- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Dec '14

02 Dec '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 14 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dart-1.8-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * dart-1.8-1 (i686) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. arodseth - 4 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Request]Remove package vim-doc-pl
by Piotr Rogoża 01 Dec '14

01 Dec '14

Hello Could you remove my AUR package vim-doc-pl*, please? Source isn't available nowhere (and I don't have any backup). *) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-doc-pl/ -- Best regards Piotr Rogoża

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Dec '14

01 Dec '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dart-1.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dart-1.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Nov '14

30 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (i686) * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dart-1.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bfgminer-5.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dart-1.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Misspelled email on account registration
by Sergio Baldovi 29 Nov '14

29 Nov '14

Hi, some days ago I register an account (serbalgi) on AUR with a misspelled email address. The activation mail has not arrived and the account has not been validated. Anyone know if there is an expiration timeout? I've also tried a password reset (d'oh!) and a random login states: "Your password has been reset. If you just created a new account, please use the link from the confirmation email to set an initial password. Otherwise, please request a reset key on the Password Reset page." I think I'm sort of stuck with the activation.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Nov '14

29 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * dart-1.8-1 (i686) * dart-1.8-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * dart-1.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dart-1.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package promotion process
by Troy Engel 28 Nov '14

28 Nov '14

When a package has hundreds of votes, what keeps it from getting promoted into Community? I'm talking specifically about cower: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cower/ Bootstrapping AUR on fresh installs is manual, what's the reason cower hasn't been promoted to Community so it's easy to install with pacman and have AUR usable out-of-the-box? (apologies if this has been discussed before and I'm opening some sort of hornet's nest) -te

5 4

Re: [aur-general] Package promotion process
by Troy Engel 28 Nov '14

28 Nov '14

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Micay <danielmicay(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 28/11/14 12:32 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> >> It shall never return. > > Never say never, the rules could be revisited one day :P. It makes sense > to forbid automatic installation, but it's a bit silly to forbid search > / downloading from the AUR when we permit it for other third party > dumping grounds like PyPi. > Yeah, I mean no offense to the current rule, but AUR is a fantastic part of Arch and not having *anything* which can install an AUR package in Community seems... disingenuous to the adoption of AUR from a fresh install. I understand this can be a political battle ("which AUR helper is best") but cower sure seems like a great candidate to just help people get started. $0.02, -te

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta
by Gary van der Merwe 28 Nov '14

28 Nov '14

Please delete meld-beta. The new gtk3 port is now available in extra, so I don't plan on maintaining this package further. Those who want to use dev versions should rather use meld-git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/meld-beta/ Thanks, Gary

4 6

[aur-general] Moving opensc from community to AUR
by Sébastien Luttringer 28 Nov '14

28 Nov '14

Hello, I'm not using opensc anymore, is there a Dev/Tu interested by taking care of it? I will move it to AUR if nobody is interested. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A

4 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Nov '14

28 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 3 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] AUR Comment for customizepkg-ald
by Daniel Albers 27 Nov '14

27 Nov '14

[ Copying aur-general for other opnions and get clarification on AUR rules out there ] Hey Jonathan, Thanks for maintaining AUR and keeping the Arch ecosystem healthy. Some honest questions/comments regarding the deletion of the AUR package customizepkg-ald: The package was a patched version of customizepkg. There are thousands of AUR packages that are variants of other packages and I can't see any problem with that. In my understanding that's part of what AUR is for. Is it not? It's been customary for AUR deletions, orphanings etc. to have a two weeks grace period. Should that not also apply to TUs? The .tar.gz that you mentioned that violated the "no binaries on AUR" rule contained nothing but ASCII files (as does customizepk¹). If I unzip the tarball and re-upload it, does that not violate the rule? What if I also untar it and upload each text file individually? Cheers, Daniel ¹ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/customizepkg/ On Di, 2014-11-25 at 18:52 +0000, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > from https://aur.archlinux.org//pkgbase/customizepkg-ald/ > jsteel wrote: > > Ah, I just realised this is an intentional duplicate of customizepkg; > please don't submit duplicate packages, submit an orphan request > instead. Deleting. > > --- > If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, > please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Nov '14

27 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * icecast-2.4.1-1 (i686) * icecast-2.4.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * icecast-2.4.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * icecast-2.4.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] android-samples-5.0 can be removed
by Christoph Bayer 26 Nov '14

