- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] git push failed 8-(
by J. Scheurich 30 Jan '20

30 Jan '20

Hi, I used git add/git commit as usual. But "git push" fails with: $ git push fatal: unable to access 'https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git/': The requested URL returned error: 403 There is no https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git/ in the git configuration files: $ find . -type f | xargs grep aur ./.git/config: url = https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git ./.git/logs/HEAD:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 45172971ba7f6a37537a68b2ba7f15e5f2f8180b J. Schurich <mufti11(a)web.de> 1580375715 +0100 clone: from https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git ./.git/logs/refs/heads/master:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 45172971ba7f6a37537a68b2ba7f15e5f2f8180b J. Schurich <mufti11(a)web.de> 1580375715 +0100 clone: from https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git ./.git/logs/refs/remotes/origin/HEAD:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 45172971ba7f6a37537a68b2ba7f15e5f2f8180b J. Schurich <mufti11(a)web.de> 1580375715 +0100 clone: from https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git Binary file ./white_dune-1.700.tar.bz2 matches any idears ? so long MUFTI

3 5

[aur-general] AUR problem: 403 for white_dune package
by J.Scheurich 24 Jan '20

24 Jan '20

Hi, When i try $ git remote add white_dune ssh://aur@aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase.git $ git push fatal: unable to access 'https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git/': The requested URL returned error: 403 $ / I run "ssh-keygen" and uploaded the .pub key. I had no problems using "git push" before.... What is wrong ? so long MUFTI /

4 6

Re: [aur-general] AUR problem: 403 for white_dune package
by eye 24 Jan '20

24 Jan '20

Just try ``` ~ ssh aur(a)aur.archlinux.org help Commands: adopt <name> Adopt a package base. disown <name> Disown a package base. flag <name> <comment> Flag a package base out-of-date. git-receive-pack Internal command used with Git. git-upload-pack Internal command used with Git. help Show this help message and exit. list-repos List all your repositories. restore <name> Restore a deleted package base. set-comaintainers <name> [...] Set package base co-maintainers. set-keywords <name> [...] Change package base keywords. setup-repo <name> Create a repository (deprecated). unflag <name> Remove out-of-date flag from a package base. unvote <name> Remove vote from a package base. vote <name> Vote for a package base. ``` if this does not work for you, you'll need to fix your ssh config / keys. Toni "J. Scheurich" mufti11(a)web.de – January 24, 2020 11:18 AM > Hi > >> $ git clone ssh://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git > >> Cloning into 'white_dune'... > >> aur(a)aur.archlinux.org: Permission denied (publickey). > >> fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Is your key added to the ssh-agent? > $ cat ~/.ssh/config > Host aur.archlinux.org > User aur > PreferredAuthentications publickey > IdentityFile ~/.ssh/aur > AddKeysToAgent yes > ... > $ git push > aur(a)aur.archlinux.org: Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Please make sure you have the correct access rights > $ > > Is this .ssh/config enough for ssh-agent ? > > so long > MUFTI > >

2 1

[aur-general] EQ And Community Kindness
by michael Bostwick 17 Jan '20

17 Jan '20

Hi, This is my first time writing the mailing list, to be honest I would have preferred anther way of bringing this up, but *I didn't see an easy way to bring my concern to someone who's empowered to fix this strong comment or make it better.* I was looking into a package to solve a complex programming task when I encountered a rather jarring pinned comment . ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libc%2B%2B/#pinned-678768 ) " Hi people, this is your regular reminder to SHUT UP about validpgpkeys checks and complaints about the fact that test suites exist. This package is doing the correct thing, and there has been a great deal of pointless moaning and whining about it, but there is also multiple pinned comments explaining why every one of those complaints is not only null and void, but retroactively ridiculous. The banhammer is ready and waiting in case you *still* want to ignore all this on top of the Trusted User warning." I really hope no one was banned by the writer of this comment, and I really hope as trusted users in the future you guys would *be a little more kind* to members of the aur community. Many linux users may be familiar with Linus Torvalds writings on his mistakes with EQ, I hope no one in aur has to experience that. For those trusted AUR members that have been kind I say *thank you for your hard work*, and for those that mean well but are harsh please keep in mind when you see a package the first thing you see in the pinned comment (and alot of context that is missed), and that speaks loudly to your impressions of aur. Thanks For your time in reading my comment, Michael B

