- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion Request: mosh, mosh-git
by Taylor Venable 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi there, I (metasyntax) am the maintainer of the mosh and mosh-git packages in the AUR. I hereby request that they be deleted so that those names may be taken over by the packages currently named mobile-shell and mobile-shell-git, respectively. FWIW, I will be uploading my packages under the new names mosh-scheme and mosh-scheme-git, so if you renaming is as easy as just removing them, that's just fine by me. Thanks much! -- Taylor C. Venable http://metasyntax.net/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 72 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs 2. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request
by Christopher luna 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the Lilyterm-testing package (it was my very first aur pkgbuild!) the goal of this package was to provide lilyterm release candidate 0.9.9, which took a loooong time to be released. anyway, got released and community has that package, so this is no longer needed. The url is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42280 thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Disown rosa-media-player
by Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hello, The rosa-media-player[1] package is out-of-date and not currently maintained by its current maintainer. Thus, I would like to request that it be disowned, so that myself or any other user interested in this package is able to maintain it properly. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417 -- Regards, Vítor Ferreira.

2 2

[aur-general] Delete request
by Sid Karunaratne 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Please remove nodeunit[1]. It is a duplicate of nodejs-nodeunit[2] but has no maintainer, no votes and a worse PKGBUILD. The latter is also better named. 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53796 2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54948 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: kate-ctags-plugin
by Chris Sakalis 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

The kate-ctags-plugin package[1] is old, orphaned and there is already a ctags plugin bundled with Kate. Perhaps it should be removed from the AUR? Thank you. --Chris Sakalis [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13942

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 72 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (11 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 4 signoffs 2. dan - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 4. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hello Archers. This is my application to be a trusted user and my sponsor is Sergej Pupykin. My name on all Arch projects is ConnorBehan. Some of you may remember me fondly from a conversation or two, others perhaps not so fondly, and I'm sure some of you don't know me at all! Anyway, since I started using Arch five years ago, I have gone from being mostly on the receiving end of support issues to mostly on the giving end. In that time, Arch has grown immensely in popularity and this puts increased pressure on the package maintainers so I want to help. On the forums, I would not go so far as to say I'm "a regular"... my posting is a bit on and off. But I have tried to be much more regular on the AUR. I currently maintain 38 packages. There are other packages that I used to maintain. Three of them are now in community under the maintainership of a TU (audit, sk1 and python-lcms). And one of them was a kernel package which was one of the first packages that Archers used to get Radeon KMS support before it was considered stable. The list of packages I would immediately put in community is not huge. My gsview and xdvdshrink packages surely have enough votes to warrant inclusion. I would also put python-gasp in community to help Arch users who are learning Python from the book thinkcspy like I did. And using talkfilters to chat in pirate speak never gets old. I also want to be in a better position to adopt orphaned packages (or neglected packages like info2man that should be orphaned). Six of my AUR packages so far were submitted by someone else. The packages I would not include are pidgin-broadcast (abuse potential), instantbird (unreliable with the packaging choices I have made) and the numerous packages that are decidedly non-vanilla. I have started three open source projects since I became involved in free software: * http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/ * http://demohack.sourceforge.net/ * http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-generic-slider I am pretty sure that only the last one has a user base greater than one =P. One thing you will probably notice from my AUR packages is that they tend to contain large, self-written patches. This is my favourite part about free software - modifying it to fix a bug or even add a significant feature. I am very much in the habit of contributing these patches back to upstream bug trackers: * http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7354 * http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7353 * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26998 * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47866 * https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667155 * https://bugzilla.instantbird.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165 * https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 * https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453706 * https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19672 * https://bitbucket.org/aafshar/pida-main/issue/464/please-make-moo-work-again * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=544752&aid=3054669&group_i… <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=544752&aid=3054669&group_i…> * http://sourceforge.net/p/gracegtk/tickets/1/ Some of them get accepted, and some don't =). Thanks for taking the time to read this and I look forward to hearing what you have to say.

4 5

[aur-general] Removal Request: Netatalk-git, Netatalk2
by SJ_UnderWater 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

I would also like to recommend [netatalk-git] and [netatalk2] for removal from AUR, they were temporary branches, have been flagged, are are now orphans. All changes have been merged into [netatalk]. Remove: [netatalk-git] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50971 [netatalk2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58178 Keep: [netatalk] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10032

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of AUR package
by David Whitlock 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, I would like to request the removal of the package genxword-py3-git ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54777) which I have been developing and I maintain. The reason is that I have changed its name. If you need any further info, or I need to contact someone else, please let me know. Thanking you in advance for your help, David Whitlock

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: gnome-terminal-git-mys
by Jekyll Wu 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] simply fails to build at all. It seems the upstream does not support building from the master branch. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50489 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjEEhAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAcdoQALPMRAwvzNUM+egDhnNCJ1DH mI6NC9KU6ZgalX1zjHRkhbLhXUF2uEXJpy+iD47dbwvXnJoa7fqNYI9PUfjqUOLY fCUtkUuS7509hUCAGb+x9o1UFVJUrUFBE3g4dlaOH8uVPG/6tGI6fFuF7p+9QPTn uW76fajpkK82+QkajMfmao6xBjTOg4DayW1FKfqmbO2hPKjIzEb+t+oKR5edLeJB MmU02apA2/Dy9ZP+6SantFF/ZA82X+HwSLoFubDjkgkkn6ffA53J1aDZn6/+fEtA A5l8fWvca+FemUabnIcRY7QYJN1QJCMV+NeJYmXuQzxYf2Lu/YjYqnmGTQTea0bx yXUH7kbGHQblcUJH1673isUnA+mxOQYw6xs0T2nlzF8f9OSuhsIKXz6hseZ53eKc 8CbEfsPkUjd/EAPjqdYIze589sJpNXMNR4RPmpeSx23yjgmicN7CG0vPoeLpNG0H g3EMnuff40MzuLR17KbXZHfWTxvNV3fkdm/2lTfJdVh1fz8ZqGzXkrXa8s/FcU5E +B1HzVWgpjah2D9oWAo27QW0teKKWfjaznPJCKIXV6DrFiQeZnZQ+8G2qBKFyhg8 zN0HnZeS/SK+/PgW7jb5m4a2qxWeMMRvK4IHCixk+Tzj5aiVCTacBNAbGqYaWuTx QurUx1a5vMzCWRx+q3Wi =5H5K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Seven seven 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Please remove create-svn - krita has its own optimized set https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47925 xine-lib-vdpau - xine-lib in extra have vdpau support https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22286 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34570 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: arch-gensplash
by Heiko Baums 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

I think the AUR package arch-gensplash [1] can be removed. It's orphaned, the last update is from 2008, it's flagged as out-of-date since more than a year, the URL doesn't exist anymore and the source package isn't available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15707 Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by Jakub Schmidtke 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, android-docs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48478 ) is very outdated (over 4 months). I sent an email to the maintainer 2 weeks ago, but I haven't received any response. Thanks!

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion request: haskell-vte
by Jekyll Wu 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is unmaintained and fails to build due to unavailable dependency. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37492 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjGNXAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAR64QAKc5+7AvsOQ3LqZcFvZ8EH4U N/auQNOLjD6AGxM+jKF2LTlZ+6/Iy3A1DH8iKjjouL3exvacg87ntRPwtC1AnOAu L7l0X8XCceRizKQKoPV+gA4CYryL6ZZj4mP8G6ScBenqaygwmWbvraKnQg7xbbGm K/53D325l6Gj9AcrrmevTAzUfqSLhetAL6zFTDwqe9y8LHlOsiy5ujZ0UEzem3YG 0a8etnilMnS+JHgJobytcY0p2QUVJ4eqrwprWRhKDRiOfcj1T3jQEt5hmpXoJsHT kkqxRNSrOmk+M0Kr40636hStPynPAg6olYkUAK278Xp+pw/ajeQUcXuCUj1Bw8ry cq7RNReDsrHVGXTuw92yNCOV7jaBDeiPQFwq7eBjMiWOCzdE5kj4/42rR0BfCvxp fuBr1OL8xBAxkGqCPfH3Ump2Kh7wG0WlAkn2w/LLekuzPAvN1DiWdX1wogVTBpqE 5iMr6jN0Z6d0sOPqTpsl1osZHQT6HixPYLBYOaaTqoU4F5+rmas/T9D5qq67Oiyj Id/wiOtrmV9J58Q6YRUZUjfGi2d+CHnkenjRy6FwWYfr2txRo3HHs4yyoyG6cZ1W lhhdxoclI5OtzYjHsGxnOkeonnGrdyihXo1AzR+h06fxEPOPuer0GjjEeqUT2ZKA nCGES7SMBzil49A+4gVm =e2wc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] [merge request] pidgin-gfire
by Taylor Lookabaugh 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

May someone please merge the votes/comments from [1]pidgin-gfire-svn to [2]pidgin-gfire-git, and then delete [1]pidgin-gfire-svn? Thanks. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29381 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58555 -- Taylor Lookabaugh

