- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Sep '13

10 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Unmerge mpv-build-git
by SpinFlo 10 Sep '13

10 Sep '13

Hi. Please unmerge mpv-build-git. This package use diferent repository . Mpv-git use "mpv" repository, my pakage use "mpv-build" repository See mpv-player in github Https://github.com/mpv-player

6 12

[aur-general] Merge request: mpv-player-git -> mpv-git
by Jerome Leclanche 10 Sep '13

10 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/ They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way. J. Leclanche

6 11

[aur-general] Problem with checksum verification of coreutils-8.21
by Adrien RAFFIN 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

Hi everyone, I'm currently updating my package ('advcp') and when i use 'makepkg -g' the list of checksums is the following: md5sums=('065ba41828644eca5dd8163446de5d64' 'SKIP' '5154b45b0e7230e17da802a3db0fd5d5') How can i get rid of 'SKIP' value and make the original package verified ? Thank you in advance

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: qscite
by Evgeniy Alekseev 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

Hi May you disown package 'qscite'? Current maintainer wasn't update package since March 2011 and doesn't reply to comments. So, it depends on Qt but isn't on Qt4, as needed. And it is necessary a small patch to compile the application correctly. I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to go. Link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qscite/ -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarcanis(a)mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arcanis(a)jabber.ru

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of OSS
by keenerd 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

tldr; Will move OSSv4 to the AUR in one week if no one can fix it or wants to maintain it. I had started maintaining OSS because I had one computer that absolutely required it. That computer has since completely broken. Also since then, our OSS package started to bit-rot around the 3.10 kernel release. The 3.10 patches floating around don't seem to help. The pre-compiled oss-nonfree package in the AUR does work. I'm guessing there is some compile flag that I am missing. It seems odd that a generic binary works for us when the package produced by our toolchain does not. I am at a loss as to how to make OSS work. I'd like to see it stay in the repositories because options and choices are good. But only if they actually function. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Sep '13

08 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * archlinux-lxdm-theme-1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Multiple Deletions Request
by David Spicer 08 Sep '13

08 Sep '13

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request for Facter
by Greg Sutcliffe 08 Sep '13

08 Sep '13

Hi, Please delete my package 'facter' [1] - it has been superceded by @joschi's ruby-facter package[2] Thanks Gwmngilfen [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/facter [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-facter

2 1