- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] remove my package
by Martin Mehine 07 May '12

07 May '12

I've pacthed the original, but the original is also working now so there's no need for mine anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59047 mehine2-qesteidutil-svn 50-1

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 May '12

07 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (7 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] ranger 1.5.4-1 could require --force
by Jakob Gruber 06 May '12

06 May '12

Hi all, the newest ranger update contains .pyo files. These were not contained in previous packages and could have been created by running ranger as root. If pacman complains about conflicts, it is safe to --force this update: pacman -S --force ranger

3 2

[aur-general] Remove mycinema-git package from AUR
by Gianluigi Biancucci 06 May '12

06 May '12

Hi, I'm the manteiner of the mycinema-git AUR package. I've created a new package with an updated name (mycinemaproject-git) and i'd like to remove the old package (flagged ad out of date). This is the link of the package to remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46191 Thanks in advance for the help, Gianluigi

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 May '12

06 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.0RC2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (7 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.14-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 2 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 5. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request for wxhexeditor-updated and wxhexeditor-svn-updated
by 小龙陈 06 May '12

06 May '12

Hi TU's, The wxhexeditor and wxhexeditor-svn packages have been orphaned, so I adopted them and updated them. Could I have my wxhexeditor-updated [1] and wxhexeditor-svn-updated [2] packages removed now? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53583 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53584 Thanks! Xiao-Long Chen

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request: KCall
by George Brooke 05 May '12

05 May '12

Hi all, I'm requesting the removal of kcall [1] this is an orphan which has been marked out of date since May 2011 and is currently unmaintained by any upstream. The kde-telepathy team are developing the ktp-call-ui which takes the place of kcall. Thanks, GeorgeB [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3853 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52029

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request: kernel26-pentium-m
by nem＠ikitten.co.uk 05 May '12

05 May '12

hello! please remove 'kernel26-pentium-m' [1] from aur. there are easier ways to get speedstepping on pentium-m and it's out of date for months. i don't have time to maintain it anymore nor did anybody speak up to do so (see comments). regards, nem [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33104

2 1

[aur-general] [removal request] nx* packages now in extra
by Milan Knížek 05 May '12

05 May '12

Hello, will you pls remove the following packages (all maintained by me) from AUR: nx-x11 nxagent nxcomp nxcompext nxcompshad nxproxy All of these sub-packages are based on nx-libs re-distributed by x2go project [1] and exist now in extra repository. (The libraries are shared by x2go, freenx and possibly other projects.) [1] http://www.x2go.org/ Thank you, Milan -- http://www.milan-knizek.net/

2 1

[aur-general] delete pybtex
by François Boulogne 05 May '12

05 May '12

Hi, Please delete [1] (pybtex) because it download the source on a bzr repo and the package name does not reflect that. I uploaded [2] named pybtex-bzr. [1] is useless because upstream does not provide a stable tarball. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47273 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59019 Cheers, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 1