5 7

Re: [aur-general] Being an asshole to package maintainers is a bannable offense, and that's okay
by Niels Egidius Johan Meijer 16 Jan '20

16 Jan '20

Hello everyone, this is my first time posting too, I hope nothing went wrong. To demonstrate that it is the presentation of the comment in question but not the content that some experience as inappropriate, I tried to re-write it for myself in a less 'emotive' way. It is usually really hard to properly express emotive content in a written text without creating ambiguity about the intention of the original poster, which I feel underlies most controversies about 'unwelcomingness' on the Internet: > Hi people, there have been a large number of complaints about the testing this package does, such as validpgpkeys checks. This package is doing the correct thing, and several previous pinned comments [have attempted to] explain why these complaints are not valid. Please refer to those before posting any additional comments. The text in []s would make the message a bit more polite, as not including it might make what other might consider a subjective claim. I put it in brackets as I it might change the content of the message a bit. The final sentence prevents users from bringing up the stale arguments that the original message tried to prevent, but does not assume anything about the intentions of the reader, which is more polite IMO. If the poster wants to be a bit more explicit, it could be replaced with the following. > Please refrain from posting any additional comments [that are already addressed by this discussion]. I feel that this is probably rude to say without the parts in brackets (as it forbids a reader who might bring up a valid point from participating), but that part might change the content a bit, hence the brackets. So far the message politely asks the reader not to do something, which might make any willing violation of this request against the implicit expectation of civilised behaviour one can/should assume in a public 'medium' such as the AUR. If somebody does this anyway I am pretty sure everyone can agree that banning could be logical next step. However, to not change the content: to make the threat of a ban explicit one could add the following line: > Please note that Moderators/TUs might [need to] resort to banning users to minimise additional noise in the comment section. However, I really think such a consequence should already be clear from the previous text. Including it might therefore make the message more hostile than it needs to be in order to achieve the desired goal (no more spammy complaints), and also slightly implies that the writer is just pretending to sound polite. (Is it called a 'comment section'?) I'd like to mention that I am not too sure about the mentioned technicalities. I also tried my best not to 'censor' the message in any kind, just change the presentation. Switching to a more formal (less-emotive) register is my go-to approach when a discussion might get heated, and I wanted to add my two cents. I hope they are of some use in any future considerations! Kind regards, Niels E. J. Meijer

1 0

[aur-general] Sha256sum unexpected behaviour
by Leonidas Spyropoulos 10 Jan '20

10 Jan '20

Hello, I got a weird issue with sha256sum behaviour. When creating the package with makepkg --geninteg I get a hash and when trying to build it with makepkg the hash fails. The interesting bit is --ptintsrcinfo comes up with a different hash. Anyone got some idea why this might happen? See below some debugging info ~/linux-gc$ makepkg --geninteg ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found linux-v5.4.10-arch1.tar.gz -> Found config -> Found 0001_bmq_v5.4-r1.patch -> Found 0002_enable_additional_cpu_optimizations-20190822.tar.gz ==> Generating checksums for source files... sha256sums=('bd51016d038277d2edd4e6d6def53b0ba24e0b238662d404a07a7d706ad2b5d3' 'aa77f7e3b611787f734c7e7d7503d3debf9af86ac999e8bccf533c5a854ec15b' '0b770209a72171dfd46401d67d13204a767eb1749ef522df7ea7292b83046537' '8c11086809864b5cef7d079f930bd40da8d0869c091965fa62e95de9a0fe13b5') ~/linux-gc$ makepkg --printsrcinfo pkgbase = linux-gc pkgdesc = Linux pkgver = 5.4.10 pkgrel = 1 url = https://cchalpha.blogspot.co.uk/ arch = x86_64 license = GPL2 makedepends = bc makedepends = kmod makedepends = libelf makedepends = xmlto makedepends = python-sphinx makedepends = python-sphinx_rtd_theme makedepends = graphviz makedepends = imagemagick makedepends = git options = !strip source = linux-v5.4.10-arch1.tar.gz::https://git.archlinux.org/linux.git/snapshot/li… source = config source = 0001_bmq_v5.4-r1.patch::https://gitlab.com/alfredchen/bmq/raw/master/5.4/bm… source = 0002_enable_additional_cpu_optimizations-20190822.tar.gz::https://github.co… validpgpkeys = ABAF11C65A2970B130ABE3C479BE3E4300411886 validpgpkeys = 647F28654894E3BD457199BE38DBBDC86092693E validpgpkeys = 8218F88849AAC522E94CF470A5E9288C4FA415FA sha256sums = 1fda6369ec7038c9ca1fe7aa6206977c5b8983c77e9d74e4ba458a4d042d1d31 sha256sums = aa77f7e3b611787f734c7e7d7503d3debf9af86ac999e8bccf533c5a854ec15b sha256sums = 0b770209a72171dfd46401d67d13204a767eb1749ef522df7ea7292b83046537 sha256sums = 8c11086809864b5cef7d079f930bd40da8d0869c091965fa62e95de9a0fe13b5 pkgname = linux-gc pkgdesc = The Linux kernel and modules with the BMQ CPU scheduler depends = coreutils depends = kmod depends = initramfs optdepends = crda: to set the correct wireless channels of your country optdepends = linux-firmware: firmware images needed for some devices provides = linux-gc=5.4.10 pkgname = linux-gc-headers pkgdesc = Headers and scripts for building modules for the Linux kernel depends = linux-gc provides = linux-gc-headers=5.4.10 provides = linux-headers=5.4.10 Thanks, -- Leonidas Spyropoulos A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

