- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] disown request : razor-qt-git
by Jekyll Wu 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

It is in 2012-03-06, almost one year ago, that this -git package is last updated. Considering that the upstream development is quite active and many more dependencies have been introduced, this package is currently in a quite bad form (just compare the dependencies with that of razor-qt to get the idea). I'm not sure the status of the maintainer, but since the packages was marked as out-of-date in 2012-12-24 and still no change since then, I would see that maintainer as inactive. In case someone asks, I haven't and won't send a private mail for contact. If one maintainer is not interested in notifications from the package he/she is maintaining, I can hardly believe he/she could/would maintain that package well. So it is up to you guys to decide. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razor-qt https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razor-qt-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal: eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly
by Kristof Jozsa 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the eclipse-scala-ide and eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly packages and would like to ask for removing the latter. The package eclipse-scala-ide have been tracking the so-so stable version of the upstream package (scala-ide.org) When Arch had the transition to Eclipse Juno and Scala IDE had an up-to-date nightly and a way obsolete stable version supporting only the previous Eclipse, I created eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly to allow Arch user scala hackers to develop with a usable tool. As of the current situation, Scala IDE is back to stable milestone releases, and I'm planning to track them via the eclipse-scala-ide package. Therefore, eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly is no longer needed. Thanks, K

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * boinc-7.0.52-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-13.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.52-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-13.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) == * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * weston-1.0.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 8 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [delete request] - monitorix-beta
by member graysky 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/monitorix-beta I am the maintainer and now that upstream has pushed the 3.0 branch to mainline, this package is meaningless. Thank you.

2 1

[aur-general] [Merge Request] wireless-bcm43142-oneiric-dkms into wireless-bcm43142-dkms
by Frank Vanderham 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

Could you please merge wireless-bcm43142-oneiric-dkms[0] into wireless-bcm43142-dkms[1]. The primary reason for the new package vs. updating the old is that the original package has "oneiric" in the name, which is an Ubuntu version name. I did not know this when I first build the PKGCONFIG; myself and several others just needed to get this damn driver to work on our Dell laptops at the time, since we had no wireless. The new package also has a much more reliable and applicable upstream link (Ubuntu, where Dell maintains this codebase). [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wireless-bcm43142-oneiric-dkms/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wireless-bcm43142-dkms/ Thank you!

2 1

[aur-general] Package I would like to see supported by core team / TU's: ocamlnet
by oliver 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

Hello, this package seems not to be available for installation with pacman, but I would like to have it there: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ocamlnet/ Has already 27 votes. Ciao, Oliver

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * boinc-7.0.52-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-13.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.52-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-13.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) == * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * weston-1.0.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 6 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 5 signoffs 3. pierre - 4 signoffs 4. bisson - 2 signoffs 5. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Merge Request]: merge gitignore-boilerplates-git and gibo-git
by Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

I already spoke with Gianni Vialetto the actual mantainer of gitignore-boilerplates-git to merge his package with mine (gibo-git). The reason is mainly that the script name is "gibo", so it's way simpler to look for it that way and also he doesn't have time to continue maintaining the package. So, in case wasn't clear just keep the "gibo" and "gibo-git" package. Regards, -- Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX http://glatelier.org/ http://about.me/pablox/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/

2 1

[aur-general] Merge gnome-shell-extension-weather
by Christian Louis Gabriel METZLER 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

Hi, can someone merge the two package gnome-shell-extension-weather ? "gnome-shell-extension-weather-git" replace "gnome-shell-extension-weather-neroth-git" (doesn't need anymore to specify the fork version). Thanks you !

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove package from AUR - md5sumjpgdata
by Oliver Bandel 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

Hello, I made some crap when I tried to build a package, nad afterwards created anozther one that works, but has a slightly different name. So the old one can be removed. The crap package is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/md5sumjpgdata/ The reason for removal andlink to the new package is mentioned in a comments. Please remove the old package. TIA, Oliver

2 1