- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Delete and Merge requests
by Doug Newgard 23 Dec '13

23 Dec '13

**DELETE** Duplicate of mono-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono-latest/ Renamed upstream to budgie, submitter/maintainer renamed package without requesting merging/removal. Nothing useful to merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/music-player-git/ Maintainer said in the comments that the package is obsolete and needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-fluid-themes-git/ Fix was implemented upstream, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmenugen-bin-fix/ Merged into kernel source tree as of 3.8: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtl8723ae-w110er/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtl8723e-w110er/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rtl8723e/ Out of date duplicate of sphinx, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sphinx-release/ Duplicate of volatility-svn, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/volatility-linux-svn/ Patch merged upstream, nothing worth merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zbar-v4l/ Duplicates of libpng and lib32-libpng. The submitter claims that they aren't because it will stay at 1.6, but they're still duplicates : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libpng16/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libpng16/ Duplicate of tor in community: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tor-stable/ Duplicate of tor-unstable: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tor-rc/ **MERGE** Maintainer renamed package but never requested merging: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono3/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono-beta/ Maintainer renamed package to comply with python naming standards, needs merged: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pytorctl-git/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pytorctl-git/ **OpenSync** The opensync packages are kind of a mess. To start with, the tool was renamed and needs merged: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool-svn/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osynctool-svn/ Then we have an unstable, development release in [community] as libopensync that complicates things. I'm thinking the best way to handle this is to make the development releases the normal packages and the older, stable release suffixed with -stable. With this in mind, libopensync-unstable is a duplicate of the [community] package and needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libopensync-unstable/ And the other unstable package needs merged along with the regular one, taking into account the rename. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool-unstable/ && https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool/ INTO https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osynctool/ I haven't looked at the plugins yet. OpenSync is mostly dead, anyway. Thanks Doug Newgard (Scimmia)

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Dec '13

23 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * weston-1.3.1-2 (i686) * weston-1.3.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * scala-2.10.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-21 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * weston-1.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 3 signoffs 2. bluewind - 3 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Dec '13

22 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 9 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (9 total) == * scala-2.10.3-1 (any) * bbswitch-0.8-3 (i686) * r8168-8.037.00-4 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-41 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-21 (i686) * bbswitch-0.8-3 (x86_64) * r8168-8.037.00-4 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-41 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-21 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * scala-2.10.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-21 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 5 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove Request
by Guten 22 Dec '13

22 Dec '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-tagen/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-retort/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-niceogiri/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-girl_friday/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-blather/ I created all these packages at first place, but now I don't use and maintaince them for a long time, please clean them up. -- ArchLinux, Vim, Ruby, Javascript and Go - GutenYe.com - github.com/GutenYe - @gutenye

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Jente Hidskes 21 Dec '13

21 Dec '13

Hello, Please delete [1], as I removed the code from GitHub and thus, the source is not available anymore. Thanks in advance, Jente [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gxms-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * goagent-3.1.1-2 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * goagent-3.1.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 2 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by Slavi Pantaleev 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

Hi. This is about my libcvp11 package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcvp11/ The binary blob source files now 404 and are nowhere to be found online. I no longer have a use for this package, as opensc from [community] seems to provide a working free-software alternative. I still have a local copy of the zip file, but: - binaries in a "source" package are not encouraged - everything around this driver seems shady - the package has 0 votes, so likely no one else has/had a need for it - I'd rather not host such a blob on a server of mine for no good reason (the free-software driver works for me) Based on all that, I think this should be deleted. Regards

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: spark-git into sparklines-git (was: spark vs. spark)
by Jerome Leclanche 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Jonathan Steel <mail(a)jsteel.org> wrote: > On Wed 14 Aug 2013 at 19:32, Jerome Leclanche wrote: >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark-git/ >> >> Conflict is avoided here because [1] has a -svn package, but it's still >> very confusing and should probably be renamed. Any suggestions? > > Ask the maintainer to change it, either in the comments or send them an > email. > > -- > Jonathan Steel I took care of this a little while ago after some discussion upstream. Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sparklines-git/ J. Leclanche

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion Request: gtkparasite
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

Apparently, someone just uploaded it and then orphaned it, perhaps he noticed that there have been a git package which is exactly the same as his. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkparasite/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * ibus-chewing-1.4.4-1 (i686) * ibus-chewing-1.4.4-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * ibus-chewing-1.4.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-chewing-1.4.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0