4 3

[aur-general] Spam
by Michael Duell 09 Jan '20

09 Jan '20

User `hellyjanes900` is spamming at [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/hellyjanes900/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/android-studio/

2 1

[aur-general] SweetHome3D related PKGBUILDs
by Alexis BRENON 08 Jan '20

08 Jan '20

Hi all, By default, SweetHome3D comes with only a few 3D models to add to your scene. Some are advertised on its site but it requires that you download them manually and then add them to SweetHome3D. I think it could be nice to have some assets package in AUR which download and add assets automatically. 8 different libraries are provided, some which are specific (for trees or for persons), and they aren't so lightweight so I choose to make 1 package for each library. Hence I wrote some scripts which generate PKGBUILDs and .install script for each package: https://github.com/AlexisBRENON/3dmodels-pkgbuild Here is the PKGBUILD for one of them to show you an example: --- # Maintainer: Alexis BRENON <brenon.alexis+arch at gmail dot com> pkgname=sweethome3d-3dmodels-contributions pkgver=1.7.1 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Free 3D models advertised on SweetHome3D website" arch=('any') url="http://www.sweethome3d.com/freeModels.jsp" license=("custom:FreeArtLicence") optdepends=("sweethome3d: Models rendering" "sweethome3d-3dmodels-blendswap-cc0: More 3D models" "sweethome3d-3dmodels-blendswap-ccby: More 3D models" "sweethome3d-3dmodels-katorlegaz: More 3D models" "sweethome3d-3dmodels-lucapresidente: More 3D models" "sweethome3d-3dmodels-reallusion: More 3D models" "sweethome3d-3dmodels-scopia: More 3D models" "sweethome3d-3dmodels-trees: More 3D models") install="$pkgname.install" source=(" http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sweethome3d/3DModels-Contributions-1.7.1… ") sha1sums=("5db3609b754747b018fc5362cc5421271656ceca") package() { mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/share/eteks/sweethome3d/furniture/contributions I=0 for lib in "${srcdir}"/*.sh3f; do install -Dm644 "$lib" "$pkgdir/usr/share/eteks/sweethome3d/furniture/contributions/contributions-$(printf "%02d" "$I").sh3f" I=$(( I + 1 )) done install -Dm644 "${srcdir}"/LICENSE* "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE" } --- Do you think that this kind of packages would be useful and fit in the rules of submissions? Kind, Alexis.

1 0

[aur-general] Change package name?
by Brian Allred 08 Jan '20

08 Jan '20

Hi all, yochananmarqos made a good point on my gpmdp <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gpmdp/> package. It's a -bin package, but I didn't originally submit it as such. Is there a way to change its name without losing the comment history and changelog? I can resubmit as gpmdp-bin if necessary, just wanted to check first. Thanks, Brian

3 3

[aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages
by Sven-Hendrik Haase 27 Dec '19

27 Dec '19

Hi guys, I maintain the official gitlab packages gitlab, gitlab-gitaly, gitlab-runner, gitlab-shell, gitlab-workhorse and python-gitlab. Out of these, I'll be dropping gitlab, gitlab-gitaly, gitlab-shell and gitlab-workhorse because they are way too much work to maintain and I can't keep up and the result isn't great. Currently known bugs: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62837 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63679 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63688 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63935 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63950 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64337 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64887 Unless any other masochistic TU really wants to feel the pain, I'll be dropping them in about two weeks. Sven

