- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Aug '15

22 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * python-pygit2-0.22.0-10 (i686) * python-pygit2-0.22.0-10 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pygit2-0.22.0-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pygit2-0.22.0-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. anatolik - 2 signoffs 2. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Aug '15

21 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * python-pygit2-0.22.0-9 (i686) * rethinkdb-2.1.1-1 (i686) * python-pygit2-0.22.0-9 (x86_64) * rethinkdb-2.1.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pygit2-0.22.0-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rethinkdb-2.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pygit2-0.22.0-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rethinkdb-2.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Aug '15

20 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] About my package snakecode
by francisco dominguez 19 Aug '15

19 Aug '15

Hi to all, i had a package in aur, the pakcage name is snakecode, snakecode is a crypt engine in python very basic, but snakecode was deleted in aur, why? Francisco.

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Aug '15

19 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-mustache-1.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-rack-1.6.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. eworm - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages
by Autumn-wind＠web.de 18 Aug '15

18 Aug '15

Someone went along and uploaded every package from the aur-mirror as a separate Repo on Github. https://github.com/aur-archive Not sure if this is helping, or working as a Archive. As there are also repos of packages that got migrated to AUR4 and could, in my opionen, be left aside. With regards Lex

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Aug '15

18 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-mustache-1.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-rack-1.6.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] AUR repos and git subtrees
by Eli Schwartz 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

I have just attempted to update fanficfare{,-git} and I cannot push the changes because they are a non-fast-forward. I cannot be 100% sure because I don't have local clones, I have been splitting off subtrees as needed (see my setup at https://github.com/eli-schwartz/pkgbuilds) but this is supposed to be 100% guaranteed to create the same sha1 hash. However, it appears that the AUR repos are now out of sync. Same content and everything. Am I supposed to believe that those packages -- and a bunch more (but not all...) of mine -- had their repos randomly and sneakily rewritten??? Or that git subtrees are simply unreliable??? Neither seems very likely. This was working perfectly at least until July 20 (the last time I updated anything). -- Eli Schwartz

3 5

[aur-general] AUR activity log?
by Mark Laws 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

Hi, In light of the mass deletion of many orphaned as well as not-really-orphaned packages, it would be nice if there were a way to get a log of AUR activity so that users other than just a package's maintainers can see that a package disappeared at some given point. It was also mentioned that deleted packages aren't really deleted, merely hidden--in that case, why not allow users to view these packages if some flag is set in the API request? This way, users can pick up maintenance of a once-extant package without having to recreate it from scratch. Thanks, Mark Laws -- |v\ /\ |\ |< |_ /\ \^| //

7 17

[aur-general] aurweb 4.0.0 released
by Lukas Fleischer 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

Hello, We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.0.0 has been released. The official aurweb setup [1] has already been updated. The most exciting change in this release is that Git repositories are now used for AUR packages. This new feature comes along with some other nice additions, such as an SSH interface for registered AUR users. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the aurweb bug tracker [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/aurweb.git/log/?id=v4.0.0 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

17 21