- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] move ruby-mpd to [unsupported]?
by Chris Brannon 05 Jun '10

05 Jun '10

The latest upstream release was made in 2006, and the package hasn't been rebuilt since then. It is orphaned, and it needs a rebuild for community cleanup. No other package depends on it. Any objections to moving ruby-mpd from [community] to [unsupported]? -- Chris

2 2

[aur-general] kalsamix
by Nathan O. 05 Jun '10

05 Jun '10

I don't think there is going to be any luck with the kalsamix http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10611 package. I looked at gentoo's package site, like somebody mentioned to check for a patch and nothing. Unless somebody knows how to program, then it is currently going to be broken. Thanks

3 5

[aur-general] Removal Request: gnome-commander-svn
by Alexander 'hatred' Drozdoff 05 Jun '10

05 Jun '10

Hi guys! Gnome Commander migrate to git, so svn repo does not present, I was remake package for git and upload new, so my old svn package should be removed. -- WBR Alexander Drozdov FIDO: 2:5045/41.84 Site: http://hatred.homelinux.net Site: http://archlinux.org.ru

2 2

[aur-general] AUR and deb or other precompiled stuff
by Ike Devolder 04 Jun '10

04 Jun '10

in some recent updates of some packages you see more and more deb's or rpms or whatever being extracted and repacked for arch is there some aur guideline about this, i really don't like this development because why not take advantage of our bleeding edge gcc power if the source is there, why not build from it? in cases like opera it is understandable because it is not open source, but in some other cases like kalsamix i find it very disturbing maybe some other comments about this ?

6 14

[aur-general] Removal request: libetc-experimental
by Simon Lipp 04 Jun '10

04 Jun '10

Hi, Since there is now a git repo for this “project”, I renamed libetc-experimental to libetc-experimental-git. Can someone remove the old package ? (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35473) Thank you in adavance

2 1

[aur-general] kalsamix
by Nathan O. 04 Jun '10

04 Jun '10

Kalsamix at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10611 I can not get it to build, I also tried using the deb version since it has already been compiled but it wants libartskde

2 2

[aur-general] jungledisk
by Nathan O. 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Jungledisk http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15015 according to the pkg page has "This package has been superseded by junglediskdesktop. The jungledisk is orphan, both points to the same homepage.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete Request
by Nathan O. 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

I am going to adopt kalsamix http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10611 and update it, kamix http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9907 is orphaned and the homepage listed says kamix is discontinued, then it says like to checkout the newest package kalsamix.

2 1

[aur-general] indigo
by Nathan O. 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

I found the package indigo at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17007 The homepage seems to say that it is a trial. In my opinion we shouldn't have trial software packaged. Though I could be wrong, thought I'd report this and see if trial software should be put in AUR

4 6

[aur-general] Opinions
by Nathan O. 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

I was wanting to get people's opinion, anybody against packaging $pkgname.desktop and icon for packages or would it be better to just package the app. I tend to just package the app and that is it, but I thought I'd get others opinion on this.

3 4