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 71 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (10 total) == * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request bitcoin-daemon
by Konstantin Nikiforov 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Outdated AUR package 'bitcoin-daemon'[1] duplicates community/bitcoin-daemon[2]. Please remove dup. from AUR. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41385 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/bitcoin-daemon/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: terminal-urgency
by Jekyll Wu 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is outdated and unmaintained. The download link is also broken (for me). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20847 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjF2gAAoJEOemZ9znWXlA8Q0P/jkUUfJH+pgl7IbLwJ/HDmm7 Ae8H2ICp2g37hL58DniFD/5W9QmpiHo+ea2PybHQYnEWAiOo9OsNHUHxVtUq4uJB 5wP74+LvhRYKAxwsDU5CD6u3MeCIbuyBOI7op34UpzL6p53v4nA57qVNXMOKS+Ki QI0qa1rSCBFQHBRrnzfV+ifV53jMPk8zAu/iDIhqqf5OTzpMUqQHM4cOnOeCsIg5 CF57muoPsvicXpiktNnS+V8quBUNEjKW8nGuTACPfh4IjQvWXgftRluEuB4jBspO HUdcSCsC+ULtmwaOOxSRXwxktE+pnvHSkOyxfELEJ5+sucH+sT8dRs2aaRlSQ3cF god4KpfYg3vggKhVM6ElFLf3Z0poPzPLycCjf4xdpWTSeRKArXXUkr4QFni9OZwq GCXbYPY5WwruLeHeXXaByWKMiQSM0+/Nl0W2xl1ibmVDzqsHRvntBWiUNOI5pb4c GsVZNzephQbUgkR2FSy32ikn8Z4wkosP/ya9jy99VstPCJ/wNRElangcxuuNnA65 iFGN11IUUnZ27c8eAJDKhwh4ACp+DrL7FOegAzDYSSU8pbv990ksBQ0VqWTNKhsB g87qj2gEN45znQt2GBYkGYLQIp0760EeIvuD6GQT/IxxLmFbk1UtYEI5mFWxWbbE jys2gS8FYSfcRuZnZ+hk =IbIk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: evilvte-hidetab
by Jekyll Wu 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It[1] is outdated and abandoned by its submitter. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjFgYAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAlgsP/38vBys2axa6xMycw/VRf+bQ cgQdOArJp8vr3ARxHcPFoBQ2Z+yvOjJJDfyk0SrjxKaDRhAGKEi+EnegJUiSzT/t 3vElrjDwKn6suVmltKTzDt5KEsa31uss0AqiF18MZe6pkZXITCaU+wul/QCeWpUV hFZkRwh1WRqZ5hOOGBukHjirDLsKjE7PJWgFcQ1I+DdFUpcuSZ68DG1StlQ95n9G ibbLbxYd+zC2MRbbm7GxeOun4OCWiwHfu1UX+n2mDfvqjskjY4PbZUhEKUO7sCb3 2DRbdXVlEAT/IB5uFhMh1eRjn708hGflXkxmkR4NCGjeT4H4QndXThdiXgy/qlDT koLkkHCm9Y/vx1lybNbpGqhv9aGT7q88LsLAGGyUyMtc/l7ZprUOE97Rq2brzugo ObDSbT9NFxcbUKFIzySaP6zKZIISLcD6XEYjwVNhMBli6T3OQUc1UxQ3HeSQjcib h7W1qj804NWxqrKQ+pxESfSj7b/rY6BAAta0HeSYYvXtbZu3cYVTN0CWPQCRFLUS BIRqRpgNYxe3fzqhQbhyLpqSXEDK3ysLka2kWFdMbPlTwXBqjiSbcctNJP7wy7h2 NmbNPDfb6xmLlI1Z/LQNwDafscoRLbuKdQHTptox7ZLK7BTZMTFwAeBJ8e9e661h mMJ953rkBaO+W2HEhVIz =0MPU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Xavier Corredor Llano 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, please remove [1] because this patches included after 3.1 kernel version [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51329 thanks -- Xavier Corredor Llano

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: python-cssutils-beta
by Lars Jacob 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

This package is not needed anymore. python-cssutils is on version 0.9.9 in community and there is no current beta on of cssutils [1]. AUR URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38135 [1] https://bitbucket.org/cthedot/cssutils/downloads Bests, Lars

2 1

[aur-general] Request package removal: pastebin-cli-git
by infinity.illusion 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

package pastebin-cli-git is no longer in development and the source code can no longer be found online. i am package maintainer Sychopx and now request it to be removed. Regards, Sychopx

2 1

[aur-general] Disown zdesktop package
by Martin Wimpress 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, The zdesktop[1] package is out of date and isn't properly packaged. I tried to contact the maintainer via the AUR and email with no answer. I request a disown so I can maintain it. We use Zimbra Desktop at work so I have a vested interested in maintaining this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41804 -- Regards, Martin.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 71 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (61 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-0.8.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (10 total) == * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * contacts-0.12-6 (i686), since 2012-04-01 * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64), since 2012-04-01 * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686), since 2012-04-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 9 signoffs 2. ibiru - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Non-working package and no maintenance
by oliver 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hello, this package seem to have a historya of problems: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44977 After the latest comment from myra, which was on 2011-08-28, the maintainer did not responded so far. The package does not work. Kann the maintainer be pushed to fix this? Ciao, Oliver

2 3

[aur-general] Orphaning desmume/agg
by Jonathan Conder 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Hi all, I have just orphaned desmume & agg, since I don't really have time to maintain packages that I don't use. Unless someone adopts it I'll move desmume to the AUR next week (it needs updating). However, I can't do that with agg as it is required by gnash-common, so it'd be good if someone could take over that one (updates for it are fairly rare). Cheers, Jonathan

2 1

[aur-general] Package renaming (tano)
by François Boulogne 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Hi, The package for tano [1] uses the git repo. of the project. I suggest to rename it according to the aur policy (ie tano-git) since there is a tarball distributed upstream [2] that could be also packaged. The maintainer is in CC. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41827 [2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/tano/files/ Cheers, François.

2 1

[aur-general] Compiz* package cleanup
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

The following packages should be deleted (or merged in some cases). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35912 Dependency no longer exists, orphan, and already almost certain this no longer works. (this has been unsupported upstream for a long time). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12211 Haven't been updated for YEARS, the domains (both for url and website) no longer exists. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51899 Does not build - the maintainer himself said it did not after the last update; which was over 6 months ago, so abandoned as well. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11539 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35960 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11540 Hasn't been updated in over 6 months, does not build (upstream killed the emerald for compiz 0.9, actually). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49693 Not a single vote, orphan and out of date. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26336 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11540 Broken; domain (both for url and website) has not existed for some time now. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19826 Fails to build, looks abandoned (both the package, and upstream). -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

5 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 69 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (59 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.47-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.22.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.3.92-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (10 total) == * almanah-0.9.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. bisson - 7 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Inactive for a few weeks
by Thorsten Töpper 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello, I'll be (partly) inactive for a couple of weeks. Maybe I'll have some time to take care of some stuff yet that's not granted. I won't participate in any upcoming votes. As I won't check my mails everyday, answers to emails may also take a few days. Kind Regards Thorsten -- Jabber: atsutane(a)freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4

3 9

[aur-general] [merge] djvu2pdf-latest
by Anton Larionov 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Please, merge djvu2pdf-latest https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57014 into djvu2pdf https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18397 -- Regards, Anton Larionov

3 2

[aur-general] [Merge Request] mmm-mode
by Stefan Husmann 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello, please merge mmm-mode[1] into emacs-mmm-mode[2]. The latter was introduced for better naming consistence. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15223 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58477 Best Regards Stefan

3 2

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

On 14/04/12 11:02 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 14.04.2012 10:23, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >> On 04/14/2012 10:19 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: >>> On 14.04.2012 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >>>> It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support. >>> There are References and In-Reply-To headers (in this mail, not the >>> previous), but they point to mail from mailman. >>> >>> Do you get digests instead of separate mails? >> True, I've checked mailman interface and it seems to be problem with my >> mail client. No, I get separated mails. > I meant if Connor gets digest, sorry for being unclear there. Yes, I switched all my lists to digest mode awhile ago when I was spending more and more time deleting emails. Do you feel strongly that I should switch back?

2 1

[aur-general] Please merge deepin-scrot-git into deepin-screenshot-git
by Jekyll Wu 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The maintainer has created deepin-screenshot-git[1] to replace deepin-scrot-git[2], which follows the renaming of the upstream. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57793 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55299 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPiOpUAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAd60P/0xmUF6MT924UPxS9Vouu1Kc zrR2AI2v6akCjSe3KHi7fWtLlv7z3ugFHflhgEsRhdsaU3ehOHj2OLnd4ytMLCjM RC1W/ILIJ/o/cCAt8F1XLkRO5/hxgTbfPu9hm0DYpY5TfCJk2jDIXGF8QYNd3hUv QIsMHBfH8duZV63bgGaSAH8MaKQTcAVPPkjRzPwbh/Q3KW5MzzARY1OqbzShvBRp Im1/l/MaGzOW6P9hVOGVZeQaJKwPaxKuNMiEvsLd5liRu34sTabvpMGeBHNq0DrO D7bCGjl//ABmh+D7w4a4r+cb3uLsJaZr7N6AuPQPnIFVXOBEpU9ceAFJ/LB5C6Ub z08XR7khXcaY/bJPsDVRH+x3iejP5jaH+itCnrBVg/XAe6ignQb7fGqvnVgHt4W3 QuvwY0c4DJg8sip+SsrKtxHxSlWoMlBb+hUuuZFRBirnPE6cjn8KzvJvggMaWFtR gTSiDy5jJY1KkVfSrextJBGD2W5tAK82WZpC1cRdWT0c7Gq3bn+hhUFaSRbUPdyt 9Yepvz7nvbC4PZ9XpYvNIdAn/eyodyUskt7kHZUbdtn81WAZibgJThx7UKTbmVx6 zZ1ZY3pAwYCM6qC/0HZWTdEWU7dIKow7Ph8FpIc7HhxgObZDYGm9zeYU9QCfWr/G NpT+IsBLB3pomsM29iW9 =zR72 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

On 13/04/12 04:16 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: > Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 18:00:08 schreef Allan McRae: >> On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote: >>> How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who >>> uploaded the key fingerprint to >>> http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and >>> http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he >>> wrote the TU application that was just sent and hopes that you do not >>> think less of him for being too absent-minded to sign emails! >> Hmm... barely acceptable, but we will let you away with it this time. >> >> Anyway, I recognize your name and have no bad connotations with it, >> which is the only criterion I use for reviewing applications. >> >> So, good luck! >> >> Allan > All looks pretty clean to me, i would do one suggestion > start using the package function, i just checked some pkgbuilds randomly and > did not see it in any of them. (this is not at all life threatening ;p) > and you can remove the '|| return 1' since makepkg catches this nicely for > some time now > > Very true. I just updated 10 of my PKGBUILDs to make them not look like they were written 3 years ago. Will do more soon.

