- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Permissions of community-staging need to be reset
by Eric Bélanger 12 Sep '10

12 Sep '10

Hi, Could an AUR admin (or Andrea) reset the perms of the community-staging repo db for both arches? Thanks

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal request
by doorknob60 12 Sep '10

12 Sep '10

(sorry if you got this twice, I'm pretty sure the first one didn't work) The fretsonfire-alarian-mod package needs to be deleted, I have replaced it with the fofix package.

3 4

[aur-general] ContextFree orphan request
by Hilton Medeiros 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Hi, please, could someone orphan this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13081 It is not updated since 2008. Thanks in advance, Hilton

2 1

[aur-general] The Arch Way
by Christoph 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Hi, I have just adopted the package xmind (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22394) because the former maintainer disowned it, and I am not shure which is the best way to build the package. There are three possibilities: 1) Building from source 2) Building from the "Portable" zip-file (see http://www.xmind.net/downloads/) 3) Building from the deb-files provided for Debian/Ubuntu (see http://www.xmind.net/downloads/) ad 1) This is what you would usually do, but according to http://groups.google.com/group/xmind-dev/browse_thread/thread/d68d0c8f30b4b… the eclipse ide would be a prerequisite, so that would need a very large download if you do not already have installed eclipse (nearly 170 MB for eclipse plus 10 MB for the xmind source code!) ad 2) This was the way the former maintainer went. Download size: 75 MB The portable zip-file contains both the 32-bit and the 64-bit versions, so the PKGBUILD just had to copy the right files. ad 3) When I proposed (a year ago) to use the deb-files instead in order to have smaller downloads (each of them, 32-bit and the 64-bit has appr. 36 MB), the maintainer told me that this would be ugly and "not the Arch way", that he would not do such a thing. When I told him that I did not get the point of it, since the zip file equally just installed ready-built binaries, he did not respond to it. I still think that using the deb-files would - in this special case - be the best option. But of course I would never dare to deviate from "the Arch way" (since it is the way to world domination, as we all know ;-)). What do you think? Christoph

8 11

[aur-general] New repositories (community-staging, multilib-testing)
by Thomas Bächler 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

The TU server now has a staging repository, this has been requested due to the big python rebuild. All rebuilds that are made for the staging repository should be put into community-staging now. multilib now has a testing repository, in case we need it (especially useful when testing has a new toolchain). Last but not least, the adjust-permissions cronjob has been disabled on both servers - should you mess with the db file directly (which you really shouldn't), never forget to restore the right permissions.

1 0

[aur-general] Haskell hlint
by Nathan O 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

I found hlint at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23099 going through the orphaned packages, so I went to check the homepage of the software at http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint and the author lists package haskell-hlint at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34172 Both of them were created by the Arch Haskell team it says at top. "haskell-hlint" is up-to-date, while hlint isn't the differences are mainly that haskell-lint has more dependencies listed and builds/installs and does additional manual install of scripts than "hlint" . So probably hlint should be deleted. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Why is aur.archlinux.org so slow? :(
by Sven-Hendrik Haase 10 Sep '10

10 Sep '10

Whenever I try uploading a reasonably large package to aur.archlinux.org, my average speed is around 500KB/s. This appears to be an artificial limitation since a server would have at least 10/10MBits uplink. I therefore request the speed limit to be disabled in order to be able to upload large packages with all available bandwidth to increase productivity. Or is there a reason for the limit? -- Sven-Hendrik

9 18

[aur-general] Please delete some chicken-egg packages
by Jim Pryor 10 Sep '10

10 Sep '10

Hi I maintain all the chicken-* packages in AUR; these are "eggs" or extensions for the Chicken Scheme compiler and interpreter. I'll soon push a bunch of updates. However, these eggs are now unsupported and should be removed from AUR: chicken-crypto-tools http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32677 chicken-mailbox-threads http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32763 chicken-multimethod http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32770 chicken-termite http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32835 chicken-wiki-parse http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32851 Thanks. -- Jim Pryor profjim(a)jimpryor.net

2 1

[aur-general] ruby-gtk2 and friends
by Brad Fanella 10 Sep '10

10 Sep '10

I adopted ruby-gtk2, ruby-atk, ruby-gdkpixbuf2, ruby-glib2, and ruby-pango in the AUR recently to update the package and fix some issues with it. If I remember correctly, these packages used to be in community and were recently removed. Was there a good reason for this, or was it just a matter of not caring to maintain it anymore? As these are very popular packages, I would like to move them to community (if nobody objects of course). Thanks, Brad

2 1

[aur-general] Arch64
by Nathan O 10 Sep '10

10 Sep '10

What would the best way to compile i686 packages on a 64bit system to test the i686 version? With also maybe a possible few 32-bit only software that I might have to run.

6 17