- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request: grub2-bios-ubuntu
by Jekyll Wu 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

It is outdated, orphaned, and it doesn't build . https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grub2-bios-ubuntu/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: brightside
by Jekyll Wu 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

It is orphaned/inactive for a long time, and it doesn't build. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brightside/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: gnome-split
by Jekyll Wu 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

It is orphaned ,and doesn't build. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-split/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: lombard
by Jekyll Wu 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

It is orphaned, and it doesn't build . Also the upstream[1] is basically dead ( last commit was 1.5 years ago to make it build vala-0.12, while we have vala-0.18 now) Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lombard/ [1] http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/media/wiki/Lombard

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: magicons
by Jekyll Wu 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

Its upstream seems gone, and the tarball is unavailable now. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/magicons/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: libgksu-ubuntu
by Jekyll Wu 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

It is orphaned and outdated, and it doesn't build (even after fixing the checksum mismatch), https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgksu-ubuntu/

3 3

[aur-general] Deletion request: gnome-doc-utils-svn
by Jekyll Wu 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

The upstream has switched to git. No need to keep this package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-doc-utils-svn/

4 4

[aur-general] Please rename my biopython packages
by Francisco Pina Martins 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

In order to conform to the new archlinux packaging policy my packages should be renamed: python3-biopython --> python-biopython biopython --> python2-biopython Please keep the comments and votes intact! Thank you very much. PS - kudos to hseara for the friendly reminder.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686) * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 3 signoffs 3. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 4. allan - 2 signoffs 5. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] SALOME git packages
by Xyne 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

Hi, I'm slowly working on creating git packages for SALOME [1]. I have posted progress on the forum [2]. The thread contains relvant links and the latest version of the PKGBUILD and error messages. It's a big beast to package and I don't have much time to spend on it right now. If anyone here wants to help, it would be appreciated. I'm hoping that this could at least be a gradual collaboration in the absence of a solo packager swooping in to deal with it. Of course, the later would be welcome too. I plan to maintain the resulting packages in the AUR when it's ready. [1] http://www.salome-platform.org/ [2] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=152299

2 1