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 61 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (55 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stativ - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Vegastrike games orphaned in the AUR
by SanskritFritz 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems to be active. Thanks SanskritFritz

2 3

[aur-general] duplicate aur packages
by Daniel Wallace 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

this was just created Linuxtycoon - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58404 which is just a copy of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58139 but uses the deb package for some reason

2 1

[aur-general] tu bylaws update proposal
by Ike Devolder 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hi, after my own application and seeing it again i would like to propose an update to the TU Bylaws giving more information that the application should be gpg signed with the addidional publication of the public key. This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_ne… attached the patch for https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html --Ike

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion requests: firefox*
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 66 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (60 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120412-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs 2. pierre - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] TU application - ConnorBehan
by Connor Behan 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who uploaded the key fingerprint to http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he wrote the TU application that was just sent and hopes that you do not think less of him for being too absent-minded to sign emails!

3 2

[aur-general] delete puredata
by Andre "Osku" Schmidt 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

hi, i think puredata package can be deleted from aur http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44768 cause that package is orphaned and theres a package named pd (like upstream tarball, fwiw) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2117 cheers .andre

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 65 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (59 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * erlang-R15B01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 4 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] package deletion request for facebook python sdk
by Alper Kanat 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

Hey There, Can you please delete the following packages? Some are removed in upstream and don't have any maintainer on AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45906 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45908 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34328 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55193 This one should have a -git in its name: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56712 --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Please nuke the following 4 packages. [1]swfdec-git ||Development has stalled 3 years ago. Only few [2]swfdec-git-pulse ||random fixes compared to the stable release, [3]swfdec-mozilla-git ||doesn't build as it is. [4]cairo-snapshot |Was needed by [1], before stable cairo 1.10 [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28182 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28180 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28183 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33888

2 1

[aur-general] note about all rosa-* stuff
by Anton Chernyshov 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi all! Just one note to all who wants to build all rosa-* packages. At this moment all new packages is uploaded (and will be uploaded) to this place - http://mirror.yandex.ru/rosa/rosa2012lts/repository/srpms/main/release/ . I have pointed to release repository with src.rpms (not frozen yet because we are planinig release at the end of April). At this mirror you can found new versions of rosa-media-player, rosa-icons and other rosa-* packages updated by ROSA team. -- С уважением, Чернышов Антон

1 0

[aur-general] partial inactivity
by Sergej Pupykin 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, I have a business trip to Japan now, so I can do my work very slowly until March 8.

2 3

[aur-general] Inactive user tdy
by Cédric Girard 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, The user tdy [1] seems no longer active. He has 360 packages with 50 outdated. Last activity I've been able to spot is mid-2011. Could someone orphan all his packages for other people to adopt them. I have not contacted him but he is in cc of this email. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=11163 Regards, -- Cédric Girard

8 18

[aur-general] Delete antargis
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10863 Out of date for over six months, orphan, url is broken, last comment says it didn't even build. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion: vim-tango-desert
by Markus Unterwaditzer 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Could you please delete vim-tango desert https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27844 ? It doesn't work with the latest version of vim and vim-colorschemes already has the tango-desert colorscheme included.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request
by speps 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, recently the Buzztard project switched from svn to git, so bml-svn [1a] -> bml-git [1b] gst-buzztard-svn [2b] -> gst-buzztard-git [2b] buzztard-svn [3b] -> buzztard-git [3b] can be merged. bsl-svn [4] can be deleted, since buzztard-git now provides bsl-git. Also jackctl [5a] was recently renamed to clijack [5b] and can be merged too. Thanks [1a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48287 [1b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58369 [2a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48286 [2b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58370 [3a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48284 [3b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58371 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48283 [5a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39392 [5b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58362 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 63 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (57 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 10 signoffs 2. allan - 7 signoffs 3. stephane - 3 signoffs 4. lcarlier - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

The following are all orphan. They each have additional reason(s) that make them candidate for deletion. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45124 Is out of date (marked 11 months ago). Stable version is newer than this "testing" version. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29428 Fails to build, out of date over 12 months, last updated in 2009. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29427 Depends on the above (which doesn't build), last updates in 2009. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17278 Fails to build and out of date for over 12 months. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18489 Out of date, and stable version (in extra) is newer than this "-dev" version. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27393 Does not build (bad depends, bad URL), out of date. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15351 Fails to build, out of date for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28344 Fails to build, out of date for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29213 should be merged into "python-httplib2" (in [extra]). Also, and out of date. Cheers! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 48 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 64 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (48 total) == * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (58 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.8.46-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * couchdb-1.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dwdiff-2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ejabberd-2.1.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esdl-2:1.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtranslator-2.91.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-qt-1.3.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libfbclient-2.5.1.26351-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openttd-1.2.0rc4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * parrot-4.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sword-1.6.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wings3d-1.4.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaws-1.92-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yaz-4.2.29-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * dee-1.0.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dee-1.0.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] fixing dupekill
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

On 2012-04-10 00:22, Daniel Campbell wrote: > Hugo: thanks for pointing that out. I had asked about it on the forum and figured there was a way to work with it that way. How would I handle the fact that the tarball would have the readme and PKGBUILD in it already? Would they simply be deleted with the src directory after a 'makepkg -c'? > > Sent from my Nokia phone Yes, they would. Anything you don't copy/move from src to pkgdir will be deleted (if building with makepkg -c). You PKGBUILD is fine as it is; it won't copy over anything undesired. Also, you can use "install -D..." to create the directory and skip the "mkdir" line. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

1 0

[aur-general] merge packages to python2 names
by Daniel Wallace 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

could you please merge - python-grapefruit https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40104 to python2-grapefruithttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58320 and python-fabulous https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40103 to python2-fabulous https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58321 so that they can be correctly labeled and since they are only required by the package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58322 Thank you, Daniel Wallace

2 1

Re: [aur-general] fixing dupekill
by Daniel Campbell 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

Hugo: thanks for pointing that out. I had asked about it on the forum and figured there was a way to work with it that way. How would I handle the fact that the tarball would have the readme and PKGBUILD in it already? Would they simply be deleted with the src directory after a 'makepkg -c'? Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request (?): libxfce4menu-devel, xfce4-notifyd-devel 0.2.1-1
by Dirk 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

I was checking XFCE related orphaned packages and found a couple I think can be deleted. libxfce4menu-devel 4.6.1-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20768 Flagged out of date, feb. 2011. Latest version (4.6.2) available in extra xfce4-notifyd-devel 0.2.1-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43937 Out of date, latest version (0.2.2) is in extra I see a lot of package flagged out-of-date on 02 Jun 2011, is this some sort of 'marked for deletion'? Some of these seem to be up to date. e.g.: battery-applet-4-xfce4 0.9.1-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18086 Build depends on HAL (deprecated, but available in AUR), bu no newer version is available upstream. Dirk

3 2

[aur-general] Request for Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

I uploaded a package that has the source included. The wiki mentioned binaries but nothing about languages like bash or Python that don't need to be compiled. Anyway, since I don't have a place to host it and fix the PKGBUILD, it needs to be removed so the AUR's not marred, I suppose. The package is named 'dupekill'. I uploaded it and am the current maintainer (xelados on the AUR). If you need further proof, my Github page is at https://github.com/sporkbox and should have this e-mail address as the contact address in the profile. Sorry to add to the workload. If the software supported it I wouldn't have had to bother anyone. Thanks. You guys should really give an option for people who upload packages to delete them through the same interface if, like me, they realize they screwed up. I had to subscribe to this list before I could send an e-mail to ask for someone to do something that should be possible without human involvement...

4 3

[aur-general] shotwell...
by oliver 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Hello, shotwell is here: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/shotwell/ and it's marked out of date. And shotwell also is here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48503 Here I don't know if it's up to date... But it uses git,.. can this just be rebuilt from git, even the package itsels is old? Also it confuses me that shotwell is on http://www.archlinux.org as well as http://aur.archlinux.org Can you explain me this? And: can the package maintainers be reminded to update? Shotwell 0.12.1 is out since a whiole and maybe even a newer verison (0.13.x) is underway... Ciao, Oliver

6 12

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Are you being glib? I achieved what I was aiming for (deleting a package). Given the reponse I got on my observation ('patches welcome'), I don't feel inclined to go through another hoop in yet another department just to be told 'no, do it yourself and we _might_ consider it'. No sense in repeating the popular opinion in another format. And if most people are happy with the bureaucracy, who am I to change it? It's not my project or my website. I carry no clout or weight among the staff. It would be a waste of time to submit a feature request for something that is clearly against the consensus. I'd have more luck forking the AUR and hacking it privately, assuming I felt passionately enough about it to spend even more time on the issue. Tldr: no, it won't achieve anything. Sent from my Nokia phone -----Original Message----- From: Karol Blazewicz Sent: 2012-04-09 17:40:55 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell(a)gmx.com> wrote: > Most systems already do the paper-trailing for us. They're known as logs. Yup. Even if regular users don't have access to said log, asking a TU once in a blue moon to check wtf is/was going on with some package is OK. Have you opened a feature request on the bugtracker for this?

