=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. lcarlier - 4 signoffs
2. tomegun - 3 signoffs
3. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs
4. thomas - 2 signoffs
5. bluewind - 2 signoffs
Hello,
The AUR package "owx" [1] does not build. I have attempted to contact
the maintainer in order to send a patch, but to no avail. Therefore, I
am interested in maintaining this package.
Thanks in advance,
-Ruslan
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42448
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: AUR owx package fix
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:20:57 -0500
From: Ruslan Nabioullin <rnabioullin(a)gmail.com>
To: ur6lad(a)archlinux.org.ua
Hello ur6lad,
The PKGBUILD in your owx package downloads the daily SVN snapshot
tarball, which changes daily (due to the name of the dir within it
having the current date); thus, the checksums change daily, and it is
impossible to build the package. I have created a patch (the email
attachment) to PKGBUILD, which checks out the current (as of now)
revision from SVN instead of downloading the snapshot (which would be
less reliable). In addition, it fixes a few trivial errors (regarding
Archlinux standards) and improves grammar.
-kb1vyp
--
Ruslan Nabioullin
rnabioullin(a)gmail.com
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. tomegun - 3 signoffs
2. ibiru - 2 signoffs
3. thomas - 1 signoffs
4. dan - 1 signoffs
Hello,
The cinnamon-applets-git and cinnamon-session-git packages have been merged into the main project upstream, so they can be removed.
Thanks,Xiao-Long Chen
Hey There,
I want to package django-grappelli (version: 2.3.5) from github. I know
that usually we clone the repository and therefore have the latest commit
of the project for VCS PKGBUILD's. However in this case, I want to package
the latest stable version. So I wrote;
# Maintainer: Alper KANAT <alperkanat(a)raptiye.org>
pkgname=django-grappelli
pkgver=2.3.5
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="A jazzy skin for the Django Admin-Interface"
url="https://github.com/sehmaschine/django-grappelli"
arch=('any')
license=('GPL2')
makedepends=("git" "python2" "python2-distribute")
conflicts=()
provides=()
source=(https://github.com/sehmaschine/django-grappelli/tarball/2.3.5)
md5sums=('36291a468ea10d50b33d782413cd436c')
build() {
cd ${srcdir}
}
For test purposes, I tried to build this PKGBUILD. The tarball is
downloaded with the name 2.3.5 and successfully extracted into src/ folder
but with a commit id (which makes it kind of random):
$ ll src/
toplam 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 tunix users 52 Oca 20 10:59 2.3.5 ->
/home/tunix/packages/alps/django-grappelli-git/2.3.5
drwxr-xr-x 4 tunix users 4096 Eki 11 11:07
sehmaschine-django-grappelli-ea9441b
So unless I do some bash magic like cd
$srcdir/sehmaschine-django-grappelli-*, I won't be able to continue to
build this package. What I wonder is if there are convenient ways to:
- Download a tarball with a predefined name (in short: rename the output
tarball)
- Extract to predefined folder
that we can specify in PKGBUILD? I read the man pages of PKGBUILD and
makepkg and couldn't find such an information.
---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. allan - 7 signoffs
2. lfleischer - 3 signoffs
3. bisson - 2 signoffs
4. thomas - 2 signoffs
5. dan - 1 signoffs