- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Maintainer for gtk-gnutella? (was: AUR Comment for gtk-gnutella)
by Dan McGee 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Anyone want to maintain this package? Feel free to take it off my hands. I don't think it is a complicated version bump, I just don't use it anymore. -Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <aur-notify(a)archlinux.org> Date: Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:07 AM Subject: AUR Comment for gtk-gnutella To: from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11309 hussam wrote: Current version: 0.96.6 --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

2 3

[aur-general] Packages duplicated
by William Díaz 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

These packages are duplicated: [1] lightscribe_x86_64, [2] lightscribe-labeler_x86_64 and [3] 4l_x86_64 1.0r6-2 lightscribe_x86_64 = bin32-lightscribe lightscribe-labeler_x86_64 = bin32-lightscribe-labeler 4l_x86_64 = bin32-4l [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21807 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7977 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21808

2 1

[aur-general] Orphaning Request (lkmonitor)
by M Rawash 01 Apr '09

01 Apr '09

please orphan "lkmonitor" in AUR, i won't bother contacting the maintainer since he hasn't been active for almost 3 years now (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=Jack&SeB=m) regards M Rawash

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by flocke 01 Apr '09

01 Apr '09

Could someone please remove this package: [1] I had a little twist in the name (brz instead of bzr) and noticed it when it was already uploaded ... Sry for the trouble! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25172 -- flocke <flocke(a)user-helfen-usern.de>

2 1

[aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon
by Allan McRae 01 Apr '09

01 Apr '09

Hi TUs, It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface. You can refresh your memory here: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html Allan

5 7

[aur-general] Package disown request for libcdk
by Alexander Rødseth 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

Hi, libcdk hasn't been updated for one and a half years. I e-mailed the maintainer almost two weeks ago and has not got any reply. If the package is disowned, I can fix it. I have the PKGBUILD ready. Thanks, Alexander Rødseth

2 2

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon
by Loui Chang 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:45:56PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Allan McRae wrote: > > Hi TUs, > > > > It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface. You can refresh > > your memory here: > > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html > > And voting is now finished. > > The votes are 17 yes, 1 abstain, 0 no. According to the wiki, we have 26 > TUs, so we barely make the quorum (bad TUs - do more voting!). > > Chris: Follow the instructions on this wiki page > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_Trusted_User_Checklist Congrats!

2 2

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon
by Jaroslav Lichtblau 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:45:56AM +0200, Allan McRae wrote: snip > > And voting is now finished. > > The votes are 17 yes, 1 abstain, 0 no. According to the wiki, we have > 26 TUs, so we barely make the quorum (bad TUs - do more voting!). snip > > Allan > > Welcome aboard, Chris! And congrats too :) -- The worst thing one can do is not to try, to be aware of what one wants and not give in to it, to spend years in silent hurt wondering if something could have materialized -- and never knowing. -- David Viscott

1 0

[aur-general] Adopting Apache Commons packages
by Marc St-Laurent 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

Hello TUs, I'd like to adopt commons-collections ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1216 ) and commons-beanutils ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1215 ), which are currently orphaned packages. However, I think it would be wise to rename them to java-commons-{digester,beanutils}, to bring them in line with the naming scheme already used by a few other Commons packages. Could you please delete the old packages, and I will upload new ones shortly? TIA Marc

1 0

[aur-general] Problem with root permission
by Michele Mocciola 29 Mar '09

29 Mar '09

I'm having trouble building PKGBUILD for mpi version of code-aster: during compilation process install script must run mpixec; because of fakeroot, mpiexec believes that is being runt by root and so looks for file /etc/mpd.conf, for its owner, that must be root, and for its permissions that must be 600; problem start when install script tries to open mpd.conf, because of permissions 600 it can't open it and so it closes with error. The only solution I found is to run makepkg as root (e.g. sudo makepkg --asroot). Do you think there are other solution for this problem? MPI implementation I use is mpich2. Thanks in advance. Michele Mocciola

1 0