- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request for otf-source-sans-pro ttf-source-sans-pro
by SanskritFritz 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

Hi, I think my packages otf-source-sans-pro [1] and ttf-source-sans-pro [2] could be deleted as is is present now in the [extra] repo [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-source-sans-pro/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-source-sans-pro/ [3] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts/ What do you think? I you agree, please go on and delete the packages. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <aur-notify(a)archlinux.org> Date: Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:12 AM Subject: AUR Comment for otf-source-sans-pro To: from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-source-sans-pro/ CharlesAtum wrote: Package is already available on [extra] repository: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts/ --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

2 1

[aur-general] Another couple to delete...
by Curtis Shimamoto 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

This is a module that is meant for Realtek RTS5229 Pcie SDCard readers. The functionality was mainlined around 3.8 with the rtsx-pci module (I know because my machine uses this). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rts5229 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rts5229-dkms/ -- Curtis Shimamoto sugar.and.scruffy [at] gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (i686) * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (i686) * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (x86_64) * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 8 signoffs 2. bisson - 4 signoffs 3. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request for f2fs packages
by Curtis Shimamoto 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

There are still a couple f2fs packages in the AUR. Since f2fs is now included in the mainline kernel, I don't think that these are necessary anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-f2fs/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-f2fs/ Thanks! -- Curtis Shimamoto sugar.and.scruffy [at] gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Moving python2-tagpy to AUR
by Alexander Rødseth 30 Nov '13

30 Nov '13

Hi, The setup scripts for python2-tagpy tries to make changes to the system at build-time (as opposed to installation-time). It also exists on the latest boost TODO and no other packages use it, except for it being an optional dependency for sonata. Sonata is currently in [extra], maintained by Ángel Velásquez. My assumption is that nobody is interested in adopting python2-tagpy and keeping it in [extra] or [community], so I'm going to move it to AUR unless there are any protests (which are followed up by adoptions). I'll move the package after an arbitrary amount of time has passed (probably when it is among the last packages on the TODO list, and we want to get the upgrade to the latest version of boost going). -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

1 1

[aur-general] weidu-bin adoption request
by Fabio Ticconi 30 Nov '13

30 Nov '13

Hi all, Apologies in advance if I'm skipping some steps in this process, or if this is not the correct place to make this request. Hopefully that is not the case. Anyway, I would like to adopt this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weidu-bin/ I created a new PKGBUILD, checked with namcap, then generated and installed the package (I'm using it successfully). I attach it for review. FYI, I had to had the !strip option as without it the executables become unusable. Weidu is going to probably see a few more releases, thanks to the EE versions of BG1 and BG2. I use it, so I can keep it updated. Let me know if I missed something. Thanks, Fabio ps: the downloaded zip contains a COPYING file, that is a GPL2 license. Therefore I used GPL2 in the license array instead of installing that file. Is this correct?

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Nov '13

30 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: fs-uae-{game-center,arcade}-devel
by grimi 29 Nov '13

29 Nov '13

Hi, author of fs-uae-game-center changed app name to fs-uae-arcade. I've uploaded already new package, please merge old one with new one. new: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fs-uae-arcade-devel/ old : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fs-uae-game-center-devel/ Thanks. -- grimi

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Nov '13

29 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Fwd: gnupg-largekeys in AUR
by Ido Rosen 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Hi, I've added gnupg-largekeys, which is the gnupg from Core, but patched to extend the maximum key size to 65535 bits. Please note that unpatched versions of gnupg can only import/encrypt to/verify signatures of key sizes up to 16384 bits large, so you could keep your key sizes less than or equal to that size for compatibility. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnupg-largekeys I think gnupg2-large-keys.patch would be a great addition into the Arch Core gnupg package, if not in its current form then at least modifying it to increase the max key size to 16384 instead of 65535. For some interesting numbers, take a look at http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/documents/D.SPA.20.pdf (especially Table 7.2, see 15424 bit RSA keys). Basically, it'd be nice for users to be able to create keys larger than 4096 bits. Cheers, Ido

2 5

[aur-general] Delete egoboo-data
by SanskritFritz 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Hi, please remove the package egoboo-data [1] because I have merged it into the egoboo package, so it is not needed anymore. I'm the maintainer of both packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/egoboo-data/ Thank you.

