12

nvidia-utils-patched <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58627> opencl-nvidia-patched <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58628> nvidia-patched <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58629> These packages were created only waiting for the nvidia driver release 295.49 which is now in extra repo, fixing the bugs of the 295.40 release. Could you also remove : pan-dev <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54590> gtkspell3-dev <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54587> There is already a pan-git package. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 May '12

04 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (7 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 4 signoffs 2. pierre - 1 signoffs 3. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Disown rosa-media-player
by Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira 04 May '12

04 May '12

Greetings, I resend my disown request for the rosa-media-player package, since as suggested I have sent an email to its maintainer and I have not yet received any response, having passed more than two weeks. -- Regards, Vítor Ferreira. 2012/4/18 Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira <vitor.dominor(a)gmail.com> > Hello, > The rosa-media-player[1] package is out-of-date and not currently > maintained by its current maintainer. Thus, I would like to request that it > be disowned, so that myself or any other user interested in this package is > able to maintain it properly. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417 > > -- > Regards, > Vítor Ferreira. >

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: SunVox
by fuzzix 03 May '12

03 May '12

Hello, The SunVox[1] package is out of date and is not properly packaged. I tried to contact the maintainer via the AUR and email but their listed address bounces (550 No Such User). I request that it be disowned so I can take over its maintenance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42684 -- Regards, fuzzix

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: okular-git-viewerinterface
by Cristóvão Sousa 03 May '12

03 May '12

It was a git branch build which no longuer exists. Thanks

2 3

[aur-general] Deletion request: kile-git-livepreview
by Cristóvão Sousa 03 May '12

03 May '12

It was a git branch build which no longuer exists. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: libaacs
by Martin Wimpress 03 May '12

03 May '12

Hi, The libaacs[1] package is out of date and isn't properly packaged. I tried to contact the maintainer via email with no answer. I request a disown so I can maintain it, I have an updated package ready to go. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45974 -- Regards, Martin.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 May '12

03 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 12 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 6 signoffs 3. tomegun - 6 signoffs 4. eric - 5 signoffs 5. idevolder - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request to remove freefilesync4 AUR package
by Allen Choong 03 May '12

03 May '12

Due to the newer AUR package, freefilesync-ubuntu, I request to remove the freefilesync4, which I will not maintain anymore. Thank you.

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 02 May '12

02 May '12

Please nuke [1]opeengoo It seems to have been renamed to [2]fengoffice which is in AUR. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30029 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33478

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request
by Uli Armbruster 02 May '12

02 May '12

Hi, please delete sst https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50112 There are other packages in the AUR providing the same application (sstreck https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9931 and sstlinux https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50013) which have more votes. Maybe one of those two should be removed as well? Greetz

2 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 May '12

02 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (24 total) == * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.4-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (9 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * doublecmd-0.5.4-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * qt4pas-2.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * doublecmd-0.5.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * qt4pas-2.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 8 signoffs 2. idevolder - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn
by Alper Kanat 01 May '12

01 May '12

Hey There, I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package (django-git) and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR is possible or not but it'd be nice to keep the comments and votes. If so, please let me know. Thanks! --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

3 4

[aur-general] TU application - speps
by speps 01 May '12

01 May '12

I postponed this task too many times in latest months. My application is an extract of the conversations between me and my sponsor, Thorsten Töpper, after his proposal in the end of 2011. - Introduction - I thought a lot of times about applying for becoming a TU before, and it would be surely a great experience and possibility for me. I'm really into free software, as in its principles, and I try contributing every day and in every form according to my possibilities as much as I can. Indeed, this would be the next step to let me contribute more efficiently. The AUR is a fascinating and innovative community driven project, that evolves a distribution development into a more bottom-up approach, letting users be part of it acting in a self learning machine. Keeping the AUR clean and productive so, has a central role in the Arch development and it would be great to cover. - About me - I'm a 26yo curious Italian guy with a more self driven than academic programming preparation who believes in and randomly contribute to free software, mainly by reporting bugs and submitting patches to upstream projects and of course maintaining a good amount of packages on AUR [1]. I'm an active Arch user/contributor/KISSophile since 4 years now, an half of my total Linux experience as my main and only OS. I'm interested in every form of mind and life expression exploration, and in any instrument that may grow up our knowledge about us and what's around us. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=speps - Resolutions - Since I'm involved into the Arch Audio project by submitting several build scripts and binary packages to its repository, I'd surely add the most popular in [community] (ex. supercollider, csound, pd, lv2 plugins), and I would help Ray Rashif maintaining the ones already there, of course. Being an out-of-the-box pro-audio ready distro (in terms of officially distributed packages) would be great for Arch, since the number of multimedia-oriented users, developers and projects using Arch as their main platform is growing day by day (LAC 2012 has been a testimonial ;)). Also, I would contribute adopting and maintaining orphans and of course taking care of bug reports. - Identity (WARNING: heavily verbose) - On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:24:20 +0100 Thorsten Töpper <atsutane(a)freethoughts.de> wrote: > Though due to the recent signature introduction a GPG Key is also > necessary and as I can't find your real name anywhere, this would also > be necessary, there were strong internal discussions because of Xyne > who can't reveal his identity. If that also a matter for you I fear > that you won't be accepted. I followed the whole discussion on ML, as it is of my interest, and I must admit the Xyne presence in the Arch team was always a good point for me to assert the possibility of contributing "officially" and "anonymously" at the same time, in the hope that is not just an exception. The meaning of identity on the Internet is still something not so defined to me through its limits, consequences and abuses. So, from the beginning of my Internet experience, I never referenced to myself through my real name/life, but using a nickname, a digital identity. This could be perceived as stupid or too paranoid for some, but for me is just a way to taste things without risking to be too much implied till the point of no return. I'm not referring to responsibilities, but to the possibility of having a choice. The adoption of GPG Keys for signing packages intention is to prevent malicious hijacking through mirrors and to certificate their provenance, and not to identify a packager in his real life. Also, even using a "real name" is not a way to assume a real existence, since hypothetically a real life identity could be easily faked too. As you can see I sign mails with my GPG Key, and I really do not see a real difference between mine and your or the one of another TU, since actually we do not personally know each others. I like to think that a digital identity just deals with the reputation that comes from the quality of the work done like from the behaviours in social relations, and a nickname is enough to cover its identification. This is just my point till now, not a way to convince someone else. I say "till now", cause this is the first time I was asked to reveal my real identity for being crucial in contributing or to be trusted. Differently, some years ago Giovanni Scafora asked my name for including it as a contributor in a [extra] PKGBUILD (cpufrequtils) after sending him a patch. In that case I took the decision of keeping on my way. I'll have to think about this since, as you say, probably another Xyne would be not allowed. My idea is, trying an application as simply "speps" and on a negative response taking the big decision. What do you think? Sorry again for the massive length of this mail, I can't be too synthetic in such cases :( Regards and thanks P.S.: the X-Face is my real eye ;) - speps -

14 17

[aur-general] Deletion request: wterm
by Jekyll Wu 01 May '12

01 May '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] does not build well, and the upstream[2] seems dead(last release was 2005). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12837 [2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/wterm/files/wterm/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPn/NjAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAA40P/2nJbgK1uyjZcDLmb/vzfiiu VUIVy+pR3Cmlyr18FcZHrrkeztIfjk4cLZ1wgf9S18LroorIXtQ874GLO3T1ZFCI yCosTKr6rRhuE3iq2r/nuZ5L/wzNdOB5t8kcC57XwiWe/zfJY49rgEFcYC9LaV/H fmUoD65GjlpRdyoiNFEh5PAANFrhVe2zmm62U+16tcZGZox66yy7DK0Wk/PsQxOq Nbko/5ixecO1Wa0xk0DeXYgmT2proafm57LQ8qlrGlu3nss9HZDbEuUQTQ96Xd5D ESoWIUrIq5+tO8CGzvEpvz/RJtjI5iuJqCtRw6AY19anWJw0v1AIqgYW56g5hmhb 4EIzlXLTKG6kFN7HbzeGl0g5Jud7dtFKZjelg0tSRn6WQ4PxcldCrEh13Iad5+g6 /n4UyiOd/C4EwRcig0Lz2rrrx02FHBEAvCjGK7QOuJTsO3fTmUieYEcAecwiLGcA gENEKNoZYENEccxaHmuo5ott4xv63fAVulCH6t3tHVdyGXCpXFxgBDteq79lOyOn t3WKCvKDdsEBayoWd9sTreITPVuw9eC1B3zsHa5Jp9cJq0xcZqGjm0RcKz3qNLzz wLoBh4dRviE9nb8Djh+jWVzwMz/lzcXv0VpIY/hZavV8GXOXsi43xKs4OnYmh6/p 3Q5vGQIbwfTA4KRE81fM =C1nQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 May '12

01 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) * lazarus-0.9.30.4-2 (i686) * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (i686) * qingy-1.0.0-4 (i686) * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) * lazarus-0.9.30.4-2 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (x86_64) * qingy-1.0.0-4 (x86_64) * doublecmd-0.5.4-2 (i686) * qt4pas-2.5-1 (i686) * doublecmd-0.5.4-2 (x86_64) * qt4pas-2.5-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (24 total) == * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.4-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (9 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * doublecmd-0.5.4-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * qt4pas-2.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * doublecmd-0.5.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * qt4pas-2.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. idevolder - 12 signoffs 2. tomegun - 9 signoffs 3. eric - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: vte-text-shadows
by Jekyll Wu 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is patched against an old version, and fails to build now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40924 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPmqjOAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAstAP/1YWTlgSu9S5CBAxZlEN3NTR 6qVz01cCAMKfrhSfcFX2zeAH7GBJZUHFZHJxPa3ETkK7LGEvWnbg5WJ8ISKDRaim YcaqiXxKkf5QiR8lHzxbrncRZDdEzfo8wQfOYFA8NQXzRQ84i5CykBl37Ni1ttim DocDb4xeVU3P/ZHEgoqj4vNIyHxBKjV3b0iHUfcsq6Vi5C8B/itNLWoCyC+D4btV rTZvbWPP+kug7Vc7db04WlNmFntPBiHusAqJwo+mVi9H3vUhfF8Zm0Fomhdlrrm1 a+MD7mLeTgFXmXCpxw/rs4g5k6bW60+87+XmYC9hN+BrijX65HBFVqQRJcgK6+6A jmQ0Rm44RMefu1HDnvaQ5tsFb6RBfG3ZKPf7FVsn/Z3jqvBbDFx03or7W4PHlHNe 68wQAlfEFlUK1TaZdq4/lE9ssUtx+SUPcz/VVeWfadiS6AP8ThrBJY7wvQLBhP4f JJGRTngoOraS9FhuiwB00nsCQXreLV0p2ZhUG8jXfjNkPWsjf6VzR3Dm5vVU3aN6 zcnnWnMG2rwcWRkJd3FckeOj6reqX5ksHPmwekyWYD/fW/kLzz17qB49YBF8umyx HCw/TpwuH737a3ZTZneDXqJPnqtwz8uTTx0KBRaTWxeXoLN9m3YOstBil18X47+I HcaULsLurBxripxs4lmy =iLxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

[aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan - results
by Sergej Pupykin 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Hello, voting is closed. Results: Yes - 8 No - 5 Abstain - 8 Total - 21 I don't know who is responsible for next actions.