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Most systems already do the paper-trailing for us. They're known as logs. ----- Original Message ----- From: Karol Blazewicz Sent: 04/09/12 04:23 PM To: dlcampbell(a)gmx.com, Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell(a)gmx.com> wrote: >> It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. > Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require someone to sign up to another service to ask for something to be done on the service they're having issue with. Departmentalizing things is a sign of bureaucracy. Most people dislike it in government, hospitals, business, and other institutions; why on Earth would we voluntarily do it in FOSS? Especially when the majority of problems (e.g. Deleting packages) can be solved by a machine. The 'paper trail' in bureaucracy is often used for accountability purpose. > Politics aside, I agree that a grace period would be good. But perhaps a little longer than a single day? Maybe 3-7 days, to account for real life getting in the way. You say you didn't properly test the package and you need up to a week to fix it? I guess the current system allows for such things too (albeit via a TU) so why not ...

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Karol Blazewicz 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell(a)gmx.com> wrote: >> It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. > Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require someone to sign up to another service to ask for something to be done on the service they're having issue with. Departmentalizing things is a sign of bureaucracy. Most people dislike it in government, hospitals, business, and other institutions; why on Earth would we voluntarily do it in FOSS? Especially when the majority of problems (e.g. Deleting packages) can be solved by a machine. The 'paper trail' in bureaucracy is often used for accountability purpose. > Politics aside, I agree that a grace period would be good. But perhaps a little longer than a single day? Maybe 3-7 days, to account for real life getting in the way. You say you didn't properly test the package and you need up to a week to fix it? I guess the current system allows for such things too (albeit via a TU) so why not ...

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Yes, it's annoying (and inefficient and illogical) to require someone to sign up to another service to ask for something to be done on the service they're having issue with. Departmentalizing things is a sign of bureaucracy. Most people dislike it in government, hospitals, business, and other institutions; why on Earth would we voluntarily do it in FOSS? Especially when the majority of problems (e.g. Deleting packages) can be solved by a machine. Politics aside, I agree that a grace period would be good. But perhaps a little longer than a single day? Maybe 3-7 days, to account for real life getting in the way. Another thing came to me as I was thinking about this issue. People that adopt an orphan package are able to upload a new src tarball, right? If so, then perhaps all that needs to be done is expanding the table to indicate which user created the package (first uploaded it) and give them permission to delete for the given grace period. I assume the required 'infrastructure' such as upload timestamps, user permissions, etc are in place already. Just an idea. Sent from my Nokia phone -----Original Message----- From: Xyne Sent: 2012-04-09 13:15:13 To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Cc: dlcampbell(a)gmx.com Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal > It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. Is it really "crippling" to send an email to this list to request deletion? Regardless, I'm not against allowing submitters to delete their own packages, but there should probably be some time limit to prevent abuse, e.g. within 24 hours of submission.

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Xyne 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

> It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. Is it really "crippling" to send an email to this list to request deletion? Regardless, I'm not against allowing submitters to delete their own packages, but there should probably be some time limit to prevent abuse, e.g. within 24 hours of submission.

1 0

[aur-general] rednotebook package
by Dmitry Korzhevin 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Hello, guys I am maintainer of rednotebook package in AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21984 I owned and updating this package about a year, and now i wish to maintain this package in official Community repository in Arch Linux. How can i do this, and what i need to do? Here is some of my contributions on Arch Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&o… Also i have some packages in AUR. And subscribed to all arch linux mailing lists. My nickname in arch linux irc channels: dkorzhevin Please, give me advice -- Best regards, Dmitry Korzhevin Tel: +38 (039) 295-0000 Office Phone: +38 (044) 383-14-12 E-mail: dkorzhevin(a)lsupport.net Jabber ID: dkorzhevin(a)lsupport.net Skype: dkorzhevin URL: http://lsupport.net Linux Support LLC

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Allan McRae 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On 09/04/12 17:56, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work would not likely be accepted. What a load of crap... Everyone submitted their first patch at one stage.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work would not likely be accepted. I guess things will stay as they are until someone important dislikes them. I'm not one for jumping through hoops. Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Bartłomiej Piotrowski 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On 04/09/2012 09:46 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > It is simple, actually. When a user uploads a package, they should be given rights to remove it if need be. Simply claiming an orphan wouldn't grant the rights. That way only mods and original uploaders would get permission to remove packages and it wouldn't be prone to abuse. It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. > > Sorry for not quoting. My phone isn't fancy enough for it. > > Sent from my Nokia phone It's often said: patches welcome. You can fill feature request on our bugtracker. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

It is simple, actually. When a user uploads a package, they should be given rights to remove it if need be. Simply claiming an orphan wouldn't grant the rights. That way only mods and original uploaders would get permission to remove packages and it wouldn't be prone to abuse. It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. Sorry for not quoting. My phone isn't fancy enough for it. Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

[aur-general] merge/delete vala
by Oliver Bandel 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hello, there is a lot of vala stuff in AUR. Some sems to be outdated: vala-010 0.10.4-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47882 vala-09 0.9.8-3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45525 vala-012 0.12.1-3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52935 ======= MORE UP TO DATE: vala-git 20120216-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31429 vala-devel 0.16.0-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38260 Ciao, Oliver

2 1

[aur-general] delete/merge request: icon theme meliae
by Dirk 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

I adopted and updated xfce-theme-meliae [1] before realising it's now a duplicate of meliae-svg-icon-theme [2]. Please delete or merge my version [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38572 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33832 There also seems to be a duplicate of an older version 0.7.2 [3] & [4]. [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22544 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48623 Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Forgotten username
by Philipp Kroos 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hi, I can't remember the username I registered with in the aur... This is the email-address associated with it. Could an admin be so kind to drop me a mail with the name? Thanks, Philipp

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 12 signoffs 2. tpowa - 4 signoffs 3. ibiru - 1 signoffs 4. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Off
by Xavier D. 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hi, I'll be off for 3 weeks with no or limited access to Internet. Please don't disown or delete my packages (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=magicrhesus&SeB=m) in the meantine. Thanks

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by rafael ff1 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

"scribus-ng" is release candidate package with an outdated (old) version and hasn't been updated for a year now. Plus this outdated package is the only one of this maintainer, so I guess he doesn't really want to maintain it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47919 (note: there is another maintained "release candidate" package, scribus-rc, no need for both) "scribus-stable" is outdated, orphan and there's a stable version of scribus in [extra], therefore this package is nonsense. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35538 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] [remove] python2-numericalpython
by Hector Martinez-Seara 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Please remove the following of my packages (python2-numericalpython): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51612 It is of no use any longer. It has been superseded by numpy and no longer developed. The last package depending on it was python2-scientificpython which now depends on numpy. Thanks, Hector -- Hector Martínez-Seara Monné mail: hseara(a)gmail.com Tel: +34656271145 Tel: +358442709253

2 1

[aur-general] AUR package removal request
by Padfoot 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

Hi, I am the maintainer of the following AUR packages: lightdm-gtk-greeter-no-gnome: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58232 lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk-no-gnome: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58236 lightdm-osk: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54208 Requesting their removal for the following reasons: lightdm-osk: upstream has moved to v1.2.x which separates the greeter from the daemon. Functionality of lightdm-osk is now provided by the following packages lightdm: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40708 lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58235 lightdm-gtk-greeter-no-gnome: after discussion with the maintainer of lightdm and other users of the package, we agreed on providing a single unthemed version of the greeter package. This package is now a duplicate of lightdm-gtk-greeter: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58230 lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk-no-gnome: same as lightdm-gtk-greeter-no-gnome. This package is a duplicate of lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58235 Cheers. Lachla.

2 1

[aur-general] reminder: icu49.1 rebuilds
by Andreas Radke 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

I'm going to finish soon the extra/testing repo rebuilds. Can you guys with community repo access please finish missing rebuilds? thx. https://www.archlinux.org/todo/138/ -Andy

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 5 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 5 signoffs 3. tomegun - 5 signoffs 4. seblu - 2 signoffs 5. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge python-crack into python2-crack
by Jonathan Wilson 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

Hi, I've uploaded a new PKGBUILD of python2-crack for library naming and fixes. Please merge and remove python-crack into python2-crack. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] signoff xbmc
by Ike Devolder 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

anyone for i686 xbmc-11.0-2 in community-testing -- Ike

2 2

[aur-general] On vacation for a few days
by Alexander Rødseth 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hi, Going for an easter vacation / cabin trip for a few days. Have a good one! -- Cheers, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: cutecom and cutecom-qt4
by Jekyll Wu 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 cutecom-qt4[1] is shipping an old version of cutecom[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16655 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4450 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPfeX/AAoJEOemZ9znWXlAZNQQAKxxdFqrc9u11S27kN99JEMa 0aTzPLvZcoIp5CBfawjqof2p3cgnOe3zMnsNrmk2xCqxWG4w0bqV+TEClqZ1lq7D m2TygI3AXcUp5K2CrdmkYGNYr/RLllDcLWgRemu12TjsMgaxrLVNgRdwBfHRx6Et ih5nrUvz/gJyD8G9Jt5HRNDAkuTifoWnfjEVQQVWJ4oc1+bYXWvd3p+lz9NYoowG QGjai6NRItIeKTQlrw5UuGiphM3izaC0/WbPTBQb99SoARyZoTXCICThCtxSvce/ h/YliW+1jqojJyFyuOnivKVQgrShb8SZ1XRJFm9tkmDV6Xe2XQN3lj2j7/Ay0Bvi L/EJAE6o8ec68/hJY9grn4++IHWExpYHfT8BFDTbwH/jLuAtlhWLeHRUhPcne7qN 7NtAvZmpSooAvEWijp/1AUgnygM+cWcCfpguNw/7ZVST96UVA85zzeQFO2NHaxxE ASzswo5M5C+kUDg55IYi8fK3C9S64asFWu7ZzQ6ndA4g7aGmwssKKCNrvmK6gw4d PZbR8jAH1QaUi+y1ucdLNDbLRWbicKxiYcYpE8xXGgUVU81vFvFvZllO0KSt7nnY KjaExEncQGLYi5JQakTqNe2xQuPeqGWQ/M9Y8I35qXvKL6gO0Gv4aJZnMMQwP6t3 WBRZVcoVRovtoKBPM3as =/Vta -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete Request] xiphos-webkit-svn
by Stefan Husmann 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hello, Please delete xiphos-webkit-svn, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53578. It builds from a vanished branch, which now has become trunk. Thanks

