- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Feb '14

11 Feb '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 18 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dssi-vst-0.9.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qtractor-0.5.12-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xjadeo-0.7.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtractor-0.5.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xjadeo-0.7.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nftables-0.099-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nftables-0.099-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (18 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686), since 2014-01-20 * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-01-20 * nftables-0.099-1 (i686), since 2014-01-20 * nftables-0.099-1 (x86_64), since 2014-01-20 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (i686), since 2014-01-27 * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (x86_64), since 2014-01-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 3 signoffs 2. heftig - 2 signoffs 3. bisson - 2 signoffs 4. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Alex Szczuczko 11 Feb '14

11 Feb '14

A WINE game package that I maintain [1] will be getting a native version. I've re-uploaded the current WINE version to papersplease-beta [2]. Please merge papersplease into papersplease-beta, so papersplease is available for the coming non-WINE package. Thanks, Alex [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/papersplease/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/papersplease-beta/

2 1

[aur-general] Package with version in the name and outdating
by oliver 10 Feb '14

10 Feb '14

Hello, if a package has the version of a software as part of the name, can it become outdated if a new version will appear? Or is that not possible, because the name referse to a certain version? Would instead a new packge would need to be created? Ciao, Oliver

2 1

[aur-general] Code review request: new PKGBUILD "omodoro"
by Oliver Kraitschy 10 Feb '14

10 Feb '14

Hello trusty Arch people, i just created my first PKGBUILD for the little python script "omodoro" i wrote. It would be nice if you guys could do a code review to approve the PKGBUILD i wrote for the AUR. The PKGBUILD is here: http://www.okraits.de/upload/omodoro/PKGBUILD Any feedback/criticism is appreciated! Greetings, Oliver

5 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Feb '14

10 Feb '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 16 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dssi-vst-0.9.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qtractor-0.5.12-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xjadeo-0.7.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtractor-0.5.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xjadeo-0.7.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nftables-0.099-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nftables-0.099-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (16 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686), since 2014-01-20 * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-01-20 * nftables-0.099-1 (i686), since 2014-01-20 * nftables-0.099-1 (x86_64), since 2014-01-20 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 11 signoffs 2. eric - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs 4. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] python-mock in AUR and community
by François Boulogne 10 Feb '14

10 Feb '14

Hi, I want to report that python-mock is in community and AUR. Thank you. -- François Boulogne. http://www.sciunto.org GPG fingerprint: 25F6 C971 4875 A6C1 EDD1 75C8 1AA7 216E 32D5 F22F

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Zack Gold 10 Feb '14

10 Feb '14

I've moved 'boto-git' to 'python2-boto-git' because it's intended for Python 2. I'd like to now merge boto-git with python2-boto-git.

2 1

[aur-general] Package deletion request
by Joseph Carta 09 Feb '14

09 Feb '14

Hi. I've just claimed ownership to and updated the previously orphaned package extract-xiso [1]. Since the author of this program incorporated the somski mod into it, the package extract-xiso-somski [2] has been made redundant and should be deleted. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/extract-xiso/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/extract-xiso-somski/

2 1

[aur-general] AUR Requests
by Michael Schubert 09 Feb '14

09 Feb '14

Hi, (Maintainers, if any, are in CC.) Could you please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaging/ -> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaging-alt/ ** Reason: PIL is being phased out by pillow; 1st is orphan and 2nd one not to be replaced like in [community] Maintainer: please add a replaces=() flag, it should replace python2-imaging and not python-imaging https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-socksipy-branch/ -> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-socks/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-socksipy-branch/ ** -> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-socks/ Reason: socksipy and -branch are dead, socks is maintained and has same API Maintainer: please let me know if you'd like to maintain the new package/why we should keep a dead branch And remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sundials25/ ** Reason: sundials=2.5 current and available, package installs into /usr directly and should not be used Unsure about: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/socksipy/ ** The original socksipy is last updated 2006 and known to have multiple issues that are fixed in the new fork, should we keep this? I tested the dependencies damnvid and polly, and both work with python2-socks ** I am not the maintainer of this package. Please consider giving them some time to respond. I'd be also very happy to orphan the new packages if they like to maintain them. cheers Michael

3 3

[aur-general] Merge request: sm-ssc-hg into stepmania-git
by Devin J. Pohly 09 Feb '14

09 Feb '14

Please merge sm-ssc-hg [0] (orphaned) into stepmania-git [1]. StepMania development has moved to GitHub, and the "sm-ssc" name is long outdated. 0: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc-hg/ 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania-git/ Thanks, *dp

2 1