8 8

[aur-general] PKGBUILD review request
by Bernhard D 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Hi, I wrote a PKGBUILD for the driver package from TBS (www.tbsdtv.com) for their dvb cards. I split packaging for modules and firmware and patched the sources to install the modules to /lib/modules/kernelversion/updates and the firmware to /lib/firmware/updates to avoid overwriting existing files. It's the first time I'm building kernel modules and there are two things I'm not sure about: - Are the files under /lib/firmware/updates found and do they have precedence? - Is "depmod -a" after install, upgrade and removal the right approach to rebuild the module dependencies? Regards, Bernhard

3 5

[aur-general] Removal request
by Schala Zeal 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57783 The download link is not only no longer valid, but the preset config files it would fetch seem to be gone entirely without an updated version.

3 2

[aur-general] Removal Request: pyflakes-svn
by N30N 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Hi there, Please remove my old pyflakes-svn package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15061 Thanks and best regards, N30N.

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.14-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 12 signoffs 2. tomegun - 10 signoffs 3. allan - 4 signoffs 4. bisson - 2 signoffs 5. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: pcmanfm-legacy
by Jekyll Wu 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is for a legacy version, and fails to buid now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42550 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPneghAAoJEOemZ9znWXlA8ioQAJ+OxLOzQMyWsIPPkE+byHCm 9cn2xQ/mivkoElxtbrj/zAuz12hurHRN2HQZdgObrpbR7GaRi4OXWqtmZQVUfVWK iETbo2jxH//uAVoeRLe24xmeiCG5X84+XfGVlcP9z4s35u9zrIyAA/JP5Bowfqr+ PN6FXKq7BmO0qj0BqClAmYcOUxNRcNvQbvYrYMwkA1Jy+XOcNTRacRjSeBXSZO2N shZYIj/M8pDE99+8PpANtcCfDT34mLe3W9nduhE/UtUf921bnG+dpd+XsdwV1TOf MTwtsF0JjgZIrm8GKoY6mKtHu+z669N50GMiMTlIpX6sEnxY0JqlJDj0fbt3ZUlA 15SKWfmZS2jqk6bfG9huGQqiKmI+91NY8sefLQ5KhpP5JzsxVafs9AtLQ4DrCPih Od13o9WxT/88H+Mon0+7GXPJhn79nHgZHMx1KXBcfBpFSgAYwmrFaAtop63+W4Ot tlXBNm/g5KZWXwUuaFLVxxREJY+RmlSGVaWQtChABAoLkQHvAw7iAgz3QdFoqR/P pnTqEvIPJW0mLYOHN45R4ZTHZkkGw7ZI7WCsvjQ+zGGZBIPWfDPldQFAr07wd9Dd 8CSQWTBl3r4VMKnW1m+MuFH3mvPPXLg4OxnDf07q+fpwsUfN52AprmAqtsbME0qr 9gFq7nnCLRQJdlooTqDL =Ms8Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: pcmanx-gtk2-current
by Jekyll Wu 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is basically the same as pcmanx-gtk2-svn[2], which has a maintainer and a better name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44255 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25925 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPneYfAAoJEOemZ9znWXlA27EP/2vI/2stixUXfQ5TeRS/xH43 dtZYdpvfK6hg37oo26+FLdvWFSdMAsYl7k5zhKgHovFw4FOKZshg/3X4FJWk6lzx dgxwIQdPslLY68GGk2wxtzyU93sPW2JmCoGA2GVXyJKKaUj15NB8LRCLMHNZ7FOU tY8u1zsr6HAoIIMxjAdju3hyopywu1Qm2lsg+ueOaMKAdGIp1xPB9XBEj1A50qvM kXMyY28a8d3NNe3+QHo27eulB/8iSifw2cvpvVB2ekfwh3l9Buizk7fUZEMsWnTT AfME8SYM8Kamcj0cKPq/7LLgirFDKkwfHZmXQEW1nKozNREvS54Xvzn/3KydJGYS naRX7mDvX6trXcFCBunAxjmLy465eACeJwilBH1/qDwmxxl61wSTIKzK788oXKR3 lanRygT30hvsx2Bt0qL3aPtafp8iKG9GT6dAjqQfatZBoHPxN+/nQ1P+2NwULTd7 tKQrhn4mW7ymeEWee1NkEAAaiBYest7Ps3W/1TZgK3Lh2F0JcVpPCSaFXFkU58ie 9sLSpEEesLlE+kpXHwvTiMcemJvg5ZZaK/JXeAqJd7y5zPpAuM0GYfrynAYHuwA+ HRiYnYcL7sQur6W5ueVWxabTysQSwIqNH4aZb2VUPzd5By3XD3Ri1pvocWS3BQHQ MOGnCnEGyG59Gf45V9oY =qlYR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: mlterm-256color and mlterm-iiimf
by Jekyll Wu 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Both packages are unmaintained, patched against old versions and have broken download link. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29284 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29224 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPneK8AAoJEOemZ9znWXlAz90P/0qN1qvrojiFtGN3jLAIyaeY V56Dye3ghkGVixfNLvWMil8aGzty7Mdnqgsx7KT3uf6t47xKKG7w/TXHmSiYHuoG 9DBcd0T2CAa1IYxOL8mgtNY/Ac1+fkbN3URCBRGpUkYB6oXgrMaz/UoHmM33GpDr 3+lLtk42WdBqGAAS/iG9lh/9Hd+pgXyy9LFQXoDkfKMc2hFhThknsTDAV0u35kV7 5vEa72M/NWET3QHPgKw0Twvn450Ax0cJhxOct4MxQkF/uvxesy9WtSjUNAFHqWlw Mc9Qt8M+FAIe02aywohETKCdkL2GII3tRkoMOZpq47wlimd6i/UQhxuQNpD3y+kg B3/nOKK5TT9tqwLAq5J4NuCpMqACAH0dWnBLNelmSWU8i6R1hrOykeH6/FvesOKf 3t+xha0Yuauq/bN1bPTtuhTs0Yn1T6DW/4y+7uU6qLJGL3PQvGt133U3C8y//tnF PKol2eBuK6CEq5bxe5NsukIH4tU1UwRXvzc1jw8l2HntXLFP5JyKBwPM+fGVsYLo l565LkDO7FMwHf/ak+grXWaFQkJaDi/k5xYzNcTQXyU0uAN3LkryCwZ0wK5eiA/P P/RQtEsC4a9edn7PgcOUNR0Zdypxv4WzOwhVIsVKq1oO9S/qhOGREUYck7zmzNZj PfpwYoalvQRPeCyUcbCC =I6pT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [aur-general] aur-general Digest, Vol 90, Issue 43
by Menachem Moystoviz 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Hi. I'd like to change my username, but apparently the name I want is in use. Where can I find the contact info for the user "gesh"? Thanks, 0x6354

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: oh-my-zsh[-extra][-git]
by James McGlashan 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

Hello, Got a few packages I'd like to be removed.. The oh-my-zsh project was and still is a great project however my fork that I named oh-my-zsh for the aur. ( Intended to be just a system-wide patch for oh-my-zsh but ended up with far more development and is less upstream ) I plan to rename it to omz-archey-git instead of oh-my-zsh-git as suggested by zendeavor on irc. I'm also moving to sorin's fork of oh-my-zsh. I will make it default as of the rename. Summary of all that above.. The below packages listed to be removed so I can upload omz-archey[-extra]-git to replace them. And I might default the pkgbuild to use my fork of sorin's oh-my-zsh. The following packages need to be removed. I submitted them all. oh-my-zsh https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54374 * oh-my-zsh-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54375 oh-my-zsh-extra-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54447 * - Meant to request it's removal a while ago. Never got around to it. Thanks in advanced, archey.

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Dirk 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

libxfcegui4-devel [1] Orphan and outdated. Newer versions available in extra and testing. orage-devel [2] Orphan and outdated. Latest version available in extra. terminal-devel [3] Orphan and outdated. Latest version available in extra. xfwm4-themes-devel [4] Orphan and outdated. Latest version is in testing. thunar-archive-plugin-devel [5] Orphan and duplicate. Same version available in extra. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20797 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20770 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43917 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23212 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43985 Thanks, Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Buce 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

Hi, After checking on an old packaged I disowned a while ago, it appears that pixelmap [1] no longer compiles. I think it broke when libpng was updated, and it doesn't look like upstream has kept pace with either libpng or minecraft development. Please delete it. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51081

4 9

[aur-general] Deletion & merge request: evince
by Dirk 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

Please delete evince-xps [1] Package is outdated and orphaned. Evince in extra seems to supports XPS. Evince-nognome [2] is outdated amd orphaned. [3] supplies the same functionality, is up to date and maintained. Please merge. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52263 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40287 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52016 Thanks, Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Disown eclipse-subversive package
by Benjamin Robin 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

Hello, The eclipse-subversive[1] package is out of date for a couple of months, and I adopted recently the following packages : eclipse-subversive-svn-connector-svnkit [2] and eclipse-subversive-svn-connector [3] which are a dependency of [1]. I tried to contact the maintainer a while ago without any answer. I request a disown so I can take care of it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10740 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19296 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19297 -- Regards, Benjamin Robin

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 26 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (26 total) == * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (i686) * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (i686) * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (i686) * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (i686) * parole-0.2.0.6-2 (i686) * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) * ristretto-0.6.0-1 (i686) * virtualbox-4.1.14-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.14-2 (i686) * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) * xfmedia-0.9.2-11 (i686) * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (x86_64) * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (x86_64) * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (x86_64) * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (x86_64) * parole-0.2.0.6-2 (x86_64) * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) * ristretto-0.6.0-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-4.1.14-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.14-2 (x86_64) * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) * xfmedia-0.9.2-11 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (28 total) == * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parole-0.2.0.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ristretto-0.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.14-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.14-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xfmedia-0.9.2-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-96-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam-krb5-4.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_mysql-0.7RC1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pam_pwcheck-3.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parole-0.2.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ristretto-0.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xfmedia-0.9.2-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 5 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Apr '12

