- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request of darktable-svn (28117)
by Christian Himpel 26 Oct '09

26 Oct '09

Hi, the darktable-svn[1] package was replaced with darktable-git[2]. Please remove the darktable-svn package, since subversion is no longer supported in this project. Thanks and kind regards, chressie [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28117 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31515

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request for kgmailnotifier
by mutlu_inek 25 Oct '09

25 Oct '09

Hi, Kgmailnotifier has not been updated in 16 months. The AUR PKGBUILD still depends on Qt3 and KDE3. I have emailed him/her about two weeks ago, but not received an answer. Moreover, if I did not overlook anything, the maintainer has not updated any of his/her packages in a rather long time. Kgmailnotifier has a new stable version that depends on Qt4 and KDE4. I thus request the package to be disowned so I can adopt it. Cheers, mutlu Link to package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10065

2 2

[aur-general] Adoption of spandsp 0.0.6pre12-1
by Ronny 25 Oct '09

25 Oct '09

Hello! I'm the maintainer of ffgtk and ffgtk needs spandsp. But the PKGBUILD of spandsp doesn't work and needs to be updated. I would do this because the maintainer vinz doesn't it. So please let me adopt this package. Thank you SIRSteiner (Ronny)

3 8

[aur-general] deletion request
by F B 24 Oct '09

24 Oct '09

Hi, This package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3591 (amsn-plugins-music) can be deleted because this function is now provided by amsn without additional plugins (and it conflicts with it). This package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30586 (bin32-mumble-overlay) because the submitter upload a binary file in aur (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-mumble-overlay/bin32-mumble-overlay…) and this is forbidden of course :) Thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] package removal request
by Chris Baker 24 Oct '09

24 Oct '09

Could you please remove python3-pyopt. I decided the 'python3' suffix was unnecessary and moved it to 'pyopt'. Thanks, Chris

2 1

[aur-general] octave and scilab startup error
by Uli Armbruster 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Hi First of all, I have [testing] enabled and I'm on 32bit. I wanted to take a look at these two alternatives of matlab. Both of them don't work here, both are complaining about a missing library error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory After installing gcc-fortran it worked, so it seems like we need a rebuild here with corrected dependencies for [testing] (octave) and [community-testing] (scilab) Greetz Army

3 3

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Ranguvar 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Can you please delete 'openboxlogout', http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24889 ? I adopted it from another user, not realizing that the package 'oblogout' already existed. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Package Removal Request
by Tom Wambold 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Hello all, Could someone please remove the following packages: soho, zope-i18nmessageid, zope-pagetemplate, zope-tal, and zope-tales? I own all of those packages, and since the website for soho has been down for awhile now, the package no longer builds. Also, soho is the only thing that depends on those zope packages, so they would be unnecessary. I also don't personally use these packages at all anymore so I don't follow their releases. Thanks! -Tom Wambold

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request
by Lukáš Jirkovský 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please remove package autopano-sift-c (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31424) I've forgot that it was moved to extra. Lukas

5 8

[aur-general] removal request
by Vasily Ryabov 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please, remove http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31354. I've mistaken in pkgname.

2 1

[aur-general] remove package: checkgmail-svn-new
by Chris Baker 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

The maintainer of the checkgmail-svn package has turned over ownership to me, so my previously created checkgmail-svn-new package should be removed. Thanks! Chris

2 1

[aur-general] Xmonad PKGBUILD improvement
by jelle van der waa 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Hi, I would like the to help the state of the xmonad package in community, currently xmonad depends on ghc , libhaskel-x11 that's correct but if haskell-x11 or ghc get's updated before it's rebuild against this new dependencies, it might break. To fix that issue the pkgbuild could be changed so xmonad would depend on haskel-x11='version' and ghc='version' . Secondly it would also cover an out of date mirror wich could lead to 'breakage'. Here is an example of a related bugreport because haskel-x11 was updated before a rebuild of xmonad: -FS#16606 - xmonad/xmonad-contrib depend on nonexistent haskell-x11 Jelle van der Waa

1 0

[aur-general] chromium packages
by Biru Ionut 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

HI, i'm opening this subject again. sorry for that. i want to delete them tonight and i want to ask you guys which is the best package to have(and renamed) conform this proposal: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Chromium_proposal chromium-browser-svn will not be deleted. chromium-bin i can't choose one from that list because i don't know which one is good. just tell me which one and i'll email the maintainer to upload with a different name. -- Ionut

9 11

[aur-general] community cvs pkgs on web interface
by Ray Rashif 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11952 So we can visit those with their full URIs?