26 Nov '14

Hello, I just accidentally uploaded a miss named package, I have re-uploaded a version with correct naming, but the old is still here to be removed: It is called "android-samples-5.0". Thank you very much in advance! Best regards, Christoph Bayer

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Nov '14

26 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 31 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (29 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * android-tools-5.0.0_r7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * android-tools-5.0.0_r7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.1.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 5 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 3. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Nov '14

25 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 23 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * android-tools-5.0.0_r7-1 (i686) * android-tools-5.0.0_r7-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * android-tools-5.0.0_r7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * android-tools-5.0.0_r7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 6 signoffs 3. anatolik - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] mkinitcpio/mdadm/mdadm_udev fail to start raid10
by Ido Rosen 25 Nov '14

25 Nov '14

The the default configuration under ArchLinux and DEVICE partitions in mdadm.conf, mdadm and the mdadm mkinitcpio hook fail to load the raid10 kernel module automatically, and as a result raid10 arrays fail to load on boot in Arch. My temporary workaround is to include the raid10 kernel module in the mkinitcpio.conf MODULES= list, it could also be included in /etc/modules-load.d/*.conf, but this should not be necessary, and is currently not necessary for raid1 arrays. I do not think this is an upstream problem since my LFS and Gentoo boxes do load the correct (raid10) kernel module without any specific configuration to do so. Has anyone else replicated this behavior? Suggestions: - Preferred: Make the initcpio hook/mdadm udev rules/whatever loads raid1.ko normally also detect raid10 (and raid5, raid6, ...) arrays properly. - Alternatively: Add a section to the SW RAID wiki page describing how to make the module load persist on boot (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Software_RAID_and_LVM#Load_kernel_modu…) Ido

2 2

[aur-general] Please delete texlive-gantt
by Alfredo Palhares 24 Nov '14

24 Nov '14

Hello, Please delete texlive-gantt[1] The package is now in textlive-latexextra [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texlive-gantt/

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Nov '14

24 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * performous-1.0-1 (i686) * performous-1.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Unsupported architectures in the AUR
by Doug Newgard 24 Nov '14

24 Nov '14

Through searching, I've found discussions about people adding unsupported architectures (specifically arm and ppc) to their current i686/x86_64 PKGBUILDs. Nobody has a problem with that (I don't, either). What I haven't found is any discussion about packages that are *exclusively* for one of these architectures. Is this something that's allowed or not? Doug

9 11

[aur-general] AUR 3.5.0 released
by Lukas Fleischer 24 Nov '14

24 Nov '14

Hello, I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.5.0 has been released. The official AUR setup [1] has already been updated. This release adds support for architecture-specific sources (resp. provides, conflicts, replaces) and for .SRCINFO, both of which will be included in the next pacman release. Apart from that, the package list and package base list are now official and available at [2, 3]. There have also been a couple of internal changes and bug fixes. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [4]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the AUR bug tracker [5]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.gz [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase.gz [4] https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.5.0 [5] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

4 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Nov '14

23 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (i686) * bbswitch-0.8-19 (i686) * r8168-8.039.00-4 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (i686) * vhba-module-20140629-10 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (i686) * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (x86_64) * bbswitch-0.8-19 (x86_64) * r8168-8.039.00-4 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20140629-10 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * goobox-3.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * goobox-3.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-56 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Our troll is going another round
by Rob McCathie 23 Nov '14

23 Nov '14

Hello AUR general, Some of you may remember this: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-July/029069.html Our troll recently tried to sneak back on to our forums and of course got banned, and now they're throwing another little tantrum. All my packages are flagged out of date once again, when none of them are, and the package delete request for my aqualung package is not legitimate. This is the troll's account: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bomberman Again the troll is attempting to cause problems with other services outside of Manjaro's, again AUR is one of them. Apologies. -- Regards, Rob McCathie

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Nov '14

22 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * cantata-1.5.0-2 (i686) * goobox-3.2.1-2 (i686) * nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (i686) * cantata-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) * goobox-3.2.1-2 (x86_64) * nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * goobox-3.2.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ifuse-1.1.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * goobox-3.2.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ifuse-1.1.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 10 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * envoy-11.1-1 (i686) * envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ifuse-1.1.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ifuse-1.1.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (i686) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29 * packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29 * uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (i686), since 2014-10-27 * uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (x86_64), since 2014-10-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 3 signoffs

1 0