2 1

Re: [aur-general] PKG rename request!
by Xyne 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Michael Düll wrote: >Hi! > >I reuploaded my package from enigmail-bin[1] to >thunderbird-enigmail-bin[2] as requested. Please merge into the new one [2]. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/enigmail-bin/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-enigmail-bin/ > done, thanks

1 0

[aur-general] PKG rename request
by Michael Düll 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Hi! I reuploaded my package from enigmail-bin[1] to thunderbird-enigmail-bin[2] as requested. Please merge into the new one [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/enigmail-bin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-enigmail-bin/

1 0

[aur-general] Package deletions
by Leo Unbekandt 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Good afternoon everyone, I was maintainer of - bin32-hubic - bin64-hubic These are proprietary clients of the cloud storage service of OVH. However the client has completely changed and this package are not useful anymore. The replacement is already on AUR, it's the package: `hubic` Is it possible to delete the old ones ? Thank you ! -- Léo Unbekandt Soulon on Gitub/Twitter/Freenode CTO @ Appsdeck

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs 2. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: spark-git / sparklines-git
by Jerome Leclanche 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

spark-git currently conflicts with the spark im client. Short of renaming the other one "spark-im", I've submitted a proposal for sparklines-git instead. I also renamed the binary itself sparklines so not to create a conflict with the spark im client (whose binary is also called spark). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sparklines-git/ J. Leclanche

1 0

[aur-general] remove fusion-icon-fixed
by Pantelis Panayiotou 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

Hello, I'm the maintainer of fusion-icon-fixed. It needs to be removed because it's a duplicate of fusion-icon. Thank you. -- Pantelis Panayiotou Operations Manager, Miliaris Limited Louki Akrita & Evanthous 2, Office 102, 1101 Nicosia Email: info(a)miliaris.eu | Web: www.miliaris.eu | Tel: 99.020.770 -- Pantelis Panayiotou - p.panayiotou(a)gmail.com This email is signed with an S/MIME digital signature, using a certificate issued by COMODO. I first used this certificate on 2013-01-09 10:50 EET. Please contact me if you need assistance verifying my digital signature.

1 0

[aur-general] question about git package as a dependency
by Lieven Moors 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

Hi, I was wondering if it would be ok to let my package (non-daw-git) depend on the ntk-git package instead of ntk. The package ntk is not yet available in AUR, but ntk-git is. I think technically, ntk-git should provide ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release of ntk. The downside for the user is that helpers like yaourt won't find the dependency. I was wondering what you guys think about this... Greetings, lieven

3 6

[aur-general] docker v. docker
by Jerome Leclanche 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2, kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time. docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the other hand, is a widely used and current container solution. As of 0.7, it's now available on all distributions (previously was only available on ubuntu). There will be a naming conflict between the two very soon. I would be in favour of renaming extra/docker preemptively since it hasn't been updated in a decade. J. Leclanche

6 8

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 11 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (11 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) * boinc-7.2.33-1 (i686) * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) * boinc-7.2.33-1 (x86_64) * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] delete request
by sir_lucjan＠bridgelinux.pl 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

Hi please remove this package - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lucjan/ - I added it by mistake Regards, Piotr 'sir_lucjan' Gorski -- sir_lucjan(a)bridgelinux.pl <sir_lucjan(a)bridgelinux.pl>

2 1

[aur-general] Disown mingw-w64-bin
by Philip A Reimer 26 Nov '13

26 Nov '13

Could someone please disown mingw-w64-bin [1]. Since Arch Linux has a working mingw-w64 toolchain [2] now it might be better to delete it? I emailed the maintainer and only received "Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently" [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-bin/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=mingw-w64 -ant32 http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64-archlinux/wiki

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request
by Dustin Falgout 26 Nov '13

26 Nov '13

Hi, The packages kcm-grub2[1] and kcm-grub2-git[2] are both orphans and there doesn't look to be any active development on the program. The PKGBUILD's need updating to compile properly. There is an alternative available in the AUR that has active development. (grub2-editor[3]) For that reason, please remove [1} and [2]. THANKS! Regards, Dustin [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kcm-grub2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kcm-grub2-git/ --------------------------------------- [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grub2-editor/

2 1

[aur-general] Delete requests
by Jerome Leclanche 26 Nov '13

26 Nov '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qsplashy-arch-svn/ - source dead https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-globalmenu/ - extremely old patched gtk, orphan, functionality upstreamed https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imlib2-svn/ - enlightenment project switched to git, an imlib2-git package should be created (http://git.enlightenment.org/legacy/imlib2.git/) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/postgresql-plpythonu/ - Very out of date. Should merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/postgresql-python/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-reportlab-svn/ - source dead https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-qt-hg/ - Sadly, project has been abandoned by mozilla https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt46/ - (?) Old version of Qt, nothing depends on it. Theres a policy against those, right? J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Nov '13

26 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * libpinyin-1.0.0-1 (i686) * libpinyin-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * libpinyin-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0