28 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (i686) * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (x86_64) * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * freemat-4.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.23.1-10 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.1.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hardinfo-0.5.1-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * librep-0.92.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * smalltalk-3.2.4-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freemat-4.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.23.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hardinfo-0.5.1-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * librep-0.92.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * smalltalk-3.2.4-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 8 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: gnome-shell-extension-battery-remaining-time
by foalsrock 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hello, I'd like to request the deletion of gnome-shell-extension-battery-remaining-time https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57302 I've forgot -git in the pkgname and created a new one with a -git suffix which makes this obsolete thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 22 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (22 total) == * freemat-4.1-3 (i686) * gambas2-2.23.1-10 (i686) * gambas3-3.1.1-2 (i686) * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-2 (i686) * gnustep-base-1.24.0-3 (i686) * gtranslator-2.91.3-3 (i686) * hardinfo-0.5.1-5 (i686) * librep-0.92.2-2 (i686) * parrot-4.3.0-1 (i686) * smalltalk-3.2.4-7 (i686) * freemat-4.1-3 (x86_64) * gambas2-2.23.1-10 (x86_64) * gambas3-3.1.1-2 (x86_64) * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-2 (x86_64) * gnustep-base-1.24.0-3 (x86_64) * gtranslator-2.91.3-3 (x86_64) * hardinfo-0.5.1-5 (x86_64) * librep-0.92.2-2 (x86_64) * parrot-4.3.0-1 (x86_64) * smalltalk-3.2.4-7 (x86_64) * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * freemat-4.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.23.1-10 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.1.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hardinfo-0.5.1-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * librep-0.92.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * smalltalk-3.2.4-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freemat-4.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas2-2.23.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hardinfo-0.5.1-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * librep-0.92.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * smalltalk-3.2.4-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 8 signoffs 2. eric - 7 signoffs 3. dan - 4 signoffs 4. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: oxygen-fonts-git
by Jekyll Wu 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Please merge oxygen-fonts-git[1] (unmaintained) into ttf-oxygen-git[2](maintained and better name). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55564 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55873 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPmkgNAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAC4AP/AmOd4JPrNdZjxjuryOZe+7x aoLhjrQkxevU/+zn8hga7s97UMzrwUmKJvE3S/E8nddI7hWboEhRMxKNP9BsLRd3 jYmn9adQ5m5TK6SYl9JCX5HOKvQxOKfLERWl3ACrc56UAenGkX62abL6xvON2wmT 9/H2YIaWzKf3VESYt50kldsNghkJHQejgal2HKVNbfbpwopUXpFMCqq68DcQQYT7 j+Naj7Uzv5if+M3ktTYKLcdfprqIAsoFRyQfO9bLihJ0KF6PSPSbnlnG+MOXSp7+ ZXs/RMqeQy7nFLmzSlieHLewT9hruZCH7arFaGsEQp3jpDXKEjwtT9fuU6GMdR5Z r52Zv/jWgAH2OVs6nk13ZajxnF+0vZeDRKtvKZc94s+23H8JWwBjcl21HMRoxUVP bQ5p6ZNSkabYkw02c8Sb724Fe3H/tn04eI8lOuxShErCCbckzmiRJwg0mQuIl2kv cjmmzSKui3ADw+e1RiJeq3TQOXSP0Yfj9UF0AqfyPQGnwSn/LtGlGt+rfFGNhPFk n1g6Pmm3pB0ZYyTbWr4D8lSS+8NjovOseEqzwMDB186e2Ni3xft1hIArpXZAF5x9 wg/hDWWT99SjM0FdWGl18dVUEjMk6ukofXqvaMlN+DHN+6n9f0rIBwOPlEbcT4Lu wnwJleYn8g+7ZPdHpnbD =2PI4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: mosh related packages
by Jekyll Wu 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mobile-shell[1] has been rename to mosh[2], and mobill-shell-git[3] has been renamed to mosh-git[4] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58455 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58803 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58171 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58804 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPmgCSAAoJEOemZ9znWXlA6lAQALEMsR+wAoL2RBcJMoeZDoBm S08M0X+7gNMFubkvlRlEKyfAQ405y0r79s9fwIKzuyHiS1WopDMLQIUR+84bHD/n D6Bx6T0picKiU5EvxeMoaau0H4O8Dk4IujU47Mz/llxF//OoNpxzGXvwFkeGrTD8 y49nr/ZongRiRRU11nz67yYC9lOfBOhhNLysVQLMtimp58FUFH2I6j9DvG0Ezkwe dx05FxJydNxztEqL3jyB5T8oYS4jRIgPlvXyWvsAYh3NEuxvaNkQnUtK1EN014qy mUmtbgvGr/pQwGXf/swLrHSO0PKGkJgtG7xcmS6huiafN7eG6BrQHH4lMYlDv1oz 1eEMDmuOm/pxk3mg1wXz2RoKwjpJ18JqHn8yPuV4Es7SPXvv77fjMYz9TGARS9G5 JujIn9Q2lt6WT53rcBaYm5wpi3AXh6pFW1i4GXNA5QoT4Zf4ZX70rxm7ALc4cS3H TQ/RNtdA6G3DmoR4vh8jemegK70O5o5HVbP/4Zcyvjew7pMO0oDasfmQBC/RqD8n z1X3NETcYmbaSqNpRmORJKJr6FsliA7bzrJfNiaBkSkAELKwVrZ09sPDrzkE6RWS kI5VvgnF3AnuopFG8dxNvUFQ1Vx3RStb2FWjuGtTszzy6Flm8MhyMO+6l8gYWxHL DHQX/5v06gUticBs4BDI =uB5h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Delete&Merge Requests
by speps 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

Hi The flowcanvas project is dead and replaced by ganv. Please delete flowcanvas-svn [1] lv2core is now bundled in lv2 (core + extensions + base plugins) Please merge lv2core-svn [2] into lv2-svn [3] I decided to revert lv2-abgate naming to the original abgate. Please merge lv2-abgate [4] into abgate [5] Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30364 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45557 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58076 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47254 (see comment) [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58580 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] [Merge Request] pithos-bzr -> pithos-git
by Steven Allen 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

If possible, please merge pithos-bzr into pithos-git. Upstream has moved to git as their primary VCS. -- Steven Allen MIT 2014, EECS MacGregor #E221 (310) 433-5865

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-2 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 4 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-fftw-static
by Schala Zeal 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28658 I recently submitted mingw32-fftw, which compiles both shared and static libraries and is also up to date. This obsoletes the static package.

2 1

[aur-general] merge request
by Schala Zeal 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

Please merge the following: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58482 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58712 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58481 into this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58483 I decided to just make it one package that installs a font collection, rather than having individual packages for each font.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by rafael ff1 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

lib32-libgdu [1] was uploaded and is maintained by me, when it was a dependency for other package, but right now it is not needed. And gnome-disk-utility (that would replace this package) doesn't have library to replace this package, so... please delete. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55046

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 5 signoffs 2. allan - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request Merge: avxsynth-svn to avxsynth-git
by SpinFlo 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

please. merge http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57829 to http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58743 avxsynth-svn change/unmaintained to git (Github) repository see http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1570517&postcount=82 greetings

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: old seeks packages
by Baptiste 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Please remove "seeks-last" [1] and "seeks-rc" [2], since both are very old versions of Seeks and currently orphaned. The latest version is 0.4.1, provided by "seeks" [3], while "seeks-last" [1] and "seeks-rc" [2] are still at 0.2.5b and 0.2.4rc1. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40055 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39969 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38043

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Christoph 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Please delete egit-tentative https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26996 which is extremely outdated and misnamed. A less outdated and correctly named version eclipse-egit exists. And please also delete eclipse-egit-another https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58737 for the reason that I explained in my package comment (see there). Cheers, Christoph

2 1

[aur-general] [Nexus2] Delete duplicate package
by Denis A. Altoé Falqueto 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Hello, There are two packages for the same software in AUR: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57137 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57055 Both fetch from the same url, but [2] is apparently a more polished package. I believe [1] should be removed in favour of [2]. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-libiconv-static
by Schala Zeal 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24287 I've updated mingw32-libiconv by including patch fixes from MinGW's Sourceforge page that allows both shared and static libraries to be built, rendering the above linked package obsolete.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-gettext-static
by Schala Zeal 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24288 mingw32-gettext now contains patches to build both shared and static libs, rendering this package obsolete.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * ndiswrapper-1.57-8 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-8 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. dan - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. andyrtr - 1 signoffs 5. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by A Rojas 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Hi, Please remove the packages: - plasma-applet-calendar https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58358 - plasma-applet-google-contacts https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57701 - plasma-applet-google-tasks https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57700 They have been renamed to plasma-applet-akonadi-{calendar,contacts,tasks} by the developer.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by rafael ff1 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

I created glib2-unstable [1] to provide a newer version than glib2 2.30, which got updated to 2.32. Therefore, no need for glib2-unstable anymore. Please delete [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57190

2 1

[aur-general] fping-ipv6 deletion request
by Cédric Girard 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Hi, fping [1] in [extra] includes IPv6 support [2]. fping-ipv6 [3] may then be deleted from AUR. [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/fping/ [2] https://github.com/schweikert/fping/commit/873bc1df2dd5a3d7e13b0383e80b2c06… [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40460 -- Cédric Girard

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by rafael ff1 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

gizmo5 [1] provides a software that was shutdown in April 3, 2011, according to wikipedia [2]. Indeed it doesn't build, reporting http error 404. Please delete [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30417 [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gizmo5

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: amule-dlp-gcc4.5
by Jekyll Wu 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is patched against an old version, and does not build now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37040 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPlO0rAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAo70P/RDBXbL5tH80yKXmhlb92mrF 6QzDT4U8KKr5ufHOxdsh7qLjHBG2DS2mQ6z+EoYMHHhh1RQyM7e2ln8F2xcBbhrW 8dq9jOLmWdInPYq/zzfqIlxvwNlTzr+/GpUcrQcqojMk1GySKKZ3/qGaw8TJow1u j+vc5MTGDK47ErpRUfrq4VijYG5ixHCnRFPB+InsD3pbCeJTmktZcwrkj6gSOkmx UiKLaOWR9EJMSekL4+8wjIgU6daFIC4SCdHoWnYyVmvRp11++ozDRuamdcfLSIUI gL6SBXD73Demg9lqiNn7/Z/MobyHQXchnkzJ3+uolZJQzoEvqKoMtU5KJl8qwC7C Bl52x+iC3bKk9K+RYOWPwBq8cziTEXiwjD4IDMD6meSD0Io26zJgWpYLhllq+cXN Y7eqU9iRDh/ooG3j8i4DpUoRn36eVF70wV0Du7WkIum02s6Q0AhbJIjFfniknDgI J7I3YmvCvwxyeaBklLKlA2kIdaf551sGIQWSF974Z4fOcrmZZbcVMoLbsfnJv15u KClGXORuRqj1mEMHjY8l8t9hZv+SFLk6E/VMEOo7agy7AFcH1a6NJPN203jMcVuE kTBJOa2vXCOUtMd3KxWZCJwWea1Kahx0idtskJMb7lmdCXBMEq+5J8UYjmqSttHD OxUWuhBPRi7P8kR9DaqZ =fO26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 82 packages missing signoffs * 10 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * gdlmm-3.3.2-2 (i686) * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-1 (i686) * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-1 (i686) * gtranslator-2.91.3-2 (i686) * nemiver-0.9.2-2 (i686) * gdlmm-3.3.2-2 (x86_64) * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-1 (x86_64) * gtranslator-2.91.3-2 (x86_64) * nemiver-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (i686) * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (69 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.48-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gdlmm-3.3.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nemiver-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.48-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdlmm-3.3.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemiver-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (13 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (10 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-06 * tasks-0.20-2 (i686), since 2012-04-06 * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686), since 2012-04-06 * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-06 * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686), since 2012-04-08 * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-08 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 12 signoffs 2. bisson - 9 signoffs 3. tomegun - 8 signoffs 4. idevolder - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request to remove my package webmin-nginx-plugin 0.05b-2
by Edke 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Hello everyone. I just submitted package webmin-nginx-plugin 0.05b-2 to AURy but only after that I realized that it should be better to name package webmin-plugin-nginx (to reflect other webmin plugin package webmin-plugin-shorewall already in AUR). Therefore I made changes and submitted new package again. So please, remove package webmin-nginx-plugin 0.05b-2 from AUR as package webmin-plugin-nginx 0.05b-1 will be one I will maintain. -- Best regards till harvest / s pozdravom do zatvy Edke edke.kraken(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: amule-dlp-gcc4.5
by Jekyll Wu 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is patched against an old version, and does not build now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37040 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPlO0vAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAk3IP/Rf9lamVjaqGtNd7npWDt0ot Smd99CBChb2gmnmxKCg4XOgGFEiuxI0B9Sr6hXgnzuAPbAeXt/QzD1kISOLdtCuO 58z7/HUUr4E+xGuRPW5g/j/zCRuIoXp6CbxEktSjKJpvr5u1vf8lGJ67T8CGl1N9 vJdEZuEr70qBw5Hvw42bi+OYjfxN78gdxEt2+Sp9V6JrOiwTWzuk1W2esVkJhOiM Y4/v4whRGBKuTQrt3En224WmRAvVjow8q49+Dl7DHHABPw+pdjFqW9+w+dsBBSOs sh6j4dypZMZPaoqDpE+yZcZ48oAZFA7buHVI+D/i5ljh4gJkGGuWaVP2DEUCtrkb /fGj60zMblsalQcJx8kVHPNsh5O0LIsTBoN3Z1B1D6xL9sOQtlI3qT/3BMVgoEEf cJOuLSnYPTGFmTLNiaYBWWCGBI9A4EA7NzQix+EmQJXkqusjeuoa98QotgurZWcW J2gbsvx/6seR8wFEQ/4mCFRs+tKXEClSVZwm7rCf7qkSx49zbpbnqkqKCFJ3Vx8O ldNZ+6CvcRPOqHor7FvQhDjwRx61m4Jxz029x8brJeb+E3qVRA3RQUY3WixzUFOc Jl8N6bwSZObO9Azz8QV1FmK4b2ngF7gZz2GMppF4FCuWFfEkX46ZCPu0S4XnpuRA 08hZcCkDHWaJundHGdY1 =wWBm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[aur-general] membership
by Todd Thiner 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

