- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Requesting orphaning of AUR syslinux-git pkg
by Keshav Amburay 15 May '14

15 May '14

Hi, I request orphaning of syslinux-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-git/ pkg. I contacted the current maintainer via comment on the AUR pkg page on Feb 8th 2014 and via mail (quoted below) on April 24, 2014 with no response from him/her in either case. The syslinux-git pkg is severely outdated and I would like to adopt it and merge my syslinux-firmware-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslinux-firmware-git/ pkg into syslinux-git pkg. Please orphan syslinux-git and also merge syslinux-firmware-git into syslinux-git if possible. Thank in advance. With Best Regards, Keshav ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Keshav Amburay <the.ridikulus.rat(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:25 PM Subject: Requesting orphaning of AUR syslinux-git pkg To: cinelli.federico(a)gmail.com Hi, I am the maintainer of syslinux-firmware-git pkg and I would like to merge my pkg into syslinux-git and maintain it. The current syslinux-git PKGBUILD is way old (works for syslinux 4.xx) and does not build correctly build syslinux 6.xx which is the current -git master. Can you please orphan the syslinux-git pkg. Thanks in advance. With Best Regards, Keshav

2 1

[aur-general] Period of Inactivity
by Martin Wimpress 15 May '14

15 May '14

Hi, I'm going to be away with my family for a little while and won't have regular Internet access during that time. I've just seen the `libgtop` rebuild. Would someone be good enough to rebuild my packages? -- Regards, Martin.

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal request: matio
by TheOddBird 15 May '14

15 May '14

I created a duplicate of libmatio. Please remove it. Sorry for any inconvenience caused ... https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/matio/ another out-of-date duplicate of "libmatio" is "libmatio-dev". https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmatio-dev/

1 0

[aur-general] kivy packages
by Profpatsch 15 May '14

15 May '14

At the moment, it’s not clear which package does what. kivy kivy-git python-kivy python2-kivy python3-kivy-git I propose the following changes: kivy & python2-kivy -> python2-kivy kivy-git -> python2-kivy-git python-kivy ✔ python3-kivy-git -> python-kivy-git -- Proudly written in Mutt with Vim on Archlinux. Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es

4 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 May '14

15 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * mongodb-2.6.1-2 (i686) * perl-libapreq2-2.13-6 (i686) * mongodb-2.6.1-2 (x86_64) * perl-libapreq2-2.13-6 (x86_64) * ruby-gnome2-2.2.0-1 (i686) * ruby-gnome2-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * perl-libapreq2-2.13-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbmc-13.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * perl-libapreq2-2.13-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-13.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * ruby-gnome2-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ruby-gnome2-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: python2-websocket-client{-pebble,}
by Florian Bruhin 15 May '14

15 May '14

Hi, please merge python2-websocket-client-pebble[1] into python2-websocket-client[2]. pebble-sdk finally depends on the most recent version, so the older version I uploaded isn't needed anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-websocket-client-pebble/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-websocket-client/ Thanks! Florian -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail www.asciiribbon.org /\ www.the-compiler.org | I love long mails http://email.is-not-s.ms/ Statistics are no substitute for judgement. -- Henry Clay

2 1

[aur-general] lib32-apitrace: suggestion of moving to [community]
by Nowaker 14 May '14

14 May '14

Hey, I'd like to suggest lib32-apitrace as a potential candidate for moving to [community]. Although it has few votes, I believe it belongs to community repo. x86_64 apitrace is already there so I believe it won't be much effort to maintain lib32 version too. lib32-apitrace is usable for GL tracing 32-bit wine apps. Since the AUR guidelines require at least 10 votes for the package to be adopted by a TU, I encourage anyone you to vote it up. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-apitrace/ Thanks. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal request] kfileaudiopreview-git
by Antonio Rojas 14 May '14

14 May '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/ Merged in kio-extras Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 May '14

14 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openimageio-1.4.5.git-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.5.7dev-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbmc-13.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.4.5.git-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.5.7dev-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-13.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disownment request: tomb
by Rich 14 May '14

14 May '14

Hi, I'm requesting that the package "tomb" [1] be disowned so that I can adopt it. The package has been flagged out of date since 2014-01-27. I posted an updated PKGBUILD in the package comments on 2014-02-26. The current (out-of-date) package does not even build since the source URL returns a 404. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tomb Thanks, -- Rich

2 2