7 18

Re: [aur-general] AUR Comment for white_dune
by J. Scheurich 27 Dec '19

27 Dec '19

> Ralf_Mardorf [1] added the following comment to white_dune [2]: > > white_dune 1.660 isn't provided by ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/ > Sorry, white_dune 1.660 is a defect package 8-( I am unable to rollback to white_dune-1.654: $ git add PKGBUILD .SRCINFO $ git commit On branch master nothing to commit, working tree clean $ git push fatal: 'mufti(a)aur.archlinux.org/packages/white_dune' does not appear to be a git repository fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. I used the AUR web interface to disown the package and hope to use git commit/psuh in future... sorry so long MUFTI

4 11

[aur-general] surf-git doesn't build (for me, anyway)
by Greg Minshall 17 Dec '19

17 Dec '19

hi. surf-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/surf-git/ gets an error when building with makepkg (see below). the problem is correctable by cp -p src/surf/config.def.h src/surf/config.h i.e., copying the suckless-supplied "default" config.h (named config.def.h) to the config.h used in the build, then doing a makepkg -e (there are also config.h files in . and in ./src identical to the one supplied in ./src/surf; i didn't need to change those and am not sure what they are for.) cheers, Greg ps: here's the error (the older function scroll() in surf was split into two, i guess): ---- c99 `pkg-config --cflags x11` `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-3.0 gcr-3 webkit2gtk-4.0` -DVERSION=\"2.0\" -DWEBEXTDIR=\"/usr/lib/surf\" -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -DGCR_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -fPIC -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -c surf.c In file included from surf.c:302: config.h:149:43: error: ‘scroll’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘scrollh’? 149 | { MODKEY, GDK_KEY_j, scroll, { .i = 'd' } }, | ^~~~~~ | scrollh

2 1

[aur-general] AUR VCS cleanup
by Lukas Fleischer 07 Dec '19

07 Dec '19

3 2

[aur-general] AUR cleanup
by Lukas Fleischer 07 Dec '19

07 Dec '19

3 2

[aur-general] AUR Merge request for kubebox and kubebox-bin
by David Rodriguez 06 Dec '19

06 Dec '19

Hello, I am the maintainer of both kubebox and kubebox-bin. It has been brought to my attention that kubebox, since it is not built from source, would be more appropriately named "kubebox-bin". I've already uploaded the new package and am requesting a merge for comments and votes. Thank you, David Rodriguez

3 2

[aur-general] New Maintainers for some AUR packages needed (mostly Hamradion stuff)
by Andreas Schreiner 05 Dec '19

05 Dec '19

Hi! I currently have no more Arch Boxes running and do want to give up the AUR Packages I maintain. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&SeB=m&K=axpu It's mostly Hamradio stuff and things related to that. Please contact me for a direct handover. Packeges not taken will be disowned in about two weeks. Thank you! Andi, OE4DNS

1 0

[aur-general] forgot password
by Yi Qingliang 30 Nov '19

30 Nov '19

Hello, I have forgot the password, can't login on aur.archlinux.org, after fill email, it said: Password Reset Check your e-mail for the confirmation link. but I have not received any message, anyone can help? THANKS!

2 4

[aur-general] Orphaned my AUR packages
by Michael Straube 27 Nov '19

27 Nov '19

Hi all, I don't use Arch anymore and orphaned my AUR packages. Feel free to adopt. They are all low maintenance. :) Cheers Michael freedoko freedoko-git chipmachine chipmachine-git enyo-doom

2 1

[aur-general] Transition from split package to unsplit package
by Georg 27 Nov '19

27 Nov '19

Hi list, with the deprecation of Python2 ahead lots of packages currently built as split packages for py2/py3 will have to transition to non-split packages building only the py3 version, but this is not the only scenario when this could be needed. What is the correct workflow for this? It might depend on whether the pkgbase is the py2 vs py3 package vs another name (all cases exist). best regards Georg

2 2

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16805] Deletion Request for the-darkmod-tweaked
by Alberto Salvia Novella 26 Nov '19

