- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Please delete my package maya2013sp1
by Flaminigo 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hi, Something messed up in the PKGBUILD file and the application's icon won't show up correctly. I don't know I cannot delete the package after submitting it. Otherwise, I will check it carefully. Sorry for that. I am a newbie. Thanks. -Sunny

3 4

[aur-general] revised PKGBUILD for dupeguru-me & two questions
by Rob Til Freedmen 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hi, now that I've read what I should have done before posting ;) I've still some questions: 1) The package changed the license to 'BSD Revised' - is it any different to 'BSD'? 2) The package contains also a qtlib license - do I have to add it also? 3) With a BSD license, is it ok to disable the nag screen shown on every start? There is still the registration/contribute menu in <help> for support of the author. Any comments welcome. rtf --x--x--x--x-- # Maintainer: rtfreedman (rob<d0t>til<d0t>freedman<aT>googlemail<d0t>com # Contributor: Dan Serban, SiD pkgname=dupeguru-me-bin pkgver=6.5.0 pkgrel=2 pkgdesc="Find duplicate songs in your music collection" arch=(any) url=http://www.hardcoded.net/dupeguru_me/ license=('BSD') depends=(python pyqt sip) source=(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112416309/dupeguru-me_${pkgver}_all.… md5sums=('1b143883a44c99965b0acea9c5c23a48') build() { return 0 } package() { cd "${srcdir}" bsdtar -xf dupeguru-me_${pkgver}_all.deb data.tar.gz bsdtar -xf data.tar.gz # nonag sed -i 's/self.model.initial_registration_setup()/# self.model.initial_registration_setup()/g' \ usr/share/dupeguru_me/qt/base/app.py mkdir -p "${pkgdir}"/usr/bin mv usr/bin/dupeguru_me "${pkgdir}"/usr/bin mv usr/share "${pkgdir}"/usr/ install -Dm644 "${pkgdir}"/usr/share/dupeguru_me/hscommon/LICENSE \ "${pkgdir}"/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE } --x--x--x--x--

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 13 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (13 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please merge aafm and aafm-git
by Cyker Way 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hello, Since aafm is actually using the upstream git repo, I've renamed it to another package called aafm-git. Please merge these two packages under the same name *aafm-git*. Thank you! -- Cyker

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Nuno Araujo 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello Me again, sorry... Could you remove the following packages? gnome15-gnome-plugins (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47363) gnome15-panel-applet (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47362) gnome15-systemtray (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47361) Those packages are obsolete (gnome15-panel-applet) or were integrated into existing packages (gnome15-gnome-plugins and gnome15-systemtray). You can check AUR comments for more information. Thank you once again! -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 3

[aur-general] Package removal request: x264-jeeb-git
by Felix Yan 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hi, I'd like to ask for removal, this package was my orphaned package by the end of last year and renamed to x264-jeeb after then, as upstream only releases patches in major versions and often breaks -git building. Thanks! Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove package
by Tomasz Niedzielski 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello. Accidentaly I sent wrong package on AUR plasma-surtime [1]. Please, be so kind and remove it. Thank you. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62208

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: dayplanner
by Robert Knauer 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello, there is a new version of dayplanner[1] since the 28th of March and the package is marked as outdated since 08th of August and there's no reaction from the maintainer. I have a working PKGBUILD for the new version and I already added an AUR package for perl-date-holidayparser[2], which is a dependency for the new version, so it would be nice if a TU could disown it that I can become the maintainer. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12499 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62205

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 13 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (13 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 4 signoffs 2. jgc - 3 signoffs 3. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge request
by Schala Zeal 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

mingw32-glm and mingw32-glmath seem to be the same software. mingw32-glm would be the appropriate one to use. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58831 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57750

2 1