- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Oct '13

13 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * awesome-3.5.2-1 (i686) * flowcanvas-0.7.1-4 (i686) * awesome-3.5.2-1 (x86_64) * flowcanvas-0.7.1-4 (x86_64) * xcb-util-cursor-0.1.0-2 (i686) * xcb-util-cursor-0.1.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * awesome-3.5.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flowcanvas-0.7.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * awesome-3.5.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flowcanvas-0.7.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * xcb-util-cursor-0.1.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xcb-util-cursor-0.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: pulseaudio_ctl --> pulseaudio-ctl
by member graysky 12 Oct '13

12 Oct '13

Based on the Scrimma's advice[1], I would like to request a TU to please merge my old package into my new package thus retaining the comments/votes. Old package: pulseaudio_ctl New package: pulseaudio-ctl Thank you in advance. Please cc me on any replies as I am NOT subscribed to the ML.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Oct '13

12 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Possible to rename my package without deleting?
by member graysky 11 Oct '13

11 Oct '13

Is it possible for a TU to rename my package in the AUR thus retaining the votes/comments? Old name: pulseaudio_ctl New name: pulseaudio-ctl I will obviously add a provides/conflicts in the new PKGBUILD if so... please cc me on the reply as I an NOT subscribed to the ML. Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Disownment of pyvtk
by Joey Dumont 11 Oct '13

11 Oct '13

Hi, I would like to disown package *pyvtk** *from maintainer Melancholy_Dream. He has not responded to my e-mail, neither to a comment on the AUR page https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyvtk. Thank you, Joey Dumont (Profil <https://profiles.google.com/joey.dumont/about>)

2 1

[aur-general] REMOVE: git-bzr-ng-penangtom
by Nuno Araujo 11 Oct '13

11 Oct '13

Hi Please remove git-bzr-ng-penangtom [1]. The kermie branch packaged by csgeek at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41669 integrates the same fixes and is better maintained. Thank you. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/git-bzr-ng-penangtom/ -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Benjamin A. Shelton 11 Oct '13

11 Oct '13

Howdy, It's time for my fall house-cleaning, and I would like to request the removal of python2-sentry [1] and python2-httpbin-git [2]. As per the Python package guidelines [3], these should never have been named with the python2- prefix as they are application packages (not libraries). I have had the corrected versions of these uploaded for quite some time, and thanks in part to my forgetfulness, I believe that the significant number of months that have since passed should be ample time for anyone who may have had these installed to migrate to the new versions. Thank you! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-sentry/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-httpbin-git/ [3] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-httpbin-git/>https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Oct '13

11 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Package delete request
by xantares 09 11 Oct '13

11 Oct '13

Hi, could you delete minw-w64- ? It's a mistake. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-/ x.

2 1

[aur-general] Disownment request: porta
by Robert Schwarz 10 Oct '13

10 Oct '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/porta/ The current package does not work and has not been updated for years. I tried to email the maintainer, but the address is no longer valid. I'd like to update it (see comment section.) Best -- Robert Schwarz

2 1