i want to post comments on aur packages how do i do this

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 74 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * gtranslator-2.91.3-1 (i686) * gtranslator-2.91.3-1 (x86_64) * mplayer2-20120414-2 (i686) * mplayer2-20120414-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.48-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.48-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (13 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20120414-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20120414-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-06 * tasks-0.20-2 (i686), since 2012-04-06 * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686), since 2012-04-06 * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-06 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request Delete: telepathy-mission-control-wout-gnome
by SpinFlo 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

hello. delete this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54455 is renplace by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58685 (change name according by other telepathy-kde packages) greetings

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 74 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * calibre-0.8.48-2 (i686) * calibre-0.8.48-2 (x86_64) * mplayer2-20120414-1 (i686) * mplayer2-20120414-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.48-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.48-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (13 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20120414-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20120414-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-06 * tasks-0.20-2 (i686), since 2012-04-06 * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686), since 2012-04-06 * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64), since 2012-04-06 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. lfleischer - 3 signoffs 3. idevolder - 2 signoffs 4. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] forgotten username
by Christopher Patrick 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

i have forgotten my aur username could somebody send it to me this is the email address i used to sign up

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: mplayer-title-utf8
by Jekyll Wu 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This package[1] from me does not build and is no longer needed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47829 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPkSuWAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAxOoP/3jO/jrtWhLH2mm/E2QWeAcr /M125WLOkxR5GXbFS8ymGKNuca+gmFN5jFC28SgQlnKf/JK0WXPUHk4ImLgUB/hm tsIpcRKsB3yxMvcsai6GJYMK5FbXqQIIn4yfd+PTkAB5MkCOuciFttXrxXnHYTA5 td4WReqmZ0CyOJAPLpWbTnB3AOHKxlPAb+Lz1FR97rIYI7JyGNnP6fbpbYifbO2K 0OIauoWjFEHyofUzpYeEVCnOcCtv7aooMmtNfh9u1qUUX9vspPsAJg7Lcp28uzxQ 3I+Xe21gUq8eHXB6IMXfBoLaNZubjSttcob+cIhy3SJaR3eMy7DdKfy/cqiTvN5i 0Vw9QljEuNXKxNPvPvahO49b2zA67ep2SWTXX0OS4y6EGv0DcMbpVJSdWXVsvzkG 0pbCP8NoMab9EoyLgVJuMJsWuJ2Q6xznQ1XbhGmeiDiBuiorVKnbZm3c0UbkBbN5 x8rvcaQUonpA4bSyOIeI3jj1tliwguixRPw7xZ/jmGcDIHqZSuGgoar3jBdqo2WA O/44qkC+uVWiJ7e2BXAyF4TsSujsjcsJFj9an4TA06qs+v25UWUbKGWsAEZQ6SUc x0URLADKnUmoZ+wxGxPuKbUtWiqotFX3g7oRGrOJrqQpFu5JcSRfGe061MI4CTHA M/91AwdRmRY6dC54VBoz =HAMB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] merge & delete request
by Dirk 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Wimms ISO Tools (wit) in [1] is an outdated duplicate of [2], please merge these. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44169 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53955 Thanks, Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] merge request wiibafu-hg
by Dirk 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

wiibafu-hg: [1] is an outdated and non-functional duplicate of [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46598 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57973 please merge. Thanks, Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 72 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 7 signoffs 2. bisson - 5 signoffs 3. eric - 2 signoffs 4. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by rafael ff1 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

lib32-file [1] is outdated for some time now (it's in version 5.0.4 while 'file' in [core] repo is in version 5.1.1 already), orphan and no one seems to need or care about this package. IMO, this package has no use. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43990 Please delete

2 1

[aur-general] Lost AUR username linked to this email account
by Filipe Pinheiro 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

*How can I get it back?* *The email is : filipe.cantarelli@gmail.com*

3 2

[aur-general] mDNSResponder on Blacklist
by SJ_UnderWater 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

I recently tried to submit a package for mDNSResponder to AUR and it was rejected, saying that mDNSResponder is on the blacklist, but after some searching, I wasn't able to find any reference to it in the repositories or the blacklist reason. I realize that avahi provides the same functionality, but I'm willing to support MDNSR and it has become an optional dependency for Netatalk's newest alpha, so I would like to be able to link against it. The open-source package itself isn't the best-supported by Apple, but with a little work it's perfectly usable and provides the "official" solution; the IETF has asked Apple to submit mDNS as a standards track RFC [http://files.multicastdns.org/draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns.txt] The fact that it's lightweight (184KiB, no deps) doesn't hurt either. See the PKGBUILD at: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1088978

3 3

[aur-general] Removal request: mgwport
by Schala Zeal 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58081 While this has been verified to build successfully, I think it expects a Windows/MSYS environment as opposed to an actual Unix environment.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge requests for compiz-*git to compiz-*-bzr
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Compiz is no longer developed in git, but rather in bzr. There are several compiz-*-git packages that should be merged into the new compiz-*-bzr packages: I don't think comments are generally relevant, so I don't think they need to be merged. compiz-core-git 20110827-1 -> compiz-core-bzr 3091-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26334 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58430 compiz-plugins-main-git 20110827-1 -> compiz-plugins-main-bzr 27-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50551 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58431 compiz-plugins-extra-git 20110827-1 -> compiz-plugins-extra-bzr 10-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50552 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58432 libcompizconfig-git 20110827-1 -> libcompizconfig-bzr 430-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11734 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58433 compizconfig-python-git 20111203-1 -> compizconfig-python-bzr 168-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11730 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58434 ccsm-git 20110827-1 -> ccsm-bzr 808-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11536 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58435 compizconfig-backend-gsettings-git 20110827-2 -> compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr 158-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51898 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58437 -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

4 4

[aur-general] Merge python-scientific in python2-scientific
by Hector Martinez-Seara 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi, Please merge python-scientific https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30945 in python2-scientific https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51615 both make reference to the same package but the first do not compile, is out of date, the name is wrong as is python2 dependent and it is orfan. I'm the maintainer of python2-scientific. Right now It is only used as a dependence of mmtk which I'm also the maintainer. Hector

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request: mosh, mosh-git
by Taylor Venable 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi there, I (metasyntax) am the maintainer of the mosh and mosh-git packages in the AUR. I hereby request that they be deleted so that those names may be taken over by the packages currently named mobile-shell and mobile-shell-git, respectively. FWIW, I will be uploading my packages under the new names mosh-scheme and mosh-scheme-git, so if you renaming is as easy as just removing them, that's just fine by me. Thanks much! -- Taylor C. Venable http://metasyntax.net/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 72 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs 2. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request
by Christopher luna 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the Lilyterm-testing package (it was my very first aur pkgbuild!) the goal of this package was to provide lilyterm release candidate 0.9.9, which took a loooong time to be released. anyway, got released and community has that package, so this is no longer needed. The url is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42280 thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Disown rosa-media-player
by Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hello, The rosa-media-player[1] package is out-of-date and not currently maintained by its current maintainer. Thus, I would like to request that it be disowned, so that myself or any other user interested in this package is able to maintain it properly. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417 -- Regards, Vítor Ferreira.

2 2

[aur-general] Delete request
by Sid Karunaratne 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Please remove nodeunit[1]. It is a duplicate of nodejs-nodeunit[2] but has no maintainer, no votes and a worse PKGBUILD. The latter is also better named. 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53796 2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54948 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: kate-ctags-plugin
by Chris Sakalis 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

The kate-ctags-plugin package[1] is old, orphaned and there is already a ctags plugin bundled with Kate. Perhaps it should be removed from the AUR? Thank you. --Chris Sakalis [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13942

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 72 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 4 signoffs 2. dan - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 4. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hello Archers. This is my application to be a trusted user and my sponsor is Sergej Pupykin. My name on all Arch projects is ConnorBehan. Some of you may remember me fondly from a conversation or two, others perhaps not so fondly, and I'm sure some of you don't know me at all! Anyway, since I started using Arch five years ago, I have gone from being mostly on the receiving end of support issues to mostly on the giving end. In that time, Arch has grown immensely in popularity and this puts increased pressure on the package maintainers so I want to help. On the forums, I would not go so far as to say I'm "a regular"... my posting is a bit on and off. But I have tried to be much more regular on the AUR. I currently maintain 38 packages. There are other packages that I used to maintain. Three of them are now in community under the maintainership of a TU (audit, sk1 and python-lcms). And one of them was a kernel package which was one of the first packages that Archers used to get Radeon KMS support before it was considered stable. The list of packages I would immediately put in community is not huge. My gsview and xdvdshrink packages surely have enough votes to warrant inclusion. I would also put python-gasp in community to help Arch users who are learning Python from the book thinkcspy like I did. And using talkfilters to chat in pirate speak never gets old. I also want to be in a better position to adopt orphaned packages (or neglected packages like info2man that should be orphaned). Six of my AUR packages so far were submitted by someone else. The packages I would not include are pidgin-broadcast (abuse potential), instantbird (unreliable with the packaging choices I have made) and the numerous packages that are decidedly non-vanilla. I have started three open source projects since I became involved in free software: * http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/ * http://demohack.sourceforge.net/ * http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-generic-slider I am pretty sure that only the last one has a user base greater than one =P. One thing you will probably notice from my AUR packages is that they tend to contain large, self-written patches. This is my favourite part about free software - modifying it to fix a bug or even add a significant feature. I am very much in the habit of contributing these patches back to upstream bug trackers: * http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7354 * http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7353 * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26998 * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47866 * https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667155 * https://bugzilla.instantbird.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165 * https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 * https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453706 * https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19672 * https://bitbucket.org/aafshar/pida-main/issue/464/please-make-moo-work-again * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=544752&aid=3054669&group_i… <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=544752&aid=3054669&group_i…> * http://sourceforge.net/p/gracegtk/tickets/1/ Some of them get accepted, and some don't =). Thanks for taking the time to read this and I look forward to hearing what you have to say.

