- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request: fbrcapi
by Bjoern Franke 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

Hi, please delete fbrcapi[1]. Upstream is dead and the usual CAPI-module meanwhile is capable of TCP-connections. regards bjo [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fbrcapi/ -- xmpp bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de

2 1

[aur-general] Request to delete golang-hg
by Johannes Löthberg 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

Hello, Could someone delete the golang-hg package? It's unmaintained (Last update was over a year ago) and there was already a go-hg package before it. -- Kindest Regards, Johannes Löthberg

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by François Boulogne 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

Hi TUs, Please, delete my package python2-liblarch_gtk [1]. The reason is that python2-liblarch_gtk has been merged in python2-liblarch by upstream. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-liblarch_gtk/ Thanks. -- François Boulogne. http://www.sciunto.org

2 1

[aur-general] Delete stechec-sdz
by Franck Michea 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stechec-sdz/ Out-of-date, sources are not available anymore. Thanks! -- Franck Michea - EPITA/LSE 2014

2 1

[aur-general] Passsword and email forgotten
by Franck Michea 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

Hey, I am that guy that forgets his email and password, so I'll do what says "Forgot password" page and post here. Can someone please send me (preferably in private) the email I used when registering few years back? My username is: kushou Thanks a lot! -- Franck Michea - EPITA/LSE 2014

2 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Masato Hashimoto 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

Hi, Many of packages owned by smaart[1] are flagged out-of-date for more than a yaer (and others are probably also out-of-date). I sent an e-mail to him/her two weeks ago but no response. So Could you orphan those packages? Thanks [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=smaart&SeB=m -- HASHIMOTO, Masato

2 1

[aur-general] Delete two packages
by grimi 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

Hi guys. Please delete following packages: bin32-fs-uae-devel package, gnome-shell-extension-swap-suspend-poweroff . bin32-fs-uae-devel: I did already implementation in my fs-uae-devel package, possibility to build 32bit binary by using special variable. gnome-shell-extension-swap-suspend-poweroff: extension that's incompatible and not needed any more in gnome-shell 3.6. Package links to delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-fs-uae-devel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-extension-swap-suspend-power… Thanks grimi

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion/Orphan request: qt2
by Jekyll Wu 09 Nov '12

09 Nov '12

It is really outdated, and the maintainer doesn't care about fixing the building problem (easy to fix and the solution has been provided in the comment). So please remove it or at least orphan it so someone can step in and update the PKGBUILD. One side note: I notice there are kdelibs2(fails to build) and kdebase2 on AUR. Does it still make sense to keep them when we are now at KDE4? Is there some general policy regarding to such totally outdated packages? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdelibs2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdebase2/ Regards Jekyll

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Nov '12

09 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0