- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Anonymous comments in the AUR
by Karol Blazewicz 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

Are anonymous comments something new? Usually they're pretty old https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lpairs/ , the newest I stumbled upon is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydrogen-drumkits/ Were some users removed from the AUR db?

2 2

[aur-general] Registration Doesn't work
by John Robson 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi everyone. The Register page (https://aur.archlinux.org/register/) is not working (at least for me). I never received my "first password" and I tried to Reset my password (https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/) several times but I received nothing. Please, someone can send this confirmation to me: john.robson AT usp.br Thank you, John

3 4

[aur-general] Snowballz
by Storm Dragon 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi, the package snowballz is out of date and doesn't seem to have a maintainer. The problems with the PKGBUILD are minor, just package names need updating. I would be willing to take on this package if no one else wants it. thing is, I can fix the current problems, but if something goes really wrong with it I will need some help. thanks Storm -- -- Registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.us/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Do you get paid for tweeting? I do: http://spn.tw/r11uj "I am your soul insane" Slayer - Gemini

3 3

[aur-general] Merge request: pyglet-hg and python-pyglet-hg
by Allen Li 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi, Please merge pyglet-hg [1] into python-pyglet-hg [2] Pyglet is a Python library, so it should have the python- prefix. Disclaimer: I'm the maintainer for python-pyglet-hg, and I stole some of lubosz's PKGBUILD and updated mine. P.S. I had a hell of a time getting the permissions right manually so the new AUR would accept it. Would this be a bug in mkaurball? [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyglet-hg/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyglet-hg/

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by Stefan Tatschner 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi, this package [1] seems to be unmaintained since almost one year and it does not follow the naming conventions of python packages. I would like to adopt this when someone orphans this for me. :) Stefan [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-pipeline/

2 4

[aur-general] AUR Delete Request: girara packages
by Moritz Lipp 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hello, Since girara 0.2 we've dropped the GTK2 support and only support GTK3 in the future. Yesterday girara-gtk2, girara-gtk3 and girara-common have been replaced with a single girara package and I want to do the same in the AUR. Therefore I've created a new girara-git package and it would be great if you could delete the following packages: * girara-gtk2-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/girara-gtk2-git/ * girara-gtk3-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/girara-gtk3-git/ * girara-common-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/girara-common-git/ Thank you! Best regards, Moritz

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: xfreq-intel-git
by ccy＠free.fr 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

Hello, I am the developer / package creator and accidentally made this entry: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xfreq-intel-git/ May you please remove it from the AUR Thank you CyrIng

2 1

[aur-general] merge request
by Jeremy Audet 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

Please merge ruby-adsf [1] into adsf [2]. adsf is primarily intended for use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging guidelines in the wiki, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain both packages. — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-adsf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/adsf/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] packages vim-*-support
by Piotr Rogoża 24 Jun '14

24 Jun '14

Hello I've got a question/problem. Some packages: vim-vim-support, vim-bash-support, vim-c etc. are in conflict between ourselves. There are a few files that are common for these packages but they're in various version. Whether it will be a good idea to install them to /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/bundle/$pkgname and add to the depends vim-pathogen? -- Kind regards Piotr Rogoża

2 3