4 5

[aur-general] Removal Request: Netatalk-git, Netatalk2
by SJ_UnderWater 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

I would also like to recommend [netatalk-git] and [netatalk2] for removal from AUR, they were temporary branches, have been flagged, are are now orphans. All changes have been merged into [netatalk]. Remove: [netatalk-git] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50971 [netatalk2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58178 Keep: [netatalk] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10032

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of AUR package
by David Whitlock 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, I would like to request the removal of the package genxword-py3-git ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54777) which I have been developing and I maintain. The reason is that I have changed its name. If you need any further info, or I need to contact someone else, please let me know. Thanking you in advance for your help, David Whitlock

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: gnome-terminal-git-mys
by Jekyll Wu 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] simply fails to build at all. It seems the upstream does not support building from the master branch. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50489 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjEEhAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAcdoQALPMRAwvzNUM+egDhnNCJ1DH mI6NC9KU6ZgalX1zjHRkhbLhXUF2uEXJpy+iD47dbwvXnJoa7fqNYI9PUfjqUOLY fCUtkUuS7509hUCAGb+x9o1UFVJUrUFBE3g4dlaOH8uVPG/6tGI6fFuF7p+9QPTn uW76fajpkK82+QkajMfmao6xBjTOg4DayW1FKfqmbO2hPKjIzEb+t+oKR5edLeJB MmU02apA2/Dy9ZP+6SantFF/ZA82X+HwSLoFubDjkgkkn6ffA53J1aDZn6/+fEtA A5l8fWvca+FemUabnIcRY7QYJN1QJCMV+NeJYmXuQzxYf2Lu/YjYqnmGTQTea0bx yXUH7kbGHQblcUJH1673isUnA+mxOQYw6xs0T2nlzF8f9OSuhsIKXz6hseZ53eKc 8CbEfsPkUjd/EAPjqdYIze589sJpNXMNR4RPmpeSx23yjgmicN7CG0vPoeLpNG0H g3EMnuff40MzuLR17KbXZHfWTxvNV3fkdm/2lTfJdVh1fz8ZqGzXkrXa8s/FcU5E +B1HzVWgpjah2D9oWAo27QW0teKKWfjaznPJCKIXV6DrFiQeZnZQ+8G2qBKFyhg8 zN0HnZeS/SK+/PgW7jb5m4a2qxWeMMRvK4IHCixk+Tzj5aiVCTacBNAbGqYaWuTx QurUx1a5vMzCWRx+q3Wi =5H5K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Seven seven 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Please remove create-svn - krita has its own optimized set https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47925 xine-lib-vdpau - xine-lib in extra have vdpau support https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22286 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34570 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: arch-gensplash
by Heiko Baums 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

I think the AUR package arch-gensplash [1] can be removed. It's orphaned, the last update is from 2008, it's flagged as out-of-date since more than a year, the URL doesn't exist anymore and the source package isn't available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15707 Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by Jakub Schmidtke 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, android-docs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48478 ) is very outdated (over 4 months). I sent an email to the maintainer 2 weeks ago, but I haven't received any response. Thanks!

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion request: haskell-vte
by Jekyll Wu 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is unmaintained and fails to build due to unavailable dependency. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37492 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjGNXAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAR64QAKc5+7AvsOQ3LqZcFvZ8EH4U N/auQNOLjD6AGxM+jKF2LTlZ+6/Iy3A1DH8iKjjouL3exvacg87ntRPwtC1AnOAu L7l0X8XCceRizKQKoPV+gA4CYryL6ZZj4mP8G6ScBenqaygwmWbvraKnQg7xbbGm K/53D325l6Gj9AcrrmevTAzUfqSLhetAL6zFTDwqe9y8LHlOsiy5ujZ0UEzem3YG 0a8etnilMnS+JHgJobytcY0p2QUVJ4eqrwprWRhKDRiOfcj1T3jQEt5hmpXoJsHT kkqxRNSrOmk+M0Kr40636hStPynPAg6olYkUAK278Xp+pw/ajeQUcXuCUj1Bw8ry cq7RNReDsrHVGXTuw92yNCOV7jaBDeiPQFwq7eBjMiWOCzdE5kj4/42rR0BfCvxp fuBr1OL8xBAxkGqCPfH3Ump2Kh7wG0WlAkn2w/LLekuzPAvN1DiWdX1wogVTBpqE 5iMr6jN0Z6d0sOPqTpsl1osZHQT6HixPYLBYOaaTqoU4F5+rmas/T9D5qq67Oiyj Id/wiOtrmV9J58Q6YRUZUjfGi2d+CHnkenjRy6FwWYfr2txRo3HHs4yyoyG6cZ1W lhhdxoclI5OtzYjHsGxnOkeonnGrdyihXo1AzR+h06fxEPOPuer0GjjEeqUT2ZKA nCGES7SMBzil49A+4gVm =e2wc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] [merge request] pidgin-gfire
by Taylor Lookabaugh 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

May someone please merge the votes/comments from [1]pidgin-gfire-svn to [2]pidgin-gfire-git, and then delete [1]pidgin-gfire-svn? Thanks. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29381 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58555 -- Taylor Lookabaugh

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 71 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (10 total) == * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request bitcoin-daemon
by Konstantin Nikiforov 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Outdated AUR package 'bitcoin-daemon'[1] duplicates community/bitcoin-daemon[2]. Please remove dup. from AUR. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41385 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/bitcoin-daemon/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: terminal-urgency
by Jekyll Wu 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is outdated and unmaintained. The download link is also broken (for me). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20847 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjF2gAAoJEOemZ9znWXlA8Q0P/jkUUfJH+pgl7IbLwJ/HDmm7 Ae8H2ICp2g37hL58DniFD/5W9QmpiHo+ea2PybHQYnEWAiOo9OsNHUHxVtUq4uJB 5wP74+LvhRYKAxwsDU5CD6u3MeCIbuyBOI7op34UpzL6p53v4nA57qVNXMOKS+Ki QI0qa1rSCBFQHBRrnzfV+ifV53jMPk8zAu/iDIhqqf5OTzpMUqQHM4cOnOeCsIg5 CF57muoPsvicXpiktNnS+V8quBUNEjKW8nGuTACPfh4IjQvWXgftRluEuB4jBspO HUdcSCsC+ULtmwaOOxSRXwxktE+pnvHSkOyxfELEJ5+sucH+sT8dRs2aaRlSQ3cF god4KpfYg3vggKhVM6ElFLf3Z0poPzPLycCjf4xdpWTSeRKArXXUkr4QFni9OZwq GCXbYPY5WwruLeHeXXaByWKMiQSM0+/Nl0W2xl1ibmVDzqsHRvntBWiUNOI5pb4c GsVZNzephQbUgkR2FSy32ikn8Z4wkosP/ya9jy99VstPCJ/wNRElangcxuuNnA65 iFGN11IUUnZ27c8eAJDKhwh4ACp+DrL7FOegAzDYSSU8pbv990ksBQ0VqWTNKhsB g87qj2gEN45znQt2GBYkGYLQIp0760EeIvuD6GQT/IxxLmFbk1UtYEI5mFWxWbbE jys2gS8FYSfcRuZnZ+hk =IbIk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: evilvte-hidetab
by Jekyll Wu 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is outdated and abandoned by its submitter. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjFgYAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAlgsP/38vBys2axa6xMycw/VRf+bQ cgQdOArJp8vr3ARxHcPFoBQ2Z+yvOjJJDfyk0SrjxKaDRhAGKEi+EnegJUiSzT/t 3vElrjDwKn6suVmltKTzDt5KEsa31uss0AqiF18MZe6pkZXITCaU+wul/QCeWpUV hFZkRwh1WRqZ5hOOGBukHjirDLsKjE7PJWgFcQ1I+DdFUpcuSZ68DG1StlQ95n9G ibbLbxYd+zC2MRbbm7GxeOun4OCWiwHfu1UX+n2mDfvqjskjY4PbZUhEKUO7sCb3 2DRbdXVlEAT/IB5uFhMh1eRjn708hGflXkxmkR4NCGjeT4H4QndXThdiXgy/qlDT koLkkHCm9Y/vx1lybNbpGqhv9aGT7q88LsLAGGyUyMtc/l7ZprUOE97Rq2brzugo ObDSbT9NFxcbUKFIzySaP6zKZIISLcD6XEYjwVNhMBli6T3OQUc1UxQ3HeSQjcib h7W1qj804NWxqrKQ+pxESfSj7b/rY6BAAta0HeSYYvXtbZu3cYVTN0CWPQCRFLUS BIRqRpgNYxe3fzqhQbhyLpqSXEDK3ysLka2kWFdMbPlTwXBqjiSbcctNJP7wy7h2 NmbNPDfb6xmLlI1Z/LQNwDafscoRLbuKdQHTptox7ZLK7BTZMTFwAeBJ8e9e661h mMJ953rkBaO+W2HEhVIz =0MPU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Xavier Corredor Llano 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, please remove [1] because this patches included after 3.1 kernel version [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51329 thanks -- Xavier Corredor Llano

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: python-cssutils-beta
by Lars Jacob 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

This package is not needed anymore. python-cssutils is on version 0.9.9 in community and there is no current beta on of cssutils [1]. AUR URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38135 [1] https://bitbucket.org/cthedot/cssutils/downloads Bests, Lars

2 1

[aur-general] Request package removal: pastebin-cli-git
by infinity.illusion 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

package pastebin-cli-git is no longer in development and the source code can no longer be found online. i am package maintainer Sychopx and now request it to be removed. Regards, Sychopx

2 1

[aur-general] Disown zdesktop package
by Martin Wimpress 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, The zdesktop[1] package is out of date and isn't properly packaged. I tried to contact the maintainer via the AUR and email with no answer. I request a disown so I can maintain it. We use Zimbra Desktop at work so I have a vested interested in maintaining this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41804 -- Regards, Martin.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 71 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (10 total) == * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 9 signoffs 2. ibiru - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Non-working package and no maintenance
by oliver 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hello, this package seem to have a historya of problems: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44977 After the latest comment from myra, which was on 2011-08-28, the maintainer did not responded so far. The package does not work. Kann the maintainer be pushed to fix this? Ciao, Oliver

2 3

[aur-general] Orphaning desmume/agg
by Jonathan Conder 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Hi all, I have just orphaned desmume & agg, since I don't really have time to maintain packages that I don't use. Unless someone adopts it I'll move desmume to the AUR next week (it needs updating). However, I can't do that with agg as it is required by gnash-common, so it'd be good if someone could take over that one (updates for it are fairly rare). Cheers, Jonathan

2 1

[aur-general] Package renaming (tano)
by François Boulogne 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Hi, The package for tano [1] uses the git repo. of the project. I suggest to rename it according to the aur policy (ie tano-git) since there is a tarball distributed upstream [2] that could be also packaged. The maintainer is in CC. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41827 [2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/tano/files/ Cheers, François.

