- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [Orphan request] vim-errormarker
by Tianjiao Yin 02 Oct '12

02 Oct '12

Hello: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41105 Last update is two years ago, marked out-of-date since 20 Aug 2011. I send a email to the maintainer three weeks ago and no response. Regards, Tianjiao

2 1

[aur-general] Disownment Request: ajenti-gi
by Yannik Stein 02 Oct '12

02 Oct '12

Could someone please disown the package ajenti-git? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41177 It has been flagged as out of date for 5 months now. I contacted the package maintainer 3 weeks ago, but haven't got any reply. Thanks, Yannik

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Oct '12

02 Oct '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.8-0.1 (i686) * catalyst-dkms-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * clementine-1.1.0rc1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.8-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clementine-1.1.0rc1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.8-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (8 total) == * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-lts-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-lts-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686), since 2012-09-17 * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64), since 2012-09-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Oct '12

01 Oct '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * clementine-1.1.0rc1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.8-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clementine-1.1.0rc1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.8-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-lts-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-lts-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs 2. lfleischer - 2 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Random (?) out-of-date marking
by Limao Luo 30 Sep '12

30 Sep '12

My package mcobj [1] has been repeatedly been marked out of date 580 times in 10 minutes, with 61 out-of-date marks per minute (picture for proof [2]). Checking through the email, I saw that the user that was doing this was named invented [3]. I'm not really sure what's going on, particularly whether this is malicious or not. I have emailed invented, and am posting this to try to get to the bottom of this. Has invented (or have other users) done this before? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49697 [2] http://i49.tinypic.com/8zh0sn.png [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=25347

3 3

[aur-general] psad package probably orphaned
by xartii 30 Sep '12

30 Sep '12

Hi, First of all sorry for all the mess I may do with this mail but it's my first message to this group. Some time ago I found that psad package in AUR is out of date (version in AUR 2.1.7, current version 2.2). On 19 Jun 2012 I posted a comment hoping maintainer will notice it, however no reaction. Then I flagged the package as out of date (13 Jul 2012), still no reaction. After a long time of waiting I mailed the maintainer (24 Sep 2012) if he's planning to update the package because if not I could take the maintanance over. Until now I recieved no answer. Here's my question. Can some TU orphan the package so I can take care of it? I mean update and maintain later. Peace, xartii

3 2

[aur-general] iceweasel-libre Removal Request
by Jorge Barroso 30 Sep '12

30 Sep '12

Hi, I've updated iceweasel, but for an error on the PKGBUILD the package was named iceweasel-libre. I've already solved the error and uploaded a new package with the correct name so, could you please remove the package iceweasel-libre? thanks in advance!

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request for networkmanager-dispatcher-ntpd-systemd
by Vasil Yonkov 30 Sep '12

30 Sep '12

Hello, I'm the maintainer of [networkmanager-dispatcher-ntpd-systemd] [1]. On 05 September [networkmanager-dispatcher-ntpd] was updated, rendering my package obsolete. Please remove it as [networkmanager-dispatcher-ntpd] is doing the job now, and also in a better way. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58862

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Sep '12

30 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * clementine-1.1.0rc1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.8-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clementine-1.1.0rc1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.8-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (6 total) == * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-lts-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-lts-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove request
by Schala Zeal 30 Sep '12

30 Sep '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61634 I reuploaded it under the correct package name.

2 1