2 3

[aur-general] Disown Hub package
by Alfredo Palhares 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hello, The hub[1] package is out of date and isn't being properly packaged. Tried to contact the maintainer a while ago, no answer. I request a disown so I can take care of it. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32551 -- Regards, Alfredo Palhares

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. idevolder - 9 signoffs 2. dan - 7 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs 4. seblu - 2 signoffs 5. mtorromeo - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: deprecated psi packages
by Joker-jar 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

psi-whiteboard (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19005) - whiteboarding is supported by psi-plus now (upstream) psi-gentoo-i18n (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10780) - deprecated psi-gentoo (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10779) - deprecated psi-otr (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19867) - otr is supported by psi-plus now (upstream) psi-otr-tfh-berlin (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29513) - deprecated psi-otrplugin (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19868) - otr plugin is psi-plus's plugin now ( https://github.com/psi-plus/plugins/tree/master/dev/otrplugin) psi-otrplugin-tfh-berlin (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29516) - deprecated psimedia-plus-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37867) - psimedia-plus project moved to git (psimedia-plus-git) all this packages are realy trash, it doesn't updates about 2 years, most of their functionality is already available in the psi-plus

2 1

[aur-general] Packages up for adoption in community.
by Thomas Dziedzic 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

Hi I am disowning vtk, paraview (along with libcgns2 as a dep), nut, root, and swi-prolog in community. I will give the devs/tus a week to adopt them before I move them to the aur. Cheers!

1 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: linux-aircrack
by Ifai Gios 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

The AUR package linux-aircrack<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51272>is obsolete as of linux-3.3, as the patches it includes are now implemented into linux. Please delete the AUR package. Thank you in advance The maintainer, ifaigios

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: 'drm' and 'trim'
by Fortunato Ventre 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

Hi, please remove drm[1] and trim[2]. I've released dsromsmanager 1.4 and created a new PKGBUILD for it[3]. I've merged both the old packages into this one. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37452 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37453 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58220

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 26 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (i686) * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (26 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 11 signoffs 2. thomas - 7 signoffs 3. allan - 5 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 5. dreisner - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Luca Bennati 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

I kindly ask a TU to merge my package freetype2-lcd_ ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12283) with the newly updated and renamed freetype2-lcd (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58190)

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 11 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs 3. stephane - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: virtualbox-sun
by Det 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

I guess this is a good summary of all the talk in virtualbox-sun's comment section[1]. The reality here is that virtualbox-bin[2] has evolved into something _at least_ as good as virtualbox-sun. While it's true that -sun is the original one it's also the one with the incorrect naming, a bit slower updates (by a day or so) and less votes (229 vs -bin's 3430). Because we can't justify keeping duplicated work around just to make everybody happy, one of them has to go. Even if -sun was to stay here the "better" stuff in -bin would have to be implemented there first before the removal and the renaming. When put together with the comment/vote merge it's starting to sound a bit pointless (taken how we can just remove that one). I know what I'd do but it's not my decision: it's yours. [1] virtualbox-sun = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31996 [2] virtualbox-bin = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51727 Det

5 9

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64), since 2012-03-19 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 8 signoffs 2. tomegun - 6 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. idevolder - 2 signoffs 5. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Huub Munstege 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

<a href="http://wife2.stopcrisis.net/cache/com_lyftenbloggie/02efpk.html"> http://wife2.stopcrisis.net/cache/com_lyftenbloggie/02efpk.html</a>

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Alexandre Ferrando 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

I've noticed today that a package that I am maintaining in the AUR [ 0 ] , baobab, has appeared also into testing [ 1 ] It seems to me that the logic option here is to delete baobab in the AUR, so please, go ahead. Thank you in advance [ 0 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12673 [ 1 ] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/x86_64/baobab/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 13 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (13 total) == * initscripts-systemd-v44-2 (any) * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * initscripts-systemd-v44-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * laptop-mode-tools-1.60-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120401-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lomoco-1.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * multipath-tools-0.4.9-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * usb_modeswitch-1.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ronald - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request
by speps 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Hi, according to the [extra] change perl-exiftool -> perl-image-exiftool please merge perl-exiftool-dev [1] -> perl-image-exiftool-dev [2] Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47856 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58123 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: msmtp-nomta
by Clemens Buchacher 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

I created msmtp-nomta as a workaround for [1], which has been fixed in the current version of the main package extra/msmtp-nomta 1.4.27-2. Thanks to Eric for fixing this long-standing issue. The msmtp-nomta package is therefore obsolete. Please remove it. Thanks. [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23287

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 20 signoffs 2. tomegun - 6 signoffs 3. allan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal or merge request for gtkradiant-svn
by iv597 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Please remove my package gtkradiant-svn or merge the comments and such into gtkradiant-git. GtkRadiant has moved to GitHub and the PKGBUILD now reflects this, hence the -svn package serves no purpose (other than perhaps confusing searchers). Thank you. -- iv597

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 Mar '12

31 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 7 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 3 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Cleanup
by Michael Düll 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

Hi everybody! Can someone please delete my old packages in AUR? - aacgain[1] (superseeded by aacgain-cvs[2], as there's no more support for tarballs upstream). - bitcoin-noforcedfee[3] (not needed anymore). Thank you everyone =) akurei [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4560 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41445 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53209

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs 4. mtorromeo - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] tweetdeck deletion request
by Cédric Girard 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Hi, TweetDeck has dropped all kind of linux support with moving away from Adobe Air. The PKGBUILD [1] is of no more use. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25070 -- Cédric Girard

3 5

[aur-general] Orphan request: open-syobon
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Please orphan open-syobon (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50327) Maintainer was emailed 2 weeks ago and there is still no response (seems like he is inactive; other his packages should probably be orphaned as well). -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

2 1

[aur-general] Merge python2-legit-git and legit-git
by Jan-Erik Rediger 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

Hi, so I re-uploaded the package under a new name: legit-git[1]. Please merge and delete the old package now: python2-legit-git[2] Thanks, badboy [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58018 [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50308

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by rafael ff1 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

lib32-libopenssl2 has bad naming, wrong lib folder (/opt/lib32/usr/lib), is orphan and is not a dependency for any package. Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19380 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: lxterminal-ru
by Jekyll Wu 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 lxterminal-ru[1] is patched against an outdated version, and the current version of community/lxtermnal already contains the translation for Russian. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25639 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPcjbbAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAtXMP/jDUAB27weyZMUHbxwUnaWAh iDEsvdlU2KLgG8s3S1Tk1roGsujUxMraqVyOiZF0Dbk2o38z+YoUbr0VbYp05Ddy Qx1nFY8ro9MlWfUsg9UmQcSnLm7iXRpWcKrFJ3oLU0QXy1k7/e0oxRkP5HqETapN PneqHuBZ4De/MvxYpsP0OlTZRlUhehmlXAZjwM7CxAEsZ3VXsbGN+VL88avLESAk u2dJ/gVCcyP1ztOlYoHfkzPZmc7tC4WLmFVNBbdfVoHoM9pzVJ0oygRyZHb6XNfo jr9d+Mp6fWHgLIZfwbSRqm4fH0YyjZ75zhF9NvyFBNtPldk/X1BcIJqYDH78lxkV jpfzopx9RpB6HOm6xwHYXm4pQB4lUxY1UJhVnFfE2RslYWIFi5OeDHS0P44rqq4D rzcKOB5axWWagLgUCbYTqTjSVcVFeOudednlH5TbcoCaiYps5tkkUL4NMYdMEDAq apqJRAzlHRK0ZsDLiq3RNYZEOF+zhJNPW5UeqHnf6Z6AOTFH6CbU7C2RW7t86Huq LmxdvAzIppqqeo0c1+wy4W37We2yzkBKMv9CPgOmwqybqdxs34M4yuIijc3xJ+ZD scbQU7hokcJvCdGLs8myLjyzv4qNCpZrVDhi+Q1SEWpYW8x+fT4Cge2FBfxrUb+z 078+0pCSLFtEljliR3DF =simc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Rename python2-legit-git to legit-git
by Jan-Erik Rediger 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the AUR package python2-legit-git[1]. As pointed out in the comments by trontonic this package should be named "legit-git" instead (as said in the guidelines[2]) Please rename this package. Thanks. badboy_ [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50308 [2]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines

2 1

[aur-general] Please merge canon printer related packages
by Lone_Wolf 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

I have been working on updating canon printer drivers, and have had success with the capt driver. please merge canon-cndrvcups-common 2.20-1 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35399 to cndrvcups-common 2.40-2 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22934 Also merge capt 2.30-1 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15094 to cndrvcups-capt 2.40-3 , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57689 Lone_Wolf

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal: tinyerpclient, openerp-web, openerp-server
by Luis von Bernus 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

openerp-server[1] and openerp-web[2] are unmaintained and have been merged into openerp[3] (by the vendor). tinyerp-client[4] is also unmaintained, outdated and obsolete, since it is an old version of openerp-client[5] before the name change[6]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26581 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46357 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57534 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15425 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26582 [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenERP

2 1

[aur-general] Request package removal: qasmixer
by Spyros Stathopoulos 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

Hello everyone! The package I was maintaining "qasmixer" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48676) has been superseded by a collection of tools that include the one I was maintaining (qastools https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54793) Therefore I would like to ask for qasmixer to be removed since the standalone sources for qasmixer have been removed from upstream. Thanks! Spyros