2 1

[aur-general] Compiz* package cleanup
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

The following packages should be deleted (or merged in some cases). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35912 Dependency no longer exists, orphan, and already almost certain this no longer works. (this has been unsupported upstream for a long time). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12211 Haven't been updated for YEARS, the domains (both for url and website) no longer exists. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51899 Does not build - the maintainer himself said it did not after the last update; which was over 6 months ago, so abandoned as well. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11539 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35960 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11540 Hasn't been updated in over 6 months, does not build (upstream killed the emerald for compiz 0.9, actually). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49693 Not a single vote, orphan and out of date. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26336 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11540 Broken; domain (both for url and website) has not existed for some time now. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19826 Fails to build, looks abandoned (both the package, and upstream). -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

5 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 69 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (59 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (10 total) == * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. bisson - 7 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Inactive for a few weeks
by Thorsten Töpper 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello, I'll be (partly) inactive for a couple of weeks. Maybe I'll have some time to take care of some stuff yet that's not granted. I won't participate in any upcoming votes. As I won't check my mails everyday, answers to emails may also take a few days. Kind Regards Thorsten -- Jabber: atsutane(a)freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4

3 9

[aur-general] [merge] djvu2pdf-latest
by Anton Larionov 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Please, merge djvu2pdf-latest https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57014 into djvu2pdf https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18397 -- Regards, Anton Larionov

3 2

[aur-general] [Merge Request] mmm-mode
by Stefan Husmann 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello, please merge mmm-mode[1] into emacs-mmm-mode[2]. The latter was introduced for better naming consistence. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15223 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58477 Best Regards Stefan

3 2

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

On 14/04/12 11:02 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 14.04.2012 10:23, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >> On 04/14/2012 10:19 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: >>> On 14.04.2012 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >>>> It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support. >>> There are References and In-Reply-To headers (in this mail, not the >>> previous), but they point to mail from mailman. >>> >>> Do you get digests instead of separate mails? >> True, I've checked mailman interface and it seems to be problem with my >> mail client. No, I get separated mails. > I meant if Connor gets digest, sorry for being unclear there. Yes, I switched all my lists to digest mode awhile ago when I was spending more and more time deleting emails. Do you feel strongly that I should switch back?

2 1

[aur-general] Please merge deepin-scrot-git into deepin-screenshot-git
by Jekyll Wu 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The maintainer has created deepin-screenshot-git[1] to replace deepin-scrot-git[2], which follows the renaming of the upstream. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57793 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55299 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPiOpUAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAd60P/0xmUF6MT924UPxS9Vouu1Kc zrR2AI2v6akCjSe3KHi7fWtLlv7z3ugFHflhgEsRhdsaU3ehOHj2OLnd4ytMLCjM RC1W/ILIJ/o/cCAt8F1XLkRO5/hxgTbfPu9hm0DYpY5TfCJk2jDIXGF8QYNd3hUv QIsMHBfH8duZV63bgGaSAH8MaKQTcAVPPkjRzPwbh/Q3KW5MzzARY1OqbzShvBRp Im1/l/MaGzOW6P9hVOGVZeQaJKwPaxKuNMiEvsLd5liRu34sTabvpMGeBHNq0DrO D7bCGjl//ABmh+D7w4a4r+cb3uLsJaZr7N6AuPQPnIFVXOBEpU9ceAFJ/LB5C6Ub z08XR7khXcaY/bJPsDVRH+x3iejP5jaH+itCnrBVg/XAe6ignQb7fGqvnVgHt4W3 QuvwY0c4DJg8sip+SsrKtxHxSlWoMlBb+hUuuZFRBirnPE6cjn8KzvJvggMaWFtR gTSiDy5jJY1KkVfSrextJBGD2W5tAK82WZpC1cRdWT0c7Gq3bn+hhUFaSRbUPdyt 9Yepvz7nvbC4PZ9XpYvNIdAn/eyodyUskt7kHZUbdtn81WAZibgJThx7UKTbmVx6 zZ1ZY3pAwYCM6qC/0HZWTdEWU7dIKow7Ph8FpIc7HhxgObZDYGm9zeYU9QCfWr/G NpT+IsBLB3pomsM29iW9 =zR72 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

On 13/04/12 04:16 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: > Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 18:00:08 schreef Allan McRae: >> On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote: >>> How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who >>> uploaded the key fingerprint to >>> http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and >>> http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he >>> wrote the TU application that was just sent and hopes that you do not >>> think less of him for being too absent-minded to sign emails! >> Hmm... barely acceptable, but we will let you away with it this time. >> >> Anyway, I recognize your name and have no bad connotations with it, >> which is the only criterion I use for reviewing applications. >> >> So, good luck! >> >> Allan > All looks pretty clean to me, i would do one suggestion > start using the package function, i just checked some pkgbuilds randomly and > did not see it in any of them. (this is not at all life threatening ;p) > and you can remove the '|| return 1' since makepkg catches this nicely for > some time now > > Very true. I just updated 10 of my PKGBUILDs to make them not look like they were written 3 years ago. Will do more soon.

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 61 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (55 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stativ - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Vegastrike games orphaned in the AUR
by SanskritFritz 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems to be active. Thanks SanskritFritz

2 3

[aur-general] duplicate aur packages
by Daniel Wallace 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

this was just created Linuxtycoon - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58404 which is just a copy of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58139 but uses the deb package for some reason

2 1

[aur-general] tu bylaws update proposal
by Ike Devolder 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hi, after my own application and seeing it again i would like to propose an update to the TU Bylaws giving more information that the application should be gpg signed with the addidional publication of the public key. This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_ne… attached the patch for https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html --Ike

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion requests: firefox*
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 66 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (60 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs 2. pierre - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who uploaded the key fingerprint to http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he wrote the TU application that was just sent and hopes that you do not think less of him for being too absent-minded to sign emails!

3 2

[aur-general] delete puredata
by Andre "Osku" Schmidt 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

hi, i think puredata package can be deleted from aur http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44768 cause that package is orphaned and theres a package named pd (like upstream tarball, fwiw) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2117 cheers .andre

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 65 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (59 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 4 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] package deletion request for facebook python sdk
by Alper Kanat 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

Hey There, Can you please delete the following packages? Some are removed in upstream and don't have any maintainer on AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45906 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45908 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34328 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55193 This one should have a -git in its name: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56712 --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Please nuke the following 4 packages. [1]swfdec-git ||Development has stalled 3 years ago. Only few [2]swfdec-git-pulse ||random fixes compared to the stable release, [3]swfdec-mozilla-git ||doesn't build as it is. [4]cairo-snapshot |Was needed by [1], before stable cairo 1.10 [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28182 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28180 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28183 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33888

2 1

[aur-general] note about all rosa-* stuff
by Anton Chernyshov 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi all! Just one note to all who wants to build all rosa-* packages. At this moment all new packages is uploaded (and will be uploaded) to this place - http://mirror.yandex.ru/rosa/rosa2012lts/repository/srpms/main/release/ . I have pointed to release repository with src.rpms (not frozen yet because we are planinig release at the end of April). At this mirror you can found new versions of rosa-media-player, rosa-icons and other rosa-* packages updated by ROSA team. -- С уважением, Чернышов Антон

1 0

[aur-general] partial inactivity
by Sergej Pupykin 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, I have a business trip to Japan now, so I can do my work very slowly until March 8.

2 3

[aur-general] Inactive user tdy
by Cédric Girard 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, The user tdy [1] seems no longer active. He has 360 packages with 50 outdated. Last activity I've been able to spot is mid-2011. Could someone orphan all his packages for other people to adopt them. I have not contacted him but he is in cc of this email. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=11163 Regards, -- Cédric Girard

8 18

[aur-general] Delete antargis
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10863 Out of date for over six months, orphan, url is broken, last comment says it didn't even build. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion: vim-tango-desert
by Markus Unterwaditzer 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Could you please delete vim-tango desert https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27844 ? It doesn't work with the latest version of vim and vim-colorschemes already has the tango-desert colorscheme included.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request
by speps 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, recently the Buzztard project switched from svn to git, so bml-svn [1a] -> bml-git [1b] gst-buzztard-svn [2b] -> gst-buzztard-git [2b] buzztard-svn [3b] -> buzztard-git [3b] can be merged. bsl-svn [4] can be deleted, since buzztard-git now provides bsl-git. Also jackctl [5a] was recently renamed to clijack [5b] and can be merged too. Thanks [1a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48287 [1b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58369 [2a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48286 [2b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58370 [3a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48284 [3b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58371 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48283 [5a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39392 [5b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58362 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 63 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (57 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 10 signoffs 2. allan - 7 signoffs 3. stephane - 3 signoffs 4. lcarlier - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

The following are all orphan. They each have additional reason(s) that make them candidate for deletion. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45124 Is out of date (marked 11 months ago). Stable version is newer than this "testing" version. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29428 Fails to build, out of date over 12 months, last updated in 2009. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29427 Depends on the above (which doesn't build), last updates in 2009. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17278 Fails to build and out of date for over 12 months. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18489 Out of date, and stable version (in extra) is newer than this "-dev" version. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27393 Does not build (bad depends, bad URL), out of date. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15351 Fails to build, out of date for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28344 Fails to build, out of date for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29213 should be merged into "python-httplib2" (in [extra]). Also, and out of date. Cheers! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 48 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 64 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (48 total) == * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (58 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] fixing dupekill
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

On 2012-04-10 00:22, Daniel Campbell wrote: > Hugo: thanks for pointing that out. I had asked about it on the forum and figured there was a way to work with it that way. How would I handle the fact that the tarball would have the readme and PKGBUILD in it already? Would they simply be deleted with the src directory after a 'makepkg -c'? > > Sent from my Nokia phone Yes, they would. Anything you don't copy/move from src to pkgdir will be deleted (if building with makepkg -c). You PKGBUILD is fine as it is; it won't copy over anything undesired. Also, you can use "install -D..." to create the directory and skip the "mkdir" line. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

1 0

[aur-general] merge packages to python2 names
by Daniel Wallace 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

could you please merge - python-grapefruit https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40104 to python2-grapefruithttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58320 and python-fabulous https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40103 to python2-fabulous https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58321 so that they can be correctly labeled and since they are only required by the package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58322 Thank you, Daniel Wallace

2 1

Re: [aur-general] fixing dupekill
by Daniel Campbell 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

Hugo: thanks for pointing that out. I had asked about it on the forum and figured there was a way to work with it that way. How would I handle the fact that the tarball would have the readme and PKGBUILD in it already? Would they simply be deleted with the src directory after a 'makepkg -c'? Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request (?): libxfce4menu-devel, xfce4-notifyd-devel 0.2.1-1
by Dirk 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

I was checking XFCE related orphaned packages and found a couple I think can be deleted. libxfce4menu-devel 4.6.1-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20768 Flagged out of date, feb. 2011. Latest version (4.6.2) available in extra xfce4-notifyd-devel 0.2.1-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43937 Out of date, latest version (0.2.2) is in extra I see a lot of package flagged out-of-date on 02 Jun 2011, is this some sort of 'marked for deletion'? Some of these seem to be up to date. e.g.: battery-applet-4-xfce4 0.9.1-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18086 Build depends on HAL (deprecated, but available in AUR), bu no newer version is available upstream. Dirk

3 2

[aur-general] Request for Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

I uploaded a package that has the source included. The wiki mentioned binaries but nothing about languages like bash or Python that don't need to be compiled. Anyway, since I don't have a place to host it and fix the PKGBUILD, it needs to be removed so the AUR's not marred, I suppose. The package is named 'dupekill'. I uploaded it and am the current maintainer (xelados on the AUR). If you need further proof, my Github page is at https://github.com/sporkbox and should have this e-mail address as the contact address in the profile. Sorry to add to the workload. If the software supported it I wouldn't have had to bother anyone. Thanks. You guys should really give an option for people who upload packages to delete them through the same interface if, like me, they realize they screwed up. I had to subscribe to this list before I could send an e-mail to ask for someone to do something that should be possible without human involvement...

