- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Nov '16

06 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 5 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * obs-studio-0.16.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * obs-studio-0.16.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. sangy - 6 signoffs 2. grawity - 2 signoffs 3. polyzen - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Missing Co-Maintainer Search Criteria on AUR
by NicoHood 06 Nov '16

06 Nov '16

Hi, I'd like to address a feature that I've been always missing. If you login to AUr you can view "Packages" and "My Packages". However the Co-Maintained packages are not listed there and you cannot even select those. If I am not totally wrong there is no way to find you co-maintained packages. The reason for why this is an important feature is to check them for newer versions, as if you are a co-maintainer most of the time the original maintainer wants to keep its position but just has no time to do so. So to get an overview of your packages that'd make a lot sense. And in case of a user "review" of his packages or his work for TU applications or just as reference it would be nice to list the packages where he also worked on. I am aware that you should have a local copy of you maintained packages anyways, but that'd be just a nice addition which might not be that complicated to add. Could also make sense on the official repo. Any opinions? Cheers, Nico

4 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Nov '16

05 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * obs-studio-0.16.4-1 (i686) * obs-studio-0.16.4-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * obs-studio-0.16.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * obs-studio-0.16.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 6 signoffs 2. pid1 - 4 signoffs 3. hcartiaux - 2 signoffs 4. Irishluck83 - 2 signoffs 5. grawity - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please find attached invoice no: 026590657
by document＠archlinux.org 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

Attached is a Print Manager form. Format = Portable Document Format File (PDF) ________________________________ Disclaimer This email/fax transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the information, or take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of any organisation or employer. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachment but please notify the sender (above) deleting this message from your system. For email transmissions please rely on your own virus check no responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage rising out of any bug or virus infection.

1 0

[aur-general] Fwd: [REPORT] Banned for reporting Out of Date CVS packages by Alucryd
by Ake Doragon no Namida 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ake Doragon no Namida <quomoow(a)gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-03 13:48 GMT+01:00 Subject: [REPORT] Banned for reporting Out of Date CVS packages by Alucryd To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Hi, i have a problem with Alucryd from AUR. Just read and give me your opinion. Me to Alucryd: > Hi, can you look at your packages? For example this package is out of date for more than 6 months. > > You have a lot of packages and a lot is up to date, so it is just a little request. > > If you can, please update "not popular" sometimes, when you have free time or you can do it > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pantheon-files-plugin-dropbox-bzr/ > > // updated after mail https://code.launchpad.net/~elementary- … in-dropbox <https://code.launchpad.net/%7Eelementary-apps/pantheon-files/pantheon-files…> , ok, without any answer on mail. (nothing wrong anyway) > Hi, > > Will you please stop flagging CVS packages that need absolutely no updating ? More than half of what you flagged builds perfectly fine and is not out of date. While the others do need some changes (which I already did or will this week) you will find that I have close to no patience and might get temporarily banned really soon if you keep trying it. > > Cheers, > -- > Maxime > > // Ok, so this guys mean: if i have installed new version (for example 10) a year ago, and i want update my package to new version (f.e.55) i must remember this package name and reinstall it manually, cos *pacman -Syu* or *yaourt -Syyu* will not work. And what when i will have 200 packages on my PC with this like "out of date" version in aur? Maybe pkgbuild is always UP to date, but version what is in AUR *IS NOT* *BANNED? For what?* https://www.archlinux.org/packages/flaghelp/ -- nothing about CVS packages https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ta … a_CVS_repo <https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Talk:VCS_package_guidelines#Updating_a…> -- first line what is written > CVS is not supported in pacman 4.1 like the other VCS tools. You will need to update pkgver manually until CVS support is added. > > i don't know what is going on, and why some of Thrusted Users are a little d*cky (maybe just this guy), but that's not a nice look for *Arch Linux Distribution*. Even for Thrusted Users Arch is rolling distribution what does mean, always up to date. So to keep that initiative i am looking for Out Of Date packages and flagging them with link to last update or last version. Sometimes packages are running from git to sourceforge of from git repo to other git repo (i found 1 package with this mind*uck, official move wat was written on official website of package). But anyway it is not thing for wich i should be banned. **uck* or *d*ck* mean *duck* Looking for unban, justice and TU should respect the laws

7 10

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. grawity - 3 signoffs 2. anthraxx - 2 signoffs 3. Irishluck83 - 1 signoffs 4. grazzolini - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] forgot email
by Markus Bockhacker 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Hi guys, seems like i forgot my email/pw combo. I know I registered one in the time around the aur4 switch... My Username on the forums is "s1lvester" (same email as this one). Can someone help me out and change the email to this one so I can reset the passwd? Thanx! Markus

2 1

[aur-general] check_logfiles PKGBUILD - newbe question
by Jakub Skory 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Hi, I wrote my first in life PKGBUILD for my own purposes (I have some Arch's in my enviroment, and I wanted to make some automatic deployement using Ansible, but it is not relevant). It would be nice to receivce some feedback from you about that. I packaged one nagios plugin check_logfiles because I needed it. There is monitoring-plugins package on official repos, but it contains only poor check_logs plugin which does not have some cool features like check_logfiles. It is worth to place it in AUR or I should just keep it for myself? # Maintainer: Jakub Skory <q84fh(a)q84fh.net> pkgname=check_logfiles pkgver=3.7.5.2 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="check_logfiles is used to scan the lines of a file for regular expressions." arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="http://labs.consol.de/nagios/check_logfiles/" license=('GPL') depends=('perl') source=("https://labs.consol.de/assets/downloads/nagios/check_logfiles-3.7.5.2.tar.gz") build() { cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver" ./configure --libexecdir=/usr/lib/monitoring-plugins/ make } package() { cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver" make DESTDIR="$pkgdir/" install } md5sums=('6b732721cd7dd1138e9c087c1cb0bd4e')

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (i686) * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (i686) * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. polyzen - 5 signoffs 2. grazzolini - 4 signoffs 3. pid1 - 2 signoffs 4. anthraxx - 2 signoffs 5. hcartiaux - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Nov '16

02 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) * collectd-5.6.1-1 (i686) * ntop-5.0.1-9 (i686) * collectd-5.6.1-1 (x86_64) * ntop-5.0.1-9 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.27-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.27-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 2. hcartiaux - 3 signoffs 3. polyzen - 2 signoffs 4. basica - 1 signoffs 5. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0