- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete requests: lxsession-edit*
by Jerome Leclanche 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxsession-edit/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxsession-edit-git/ This functionality is part of lxsession. J. Leclanche

4 6

[aur-general] Orphaning graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
by Simon Hollingshead 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

There's an issue that needs fixing in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat/ but the maintainer has a lavabit email address, so I can't contact them. Their lack of AUR activity and fact they have other flagged packages seems to suggest they wouldn't check back to notice any comments on packages, so please can you disown it so I can fix it? -- Simon Hollingshead simon.hollingshead(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] architecture question
by Kuba Serafinowski 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

Hi, I recently got several requests to include armv7h in arch() of my PKGBUILDs, is it okay to do it even though it's not officially supported? Cheers, Kuba

5 5

[aur-general] python-sleekxmpp merge request
by Jonathan Arnold 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

I'm the creator & mainter for python-sleekxmpp-git : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-git/ And I think it should be merged with python-sleekxmpp-devel : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-devel/ Not sure why I created a new package, as the -devel, despite being misnamed, is pretty much the same thing I submitted about about a year later. I will request a few changes to the PKGBUILD once the merge happens, including, perhaps, resubmitting it as -git -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden

3 2

[aur-general] disown request: haskell-platform
by Daniel Spies 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

Hi, please disown haskell-platform: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-platform/ The package has been flagged out-of-date on 2012-11-06 and has not been updated by the maintainer since. Thanks, Daniel

3 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * boinc-7.0.65-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * google-glog-0.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kyotocabinet-1.2.76-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libsodium-0.4.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opencc-0.4.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pidgin-hotkeys-0.2.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * proxychains-3.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-xapian-1:1.2.15-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * zh-autoconvert-0.3.16-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * zinnia-0.06-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * boinc-7.0.65-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * google-glog-0.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kyotocabinet-1.2.76-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libsodium-0.4.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.4.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opencc-0.4.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-hotkeys-0.2.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * proxychains-3.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-xapian-1:1.2.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zh-autoconvert-0.3.16-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zinnia-0.06-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 6 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Lara Maia 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

Please merge buuficontheme [1] into buuf-icon-theme [2]. Both are same icon theme. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/buuficontheme/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/buuf-icon-theme/ Thanks -- *~ Lara ~*

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: xorriso , xorriso-tcltk
by Thomas Schmitt 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

Hi, please remove AUR packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso-tcltk/ Both are outdated, overlapping with Archlinux package "libisoburn", and already have been orphaned more than a month ago. Andreas Radke reports in https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36931#comment115624 that there is now a libisoburn-1.3.2-3 in testing repo which provides xorriso and xorriso-tcltk and optdepends on tk and bwidget. Have a nice day :) Thomas

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: monodevelop-monogame-addin-git
by bwr sandman 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

Monodevelop now offers the MonoGame Project addin directly on their site[1] and in their addin manager. The package monodevelop-monogame-addin-git[2] is therefore useless. [1] http://addins.monodevelop.com/Project/Index/47 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/monodevelop-monogame-addin-git/

2 1