4 7

[aur-general] Deletion request: gnome-terminal-urgent-hint
by Jekyll Wu 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 gnome-terminal-urgent-hint[1] is patched against a quite old version(2.26), not maintained and does not build. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28871 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJPcauTAAoJEOemZ9znWXlA4F0P93V01HEZOKF36m1vgztRPM8v sjUWr3m0VY5tnonMDD3Hpjnhq21/zPVl00qOyim7pITX4Rm/7u1IuFRTHKwOMWr3 JborJjd10zhWoZ1enYgCNXmNOaAZgKjXdiV4i706U2CCU2XQvjOnfDq9bs3hZqAu BYP0fR4ifn/PbsgmmAFgGvt2lREVgyO6pZN9AKTiajRHQFCfW/u1sDFnvSOwXYzM czkaqCqwyrvny/7qm16BwVw84T5Ix6p4nsUKmQNNI4XS3iL1AJ9bEEHaX+eMO4D5 oBmnu9a5vzmrFtAeOMUYWTeEr9I3lk5d/kA0YqLaSTX/d8ORxw/jBYA8nN2r1R2x YZvyx0htHWUuG42jpaI8BvhuHqi39ESr2Qpv9SwQW+0QKb/aMPpLsQW/MQkOi2bA 0uVWSBvZUmP2uVSmtRdYo/pVwYNzKrnRPf/A2pZeNW4XXeIT9c1SpSKk9K97t7pj vebR7Oe3BL2S5AHLwhls8Yy4hEVmDiB+RoY/nSHDqohshNq6Ki6HfTBLmzCd1uZV nf9JjafZE0YSEv/9jbAnj1qAVWpegsgKFGBpdUkpp0/UquwwY2iGwRgZYGqlDZ8h LL4uQAdC112pOoDvHLkeo30DoH8KCAXNJjNJnrOzg15nm3i/KvbdAvjXfcYuXfdH /PwdgIalMR6Iw+12sAs= =4c8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: google-chrome-mini
by Det 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

This is not even funny: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57611 - A clone of 'google-chrome-dev' - Otherwise the same but the build and dependencies somehow more 'minimal' - In practice completely useless Det

14 32

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 22 signoffs 2. tomegun - 10 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: mysqlpp
by Adam Nielsen 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

Hi, Could mysqlpp[1] please be deleted? It is out of date, and there is a newer version in [community] under the name mysql++[2]. Thanks, Adam. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4538 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mysql++/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (i686) * vhba-module-20110915-5 (i686) * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (x86_64) * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20110915-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 21 signoffs 2. dreisner - 8 signoffs 3. eric - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by BxS 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

Dear TUs, please delete package [1], it as been replaced by package [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57910 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57960 Thanks. Best Regards, BxS

3 2

[aur-general] Request for Oracle package merges
by Adam Nielsen 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

Hi all, This morning with the cooperation of the previous maintainer, I have adopted the out of date Oracle Instant Client packages on AUR. I would like to change the package names however, as I believe "instantclient" is not descriptive enough. I would like to change this to "oracle-instantclient". I have gone ahead and uploaded new/updated packages to the AUR with these new names, so I would like to request the old packages be merged into the new ones. Would someone please be able to assist me with this merge? The new packages all start with "oracle-". Here is a list of all the old ones: instantclient-basic https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16676 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57813 instantclient-jdbc https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16726 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57817 instantclient-odbc https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19875 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57816 instantclient-sdk https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16725 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57814 instantclient-sqlplus https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16724 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57815 I would also like to request the instantclient-basiclite package be deleted, as it is identical to instantclient-basic but only contains messages in English (the translations have been removed), so I don't think it is necessary to maintain separately: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16706 Anyone currently using the basiclite package can switch to oracle-instantclient-basic with no loss in functionality. I have included some shell code in the new PKGBUILDs to help alert people to the fact that the package data files need to be downloaded separately (directly from Oracle) as they cannot be downloaded automatically. I would appreciate any feedback on whether the way I have done this is acceptable. It doesn't seem to have caused any issues with AUR. Please let me know if you need any additional information or if there is something I have missed. Many thanks, Adam.

4 5

[aur-general] Delete Request
by speps 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Hi, distrho-plugins-lv2-git [1] is now superseded by distrho-lv2-git [2] and can be deleted. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55567 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57903 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] removal request: fchvt
by Martti Kühne 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

please remove my package fchvt. haven't used it in a while and don't really think anyone would. cheers! mar77i

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-freetds-static
by Schala Zeal 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Please have the following package removed. mingw32-freetds is able to provide both static and shared libs, thus obsoleting this package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28832

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-2 (any) * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 11 signoffs 2. eric - 2 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request : kding and kding-kde4
by Jekyll Wu 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 They pack the same application, except that kding[1] has a maintainer while kding-kde4[2] does not. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12576 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28559 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPbS/JAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAAngQAKTZxN4B0Y6Jxd1iuZkbM2EK Pf/FttXFOl2ajQYg1EZmvFbz1OS6rM4sJlF4ERUZoYppKVw4VwZXaYzoe1RwjJMD 1vha9sdkOBkdIcM1UabLXXY6G/TXIZd00oYGGSsnn4BbDJ/qOriUKOqpMB/cMiY2 0dF50fYYVS9GuknipZWP33Div5+t6NNLJFTDwnxpQSDKUzKILn63KN8PkC/lWRtE 8cnqmZDOn089jCou+d7AScbycXBgH5GxpsB0aWuS0l61EgfcNg8DnH5sSHnvVIQv WmqhlgPpoljWHsA3v2DoJ2nM35i9Ryo7o+OfU19RSSbFFed/3ulotSMwMEq51J1h ritpbXz296HFQI96zQzy2WJVQy0EZqxrgTdpPPfQi/mARpWme+ftVxJNdKVgxg+R h6yrIlmgWVRTG2JTOUVI3UTvXQD9+iuZrANy9Kx5W2XpERAJHSzRSxK9TFFBSTrK q1d1yQmKwzixvRfJ+5iN3HeqnBViITNH/re5XPcsgEB6Csl/NLAVVDwjNtBWxxbo iAvreIvg0ELFl5GPp4M4gBZ9dijw1bSy0X77/EDHlHXzNhCYAKn67uqqZiLxIUZU icU9ETiT8emq2aOkJfKelF/gmq1lzbfi0G6rclD0FEb+ZPhTnGIm26teF2k82vtf RPPlM44x0lEUVHT/TmZO =wCWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

Package xf86-video-sis671 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34256) is outdated, broken and lacks some features that xf86-sis-m671 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47620) have (support for 1366x768 resolution and others). Anyway it is just feature-lacking version of xf86-video-sisimedia in [community] and therefore should be removed and have it's votes merged into xf86-sis-m671 to preserve votes of sis761 chipset owners in AUR. -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

4 6

[aur-general] mysql-gui-tools unmaintained
by Jeff Cook 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

mysql-gui-tools 5.0r14-5 has not been updated since Jun '11. It no longer builds. A fix for the build failure has been in the comments since December. The package has been marked out of date since Dec 1. Can we get this package orphaned and adopted by someone else please?

5 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 9 signoffs 2. dan - 4 signoffs 3. idevolder - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request pure-stlvec
by Bjoern Lindig 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hi, the new package pure-stllib provides pure-stlvec. Could somebody please remove the later. The new one: pure-stllib https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57850 To be removed: pure-stlvec https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57181 Many thanks! Bjoern

2 1

[aur-general] darcs moved into aur
by Pierre Schmitz 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hi all, just to let you know: darcs has been moved from [community] to aur as it can no longer be built with the haskell packages in [extra]. It was also one of the last unsigned packages in the repo. Of course any TU may re-add it once these issues are fixed. See https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57820 Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com

3 3

[aur-general] [Delete request] flo-git
by Stefan Husmann 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hello please delete flo-git. The maintainer was e-mailed and agreed to do so, because the project is not active anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39921 Best Regards Stefan

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by Eric Koenigs 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Ahoy, I've recently submitted the charon package[1], but I've renamed it to charon-flow[2]. Would somebody be so kind as to remove the former? Thanks in advance. Greetings, Eric [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57661 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57828 -- Umlauts? This. Is. QUERTY!

2 1

[aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver
by Maximilian Bräutigam 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hi all, recently, I wrote an ebuild where pkgver=2.4.2 but in the download link a 242 is needed. Thus, I decided to avoid any redundancy and to write _pkgver="${pkgver//\./}". The PKGBUILD is working fine but aur.archlinux.org is expanding the download link to "2.4.2//\./}". Is there a way to avoid both the redundancy and the wrong interpretation at aur.archlinux.org? This is the package we are talking about: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230 Kind regards, Max

4 5

[aur-general] I would like to maintain mint-x-icons
by Carl George 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hello, I would like to become the maintainer for mint-x-icons in the AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42041 The package has been out of date for almost three months. I have contacted the current maintainer, Ryan Peters, and he is ok with me adopting it. I have a new PKGBUILD ready to submit for the current version of the package. What do we need to do to complete this? Thanks, Carl

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. dreisner - 6 signoffs 3. thomas - 5 signoffs 4. ibiru - 5 signoffs 5. andyrtr - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [merge-request] sabnzbd-bzr to sabnzbd-git
by Lucky 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hello, please merge the following packages, because developers switch to git. sabnzbd-bzr [1] to sabnzbd-git [2] [1] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38771> [2] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51772>

2 1

[aur-general] [libccfits] removal
by Nico Nell 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hello, I've started maintaining ccfits (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4439) and found that there is a duplicate orphaned package called "libccfits" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38912) that should probably be removed. Thanks, ~Nick

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 4. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Schala Zeal 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

I'd like to merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56848 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57782 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56849 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57783 It seems this project renamed itself

