Aur-general

Download

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

20 participants
10964 discussions

[aur-general] Why do we still have compatibility rename for community?
by Varun Acharya 30 Nov '07

30 Nov '07

Hi Devs/TU's, Why do we still have the renaming of packages in community so that packages are uploaded without the '-arch' in the filename? Official repo's were converted a while back, any reason were not editing communitypkg to do the same? Varun

4 3

[aur-general] -mtune=generic
by bardo 29 Nov '07

29 Nov '07

Hi. This flag was introduced with glibc-2.6 and gcc-4.2 as suggested for devs and tus (http://archlinux.org/news/326/) Is it still needed? Was it a temporary thing that was erroneously introduced in the aforementioned packages or is it a necessary and thus "definitive" flag? Thanks for any clarification. C.

2 1

[aur-general] Build machine update
by Aaron Griffin 29 Nov '07

29 Nov '07

For any Devs/TUs in need of an x86_64 build machine, we're now in business. This machine I have sitting here is not powerful, but it's doing nothing, so we might as well all help out and heat my apartment this winter 8) What I've done is set this machine up to use the new chroot tools from our devtools package, and allow users rights to run the chroot build script. Dan, Jeff, and myself have tested it and it seems to work fine for right now. For people with existing accounts - I will add a motd with instructions soon, so when you see a small HOWTO on login, feel free to go to town. For people who DON'T have an account but still want to build x86_64 packages and don't have a machine, let me know.

1 0

[aur-general] New list alias test.
by eliott 28 Nov '07

28 Nov '07

test

4 7

Jump to page: