May 2009 - Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 26 May '09

26 May '09

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > > I am missing something here ? > > > > > > sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/Build/root -- -u > > building union chroot > > ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! > > > > > > I have aufs2-utils installed and I did a modprobe fuse and modprobe aufs > > > > You need to patch makechrootpkg with this: > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/devtools/commit/?id=2269e5c9 > > Allan > > > Since unionfs has been dropped from kernel-2.6.29.4-1 Please can someone push devtools-2269e5c9 to the repo that devtools installs from. And update the DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot to say you need kernel-2.6.xx and aufs2-utils. I lost 3 days trying to fix this. I needed to build a few packages for a server. Since I have done a Clean install from the latest install CD and sync'd/updated the system my build system broke and following the wiki no longer works. Thanks

2 1

[arch-general] Problem w/Digest?
by Keith 26 May '09

26 May '09

Below are the 1st and last messages contained in the copy of Vol. 55 #44 I received, dated May 24, 5:56 PM EDT. Note the timestamp on message #1: May 23, 9:17 AM UTC. Yet the message quoted within message #10, timestamped May 24, 11:52 UTC, isn't in the digest (or anywhere else I can find). I've noted this numerous times recently and wrote it off to a lousy memory. But it's clearly more than that. Are these cross-posts being replied to? Is the digest dropping messages? Thanks...K Message: 1 Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:17:27 +0000 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot(a)columbus.rr.com> Subject: Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general(a)archlinux.org> Message-ID: <1243070247.15748.7.camel(a)desktop.bildanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > Baho Utot wrote: > >> > > I am missing something here ? >> > > >> > > <snip> Message: 10 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:55:59 +0300 From: Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clean-up To: arch-general(a)archlinux.org Message-ID: <20090524215559.GA3136@dark> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Thomas B?chler wrote: > > Tobias Powalowski schrieb: > >> >> moved in lilo,openvpn,openswan and capi4k-utils to extra >> > > > > I'd like to keep openvpn in core. I'd even maintain it, but I use the > > openvpn 2.1 release candidates and thus don't test or use the 2.0.X > > releases. > > > The first three were moved to core not extra. Its just capi4k-utils that was moved in a different repo than it was before. -- Greg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090525/b1695e…>

2 1

[arch-general] run-parts source URL bad
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

==> Making package: run-parts 2.31-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:59 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Downloading debianutils_2.31.tar.gz... --2009-05-25 18:31:59-- http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/debianutils/debianutils_2.31.tar.gz Resolving ftp.debian.org... 130.89.149.226 Connecting to ftp.debian.org|130.89.149.226|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-05-25 18:32:00 ERROR 404: Not Found. ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading debianutils_2.31.tar.gz Aborting...

2 1

[arch-general] licenses 2.4-1 - MD5SUM error
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

==> Making package: licenses 2.4-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:20 UTC 2009) ..... ==> Validating source files with md5sums... LICENSE-2.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-nd-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-sa-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nd-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-sa-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-readme.txt ... Passed cddl-1.0.txt ... Passed eclipse-1.0.txt ... Passed gpl-2.0.txt ... Passed gpl-3.0.txt ... Passed lgpl-2.1.txt ... FAILED lgpl.txt ... FAILED fdl.txt ... FAILED lppl.txt ... Passed MPL-1.1.txt ... Passed perlartistic.txt ... Passed 3_0.txt ... Passed LICENSE.txt ... Passed cpl-1.0.txt ... Passed python-2.txt ... Passed LICENSE.ralink-firmware.txt ... Passed ZopePublicLicense.txt ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

2 1

[arch-general] xorg crash with setxkbmap frequently use
by Sergey Manucharian 25 May '09

25 May '09

Hi folks, X server crashes randomly with the following error: [xkb] BOGUS LENGTH in write keyboard desc, expected 5576, got 5592 Graphic card is Intel G965, driver xf86-video-intel, tried both from [extra] and [testing]. I'm using the Caps_Lock key to change the keyboard layout via a script. I do not want to use "grp:caps_toggle" in xkb options since I need to do something else besides just layout switching. My bash script toggles between layouts running "setxkbmap -layout us" or "setxkbmap -layout ru" commands depending on the current one. Once in a while X server crashes on the toggling. Before I used the "stock" method "grp:caps_toggle", and it never crashed. Google finds several bug reports with the similar error string, but they are not related to layout switching. Thanks for ideas! Sergey.

2 3

[arch-general] vi again
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

I am trying to build vi in core.....any one have a patch to make it compile without me preforming surgery on the PKGBUILD and bash scripts? Thanks

2 2

[arch-general] namcap
by Baho Utot 25 May '09

25 May '09

I tried namcap a freshly built fakeroot from the latest abs sync Here is what it said namcap fakeroot-1.12.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz fakeroot E: Dependency detected and not included (bash) from files ['usr/bin/fakeroot'] fakeroot W: Dependency included but already satisfied (glibc) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (filesystem) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (grep) fakeroot W: Dependency included and not needed (sed) This is the dependency line from the PKGBUILD depends=('glibc' 'filesystem' 'grep' 'sed') What is namcap telling me ? Could fakeroot be built from a PKGBUILD without those dependencies? And is missing the bash dependency?

3 3

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clean-up
by Grigorios Bouzakis 24 May '09

24 May '09

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Tobias Powalowski schrieb: >> moved in lilo,openvpn,openswan and capi4k-utils to extra > > I'd like to keep openvpn in core. I'd even maintain it, but I use the > openvpn 2.1 release candidates and thus don't test or use the 2.0.X > releases. > The first three were moved to core not extra. Its just capi4k-utils that was moved in a different repo than it was before. -- Greg

2 1

Re: [arch-general] [aur-general] Was: telepathy/empathy removed from [testing]
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 24 May '09

24 May '09

Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > Due to lack of developer time to package this fully, the > telepathy/empathy packages sat in [testing] for a long time and become > out dated. Now they have been removed, so these packages are free to > go into [community] if a TU wishes to do so. > > Allan > > > > Hello What about squid? i686 Testing squid 2.7.STABLE6-2 Orphan 2009-03-12 x86_64 Testing squid 2.7.STABLE6-2 Orphan 2009-03-13 i686 Extra squid 2.7.STABLE6-1 Orphan 2009-05-10 x86_64 Extra squid 2.7.STABLE6-1 Orphan 2009-04-26 As can see, the version in extra is more recent (at least in date) that te version in testing (+2 months old) The diff between 1 and 2 is the addition of libcap=>2.16 to depends array. Cheers, -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

2 1

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sqlite3 3.6.14.1-1
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 24 May '09

24 May '09

Andreas Radke wrote: > bump. anyone? No issues with Firefox? > > -Andy > > Works fine here. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

1 0