- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Package remove request
by Vitaliy Berdinskikh 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Hi TUs! Because xmlrpc-c was added to extra http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?arch=&repo=&q=xmlrpc&last_update=&limit=… remove my package from AUR http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5885 Thanks! -- Sincerely yours, Vitaliy Berdinskikh (Виталий Бердинских) xmpp:vitaliy@berdinskikh.in.ua <xmpp%253Avitaliy(a)berdinskikh.in.ua> skype:skipper.barbossa

2 1

[aur-general] Packages removal request
by Grigorios Bouzakis 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14433 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2464 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8415 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2041 All part of the extra repository. Greg

2 1

[aur-general] Building in a chroot
by Allan McRae 19 Jan '09

19 Jan '09

Hi TUs, I wrote a page on build packages in a chroot in the DeveloperWiki that I think might be useful for TU too. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_Clean_Chroot This is good for TUs who want to run [testing] and build packages for [community] on the same system. Any questions, just ask. Cheers, Allan

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal
by Florian Pritz 17 Jan '09

17 Jan '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Please remove http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20941 as the patch has been added to rxvt-unicode-256color. Thanks. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJJca0WAAoJEG0WVcFM4cE+hAEP/jyblhw6dd5nPbTXLP2+0H3l qfyXFdyf4LpF498Nku44mLk6zs9nlay7AaPa8GPcVGtOYTYFSCK6+BtLCW5XTC4N CqEWzPukKNTXHZzqZvKJYTXC0x2E+QuFsa/H5nH20dsaYL4zHWKA7iRhYOavFYOy s1rTMOXEzWaUdzmU3TeWjbn540sAuwKsE/eQMsrDnS3+dqO30Kj0FYMFOG9aAT/c VG9xV0oFTt/zjZ6AxaCIMomxyaWLNFkX+JL+hv/yEORQMF2DK0upr2scF3e6DgR8 vjbzdZyCN8fitvfBkOWuM8K9DrN5pD2PRES1xbk9yj8vUXXOo0yWKxcrEog1BcuS VLx2dasfpe52CYGxRnB545Io/9xQTPQWJNvv+iQZmycr5P3lbnMqaTRw0sNgJfv+ yPfk+RzTUS/Y/4XqC0pEeCj6B7/XMhtHn/O13C2QOyEao07Njx3l+Jtt3I9Z7a0K nJz+8/AuIAQpRxyEPAjUe+D6mpmxdZKZXRLzxmEJdbkvW7Uswn/ExTu2FtgSytgT gFAl3m7/NFh4AnPNFI3cEwbV6VuBRb+cDT+9K44UjVJVEem3ti45GTyetc4txhxK X0IlvHD2ctjRlYONYIJtS1oJBIYHDr4/q1yJCN7kTO55FC54Klwp4Jai+JA1UXIa 47RNTU2hgDcgatdvOjgs =AX0W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] A small thank you
by Benjamin Andresen 17 Jan '09

17 Jan '09

Hello everyone, I just read this blog entry: http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/the-beauty-of-aur/ and thought: I need to say thank you, too. It's a nice product. So thanks to the AUR developers: BaSh, et al. And of course thanks to bfinch for getting the whole thing rolling. br, a happy AUR-user

1 0

Re: [aur-general] grub-gfx install failed
by goodmenzy＠gmail.com 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

On 2009-01-16 13:25:34, Allan McRae wrote: > goodmenzy(a)gmail.com wrote: >> It said : >> >> >> checking package integrity... >> (1/1) checking for file conflicts [####################################################] 100% >> error: could not prepare transaction >> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) >> grub-gfx: /usr/share/info/dir exists in filesystem >> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. >> > > File a bug report. > > Done, a bug report has been posted at http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12811?tasks=all&project=2

1 0

[aur-general] grub-gfx install failed
by goodmenzy＠gmail.com 16 Jan '09

16 Jan '09

It said : checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [####################################################] 100% error: could not prepare transaction error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) grub-gfx: /usr/share/info/dir exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of x86_64-specific and opera flashplugin packages
by Evangelos Foutras 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Hello fellow TUs, I have come across people who picked a flashplugin package from the AUR over the one in [extra]. I feel that x86_64 flashplugin packages should be removed from the AUR now that the official one supports both architectures. Furthermore, Opera seems to get along just fine with flashplugin from [extra] so we don't need Opera-specific packages either. Packages in question are: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18096 (flashplayer-opera64) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21601 (flashplugin-alpha-64) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17442 (flashplugin-beta-opera) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18695 (flashplugin-mozilla, maintainer believes this should stay because "the official plugin doesn't have mms.cfg" - not sure what this is :>) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14074 (flashplugin-opera) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21607 (flashplugin-x86_64) From the above, I'd say that the following can be safely deleted: flashplayer-opera64 flashplugin-alpha-64 flashplugin-beta-opera flashplugin-opera flashplugin-x86_64 Any opinions on this? Do you think we should proceed with the removal of these packages in order to avoid confusion between them and flashplugin from [extra]?

2 2

[aur-general] opencv-cvs removing request
by Артем Смирнов 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Hi, please remove package opencv-cvs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1749, its replaced by opencv-svn. Thanks. -- Artyom

2 1

[aur-general] package removal request
by joyfulgirl＠archlinux.us 14 Jan '09

14 Jan '09

Hey all, Could someone remove cl-ppcre-clisp and stumpwm-clisp-git from the AUR? I've recently adopted the SBCL versions of both packages and made the PKGBUILDs able to work with both lisps. I've also given any users of the original packages about a month's notice of the pending deletion in the comments. Much appreciated! -- If I Ever Become An Evil Villainess... 224. I will build machines which simply fail when overloaded, rather than wiping out all nearby henchpeople in an explosion or setting off a chain reaction. I will do this by using devices known as "surge protectors."

2 2