- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal Request.
by member SpeedVin 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

Hello. Please remove my package grub2-git becouse grub2 git repo is down for long time. Thanks.

2 2

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev] partially inactive
by Ronald van Haren 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > Am 02.02.2010 14:35, schrieb Ronald van Haren: >> so a little update on this. >> It took a bit longer than expected and I'm still not completely done >> with painting and stuff (yikes I really hate painting), > > Who doesn't? > >> but tomorrow >> I'll move my stuff over. > > Congrats. > >> If I'm not mistaken internet connection should be delivered sometime >> during this week. > > Two years ago, it took over 3 months until I had decent internet (I was > war-driving before that, which didn't work out too well, and could > transfer big amounts of data only from work). I hope this works better > for you. > >> Either way I need a few afternoons and evenings >> unpacking stuff so I may not get around in doing much Arch related >> stuff the rest of this week. I will check my mail regularly though. >> >> I'll post an update when it's all done. > > Have fun :) > > > > > So the fun is mostly over. I was able to carpet the last room and set up a workspace there. A lot of stuff is of course still in boxes but that's how it works anyway isn't it (if you don't miss it after 2 months throw it away)... You can consider me active again. I will go through some of the bug reports that got assigned to me in the next few days and see if something needs a quick fix. Thanks for those that took care of some updates/bug report. Ronald

1 0

[aur-general] delete request
by Moritz Rudert 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Hi, unfortenately I've forget to rename a kernel package. So please delete kernel26... greetings helios

3 3

[aur-general] snort and zim orphans and out-of-date
by Andrea Scarpino 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Is some DEV or TU interested in maintain snort or zim? or can I move them to AUR? zim pkgbuild must be rewrite, the upstream project uses python now. Cheers -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

4 5

[aur-general] Removal request for catalyst-opencl
by Vi0L0 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Hi, plase remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32968 It's not needed any more. Thanks :-) -- Greetz Vi0L0 gpg: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x561FEC2AFFC7E56E

2 1

[aur-general] unicap splitted in 3 packages
by Jordi Cerdan 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Hi, I currently maintain unicap package in AUR. This package has been splitted in 3 new packages ( http://unicap-imaging.org/blog/ ): libunicap, libunicapgtk and libucil. I think we have 2 solutions there, but I don't know which one is more "elegant": - create 3 new packages and delete unicap - rename unicap to libunicap and create 2 new packages Which one should we choose? Kind regards. -- Jordi Cerdan http://www.jordicerdan.com Andorra

2 1

[aur-general] Delete package: sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1
by Farhan Yousaf 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Can someone delete this package please? I just created it in error. sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1 <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34388> Thanks. Farhan

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by H.Gökhan SARI 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Hello, I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working on a mercurial repository rather than publishing clear version updates. And there is already a package 'blogpost-hg*' in AUR, so please delete my package blogpost. * blogpost => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18588 blogpost-hg => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33024 -- H.Gökhan SARI hsa2(a)difuzyon.net

2 3

[aur-general] Orphaning Request (xf86-input-wacom)
by M Rawash 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by "illicium" in the comments section (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted maintainer a couple of days ago, with no response. thanks, M Rawash

3 4

[aur-general] Removal request
by Ismael Barros² 07 Feb '10

07 Feb '10

Hi, Please, remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 It's a duplicate of this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 I duplicated it by mistake, I forgot to change the package name when I forked xf86-input-synaptics package. Regards, Ismael

3 5

[aur-general] zim-nightly package in AUR
by H.Gökhan SARI 07 Feb '10

07 Feb '10

Hello, There is a package called zim in [extra]. I've been using it, but today i realised that zim is rewritten with python rather than perl. Then I removed old version and switched to pyzim in AUR (Because package in [extra] is not updated for a while). However, there is a package called zim-nightly* in AUR, which is -*very*- obsolete :P (It's not updated for more than a year). I think it should be deleted, shouldn't it? *: zim-nightly => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16408 -- H.Gökhan SARI hsa2(a)difuzyon.net

2 1

[aur-general] Taking package (kernel26-bfs) by TU to community.
by member SpeedVin 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hello. Is there any way to take package (kernel26-bfs) to community by someone from Trusted Users group? I will orphan it in some time becouse I don't have much time to maintrain it. Thanks for answer [image: smile]

2 2

[aur-general] Staff : can you clean this AUR page's comments ?
by CalimeroTeknik 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hello ! New to this list but not to AUR, I subscribed to ask for someone to delete some comments on one of my AUR packages : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30159 rosedubai seems to be a windows xp (bleeh) user, who apparently looks for help for wifi on windows at the wrong place. (AUR page for an ethernet driver...) I explained him that patiently by mail. Can someone delete his comments ? -- Calimero

