- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [removal request] wib
by Thomas Dziedzic 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

wib needs to be removed, replaced by awib wib - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7731 awib - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7730

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] Some spring cleaning.
by Thomas Dziedzic 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

libgpod-svn - deprecated, replaced by libgpod-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13297 opera-devel-qt4 - opera-devel exists for this since opera dropped qt4 dependency. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15228 xdriller-free - xdriller exists in the aur http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34723

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qtscrobbler, qtscrobbler-cli
by Simon Legner 21 Mar '10

21 Mar '10

I just uploaded qtscrobbler-cli as qtscrob-cli. So the mentioned packages are free to be removed. I didn't get a result when searching for qtscrobbler in AUR. So I built and submitted qtscrobbler as a new package. Just as explanation for the duplication ... Mentioning the term qtscrobbler in the pkgdesc-field would solve this "inconvenience" ... I'll leave a comment there. Regards!

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: qtscrobbler, qtscrobbler-cli
by Simon Legner 21 Mar '10

21 Mar '10

Please remove my AUR packages qtscrobbler [1] and qtscrobbler-cli [2] due to duplication. Thanks! Simon Legner [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35488 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35489

2 1

[aur-general] Removal package request
by Lukáš Jirkovský 21 Mar '10

21 Mar '10

This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338

12 18

[aur-general] Pls delete package
by YUP 20 Mar '10

20 Mar '10

Hi, Please delete lxde-common-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28204, lxde project moved to git some time ago and all lxde packages from svn are unusable. Thanks! YUP (knedlyk)

2 1

[aur-general] AUR comment spammer
by Sven-Hendrik Haase 20 Mar '10

20 Mar '10

I'd like to report "diblidabliduu" (http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=17924) who spammed the yaourt comments (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5863) quite a bit (most of which is now deleted). I'm getting enough email spam already. -- Sven-Hendrik

7 9

[aur-general] Please disown hasciicam
by Jakob Gruber 20 Mar '10

20 Mar '10

Hi, please disown hasciicam. I've flagged it out of date (+ comments on how to fix the PKGBUILD) in Nov 2009 with no response from the maintainer. Last Updated: (unknown) First Submitted: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:51:25 +0000 Thanks, schuay

4 3

[aur-general] Duplicate packages/Orphaning request (go-openoffice-XX)
by Adam Hani Schakaki 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

Hello, Here are some duplicate packages in AUR: go-oo-bin-base: in official repo go-oo-ru: new package is named go-openoffice-ru go-openoffice-es: new package is name go-openoffice.org-es go-openoffice-sv-lang: duplicate to go-openoffice-sv Further I request for orphaning go-openoffice-es, go-openoffice-pt-br and go-openoffice-sv, the maintainer aren't updating it, and just the filename of the downloads changed and you cannot say that this is much work. So I would update it, if it will be orphaned. Thanks in advance Adam Hani Schakaki

2 3

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request for go-openoffice-de
by Adam Hani Schakaki 17 Mar '10

17 Mar '10

Hi again, Will it be orphaned or why not? Thanks >Hello, >go-openoffice-de had no updates a long time and it is updated. The >maintainer didn't manage it to update, as he said. >I couldn't reach the maintainer by comment or email, so I created a new >one (go-openoffice-de-lang), which works. So I request orphaning and may >be refactoring go-openoffice-de-lang to go-openoffice-de. >Thanks in advance >Adam Hani Schakaki

2 2