2 1

Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Thanks Xiao-Long. I'll keep the `-dd` option in mind next time I encounter this problem. On the note of leaving a comment on AUR page - how do you even register an account there? Cheers, Xav 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > Yeah, that would be a problem in the packages then. There shouldn't be > circular dependencies. Maybe you can leave a comment on AUR page about this. > > You don't necessarily need to alter the PKGBUILD's. If you add '-dd' to > the pacman command arguments, it will ignore dependency issues, like > 'pacman -Udd nvidia-bumblebee-295.20-1.pkg.tar.xz'. The dependency loop > only lasts until both packages are installed anyway. > > Regards, > Xiao-Long Chen > > ------------------------------ > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:32:36 +1000 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > To: chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com; aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > > Hello, > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried it, and I got: > > loading packages... > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) > :: nvidia-bumblebee: requires nvidia-utils-bumblebee=290.10 > > So I thought, all right, I'll update nvidia-bumblebee. However, the > update has: > > depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=${pkgver}") > > which fails the installation because my nvidia-utils-bumblebee is still at > 290.xx. I hacked the PKGBUILD to be able to install it: > > depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=290.00") > > Otherwise it would raise an inter-conflict and fail. This isn't exactly > clean. > > Cheers, > Xav > > > > 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > > The new xorg-server conflicts with nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) <= version > 290.10. > The current version of nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) is 295.20. Just install > the new > version from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50025 > > Hope this helps! > Xiao-Long Chen > > > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:46:25 +1000 > > To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > Subject: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > > Hello all, > > > > With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full > > system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. > > > > resolving dependencies... > > warning: dependency cycle detected: > > warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency > > looking for inter-conflicts... > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-uti ls-bumblebee are in conflict > (nvidia-utils). > > > Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] > > error: unresolvable package conflicts detected > > error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict > > (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to > > utilise my discrete graphics hardware. > > > > The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem > > before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: > > > > Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > > > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > > > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > > > Need fix > > > > > > > > > > > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > > > Just rebuild the package manually. > > > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 > > > > > > How could I go around or fix this problem? > > > > Cheers, > > Xav > > >

1 0

Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hello, Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried it, and I got: loading packages... resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: nvidia-bumblebee: requires nvidia-utils-bumblebee=290.10 So I thought, all right, I'll update nvidia-bumblebee. However, the update has: depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=${pkgver}") which fails the installation because my nvidia-utils-bumblebee is still at 290.xx. I hacked the PKGBUILD to be able to install it: depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=290.00") Otherwise it would raise an inter-conflict and fail. This isn't exactly clean. Cheers, Xav 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > The new xorg-server conflicts with nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) <= version > 290.10. > The current version of nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) is 295.20. Just install > the new > version from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50025 > > Hope this helps! > Xiao-Long Chen > > > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:46:25 +1000 > > To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > Subject: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > > Hello all, > > > > With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full > > system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. > > > > resolving dependencies... > > warning: dependency cycle detected: > > warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency > > looking for inter-conflicts... > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-uti ls-bumblebee are in conflict > (nvidia-utils). > > > Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] > > error: unresolvable package conflicts detected > > error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict > > (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to > > utilise my discrete graphics hardware. > > > > The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem > > before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: > > > > Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > > > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > > > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > > > Need fix > > > > > > > > > > > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > > > Just rebuild the package manually. > > > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 > > > > > > How could I go around or fix this problem? > > > > Cheers, > > Xav >

1 0

[aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hello all, With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. resolving dependencies... warning: dependency cycle detected: warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency looking for inter-conflicts... :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils). Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] error: unresolvable package conflicts detected error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to utilise my discrete graphics hardware. The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > Need fix > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > Just rebuild the package manually. > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 How could I go around or fix this problem? Cheers, Xav

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request exaile-beta
by J. W. Birdsong 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

I personaly see no reason to keep it around but if y'all feel differently feel free to leave it as an orphan. Thanks JB 1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26257 2) https://launchpad.net/exaile/+download

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion Request: gnustep-theme-gnome-svn
by spider-mario 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

GNUstep’s GNOME theme is now called “GTK”, so gnustep-theme-gnome-svn has been replaced by gnustep-theme-gtk-svn and should thus be removed from the AUR. > r34756 | gcasa | 2012-02-15 21:37:30 +0100 (mer. 15 févr. 2012) | 2 lignes > Rename GnomeTheme to GtkTheme which is more appropriate.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by speps 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hi, prpltwtr [1] is strongly outdated, the current maintainer seems to be inactive. I sent him a mail on the 9Th March. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35325 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] Merge / deletion requests
by Simon Sapin 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hi, Please remove 'python2-weasyprint' and 'python-weasyprint' or merge them into 'weasyprint'. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57201 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57205 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57621 The later installs for both Python 2 and 3. I think that a single package is less confusing, and it avoids the conflict in /usr/bin WeasyPrint can be used from the command line or as a Python library. Unlike pip for example, users of the command-line executable do not care which version of Python is used, so having multiple versioned executables in /usr/bin/ is not useful. As a library however, users will want one Python version or the other. Do you have suggestion for packaging in such cases? Also, please remove python3-decorator. python-decorator (for python 3) and python2-decorator are now both in "community". https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57204 Regards, -- Simon Sapin

2 13

[aur-general] [community] Up for adoption: cairo-compmgr, gadmin-samba
by Florian Pritz 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hi, I'll drop those to the AUR unless someone adopts them in the next few days: - gadmin-samba: upstream website and ftp server are down - cairo-compmgr: upstream is pretty dead (hardly any commits in git nor recent releases) and it doesn't build right now because -ldl is missing from $(LIBS). -- Florian Pritz

3 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 4 signoffs 2. lfleischer - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: kobby, libqinfinity
by Aaron DeVore 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

I just talked with the author of Kobby and libqinfinity, Greg Haynes. He has completely killed off both projects, so the AUR packages should be deleted. -Aaron DeVore

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Alessio Sergi 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

Hi TUs, please delete the following packages: youtube2mp3-{128,192,256,320}-bitrate [1][2][3][4] 'cause they were uploaded by mistake. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57706 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57707 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57708 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57709 -- Alessio Sergi

2 1

[aur-general] Request for merge
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

Please merge [1]xf86-input-synaptics-clickpad to [2]xf86-input-synaptics-led. The -led is just a new clone of my -clickpad version (People why do you steal my PKGBUILDs?). The naming is better considering future when version 1.6 of synaptics driver gets released with clickpad support in the mainline. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38120 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57575

2 1

[aur-general] remove request [celtx-bin64]
by member graysky 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

I adopted the 'celtx-bin' package and updated it to the latest version as well as enhanced the support to cover both i686 and x86_64. There is also a package called celtx-bin64 which is now redundant. The maintainer of this package agrees that we should remove it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46977

2 1

[aur-general] please merge/delete
by Daniel Wallace 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

this is a new package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57714 andoidscreencast I just had the maintainer disown it and I fixed it here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57719 androidscreencast-git thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 3 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community
by Stefan Husmann 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Am 12.03.2012 21:20, schrieb Aaron Griffin: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kaspar Bumke<kaspar.bumke(a)gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM > Subject: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community > To: aaron(a)archlinux.org > > > Hi, > > Could you forward to arch-dev-public at your discretion please? > > I saw that that the avr-gcc and avr-binutils packages are currently > orphans in community. Additionally, avr-gcc is flagged out of date. I > work with AVRs on Arch Linux and would be willing to take over > maintaining these packages. > > I have been using Arch for over two years now and you can have a look > at my small contributions to the AUR and Wiki: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=kasbah > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kasbah > > I would be delighted to be able to contribute more by maintaining > these packages and would be willing to put the time in to learn what I > need to be a maintainer. I can see that Jelle van der Waa is currently > maintainer on avrdude and avr-libc and if he/she is willing to adopt > these packages they may be a better maintainer than me. > > Kind Regards, > > Kaspar > I think, aur-general is the more appropiate list for [community]-packages.

1 0

[aur-general] [ike.devolder@gmail.com: Re: Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671]
by Martti Kühne 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

----- Forwarded message from Ike Devolder <ike.devolder(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:53:50 +0100 From: Ike Devolder <ike.devolder(a)gmail.com> To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120217 Thunderbird/10.0.2 Op 17-03-12 05:44, alexander.r(a)gmx.com schreef: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:12:52PM +1100, alexander.r(a)gmx.com wrote: >> Package xf86-video-sis671 >> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34256) is outdated, broken >> and lacks some features that xf86-sis-m671 >> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47620) have (support for >> 1366x768 resolution and others). Anyway it is just feature-lacking >> version of xf86-video-sisimedia in [community] and therefore should be >> removed and have it's votes merged into xf86-sis-m671 to preserve votes >> of sis761 chipset owners in AUR. >> -- >> My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR > ---end quoted text--- > > Am I ignored O_o ? Anyway sorry and please forget about previous message; better > disown xf86-sis-m671 (it was said to be useless and marked as outdated long ago) > and merge it into xf86-video-sis671, which I just updated. no you are not ignored but you are not the maintainer of xf86-sis-m671 so if you get hellnest to confirm the merge here we can do that -- Ike ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

[aur-general] Delete rEFIt package
by Keshav P R 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Hi, rEFIt[1] has not been updated in over two years by upstream, does not build under linux (any distro) as of now, and is orphaned. I have uploaded refind-x86_64[2] which is a fork of rEFIt. It currently builds under linux and contains bugfixes. Please delete the rEFIt package. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14837 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57632

2 3

[aur-general] Please merge/delete cairo-xcb-ubuntu
by Kevin Vesga 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Please delete cairo-xcb-ubuntu [1] as the maintainer has made a new package cairo-ubuntu-xcb [2]. Or you can merge them I suppose. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44663 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52780

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 9 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs 4. eric - 2 signoffs 5. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: python3-lxml
by Tim Koopman 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