4 3

[aur-general] shotwell...
by oliver 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Hello, shotwell is here: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/shotwell/ and it's marked out of date. And shotwell also is here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48503 Here I don't know if it's up to date... But it uses git,.. can this just be rebuilt from git, even the package itsels is old? Also it confuses me that shotwell is on http://www.archlinux.org as well as http://aur.archlinux.org Can you explain me this? And: can the package maintainers be reminded to update? Shotwell 0.12.1 is out since a whiole and maybe even a newer verison (0.13.x) is underway... Ciao, Oliver

6 12

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Are you being glib? I achieved what I was aiming for (deleting a package). Given the reponse I got on my observation ('patches welcome'), I don't feel inclined to go through another hoop in yet another department just to be told 'no, do it yourself and we _might_ consider it'. No sense in repeating the popular opinion in another format. And if most people are happy with the bureaucracy, who am I to change it? It's not my project or my website. I carry no clout or weight among the staff. It would be a waste of time to submit a feature request for something that is clearly against the consensus. I'd have more luck forking the AUR and hacking it privately, assuming I felt passionately enough about it to spend even more time on the issue. Tldr: no, it won't achieve anything. Sent from my Nokia phone -----Original Message----- From: Karol Blazewicz Sent: 2012-04-09 17:40:55 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell(a)gmx.com> wrote: > Most systems already do the paper-trailing for us. They're known as logs. Yup. Even if regular users don't have access to said log, asking a TU once in a blue moon to check wtf is/was going on with some package is OK. Have you opened a feature request on the bugtracker for this?

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Most systems already do the paper-trailing for us. They're known as logs. ----- Original Message ----- From: Karol Blazewicz Sent: 04/09/12 04:23 PM To: dlcampbell(a)gmx.com, Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell(a)gmx.com> wrote: >> It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. > Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require someone to sign up to another service to ask for something to be done on the service they're having issue with. Departmentalizing things is a sign of bureaucracy. Most people dislike it in government, hospitals, business, and other institutions; why on Earth would we voluntarily do it in FOSS? Especially when the majority of problems (e.g. Deleting packages) can be solved by a machine. The 'paper trail' in bureaucracy is often used for accountability purpose. > Politics aside, I agree that a grace period would be good. But perhaps a little longer than a single day? Maybe 3-7 days, to account for real life getting in the way. You say you didn't properly test the package and you need up to a week to fix it? I guess the current system allows for such things too (albeit via a TU) so why not ...

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Karol Blazewicz 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell(a)gmx.com> wrote: >> It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. > Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require someone to sign up to another service to ask for something to be done on the service they're having issue with. Departmentalizing things is a sign of bureaucracy. Most people dislike it in government, hospitals, business, and other institutions; why on Earth would we voluntarily do it in FOSS? Especially when the majority of problems (e.g. Deleting packages) can be solved by a machine. The 'paper trail' in bureaucracy is often used for accountability purpose. > Politics aside, I agree that a grace period would be good. But perhaps a little longer than a single day? Maybe 3-7 days, to account for real life getting in the way. You say you didn't properly test the package and you need up to a week to fix it? I guess the current system allows for such things too (albeit via a TU) so why not ...

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require someone to sign up to another service to ask for something to be done on the service they're having issue with. Departmentalizing things is a sign of bureaucracy. Most people dislike it in government, hospitals, business, and other institutions; why on Earth would we voluntarily do it in FOSS? Especially when the majority of problems (e.g. Deleting packages) can be solved by a machine. Politics aside, I agree that a grace period would be good. But perhaps a little longer than a single day? Maybe 3-7 days, to account for real life getting in the way. Another thing came to me as I was thinking about this issue. People that adopt an orphan package are able to upload a new src tarball, right? If so, then perhaps all that needs to be done is expanding the table to indicate which user created the package (first uploaded it) and give them permission to delete for the given grace period. I assume the required 'infrastructure' such as upload timestamps, user permissions, etc are in place already. Just an idea. Sent from my Nokia phone -----Original Message----- From: Xyne Sent: 2012-04-09 13:15:13 To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Cc: dlcampbell(a)gmx.com Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal > It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. Is it really "crippling" to send an email to this list to request deletion? Regardless, I'm not against allowing submitters to delete their own packages, but there should probably be some time limit to prevent abuse, e.g. within 24 hours of submission.

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Xyne 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

> It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. Is it really "crippling" to send an email to this list to request deletion? Regardless, I'm not against allowing submitters to delete their own packages, but there should probably be some time limit to prevent abuse, e.g. within 24 hours of submission.

1 0

[aur-general] rednotebook package
by Dmitry Korzhevin 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Hello, guys I am maintainer of rednotebook package in AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21984 I owned and updating this package about a year, and now i wish to maintain this package in official Community repository in Arch Linux. How can i do this, and what i need to do? Here is some of my contributions on Arch Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&o… Also i have some packages in AUR. And subscribed to all arch linux mailing lists. My nickname in arch linux irc channels: dkorzhevin Please, give me advice -- Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin Tel: +38 (039) 295-0000 Office Phone: +38 (044) 383-14-12 E-mail: dkorzhevin(a)lsupport.net Jabber ID: dkorzhevin(a)lsupport.net Skype: dkorzhevin URL: http://lsupport.net Linux Support LLC

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Allan McRae 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On 09/04/12 17:56, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work would not likely be accepted. What a load of crap... Everyone submitted their first patch at one stage.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work would not likely be accepted. I guess things will stay as they are until someone important dislikes them. I'm not one for jumping through hoops. Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Bartłomiej Piotrowski 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On 04/09/2012 09:46 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > It is simple, actually. When a user uploads a package, they should be given rights to remove it if need be. Simply claiming an orphan wouldn't grant the rights. That way only mods and original uploaders would get permission to remove packages and it wouldn't be prone to abuse. It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. > > Sorry for not quoting. My phone isn't fancy enough for it. > > Sent from my Nokia phone It's often said: patches welcome. You can fill feature request on our bugtracker. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

It is simple, actually. When a user uploads a package, they should be given rights to remove it if need be. Simply claiming an orphan wouldn't grant the rights. That way only mods and original uploaders would get permission to remove packages and it wouldn't be prone to abuse. It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. Sorry for not quoting. My phone isn't fancy enough for it. Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

[aur-general] merge/delete vala
by Oliver Bandel 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hello, there is a lot of vala stuff in AUR. Some sems to be outdated: vala-010 0.10.4-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47882 vala-09 0.9.8-3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45525 vala-012 0.12.1-3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52935 ======= MORE UP TO DATE: vala-git 20120216-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31429 vala-devel 0.16.0-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38260 Ciao, Oliver

2 1

[aur-general] delete/merge request: icon theme meliae
by Dirk 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

I adopted and updated xfce-theme-meliae [1] before realising it's now a duplicate of meliae-svg-icon-theme [2]. Please delete or merge my version [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38572 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33832 There also seems to be a duplicate of an older version 0.7.2 [3] & [4]. [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22544 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48623 Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Forgotten username
by Philipp Kroos 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hi, I can't remember the username I registered with in the aur... This is the email-address associated with it. Could an admin be so kind to drop me a mail with the name? Thanks, Philipp

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 12 signoffs 2. tpowa - 4 signoffs 3. ibiru - 1 signoffs 4. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Off
by Xavier D. 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hi, I'll be off for 3 weeks with no or limited access to Internet. Please don't disown or delete my packages (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=magicrhesus&SeB=m) in the meantine. Thanks

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by rafael ff1 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

"scribus-ng" is release candidate package with an outdated (old) version and hasn't been updated for a year now. Plus this outdated package is the only one of this maintainer, so I guess he doesn't really want to maintain it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47919 (note: there is another maintained "release candidate" package, scribus-rc, no need for both) "scribus-stable" is outdated, orphan and there's a stable version of scribus in [extra], therefore this package is nonsense. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35538 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] [remove] python2-numericalpython
by Hector Martinez-Seara 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Please remove the following of my packages (python2-numericalpython): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51612 It is of no use any longer. It has been superseded by numpy and no longer developed. The last package depending on it was python2-scientificpython which now depends on numpy. Thanks, Hector -- Hector Martínez-Seara Monné mail: hseara(a)gmail.com Tel: +34656271145 Tel: +358442709253

2 1

[aur-general] AUR package removal request
by Padfoot 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

Hi, I am the maintainer of the following AUR packages: lightdm-gtk-greeter-no-gnome: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58232 lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk-no-gnome: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58236 lightdm-osk: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54208 Requesting their removal for the following reasons: lightdm-osk: upstream has moved to v1.2.x which separates the greeter from the daemon. Functionality of lightdm-osk is now provided by the following packages lightdm: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40708 lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58235 lightdm-gtk-greeter-no-gnome: after discussion with the maintainer of lightdm and other users of the package, we agreed on providing a single unthemed version of the greeter package. This package is now a duplicate of lightdm-gtk-greeter: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58230 lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk-no-gnome: same as lightdm-gtk-greeter-no-gnome. This package is a duplicate of lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58235 Cheers. Lachla.

