- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Away
by Allan McRae 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Hi all, I will be on holiday from tomorrow until the 21st of February. I will probably have email access but won't be doing any packaging, etc. Feel free to update any package of mine apart from python3 in [community] as I have some changes that I want to make when 3.0.1 is released. Cheers, Allan

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Unknown package flagged out-of-date
by Loui Chang 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:30:32AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Loui Chang wrote: > > Oh sorry. I understand what you mean now. > > Yeah the contents of the front page are cached. They only update every > > ten minutes. > > > > Ah... that explains it. So, I guess this occured with the latest AUR > update? Yep.

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Unknown package flagged out-of-date
by Loui Chang 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:23:51PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Well, that seemed to fix it. I tried flagging and unflagging it earlier > because that was my last package flagged out of date but it did not work for > me. You don't get an email if you flag your own package.

2 2

Re: [aur-general] Unknown package flagged out-of-date
by Grigorios Bouzakis 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:11:46PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > I have one package out-of-date according to the AUR home page but > looking through my packages, none have the nice red highlight on them. > Is anyone else noticing this? > > Allan Well, i might be guilty for that. I unflagged axel out of date cause it was still flagged when you had uploaded the new version. I just flagged and unflagged it again just to check. Does it still happen? Greg

2 2

[aur-general] Unknown package flagged out-of-date
by Allan McRae 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Hi, I have one package out-of-date according to the AUR home page but looking through my packages, none have the nice red highlight on them. Is anyone else noticing this? Allan

1 0

[aur-general] Deprecated packages
by Sébastien Piccand 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Hi all, I used to take care of the following packages: libzzub, libzzub-svn, pyzzub, pyzzub-svn They are now deprecated by armstrong (the name changed) I think one can now delete them. Seb

2 2

[aur-general] libburn/libisofs/xfburn will move
by Andreas Radke 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

I've put libburn/libisofs/xfburn into testing now being part of the upcoming Xfce 4.6 release. They will move together to extra. Once this will be done please remove them from community repo. hdoria, please adopt them in extra/testing or tell me if I should maintain them in extra. -Andy

1 0

[aur-general] package removal request
by Grigorios Bouzakis 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20539 is the same as http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/davfs2/ Greg

2 2

[aur-general] Upgrading AUR.
by Loui Chang 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Hey everyone. I will be upgrading AUR in a few minutes. Here's just a head's up.

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Vote - Moving [community] to use same system as main repos
by Loui Chang 01 Feb '09

01 Feb '09

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 03:36:56PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Loui Chang wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:51:40PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > > >> As far as the web changes go, I suggest the relevant AUR developers talk > >> to the people who do the Arch site work and sort this out. > >> > > > > Well it depends. Do we want [community] to remain in AUR so we keep > > votes and comments and such, or do we drop those packages from AUR? > > > > One thing I think no-one has brought up regarding this. The main repos > don't have package categories. So how would the AUR handle that? I think the categories would be removed.

13 29