The package is available in community as python-lxml. Tim

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: zathura-girara-git and zathura-git
by karnath 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Please, merge votes of zathura-girara-git [1] with zathura-git [2] and delete zathura-girara-git [2] since girara branch is now main development branch and is used in zathura-git. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48569 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30285 -- E-Mail : karnathtorjian(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by ianux 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Please delete fortune-classe-americaine https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52043 which is duplicate of fortune-classe-americaine-fr And ices https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2035 which is duplicate of ices0 Thank you -- radio ianux - http://ianux.fr/

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Please remove [1]voikko-openoffice as it isn't needed anymore as I assume everyone has already changed to libreoffice. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44143

2 1

[aur-general] kdebindings-python provides bindings for Python 3.x
by Andrea Scarpino 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Hi all, I updated kdebindings-python to provides bindings for Python 3.x. Many projects still use python 2.x so, we'll keep a new kdebindings-python2 package in our repo. We already rebuilt our packages, please maintainers update your packages on AUR. >From now on, /usr/bin/pykdeuic4 will refer to the python3 version. /usr/bin/python2-pykdeuic4 will refer to the python2 version. Also, all examples and sip files, for the Python2 version, are stored respectively in /usr/share/apps/pykde4/python2-examples and /usr/share/sip/python2-PyKDE4 Thanks. -- Andrea

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. dan - 6 signoffs 3. ibiru - 3 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 5. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request
by Simon Perry 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Hi, Please remove perl-javascript as it no longer builds with xulrunner 11.0, and a fix from upstream is very unlikely. Also, I've recently discovered that the same functionality is provided by perl-javascript-spidermonkey which builds / works fine. Cheers. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45852 -- Simon Perry (aka Pezz)

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion / Merge Request: {firefox, thunderbird}-firetray-svn
by Alexandre Ferrando 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

I've been maintaining for a few months the svn version of a thunderbird and firefox extension which are now broken and will not be fixed. Could the packages be deleted and their votes merged with their new git versions that do work? firefox-firetray: svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55256 git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57655 thunderbird-firetray svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45910 git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57653 Thank you in advance

2 1

[aur-general] astrolog package errors
by Jude DaShiell 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

The source file astrolog.dat is not one to delete from the build of the astrolog package. At a minimum it ought to go into /usr/share/astrolog since it is a configuration file the installed astrolog package will use if it finds it in the right place. The default for astrolog is to look for astrolog.dat in the astrolog directory right under the user's home directory. By default the ephemeris files also go into that astrolog directory as well. I think I can write myself an astrolog setup script which would do these things after a successful installation. The ephemeris files are in ephemall.zip and by default astrolog will use them if they're found. It's possible to edit astrolog.h and change some or all of these defaults but untouched that's where things go. For myself, I'd store charts in /home/jude/astrolog/charts so that requires at least one edit before building when I build it on slackware. The ultimate value of astrolog.dat is that it provides a user with a correct starting template to use for configuration. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Jude <jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net> <http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html>

2 1

Re: [aur-general] AUR Email
by hector acosta 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

> are you sure you want to remove your account connected to this emailaddress Probably, can you first tell me the account? --Héctor Acosta

2 1

[aur-general] AUR email
by hector acosta 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

I want to change the email for the account hacosta to this one, but I can't do it because it's already assigned to another account (it was probably me). Can I get this changed? --Héctor Acosta

2 1

[aur-general] Merge/delete request: renpy & renpy64 -> renpy-bin
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Please merge votes and comments of renpy & renpy64 packages (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23983 and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36311) into renpy-bin (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57622) and delete renpy64 so I can create source-based renpy package from scratch. -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] kernel26-grsecurity
by Krzysztof Grygiencz 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Hi, I think that kernel26-grsecurity [1] should be deleted because a) It's outdated. b) Unmaintained. c) There is new grsecurity kernel - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56674 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26652 Regards, kfgz

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal/merge request
by Christos Nouskas 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Package kernel26-pf [0] was obsoleted by linux-pf [1] but kept in the AUR because compressed hibernation failed with the latter. The issue is now resolved, so please merge comments/votes of kernel26-pf into linux-pf and remove kernel26-pf (I maintain both of them). Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40191 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50956

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * python-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) * python-docutils-0.8.1-1 (any) * python2-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * python-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-docutils-0.8.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. eric - 5 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs 4. pierre - 1 signoffs 5. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] TU Application - György Balló - results
by Alexander Rødseth 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Hi everyone, The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm pleased to welcome him as a new TU. The results are: yes: 18 no: 1 abstain: 3 total: 22 (quorum has been met) Instructions for new TUs are available at our wiki and I'll also provide him with additional info (including our secret code to the suitcase with the red button). -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

7 6

[aur-general] Deletion request: uim-svn
by noonov 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Hi, I've disowned uim-svn[1], as the project switched svn to git. Please delete it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14858 Thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] New Package: ttytter beta
by Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

The most awesome cli twitter client now has a public beta[1] and being a big fan of it, I thought that it would be a good idea to have a package for it. It actually doesn't conflict at all with the original package so I didn't fill that. The AUR package url is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57612 As always, any feedback (specially regarding the way I decided the "pkgver" variable) would be appreciated :) [1] http://www.floodgap.com/software/ttytter/beta/ Warm regards, -- Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX http://www.glatelier.org/ <http://www.mozillachile.org/> http://about.me/pablox/ <http://friendfeed.com/pablox/> http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request crossover-pro, crossover-games, crossover-standard
by Roland 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

The packages crossover-pro, crossover-games and crossover-standard are replaced by the new crossover package. Please delete them: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16777 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14187 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22027

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request
by Jonathan Arnold 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Could you merge python-sleekxmpp into my new, more correctly named, package python-sleekxmpp-git ? python-sleekxmpp : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34449 python-sleekxmpp-git : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57589 Thanks to mtorromeo for the input and sorry for th delay. -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

3 2

[aur-general] Dropping package ownership
by Jakub Viták 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Hi. I have dropped ownership of several packages. Could you please remove following from AUR: system/depository devel/gof-git modules/ipwireless_cs lib/libaio-oracle devel/pluf-aa-git And please, adopt rest if possible: lib/authpgsql network/check_multi devel/ditz-commander network/indefero-git network/gozerbot network/nagiosql network/nconf multimedia/nokinux x11/obpager devel/simpletest devel/pluf-git devel/indefero-git Thank you in advance. Regards, Jakub V.

3 2

[aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder - results
by Stéphane Gaudreault 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Hi TUs, The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :) The results are: Yes : 18 No : 1 Abstain : 2 Total : 21 (Quorum has been met) Ike, please follow these steps [1]. Cheers, Stéphane [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_Trusted_User_Checklist#TODO_list_f…

13 13

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs 3. stephane - 4 signoffs 4. ibiru - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Xavier D. 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Ola, Could you delete the following packages as they are all redundant, outdated (and IMHO there is no reason to call them *-8layertech) * appkonference-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29082 * asterisk-core-sounds-en-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28471 * asterisk-extra-sounds-en-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28472 * asterisk16-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26282 * asterisk16-addons-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26305 * asterisk16-g72x-codecs-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26307 * dahdi-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26254 * dahdi-atcom-ax1600p-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28628 * dahdi-tools-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26255 * iaxmodem-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26754 Could you also delete: * asterisk-sounds (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10224) as it's now possible to install them from the asterisk package (1.8 & 10), it exists a package for 1.6 so it's not a problem * libresample-asterisk (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27165) as it's outdated and redundant with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22727 Thanks in advance

3 2

[aur-general] Delete grub-ext
by Keshav P R 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Hi, grub-ext[1] was uploaded by "elamskoy" as a temp workaround for some issue(s) in grub-gfx[2] package, but that person has since taken over grub-gfx and orphaned grub-ext. Please delete grub-ext. Regards. Keshav [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53974 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2416

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request: python2-decorator
by Maxime Gauduin 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

Hi, Could you please delete python2-decorator from AUR. I uploaded a PKGBUILD while trying to fix firewalld and didn't check the official repo before. Turns out it was already in there. BTW, there's also a python3-decorator in AUR, which would be a duplicate of python-decorator in the official repo. Thx in advance, I'm really sorry for the trouble. -- Alucryd

2 2

[aur-general] merge request synaptics-xrandr
by Kaspar Bumke 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

Hi, Could we merge the package (synaptics-xrandr) I am currently mainting: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 into (xf86-input-synaptics-xrandr): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34369 I think the second name is more appropriate as it is closer to the unpatched package in extra and would be happy for mine to be merged into that. Regards, Kaspar

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community
by Jakob Gruber 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

On 03/12/2012 09:20 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kaspar Bumke <kaspar.bumke(a)gmail.com> > ... > Could you forward to arch-dev-public at your discretion please? [community] matters are usually discussed on aur-general. > I saw that that the avr-gcc and avr-binutils packages are currently > orphans in community. Additionally, avr-gcc is flagged out of date. I > work with AVRs on Arch Linux and would be willing to take over > maintaining these packages. I've adopted avr-gcc and avr-binutils. If you become a TU, I'd be happy to transfer them to your maintainership. The same goes for Jelle of course, if he is interested in them. Jakob

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by YUP 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

Hi, Please delete my package usbip-svn. There is no sense to maintain this package since usbip drivers are already in kernel. >From README: The drivers were already in the kernel tree since version 2.6.28. The userspace tools have been moved on 20110520." Thanks. Yarema (Knedlyk)

2 1

[aur-general] Could you adopt qemu-git on AUR
by Daniel Lin 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

*Hi, Peter,* * * *https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30298 * *I found the maintainer is no longer update. * *Maybe its time to ask AUR maintainer to disown the package to you.*

4 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 9 signoffs 2. allan - 6 signoffs 3. bisson - 3 signoffs 4. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Moving libmatio from community to AUR
by Laurent Carlier 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

This package is orphaned, unsigned, doesn't build anymore, and is not a dependency from a community package. So i want to move it to AUR https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/

2 1