2 2

[aur-general] Delete wxgtk-media (but wait for wxgtk-2.8.10.1-5)
by Dany Martineau 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Hi! I read that mediactrl is now enabled in wxgtk-2.8.10.1-5 When this version appears in extra, could an admin delete wxgtk-media please? Thanks!! -- Dany Martineau Enseignant en mathématiques École secondaire du Harfang 4e et 5e secondaire http://danym.org CSSMI

2 1

[aur-general] should be esound an optdepends?
by Andrea Scarpino 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

>From FS#16502: With GNOME 2.28 arriving, it's time to make esound an optional package, which is currently not the case. Here is the list of the packages which requires esound. I think for all of them that esound should be an optional dependency (except maybe enlightenment?). * bmp * cinelerra-cv * enlightenment * epplet-base * freeciv * gmerlin * gstreamer0.10-good-plugins * kvirc * kvm * libgnome * qemu * vice * xine-lib * xmms What's our decision about this? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

1 0

[aur-general] TU Vote: Angel Velásquez (angvp)
by Evangelos Foutras 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Hi TUs, This begins the voting period for the addition of Angel Velásquez (angvp) as a TU, which will end in seven days. You can view his application at http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-October/006803.html Don't forget to vote (using the web interface)! Cheers.

1 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] List of packages that could be rebuilt if you have nothing better to do...
by Allan McRae 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > >> Allan McRae wrote: >> >> >>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Allan McRae wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for >>>>> which there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in >>>>> their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with >>>>> man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages. See >>>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List >>>>> >>>>> Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the >>>>> DeveloperWiki? >>>>> >>>>> Allan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Good job. >>>> >>>> And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I >>>> sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed >>>> packages [#2] are now "any" >>>> >>>> >>>> [#1] >>>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html >>>> [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I'm being lazy... any change you can easily generate an updated list >>> for [core]/[extra]? Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle. >>> >>> Allan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> No problem, I can do a "light scan" making a difference between this >> list and list of current packages. >> I guess that doing again a "deep scan" don't make much sense, >> >> >> Good Luck! >> >> >> > List updated [#1] > > This is based on old list, deleting current converted packages and > packages deleted from repos. > No new packages are added because I didn't a deep/fine scan. For each repo. > > If any have a time, the idea to do the deep scan is (what I remember was > done manually in the past) > > 1) Download this db [#2]. > 2) Keep with 0 size files from db. -> packages names. > 3) Scan from previous result list if there are any ELF32/ELF64 LSB > (relocatables (objects files, kernel modules, ar archives, etc), > executables, shared objects) and discard ELF for others archs (for > example AVR, ARM, SPARC) inside each package. > > > [#1] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any-20091019.txt > [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/db-20091019.tar.bz2 > Thanks, I have added the [core] and [extra] packages to my wiki page. A TU probably wants to add this to the [community] TODO page (which needs a big update: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community_todo) Allan

1 0

[aur-general] nouveau-drm-snapshot
by Xavier 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

>From my comment in AUR : " But I am not sure this pkgbuild is needed after all. It does exactly the same as the one in extra : http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/nouveau-drm/repos/extra-i686/PKGBUILD… So it violates AUR guidelines :) " The new "web svn" location is : http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/nouveau-drm/repos/extra-i686/PKGBU…

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: kernel-eeepc-901-kms
by Smith Dhumbumroong 18 Oct '09

18 Oct '09

Please delete kernel-eeepc-901-kms (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26393) as it have been replaced by kernel-eeepc-901 package in AUR.

2 2

[aur-general] Obsoleted, lacking developer wiki parts
by Laszlo Papp 17 Oct '09

17 Oct '09

Hello some obsoleted, laking part of the Developer Wiki! --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Adopting_Packages 1. Browse the *community* Trusted User Repository located at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?L=3 (the link is not available anymore) 3. Retreive the PKGBUILDs for the new packages: CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.archlinux.org:/home/cvs-community and perform the testing/verificatoin on the PKGBUILD. Note that there is no need to change the version number unless changes are made to the package, this will minimize needless re-downloading. (CVS to SVN?) --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Sigurd_%28TU%29 <- empty presently (gerolde, gudrun is okay.) --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:NewsletterSteps 1. Get most recent version of the newsletter: git clone ssh:// archlinux.org/srv/projects/git/newsletter.git/ <- I can't clone it. (Can the developers maybe do this action only?) --- Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: webkit-sharp
by Tim Yang 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: webkit-sharp
by tdy＠gmx.com 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

2 1

[aur-general] Filter packages by voted-status
by Lauri Niskanen 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

Hello, Is it possible to only show the packages I have voted for on the AUR web interface? If not could you please add that feature. It would make managing votes much easier. And who doesn't like to have easier control over things. -- Ape <Lauri Niskanen>

2 3

[aur-general] [delete request] kde4-servicemenu-pdf
by Christoph 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

There is a package kde4-servicemenu-pdf http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21764 and a package servicemenu-pdf-kde4 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24898 I think that one of them should be deleted, in my opinion the first one because the first one is orphaned anyway and the second one is newer and has the better name (I think). Cheers, Christoph

2 1