- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Package removal (kernel26-bfs-pae)
by Patryk Pasierbski 11 Apr '10

11 Apr '10

Hello again. Please remove kernel26-bfs-pae package because it's unmaintained,outdated and unneeded for long time. Here's the link to the package source http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29874 . Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal (kernel26-bfs).
by Patryk Pasierbski 11 Apr '10

11 Apr '10

Hello. Please delete my package because -ck patch set have bfs,autoiso-xorg patch and more. We don't need kernel26-bfs package source (It was created because kernel26-ck was not building and was outdated). Here's link to package source http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29842 . Thanks

2 2

[aur-general] duplicate package
by Moritz Rudert 11 Apr '10

11 Apr '10

Hi, xen4 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36338) its a duplicate of xen-hv-tools (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28984) So maybe delete xen4? Greetings Moritz <helios> Rudert

1 0

[aur-general] deprecated e17 packages removed (was:Re: [community] rebuilds (done))
by Ronald van Haren 11 Apr '10

11 Apr '10

FYI, I just removed the deprecated e17 packages. I'll probably add some new libs in the next build as we're nearing release of the first ever stable e17 release and the package list is mostly finalized (elementary-svn comes to mind). Either way, these packages were mostly broken so you can probably remove them from your machines if you have them installed (remove package list at the bottom of this mail). Ronald On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> 2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin <pupykin.s(a)gmail.com>: >>> Ronald van Haren wrote: >>>> >>>> 2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin<pupykin.s(a)gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Community rebuilds are done now. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ecore-svn fix likes a hack and I did not test if it works. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Haven't tested but looking at the fix I suppose it may mess things up >>>> with other parts of e17. Wasn't it just possible to keep the package >>>> at the old svn checkout version? >>>> >>> >>> I rebuilt old versions (45614-2-x86_64 and 45954-2-i686) >>> >> >> in that case I suppose your fix will work. It's just that they >> appeared as ecore-svn 47760-1 in the RSS feed. >> I'm halfway building the complete chain now with your fix, seems to be fine. >> >> Ronald >> > > complete new e17 chain is now in community-testing for both architectures. > > the following packages are now deprecated and should be removed when > above moves to community: > > engrave-svn > entrance-svn > esmart-svn > exml-svn > ewl-svn > > Ronald >

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by Moritz Rudert 11 Apr '10

11 Apr '10

Hi, please remove the package bin32-zattoo-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23635) It outdated and the working package is http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36150 So please delete the first one. Greetings Moritz <helios> Rudert

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] libao 1.0 rebuild list
by Andrea Scarpino 11 Apr '10

11 Apr '10

On Saturday 10 April 2010 23:05:15 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi DEVs and TUs, > I am uploading libao 1.0.0 in [testing] now. > > There is a soname bump, so I created a (small) rebuild list for [extra] and > [community] packages. > > Thanks Well, I built some packages and they are in my staging dir, but I cannot release them due to repolock issue. Now I am going out, if you want you can build libao yourself; commit are in trunk. CCin' aur-general -- Andrea | deelab.org/bash

1 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: renpy
by Franz Rogar 10 Apr '10

10 Apr '10

Hello, Package "renpy" [1] has been outdated since three months ago when version 6.10.2 was released. It's marked as "out-of-date" and have some comments supplying fixes and alternative updated PKBGUILDs (which suffers from same problems I'll point later) but there're no signs of maintenance. PKGBUILD has also some other major problems that should be fixed: - It doesn't support x86_64. It needs lib32 dependencies which are not indicated. - It doesn't rely on pygame (or python-game) at all, so it should be removed. - It relies on java-runtime and zenity (for folder selection), which are unset. - Etc. I contacted mantainer via e-mail but have got no answer from him. Therefore, I request if package renpy [1] could be orphaned so other user/dev can take care of it. I can take it over as I'm currently mantaining renpy64 (renpy with support for "pure" Arch64). [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23983 -- Thanks in anyway, Franz Rogar

2 1

[aur-general] community-testing repo cleanout
by Andrea Scarpino 10 Apr '10

10 Apr '10

[quote="Allan"] Now the big rebuild is moved, it is a good time to clean out the rest of [community-testing]. Here is a semi-annotated package list: [/quote] bzrtools 2.2.0-1 just an update? cgmail 0.6.1-1 just an update? choqok 0.9.55-1 beta testing cinelerra-cv 20100405-1 just an update? geos 3.2.1-1 just an update? libsquish 1.10-1 old, in testing since September lomoco 1.0-5 old pessulus 2.30.0-1 just an update? python-configobj 4.7.2-2 testing arch 'any' tinyxml 2.5.3-4 old, in testing since October uriparser 0.7.5-1 just an update? -- Andrea | deelab.org/bash

3 4

[aur-general] Orphan request: brother-mfc210c-fixed-version
by Sven Schneider 10 Apr '10

10 Apr '10

Hi, the package "brother-mfc210c-fixed-version" (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19795) does not seem to be taken care of by he current maintainer. Can someone orphan this package please, so that another maintainer can take it over. Thanks Sven

2 1

[aur-general] [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR?
by Evangelos Foutras 10 Apr '10

10 Apr '10

Please start threads regarding [community] packages on aur-general so that other TUs can respond. I didn't notice I was replying to arch-dev-public and got my message bounced. :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR? To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development <arch-dev-public(a)archlinux.org> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) <ghost1227(a)archlinux.us> wrote: > I'm currently maintaining raggle, which has been abandoned > upstream for some time. The recent rebuild of ruby broke it > horribly and thus far I have been unable to patch it in > such a way that it functions as expected. I hate to remove > this package as it seems to be quite popular, but given > its condition and upstream status, I think removal to AUR > is best unless someone else can provide a working patch. > Thoughts? > -- It doesn't seem to be popular; it has 0.29% usage according to pkgstats. I'd say drop it. :)

3 2