July 2009 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Please orphan "newton-dynamics-beta"
by Sven-Hendrik Haase 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

I sent this request two days ago but it was obviously ignored or no TU has been available for two days, therefore I'm sending it again: Hey, please orphan AUR package "newton-dynamics-beta" so that I may adopt it. The original author doesn't seem to care and hasn't answered in over a week to mail and comments. Additionally, the package is out of date. -- Sven-Hendrik

5 7

[aur-general] package deletion request
by F B 12 Jul '09

12 Jul '09

Hi, the package codecs-extra could be deleted (it has been replaced by the new version of "codecs") http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26969 and also this package is a duplicate of "codecs" but the maintainer seems to be inactive: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14946 Thank you in advance.

2 1

Re: [aur-general] dmraid 1.0.0-rc15
by Hvannentir 12 Jul '09

12 Jul '09

I dont apply any extra patches, one of them break the corrected issue for jmicron on device names. I'll try to find the one that causing this and report it. > 2009/7/4 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa(a)gmx.de>: >> Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: >>> Hi >>> I have tested the testing package, and it does not work. >>> Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices name ( >>> "jmicronRAID0 p1" ) >>> So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my install >>> running - I still have to remake initram with my working dmraid ( yeah yeah >>> I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you my pkgbuild if you want. >>> >>> 2009/7/2 Antoine Noal <antoine.noal(a)gmail.com> >>> >>> > Hi >>> > I have tested the testing package, and it does not work. >>> > Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices name ( >>> > "jmicronRAID0 p1" ) >>> > So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my >>> > install running - I still have to remake initram with my working dmraid ( >>> > yeah yeah I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you my pkgbuild >>> > if you want. >>> > >>> > 2009/6/21 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa(a)gmx.de> >>> > >>> > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: >>> >> > Additional p ? What do you mean ? >>> >> > >>> >> > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa(a)gmx.de> >>> >> > >>> >> > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: >>> >> > > > Ok then so I can tell you that on arch64 with a jmicron chipset >>> >> > > > it's working fine. >>> >> > > > I'll send you all the needed info you want later, I'm not on my >>> >> > > > box >>> >> >>> >> now >>> >> >>> >> > > but >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > I haven't applied any extra patchs. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa(a)gmx.de> >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir: >>> >> > > > > > Hi >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > I flagged out of date dmraid quite some time ago because I had >>> >> >>> >> to >>> >> >>> >> > > build >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > > my >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > own package for dmraid rc15. >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Indeed, in order to make my software raid work with a Jmicron >>> >> > > >>> >> > > chipset, >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > an important fix was necessary. >>> >> > > > > > ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 ) >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Why the package is still oudated ? >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > I'm looknig for dmraid users, i can't test it, last time i >>> >> > > > > bumped >>> >> >>> >> it >>> >> >>> >> > > > > to .15 and a lot of dmraid users had broken machines. >>> >> > > > > We can do again a testrun if it works now better with some >>> >> > > > > patches from redhat. >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > -- >>> >> > > > > Tobias Powalowski >>> >> > > > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) >>> >> > > > > http://www.archlinux.org >>> >> > > > > tpowa(a)archlinux.org >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Do you need the additional p too? >>> >> > > >>> >> > > -- >>> >> > > Tobias Powalowski >>> >> > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) >>> >> > > http://www.archlinux.org >>> >> > > tpowa(a)archlinux.org >>> >> >>> >> The new dmarid package is in testing, please test and give feedback, >>> >> thanks >>> >> greetings >>> >> tpowa >>> >> -- >>> >> Tobias Powalowski >>> >> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) >>> >> http://www.archlinux.org >>> >> tpowa(a)archlinux.org >> What is the difference to my package? >> It's the standard tarball with the most recent fedora patches. >> greetings >> tpowa >> >> -- >> Tobias Powalowski >> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) >> http://www.archlinux.org >> tpowa(a)archlinux.org >> >

2 1

[aur-general] pike
by nathan owe. 12 Jul '09

12 Jul '09

ok i finished the pkgbuild but it finishes successfully but not successfully, it makes the pkg and installs to the correct dir. but during the compile process it leaves out master.pike

2 1

[aur-general] pike
by nathan owe. 12 Jul '09

12 Jul '09

nm i got it to work :-)

1 0

[aur-general] Please orphan "newton-dynamics-beta"
by Sven-Hendrik Haase 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

Hey, please orphan AUR package "newton-dynamics-beta" so that I may adopt it. The original author doesn't seem to care and hasn't answered in over a week to mail and comments. Additionally, the package is out of date. -- Sven-Hendrik

1 0

[aur-general] orphaning simulavr in AUR
by taptaptap dödödö 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

Hello TUs! Can anybody orphan this package? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12869. I can maintain it, and I maintain such an embedded packages in AUR, thank you. Btw, http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26259 <- this package is a duplicated for the previous one, i think. Sincerelly, Laszlo Papp

2 2

[aur-general] Pike pkg
by nathan owe. 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

[ndowens@Arch pike]$ sudo pacman -U pike-7.8.316-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz loading package data... checking dependencies... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: pike: requires unixodbc gtk gnome-panel postgresql-libs but it is in my depend array and yaourt says they are installed but still it won't let me install the pkg

3 2

[aur-general] CVS problem? AUR Comment for moovida
by Stefan Husmann 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

Hello, I got an AUR Comment for my package moovida, that the CVS button dos not work. What did I do wrong? Regards Stefan

5 8

[aur-general] Integrity Check community x86_64 10-07-2009
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 10 Jul '09

10 Jul '09

======================================= = Integrity Check x86_64 of community = ======================================= Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs ------------------- /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib32/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/network/muttng/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/xfce/CVS Missing Dependencies ---------------------- eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3' open-vm-tools-modules --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' qc-usb-messenger --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' cdfs --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' Missing Makedepends --------------------- id3lib-rcc --> 'gcc34' greycstoration --> 'gcc34' tvision --> 'gcc34' classpath --> 'jikes' open-vm-tools --> 'chrpath' Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 20 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 9 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0

1 0