2 1

[aur-general] Change of Package Name
by José Valecillos 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one. I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that? -- José Valecillos

6 9

Re: [aur-general] [arch-notifications] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 05-02-2010
by Eric Bélanger 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, <repomaint(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > ================================================ > = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = > ================================================ > > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > --------------------- > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword-plugins vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/xmlrpc-c vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/xmlrpc-c > What's the deal with xmlrpc-c ? It seems that it was moved from extra to community repo. Is that correct? But the package is still in the extra db. It's in the community svn but the package isn't in the community repo yet. Did someone forgot to run db-community?

1 0

[aur-general] Adoption of python-markdown
by Andrew Antle 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

I've adopted python-markdown in [unsupported]. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10797 -- Andrew Antle <andrew dot antle at gmail dot com>

2 2

[aur-general] [exim] Bump to 4.71
by Angel Velásquez 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

Hi, Yesterday Andrea (BaSh) moved to [community] exim, when I arrived home I got the bug notifications which the package had when it was on [extra]; but Daniel (Ghost1227) closes those bug too fast :O (I already said thank to him), now that those bugs are closed, I packaged a new release and it's on [community-testing] I would like some feedback from exim's user, so if the package it's ready I will move it from [community-testing] to [community]. Opinions? -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Massimiliano Torromeo 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

Hi, please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in testing and will be officially supported by arch. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 Thanks.

3 4

Re: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?
by Andrea Fagiani 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

On 02/03/2010 02:41 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > >> Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] >> maintaining, just as AUR moderator? >> > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > I also think there is a lot of work to be done "polishing" the AUR, and that could be a good start.

4 3

[aur-general] oss maintainer needed
by Ionut Biru 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Hi TUs, any of you are using oss? Now that Paulo has resigned, oss has no maintainer anymore and we have a bug pending on bugtracker. I can't do any fixes or maintenance since i don't use it and i don't intend to use it. -- Ionut

2 1

[aur-general] Status of Shorewall and Shorewall6
by Malte Rabenseifner 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Greetings TUs, I just want to ask about the status of Shorewall and Shorewall6. I agree that it is worth keeping in [community] but it has been dropped to AUR several hours ago. Now it is back in [community], my AUR packages (that I initially just adopted) are deleted again. I am willing to maintain it in AUR but first of all please clarify whether it should be maintained in AUR or orphaned in [community]. =) Best regards, -- Malte Rabenseifner malte(a)zearan.de Germany -- Vor dem Wissen kommt das Verstehen. Vor dem Verstehen kommt das Sehen. Vor dem Sehen kommt das Erkennen. Vor dem Erkennen kommt das Wissen. -- Beneath knowing, understanding. Beneath understanding, seeing. Beneath seeing, recognizing. Beneath recognizing, knowing. --

2 1

[aur-general] comical and moonlight deleted from db but still on FTP
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Hola, ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/i686/comical-0.8-3.pkg.tar.gz ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/x86_64/comical-0.8-3.pkg.tar.gz ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/i686/moonlight-1.0.1-5.pkg.tar.gz ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/x86_64/moonlight-1.0.1-5.pkg.tar.gz Seems that this is not detected by " Integrity Check" reports. Chau. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

12 18

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] exim maintainer wanted
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

On 02/01/2010 12:08 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > exim has no maintainer and I have been assigned a bug for it as the > last person to rebuild it (db-4.8 rebuild). I do not use it and have > no intentions of fixing the bug. Does anybody want to be the maintainer? > > Allan > > If not dev take it, I guess, should be moved to [community] if there is some TU interested on it. Or drop it directly to AUR. Current exim version in [extra] is 3.69 (2007/12/20) and latest is 4.71 (2009/11/23). There are two open bug/feature reports with fixes attached [#1] [#1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/?project=1&string=exim -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

3 2

[aur-general] [FYI] Two new packages in community: libcuefile and libreplaygain
by bardo 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

I finally managed to build the last musepack-tools release, but it now needs two small libraries (and relative headers) also published by the Musepack Team. I'm going to upload them as dependencies. Corrado

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request
by § Mark § 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Could you please orphan http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2476 The current maintainer has not updated this package since the end of November nor has he responded to any of my emails requesting an update or to orphan package. Thanks Mark -- Registered Linux User # 424781 Registered Linux Computer # 364703 Smarter, Faster, Better... Arch Linux

2 1