2 1

[aur-general] reminder: icu49.1 rebuilds
by Andreas Radke 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

I'm going to finish soon the extra/testing repo rebuilds. Can you guys with community repo access please finish missing rebuilds? thx. https://www.archlinux.org/todo/138/ -Andy

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 5 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 5 signoffs 3. tomegun - 5 signoffs 4. seblu - 2 signoffs 5. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge python-crack into python2-crack
by Jonathan Wilson 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

Hi, I've uploaded a new PKGBUILD of python2-crack for library naming and fixes. Please merge and remove python-crack into python2-crack. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] signoff xbmc
by Ike Devolder 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

anyone for i686 xbmc-11.0-2 in community-testing -- Ike

2 2

[aur-general] On vacation for a few days
by Alexander Rødseth 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hi, Going for an easter vacation / cabin trip for a few days. Have a good one! -- Cheers, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: cutecom and cutecom-qt4
by Jekyll Wu 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 cutecom-qt4[1] is shipping an old version of cutecom[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16655 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4450 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPfeX/AAoJEOemZ9znWXlAZNQQAKxxdFqrc9u11S27kN99JEMa 0aTzPLvZcoIp5CBfawjqof2p3cgnOe3zMnsNrmk2xCqxWG4w0bqV+TEClqZ1lq7D m2TygI3AXcUp5K2CrdmkYGNYr/RLllDcLWgRemu12TjsMgaxrLVNgRdwBfHRx6Et ih5nrUvz/gJyD8G9Jt5HRNDAkuTifoWnfjEVQQVWJ4oc1+bYXWvd3p+lz9NYoowG QGjai6NRItIeKTQlrw5UuGiphM3izaC0/WbPTBQb99SoARyZoTXCICThCtxSvce/ h/YliW+1jqojJyFyuOnivKVQgrShb8SZ1XRJFm9tkmDV6Xe2XQN3lj2j7/Ay0Bvi L/EJAE6o8ec68/hJY9grn4++IHWExpYHfT8BFDTbwH/jLuAtlhWLeHRUhPcne7qN 7NtAvZmpSooAvEWijp/1AUgnygM+cWcCfpguNw/7ZVST96UVA85zzeQFO2NHaxxE ASzswo5M5C+kUDg55IYi8fK3C9S64asFWu7ZzQ6ndA4g7aGmwssKKCNrvmK6gw4d PZbR8jAH1QaUi+y1ucdLNDbLRWbicKxiYcYpE8xXGgUVU81vFvFvZllO0KSt7nnY KjaExEncQGLYi5JQakTqNe2xQuPeqGWQ/M9Y8I35qXvKL6gO0Gv4aJZnMMQwP6t3 WBRZVcoVRovtoKBPM3as =/Vta -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete Request] xiphos-webkit-svn
by Stefan Husmann 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hello, Please delete xiphos-webkit-svn, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53578. It builds from a vanished branch, which now has become trunk. Thanks

2 3

[aur-general] Disown Hub package
by Alfredo Palhares 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hello, The hub[1] package is out of date and isn't being properly packaged. Tried to contact the maintainer a while ago, no answer. I request a disown so I can take care of it. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32551 -- Regards, Alfredo Palhares

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. idevolder - 9 signoffs 2. dan - 7 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs 4. seblu - 2 signoffs 5. mtorromeo - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: deprecated psi packages
by Joker-jar 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

psi-whiteboard (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19005) - whiteboarding is supported by psi-plus now (upstream) psi-gentoo-i18n (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10780) - deprecated psi-gentoo (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10779) - deprecated psi-otr (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19867) - otr is supported by psi-plus now (upstream) psi-otr-tfh-berlin (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29513) - deprecated psi-otrplugin (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19868) - otr plugin is psi-plus's plugin now ( https://github.com/psi-plus/plugins/tree/master/dev/otrplugin) psi-otrplugin-tfh-berlin (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29516) - deprecated psimedia-plus-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37867) - psimedia-plus project moved to git (psimedia-plus-git) all this packages are realy trash, it doesn't updates about 2 years, most of their functionality is already available in the psi-plus

2 1

[aur-general] Packages up for adoption in community.
by Thomas Dziedzic 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hi I am disowning vtk, paraview (along with libcgns2 as a dep), nut, root, and swi-prolog in community. I will give the devs/tus a week to adopt them before I move them to the aur. Cheers!

1 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: linux-aircrack
by Ifai Gios 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

The AUR package linux-aircrack<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51272>is obsolete as of linux-3.3, as the patches it includes are now implemented into linux. Please delete the AUR package. Thank you in advance The maintainer, ifaigios

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: 'drm' and 'trim'
by Fortunato Ventre 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

Hi, please remove drm[1] and trim[2]. I've released dsromsmanager 1.4 and created a new PKGBUILD for it[3]. I've merged both the old packages into this one. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37452 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37453 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58220

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 26 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (i686) * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (26 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 11 signoffs 2. thomas - 7 signoffs 3. allan - 5 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 5. dreisner - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Luca Bennati 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

I kindly ask a TU to merge my package freetype2-lcd_ ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12283) with the newly updated and renamed freetype2-lcd (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58190)

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 11 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs 3. stephane - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: virtualbox-sun
by Det 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

I guess this is a good summary of all the talk in virtualbox-sun's comment section[1]. The reality here is that virtualbox-bin[2] has evolved into something _at least_ as good as virtualbox-sun. While it's true that -sun is the original one it's also the one with the incorrect naming, a bit slower updates (by a day or so) and less votes (229 vs -bin's 3430). Because we can't justify keeping duplicated work around just to make everybody happy, one of them has to go. Even if -sun was to stay here the "better" stuff in -bin would have to be implemented there first before the removal and the renaming. When put together with the comment/vote merge it's starting to sound a bit pointless (taken how we can just remove that one). I know what I'd do but it's not my decision: it's yours. [1] virtualbox-sun = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31996 [2] virtualbox-bin = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51727 Det

5 9

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64), since 2012-03-19 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 8 signoffs 2. tomegun - 6 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. idevolder - 2 signoffs 5. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Huub Munstege 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

<a href="http://wife2.stopcrisis.net/cache/com_lyftenbloggie/02efpk.html"> http://wife2.stopcrisis.net/cache/com_lyftenbloggie/02efpk.html</a>

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Alexandre Ferrando 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

I've noticed today that a package that I am maintaining in the AUR [ 0 ] , baobab, has appeared also into testing [ 1 ] It seems to me that the logic option here is to delete baobab in the AUR, so please, go ahead. Thank you in advance [ 0 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12673 [ 1 ] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/x86_64/baobab/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 13 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (13 total) == * initscripts-systemd-v44-2 (any) * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ronald - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request
by speps 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Hi, according to the [extra] change perl-exiftool -> perl-image-exiftool please merge perl-exiftool-dev [1] -> perl-image-exiftool-dev [2] Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47856 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58123 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: msmtp-nomta
by Clemens Buchacher 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

I created msmtp-nomta as a workaround for [1], which has been fixed in the current version of the main package extra/msmtp-nomta 1.4.27-2. Thanks to Eric for fixing this long-standing issue. The msmtp-nomta package is therefore obsolete. Please remove it. Thanks. [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23287

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 20 signoffs 2. tomegun - 6 signoffs 3. allan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal or merge request for gtkradiant-svn
by iv597 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Please remove my package gtkradiant-svn or merge the comments and such into gtkradiant-git. GtkRadiant has moved to GitHub and the PKGBUILD now reflects this, hence the -svn package serves no purpose (other than perhaps confusing searchers). Thank you. -- iv597

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 Mar '12

31 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 7 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 3 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Cleanup
by Michael Düll 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

Hi everybody! Can someone please delete my old packages in AUR? - aacgain[1] (superseeded by aacgain-cvs[2], as there's no more support for tarballs upstream). - bitcoin-noforcedfee[3] (not needed anymore). Thank you everyone =) akurei [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4560 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41445 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53209

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs 4. mtorromeo - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] tweetdeck deletion request
by Cédric Girard 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Hi, TweetDeck has dropped all kind of linux support with moving away from Adobe Air. The PKGBUILD [1] is of no more use. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25070 -- Cédric Girard

3 5

[aur-general] Orphan request: open-syobon
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Please orphan open-syobon (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50327) Maintainer was emailed 2 weeks ago and there is still no response (seems like he is inactive; other his packages should probably be orphaned as well). -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

2 1

[aur-general] Merge python2-legit-git and legit-git
by Jan-Erik Rediger 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Hi, so I re-uploaded the package under a new name: legit-git[1]. Please merge and delete the old package now: python2-legit-git[2] Thanks, badboy [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58018 [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50308

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by rafael ff1 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

lib32-libopenssl2 has bad naming, wrong lib folder (/opt/lib32/usr/lib), is orphan and is not a dependency for any package. Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19380 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: lxterminal-ru
by Jekyll Wu 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 lxterminal-ru[1] is patched against an outdated version, and the current version of community/lxtermnal already contains the translation for Russian. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25639 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPcjbbAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAtXMP/jDUAB27weyZMUHbxwUnaWAh iDEsvdlU2KLgG8s3S1Tk1roGsujUxMraqVyOiZF0Dbk2o38z+YoUbr0VbYp05Ddy Qx1nFY8ro9MlWfUsg9UmQcSnLm7iXRpWcKrFJ3oLU0QXy1k7/e0oxRkP5HqETapN PneqHuBZ4De/MvxYpsP0OlTZRlUhehmlXAZjwM7CxAEsZ3VXsbGN+VL88avLESAk u2dJ/gVCcyP1ztOlYoHfkzPZmc7tC4WLmFVNBbdfVoHoM9pzVJ0oygRyZHb6XNfo jr9d+Mp6fWHgLIZfwbSRqm4fH0YyjZ75zhF9NvyFBNtPldk/X1BcIJqYDH78lxkV jpfzopx9RpB6HOm6xwHYXm4pQB4lUxY1UJhVnFfE2RslYWIFi5OeDHS0P44rqq4D rzcKOB5axWWagLgUCbYTqTjSVcVFeOudednlH5TbcoCaiYps5tkkUL4NMYdMEDAq apqJRAzlHRK0ZsDLiq3RNYZEOF+zhJNPW5UeqHnf6Z6AOTFH6CbU7C2RW7t86Huq LmxdvAzIppqqeo0c1+wy4W37We2yzkBKMv9CPgOmwqybqdxs34M4yuIijc3xJ+ZD scbQU7hokcJvCdGLs8myLjyzv4qNCpZrVDhi+Q1SEWpYW8x+fT4Cge2FBfxrUb+z 078+0pCSLFtEljliR3DF =simc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Rename python2-legit-git to legit-git
by Jan-Erik Rediger 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the AUR package python2-legit-git[1]. As pointed out in the comments by trontonic this package should be named "legit-git" instead (as said in the guidelines[2]) Please rename this package. Thanks. badboy_ [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50308 [2]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines

2 1

[aur-general] Please merge canon printer related packages
by Lone_Wolf 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

I have been working on updating canon printer drivers, and have had success with the capt driver. please merge canon-cndrvcups-common 2.20-1 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35399 to cndrvcups-common 2.40-2 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22934 Also merge capt 2.30-1 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15094 to cndrvcups-capt 2.40-3 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57689 Lone_Wolf

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal: tinyerpclient, openerp-web, openerp-server
by Luis von Bernus 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

openerp-server[1] and openerp-web[2] are unmaintained and have been merged into openerp[3] (by the vendor). tinyerp-client[4] is also unmaintained, outdated and obsolete, since it is an old version of openerp-client[5] before the name change[6]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26581 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46357 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57534 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15425 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26582 [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenERP

2 1

[aur-general] Request package removal: qasmixer
by Spyros Stathopoulos 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Hello everyone! The package I was maintaining "qasmixer" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48676) has been superseded by a collection of tools that include the one I was maintaining (qastools https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54793) Therefore I would like to ask for qasmixer to be removed since the standalone sources for qasmixer have been removed from upstream. Thanks! Spyros

4 7