26 Nov '19

On 26/11/19 2:27, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for the-darkmod-tweaked [2]: > > After discussion in the package comments for thedarkmod-bin, it was > determined that the custom installer used in the former package > "darkmod" violated the rules of submission on numerous levels. > > The package was reimplemented by a Trusted User, and for good measure > cleaned up and renamed to something more closely matching upstream > intentions, but for all this, the core issue with > https://gitlab.com/es20490446e/the-darkmod-tweaked had nothing to do > whether mv is better than cp, or whatever else this justification > entails: > > ``` > So I'm providing an alternative version for this package, called "the- > darkmod-tweaked", with the following enhancements over the official > bundle: > > Separated saved games and downloaded mission repository for each > user. > Missions cache auto-cleanup. > Enhanced installation speed compared with the official installer. > ``` > > No, this is not acceptable. Your new package is still obfuscation and > violates the rules of submission. > > Your "tweaks" in comparison with thedarkmod-bin do not answer the > question: "why was the previous package orphaned via moderator > action". > > You may not re-upload a package which was deemed inadmissible to the > AUR, and simply rename the pkgname in order to justify its existence. > You are REQUIRED to either: > - first defend your claim that the initial judgment "this is unfit for > the AUR" was incorrect, or > - fix the problems > > You have done neither. > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/ > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/the-darkmod-tweaked/ Even when I thought that could piss you off, I genuinely believed that would fall within the rules. Now you suspended my account, and destroyed all my work on Arch. But that was a less risky decision than keeping you around. Your purpose was never to enforce good practices but to boycott. What you call quality standards won't allow me to reach my goals. You don't care about the contents of the book, you only care about how well it's written.

4 4

[aur-general] xmrig-amd package deleted?
by Matt Harrison 25 Nov '19

25 Nov '19

Hi, It looks like the xmrig-amd [1] was recently deleted from the AUR. I don't currently see any mention anywhere of why or how it was deleted, so I am wondering why it was deleted? I can re-created it from the archive and maintain it myself, but I wanted to check first to not step on anyone's feet if it was deleted for a specific reason. Thanks, Matt Harrison [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xmrig-amd/

2 2

[aur-general] Dispute on thedarkmod-bin
by Alberto Salvia Novella 25 Nov '19

25 Nov '19

A Trusted User decided to orphan one of my packages, and override it with their own version. The reason given was I was using a custom installer for it, but without that installer the software cannot run properly as it was never designed to be used in a Linux filesystem system wide. Still they insisted it could be done. Now that they orphaned the packaged and implemented their own solution, the software is no longer working and it can never do so. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thedarkmod-bin

2 1

[aur-general] hook failed on git-push, package not displayed
by Rafael Fontenelle 23 Nov '19

23 Nov '19

Hello, I just created a new package 'obs-xdg-portal' and with containing a PKGBUILD, a .SRCINFO and a .gitignore, pushed it to AUR, but it didn't went well. Firstly, the package is not available https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obs-xdg-portal/ When I ran 'git push', it complained about hooks/update not being executable: $ git push Enumerating objects: 4, done. Counting objects: 100% (4/4), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 830 bytes | 830.00 KiB/s, done. Total 4 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) hint: The 'hooks/update' hook was ignored because it's not set as executable. hint: You can disable this warning with `git config advice.ignoredHook false`. To ssh://aur.archlinux.org/obs-xdg-portal * [new branch] master -> master Whenever I try to clone the directory again, it reports "nonexistent ref" $ git clone ssh://aur@aur.archlinux.org/obs-xdg-portal Cloning into 'obs-xdg-portal'... remote: Enumerating objects: 7, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (7/7), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. remote: Total 7 (delta 0), reused 1 (delta 0) Receiving objects: 100% (7/7), done. warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout. Ideas? Best regards, Rafael Fontenelle

2 1

[aur-general] Updating AUR versions server side
by Alberto Salvia Novella 06 Nov '19

06 Nov '19

What if regular, non development, AUR packages were tested server side for new versions? Won't that make more sense than the maintainer having to run pkgver() manually from time to time? (Reply including me on the recipients) Alberto <https://es20490446e.wordpress.com>

4 4

Re: [aur-general] aur client
by Alberto Salvia Novella 02 Nov '19

02 Nov '19

Loui Chang: > I would hope some TU does add 'aur' to the blacklist > of package names. That would make sense if the package was misleading, but "aur" is an aur client for publishing to the AUR. It couldn't have clearer naming. Have a look at "sex", described as "spouts silly mad-lib style porn-like text". I'm still wondering what that means. Bottom line is that packages can be named after anything you want. As long as they are named the same as upstream, and the software is legal and useful.

4 12