June 2010 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Golang in AUR
by Stephen Weinberg 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

The aur has far too many versions of go (http://golang.org) Many of them are out of date. I went though and tried to find as many as I could. I believe most of these should be deleted. go-google-mercurial http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31969 I think this one should be deleted. go is in community and this does not have provides/conflicts with that package. golang http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31912 Very old. I am not even sure if it works. It is also missing provides/conflicts. go-hg http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33695 Much better! Missing provides but has conflicts. PKGBUILD looks sound. go-lang-hg http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31913 This one is the best. It does not have any problems. It looks like it is mostly a copy of the one from abs except it fetches the tip instead of release. It also has provides/conflicts. go-lang-hg has only one flaw, the name. I think it should be named go-hg since it is the hg of a package in community. If I am wrong on any of this, let me know. I am new to packaging and I have only made three of them. I am still learning :-). -- Stephen

5 8

[aur-general] delete request
by Moritz Rudert 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

Hi, can somebody delete kernel26-vanilla-mainline - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37350, cause its a duplicate of kernel26-rc - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31932. Thanks and greetings helios

2 1

[aur-general] delete request
by Moritz Rudert 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

Hi, can somebody delete this package, cause it is not needed anymore: kernel26-vanilla-firmware - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33014 Thanks and greetings helios

2 1

[aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates
by Cedric Staniewski 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

Hello everyone, I noticed that there are several duplicates of extra packages in the AUR or at least they share the same name. Perhaps a TU want to clean them up. allegro apr-util aspell-nl asymptote autopano-sift-c bochs darcs davfs2 fixesproto haskell-extensible-exceptions haskell-hashed-storage haskell-haskeline haskell-mmap haskell-terminfo jackbeat kdeutils-kcalc koffice lensfun lha libedit libical liblqr libmp3splt liboil libpst libticonv libytnef libzrtpcpp link-grammar lxsplit mp3wrap neon opencv oxine pal partitionmanager perl-bit-vector perl-carp-clan perl-dbd-sqlite perl-digest-sha1 perl-test-pod perl-timedate qtscriptgenerator rdesktop taglib-extras truecrypt tsocks watchdog words xf86-video-geode Regards, Cedric

16 43

[aur-general] Remove xc5000-fw package
by Tom Wambold 20 Jun '10

20 Jun '10

Hello TUs: Please remove the xc5000-fw package [1], as the file is included in the latest linux-firmware package. Thanks! -Tom [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24134

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Cedric Staniewski 20 Jun '10

20 Jun '10

Hi TUs, Please remove this package[1] as it is now obsolete, thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32428

2 1

Re: [aur-general] WARNING boost 1.43 enter testing
by Ionuț Bîru 20 Jun '10

20 Jun '10

On 06/18/2010 04:06 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > Hi DEVs/TUs, > > this new version has been split into boost-libs and boost. Now boost is > a makedepends and boost-libs a depends. > > If you rebuild a package that is not yours, please check to see if a new > upstream version is available, mostly to be compatible with boost >1.41. > encfs and schroot is two that comes in my head right now. > > Others, please test it and let me know via bugtracker if we have any > problems with the new boost. > > i know there was a problem with gcc 4.5 but every patch that i found, is > already applied in this version. > the rebuilding is over and i would prefer to let them in testing couples of days more. I would appreciate some feedback especially from encfs users -- Ionuț

1 0

[aur-general] Voting period: Thomas Dziedzic(td123)
by Ionuț Bîru 19 Jun '10

19 Jun '10

Hi TUs, It's voting time for Thomas Dziedzic's TU application. See discussion period here: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-June/009198.html -- Ionuț

14 21

[aur-general] Please delete packages
by xandry 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

flashplugin-dev (#1), flashplugin-prerelease-debug (#2) supersedes this. flashplugin-universal (#3), flashplugin9 (#5) is out of date and it is substituted flashplugin-native64 (#4) + flashplugin from extra. Such package cannot be because of that any more that versions different for architectures. lib32-flashplugin (#6) substituted flashplugin from extra. lib32-flashplugin-prerelease (#7) it is substituted flashplugin-prerelease (#8) 1. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32391 2. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34871 3. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25402 4. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38184 5. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21045 6. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15406 7. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37888 8. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32072 -- I apologise for my English. Написано в почтовом клиенте браузера Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/

1 0

[aur-general] delete xar and rename xar-archive to xar
by solsTiCe d'Hiver 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

as xar package is unmaintained since 2007 it could be deleted and xar-archive renamed to xar. Of course you better notify the owners of these packages first ;-) xar seems not to see any developped recently but may be a 1.5.3 release will come soon.

2 1