- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] deletion request
by Francois Rigaut 02 Jul '11

02 Jul '11

Dear TU/AUR managers, Can you please delete the following packages: yorick yorick-imutil yorick-soy yorick-yutils yorick-spydr yorick-yao reason: they are superseeded by their -git versions. and yorick-all reason: I've never been able to make this metapackage work properly. Thanks in advance! Francois Rigaut

2 3

[aur-general] Deletion request
by KESHAV P.R. 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Please delete sip-communicator-nightly http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32221 . It has been replaced with jitsi http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48928 due to upstream name change. Also the download url for sip-communicator-nightly does not work anymore. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request for awib & ascii-invaders
by Baptiste 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Hello, I would like to adopt ascii-invaders [1] and awib [2]. I had proposed some changes to the PKGBUILD back in January, but the current maintainer of both packages (Phrodo_00 [3]) didn't show any sign of life since then. Changes include a python -> python2 patch and a new upstream release for awib [2]. Thanks, Baptiste PS: CC-ing this to Phrodo_00 [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7730 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=1707 -- "C'est mieux, mais il y a plus cher ailleurs" : ____ _ _ _ _ ___ _ / ___| \ | | | | | / / | (_)_ __ _ ___ __ | | _| \| | | | |/ /| | | | '_ \| | | \ \/ / | |_| | |\ | |_| / / | |___| | | | | |_| |> < \____|_| \_|\___/_/ |_____|_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ GNU/Linux fan && Archlinux user

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: btrfs-progs
by Estêvão 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

This package [1] is now available in [core] as btrfs-progs-unstable. [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15635 Thanks. -- Estêvão Valadão

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: mencoder
by Estêvão 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Please delete mencoder [1], now it's available in [extra]. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21282 -- Estêvão Valadão

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request for xfce-menu-edit
by Heiko Baums 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

xfce-menu-edit is obsolete. It doesn't compile anymore, doesn't work with Xfce 4.8 anyway and is orphaned. So I guess it should be removed from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39370 See also the last maintainer's comment in AUR. Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request: e17-full-svn
by Calimero 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Hello, Could you remove e17-full-svn? It has become absolutely impossible to maintain. It needs to be linked to several libraries that are included in the package itself, so a hundred of silly hacks are necessary. I have lost an entire day on it to finally think that it wasn't worth so much effort (and maintainability would be horrible too). All the best

2 1

[aur-general] Delete: mod_bw and mod_macro
by Phillip Smith 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Could someone please delete "mod_bw" and "mod_macro" as I have renamed them to have the "apache-" prefix. Thx, ~p

2 1

[aur-general] Package Guidelines: Naming of Apache mods
by Phillip Smith 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Hi all, My Google-fu has turned up nothing on this this. Is there a preferred standard for naming packages of Apache mods? I see everything in [extra] is just "mod_name" but some AUR packages are "apache-mod_name" Personally I prefer the "apache-mod_name" form, but I take the format of [extra] to be the official word? It doesn't seem to have been discussed before (as best I can find in my searching) so thought I would raise it. I have packages in AUR using both formats and I want to bring them in line with "the right way", whichever that is ;) Cheers, ~p

5 4

[aur-general] Remove gnome-panel-no-limit-places-menu
by Simon Legner 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Please consider to remove gnome-panel-no-limit-places-menu [1] as it is completely out-dated. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39415

1 0